作者： root

伊朗官员：船只过霍尔木兹海峡需与革命卫队协调

2026年4月18日 00:02 / 联合早报

伊朗官员说，船只通行将仅限于伊朗认为安全的航道，军舰仍然禁止通过霍尔木兹海峡。 （路透社）

一名伊朗高级官员告诉路透社，所有船只均可通过霍尔木兹海峡，但这需要与伊朗伊斯兰革命卫队（IRGC）协调。他还补充说，把伊朗资金解冻是协议的一部分。

伊朗外交部长阿拉格齐星期五（4月17日）在社交媒体X网站上撰文称，在黎巴嫩达成停火协议后，霍尔木兹海峡已经开放。

美国总统特朗普说，他相信结束伊朗战争的协议“很快”就会达成，具体时间仍不明朗。

这名伊朗官员说，船只通行将仅限于伊朗认为安全的航道，并补充说，军舰仍然禁止通过霍尔木兹海峡。

目前尚不清楚这是否包括或不包括自20世纪70年代以来国际航运使用的、用于进出波斯湾的既定交通分离方案（TSS）航道。

伊朗宣布霍尔木兹海峡开放让商船通行 油价随即大跌

特朗普：美国助伊朗在霍尔木兹海峡扫雷 但封锁仍持续

他说：“即使是美国船只也可以通行，但军舰除外。”

官员补充说，途经霍尔木兹海峡的某些航线将继续开放，但这些航线的安全状况需要由伊朗方面来认定。

Career US prosecutor removed from probe into ex-CIA chief Brennan, sources say

April 17, 2026 5:40 PM UTC Updated 2 hours ago / Reuters

节点运行失败

Former CIA director John Brennan testifies before the House Intelligence Committee to take questions on “Russian active measures during the 2016 election campaign” in the U.S. Capitol in Washington, U.S., May 23, 2017. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque/File Photo

• Veteran prosecutor had been overseeing probe into ex-CIA Director Brennan
• Investigation is examining Brennan’s testimony about 2016 Russian election interference
• DOJ under pressure to deliver prosecutions of Trump’s adversaries

WASHINGTON, April 17 (Reuters) – A career U.S. prosecutor who had been helping to lead a criminal investigation into former CIA Director John Brennan was removed from the probe, according to two people familiar with the investigation.

Maria Medetis Long, a top prosecutor in the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Miami, informed attorneys connected to the investigation late on Thursday that she is no longer working on the case, the sources said. The probe is examining whether Brennan made false statements in 2023 congressional testimony about the U.S. intelligence finding that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to aid Trump.

Jumpstart your morning with the latest legal news delivered straight to your inbox from The Daily Docket newsletter. Sign up here.

Advertisement · Scroll to continue

It was not immediately clear what led to Medetis Long’s removal from the probe, which was first reported by CNN. The investigation has been ongoing for months.

A Justice Department spokesperson confirmed the move and portrayed it as routine DOJ practice.

“Attorneys are moved around on cases so offices can most effectively allocate resources,” the spokesperson said in a statement. “It is completely healthy and normal to change members of legal teams.”

Reuters reported on Thursday that the FBI was planning to interview roughly a half-dozen witnesses, including former U.S. intelligence officials, over the next several weeks as part of the investigation into Brennan.

Advertisement · Scroll to continue

Brennan, a cable news analyst and longtime critic of Trump, has condemned reported investigations into him as politically biased and a misuse of the legal system. His lawyer has said there is no legal basis for an investigation.

A DOJ official told Reuters on Friday that there had been frustration inside the department with the pace of the investigation. Another source familiar with the investigation said some witness interviews were not expected to take place until June.

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche has faced pressure to deliver prosecutions of Trump’s perceived political enemies after his predecessor, Pam Bondi, was ousted over Trump’s dissatisfaction with her handling of probes Trump demanded.

Medetis Long is the head of the national security section for the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Miami. She was part of the prosecution team that convicted a man at trial last year for attempting to assassinate Trump at his Florida golf club in 2024.

Reporting by Andrew Goudsward and Jana Winter; Editing by Bill Berkrot

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

‘A good sign for all of us

Trump says Iranians have “agreed to everything,” including removal of enriched uranium

April 17, 2026 / 2:45 PM EDT / CBS News

By Weijia Jiang

Weijia Jiang Senior White House Correspondent

Weijia Jiang is the senior White House correspondent for CBS News based in Washington, D.C. Jiang has covered the White House beat since 2018, including the transitions between presidential administrations. In 2023, Jiang won an Emmy Award for her contributions to “CBS Mornings.”

Read Full Bio

Weijia Jiang

President Trump said in a phone interview that Iran has “agreed to everything,” and will work with the U.S. to remove its enriched uranium.

He insisted that doing so will not involve U.S. ground troops. But when asked who would retrieve it, he would only say “our people.”

“No. No troops,” he said. “We’ll go down and get it with them, and then we’ll take it. We’ll be getting it together because by that time, we’ll have an agreement and there’s no need for fighting when there’s an agreement. Nice right? That’s better. We would have done it the other way if we had to.”

The president said the material would then be brought to the U.S.

“Our people, together with the Iranians, are going to work together to go get it. And then we’ll take it to the United States,” he said.

The president also said Iran has agreed to stop backing proxy terrorist groups, like Hezbollah and Hamas.

When asked when he would be announcing the deal, Mr. Trump said the two sides are meeting this weekend and that the U.S. would continue its blockade “until we get it done.”

Although Axios reported that the Trump administration was discussing the possibility of releasing $20 billion in frozen Iranian assets in exchange for its nuclear stockpile, the president denied it: “No, we are not paying 10 cents.”

Harris blames Trump for rising gas prices — after once saying they’re the ‘price to pay for democracy’

2026-04-17 12:58pm EDT / Fox News

In 2022, Harris said Americans had to ‘stand with your friends’ as gas prices surged during the Russia-Ukraine war

By Paul Steinhauser , Alex Nitzberg , Brooke Singman, Fox News

Former Vice President Kamala Harris this week blasted President Donald Trump for the surge in gas prices triggered by the U.S. war with Iran.

But four years ago, the then-vice president said that soaring gas prices sparked in part by the Russian invasion of Ukraine were the “price to pay for democracy.”

“Here in North Carolina and around the country, gas prices are too high,” Harris wrote this week in a social media post. “This is a direct result of Donald Trump’s war of choice in Iran, and the American people are paying the price.”

The Wednesday post featured a video of Harris delivering remarks while standing outside in front of a sign displaying fuel prices at a gas station in North Carolina.

HARRIS STOPS IN KEY PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARY STATE AFTER LEAVING DOOR WIDE OPEN TO 2028 RUN

Former Vice President Kamala Harris, center, speaks with patrons during a stop at Crave restaurant ahead of a South Carolina Democratic Party fundraiser on Wednesday, April 15, 2026, in Greenville, S.C(Meg Kinnard/AP Photo)

“We’ve got a president who is paying more attention to what he thinks is in his best political interests and personal interests, as opposed to what is in the best interest of working people in America,” Harris declared at the end of the brief video.

The average price of regular gasoline surged to over $4 per gallon following the U.S. and Israeli attacks on Iran, which were launched on Feb. 28. Iran’s military has been decimated, and Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and other top Iranian officials were killed during the month-and-a-half-long war.

In response, Iran targeted energy facilities with missile and drone attacks in a number of Persian Gulf nations. It has also made the Strait of Hormuz nearly impassable to commercial shipping, bringing roughly 20% of the world’s oil supply to a halt and sending global fuel prices sharply higher.

Trump’s attacks on Iran have provided Democrats with political ammunition amid their focus on affordability and persistent inflation. The issue has also boosted them to overperformance at the ballot box in two special congressional elections this month.

DEMOCRATS POUNCE ON $4 PER GALLON GAS – BLAME TRUMP’S IRAN WAR FOR ‘BROKEN PROMISE’

Gen. Dan Caine, right, said he wanted to keep some details of the historic rescue secret to preserve future missions as President Donald Trump and War Secretary Pete Hegseth, center, vowed the two heaviest days of bombing to come in Iran.(AP Photo)

[image_5]

The attacks have also upset some in Trump’s MAGA base, who feel the president has broken his 2024 campaign promise to avoid foreign military entanglements.

The current gas prices in the U.S. are the highest in four years.

Speaking during a press conference in Bucharest, Romania during that gas price surge in 2022 during the early months of the Russia-Ukraine war, Harris said the U.S. was “committed in everything we are doing” in support of Ukraine.

“And yes, the president did say in the State of the Union, there is a price to pay for democracy — got to stand with your friends — and as everybody knows, even in your personal life, being loyal to those friendships based on common principles and values, sometimes, it’s difficult — often, it ain’t easy.”

“But that is what the friendship is about — shared values,” Harris said. “So that’s what we’re doing.”

FOX BUSINESS: OIL PRICES PLUNGE AFTER STRAIGHT OF HORMUZ REOPENS

[image_6]

Vice President Kamala Harris holds a joint press conference following her meeting with Romanian President Klaus Iohannis at Cotroceni Palace in Otopeni, Romania, Friday, March 11, 2022.(Saul Loeb/Pool Photo/AP)

Republicans at the time blamed then-President Joe Biden’s administration for the high gas prices, just as Democrats are now blaming Trump.

[image_7]

But a major difference in the two situations is that while Trump ordered the U.S. strikes on Iran, the Biden administration came to Ukraine’s aid after Russian launched a widescale military invasion.

The White House at the time repeatedly blamed Russian leader Vladimir Putin for record-high gas prices in the U.S., even coining the surge the “#PutinPriceHike” and vowing that Biden would do everything he could to shield Americans from “pain at the pump.”

But Trump and Republicans capitalized on inflation, using it as a key issue in the sweeping 2024 election victories, when they won back the White House and Senate and held their House majority.

[image_8]

Fuel prices are displayed on a sign at a gas station on April 13, 2026, in Miami, Fla.(Joe Raedle/Getty Images)

Democrats are hoping to turn the tables in this year’s midterm elections by spotlighting affordability as they aim to flip the House and Senate.

And Harris, who lost to Trump in the 2024 election after replacing Biden as the Democratic Party’s nominee, has left the door wide open to a 2028 White Houser run.

The White House pushed back against this week’s jab from Harris.

[image_9]

In a statement to Fox News Digital, White House spokeswoman Taylor Rogers argued, “No one cares or believes what Kamala Harris says because Americans remember the economic pain caused by the Biden-Harris administration’s very unpopular and costly Green New Scam. Kamala’s anti-energy dominance agenda sent electricity prices soaring more than 30 percent in just four years, and the average gas price across the country skyrocketed to $5 in just one year.”

Paul Steinhauser is a politics reporter based in the swing state of New Hampshire. He covers the campaign trail from coast to coast.

Judge rejects Justice Department effort to get sensitive voter information from Rhode Island

2026-04-17 3:16 PM EDT / CBS News

Washington — A federal judge on Friday rejected the Justice Department’s effort to force Rhode Island to turn over sensitive voter information, dealing another blow to the Trump administration’s attempts to gain access to state voter registration lists.

U.S. District Judge Mary McElroy, who was appointed by President Trump in his first term, granted a request from Rhode Island officials to dismiss a Justice Department lawsuit that sought the state’s unredacted voter rolls, which contain personal information about residents registered to vote.

McElroy wrote in a 14-page decision that the Justice Department’s effort was a “fishing expedition” that was not authorized by federal election laws. She also denied a motion from the Trump administration that sought to force Rhode Island Secretary of State Gregg Amore to hand over the voter data.

Amore cheered the decision in a statement and said it affirms the state’s position that the Justice Department has no legal right to the state’s private voter information.

“Voter list maintenance is a responsibility entrusted to the states, and I remain confident in the steps we take here in Rhode Island to keep our list as accurate as possible,” he said. “The executive branch seems to have no problem taking actions that are clear Constitutional overreaches, regularly meddling in responsibilities that are the rights of the states. But the power of our democratic republic, built on three, coequal branches of government, is clearer than ever before. When the Trump Administration tries to act superior to those other branches to violate the rights of Rhode Island voters, we will challenge it. And the courts will uphold the rule of law.”

The dismissal of the case in Rhode Island marks the fifth loss for the Justice Department in its efforts to access state voter registration lists. Judges have also dismissed lawsuits seeking voter registration information from California, Oregon, Michigan and Massachusetts.

The Justice Department has sued 30 states and the District of Columbia after officials in those places refused to hand over their voter rolls, which contain names, birth dates, drivers’ license numbers and partial Social Security numbers.

The Trump administration has claimed it needs that information in order to ensure states are complying with two federal laws that require states to undertake efforts to maintain accurate voter registration lists: the National Voter Registration Act and the Help America Vote Act.

But McElroy, the judge, wrote in her decision that the government’s demand for Rhode Island’s voter data lacked “any factual allegations” suggesting that the state may be violating requirements for maintaining voter registration lists. The Justice Department’s “purpose stated in the Attorney General’s demand — purportedly, to ensure compliance with the NVRA and HAVA — does not plausibly relate to individual voting rights,” she said.

The Justice Department first sought Rhode Island’s voter registration list in September. In response to the request, Amore offered to give the government a copy of the state’s publicly available list, but declined to turn over the unredacted information. He argued that the data was private and said federal laws cited by the Justice Department did not authorize the demand for the state’s voter rolls.

The Justice Department had not previously acknowledged that it intends to provide voter information from the states to the Department of Homeland Security for immigration and law enforcement purposes. But CBS News reported last month that the Departments of Justice and Homeland Security were close to an arrangement on how the data would be shared, and a government lawyer then acknowledged to the Rhode Island court plans to share the information so it can be run through a Homeland Security database to see if noncitizens are registered to vote.

Mr. Trump often claims that noncitizens are voting in U.S. elections, even though it is a federal crime to do so and instances of noncitizen voting are rare. He has pushed the Senate to pass legislation, called the SAVE America Act, which would require Americans to show proof of citizenship in-person to register to vote in federal elections and implement photo ID requirements for voting. The House approved the plan in February, but it is unlikely to clear the GOP-led Senate, where most legislation requires 60 votes to advance.

Mr. Trump also signed an executive order last year that would require documentary proof of citizenship to register to vote, among other changes, but key parts of the directive have been blocked by the courts.

Trump signs order to limit mail-in voting

https://www.cbsnews.com/video/trump-signs-executive-order-to-limit-mail-in-voting/

Trump signs executive order to limit mail-in voting

(01:48)

The Trump team’s puzzling ‘all is well’ message on the economy

2026-04-17 12:59 PM ET / CNN

Analysis by

Aaron Blake

After spending the early part of the Iran war trying to sell Americans on an economic message of short-term pain for long-term gain, President Donald Trump and his team have increasingly reverted to their previous posture: that of Kevin Bacon in “Animal House.”

Remain calm, they’re effectively saying. All is well.

It was a puzzling and dicey political message before the war; it’s even more puzzling and dicey now.

They used a version of this message in the fall. Even as affordability concerns increasingly lingered as a problem for Trump, he set about arguing that prices were actually down — and substantially so — even though they weren’t.

Today, the message is more: Despite what voters are hearing (or seeing at any local gas station), things are actually quite good. And besides, the situation could’ve been way worse.

“To be honest, we are doing so well,” Trump told Fox Business’s Maria Bartiromo in an interview that aired Wednesday, citing a resilient stock market.

When Bartiromo pushed back a little, Trump argued that $92-per-barrel oil wasn’t so bad when you consider some were talking about $200 per barrel.

“And you know what?” Trump added. “I’m very happy.”

Trump expanded on this rather optimistic line on Thursday, both outside the White House and during a campaign event in Las Vegas focused on tax cuts.

He said the inflation rate was “a very low number, and it’s still low.” This despite it spiking to its highest level in two years last month — and it’s expected to keep rising as the war’s effects linger. He referred to “our great economy.”

When asked about $4-per-gallon gas, he mentioned the stock market and said: “Everything’s doing really well.”

He again said that gas prices were “not very high” compared to “what they were supposed to be.” (Energy Secretary Chris Wright told NBC News just a month ago that there was “a very good chance” gas would be under $3 per gallon by the summer.)

Trump also called inflation “fake,” because it was due to rising fuel and energy prices.

“We had the best economy in the history of our country my first term,” Trump added. “And we’re blowing it out now — we’re blowing it away now.”

Others seem to be on the same page.

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt in a briefing this week urged people to “look at how gas prices decreased over the past year since this president was in office.” Even that isn’t exactly an impressive stat: Gas was about $3.11 per gallon when Trump was inaugurated, according to data from Gas Buddy; it had declined by little more than 10 cents when the war launched.

And Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told CNBC this week that Trump was able to launch the war because the “economy was in such good shape.” He also said at a briefing with Leavitt that the economy remains “very strong.”

And in a Tax Day interview with the National News Desk, Bessent offered some particularly eyebrow-raising comments.

He wagered that Americans are actually more sanguine about the economy than they let on.

“The consumer, while they may be sounding grim, is actually quite buoyant,” he said, citing spending behavior.

When the reporter submitted that Bessent was saying people didn’t feel good but were actually acting confidently, he indicated it wasn’t even that. He wagered that people actually do feel good about the economy, even if they don’t say that.

“Well, look in their heart of hearts, they feel good,” Bessent said. “I’m not sure what they’re telling the survey people.”

Bessent isn’t totally freelancing here.

There is an argument to be made that the economic fundamentals aren’t nearly as grim as Americans seem to believe, as CNN’s David Goldman wrote shortly before the war began in February. Consumer spending has remained pretty robust in the post-Covid era.

The fact that the stock market keeps rising — and has now recovered its losses from early in the war — seems to speak to that.

But the Biden administration made similar arguments after the inflation rate came down, which didn’t work out so well for them in 2024, as former President Joe Biden’s approval numbers on the economy tanked.

So to the extent Bessent’s argument is now a guiding principle, it’s a really risky one. Because Americans are telling those “survey people” some really “grim” things.

Recently, the much-watched University of Michigan consumer sentiment index hit a new record low in data that spans decades — back to just after World War II.

It’s now lower not only than it was during the post-Covid inflation spike, but also during the Great Recession in the late 2000s and during various other times of economic hardship in the latter half of the 20th Century.

And polling echoes that pessimism.

The most recent CNN poll from late March, for instance, showed just 23% of Americans labeled the economy as at least “somewhat good.” That number was lower only twice during Biden’s tenure, for a brief period in 2022.

The poll also showed:

• 62% expected the economy to remain poor over the next year — the worst such finding in nearly three decades of CNN polling.
• More than 6 in 10 people labeled rising gas prices at least a “moderate hardship”
• More than 6 in 10 said they’d changed their spending habits in one way or another.

And perhaps more to the point, Americans said 65%-25% that Trump had worsened economic conditions rather than made them better.

That minus-40-point gap isn’t just worse than it ever was for Biden; it’s also significantly worse than it was in January, when Trump was only minus-23.

The war has clearly made the economy more of a liability for Trump. Maybe that starts to go away if the war does.

But trying to convince voters that the economy is actually good, despite the significant evidence to the contrary and their very ingrained negative feelings about it, doesn’t seem like a great strategy.

President Donald Trump gives a thumbs up to members of the media after walking off of Air Force One at Miami International Airport, on April 11.

Tasos Katopodis/Getty Images

We took a boat into the Strait of Hormuz. Here’s what we saw.

2026-04-17 1:04 PM EDT / CBS News

By Imtiaz Tyab
Imtiaz Tyab Senior foreign correspondent
Imtiaz Tyab is a CBS News senior foreign correspondent based in London and reports for all platforms, including the “CBS Evening News,” “CBS Mornings,” “CBS Sunday Morning” and CBS News 24/7. He has extensive experience reporting from major global flashpoints, including the Middle East and the war on terror.

Read Full Bio

Sohel Uddin

It took weeks of planning to find a way into the Strait of Hormuz.

We studied maps. Talked through scenarios. How we would get in. How we would get out. Who we could call if something went wrong. And what would happen if we ran into trouble along the way.

Our plan was to reach one of the strait’s narrowest points. Close enough to see, for ourselves, the oil tankers and cargo ships that had been backing up there for weeks.

When a ceasefire between the United States, Israel, and Iran, brokered by Pakistan, came into effect, we made the call. The first round of talks in Islamabad had failed. But the truce was largely holding, and for a moment, the risk felt manageable.

We crossed from one Gulf country into another and eventually found ourselves on a coastal road that felt almost too beautiful for the tensions that lay just offshore.

On one side were jagged mountains rising straight out of the earth, completely bare of vegetation. On the other, clear blue water stretched out into the Gulf.

And then, as the road curved, we saw the ships. Not one or two, but dozens. Sitting still. Waiting.

Two ships near the Strait of Hormuz. CBS News

Accessing the Strait of Hormuz

It is easy to forget, looking at that stretch of water, that roughly 20% of the world’s oil passes through it. The strait became a pressure point in the war between the U.S. and Iran, turning into a choke point for the global economy.

Since the violence escalated, access to the waterway has been tightly controlled. Journalists are not meant to be on these waters.

So we tried another way.

At a small port, posing as tourists, we asked around. Quietly.

That is where we met Sharif. His real name is not being used. Sharif is from Egypt and has spent decades working along this coastline. In normal times, he told us, tourists would be lining up for him to take them on trips out to sea. Now, there was almost no one.

An empty tour boat. CBS News

After some negotiating, he agreed to take us. We paid $120 for two hours.

His boat was a traditional dhow: wooden, worn, painted brown. The kind that has been used in these waters for generations. Inside, embroidered cushions lined the seats.

We climbed aboard.

A friendly encounter

Out on the water, the first thing that strikes you is how calm it all feels.

The sea is flat. The coastline dramatic but still. For a moment, it is hard to reconcile what you are seeing with everything you know about what is happening here.

Then the dolphins appeared. They came up alongside the boat and stayed with us, weaving through the wake, rising and dipping in the sunlight.

Imtiaz Tyab aboard a boat in the Strait of Hormuz. CBS News

And then, beyond them, the ships. We did not have to go far to see them. Within minutes, they appeared: Tankers, cargo vessels, all sitting idle.

We didn’t dare get to close to them. A police vessel was clearly visible in the distance. But, at one point, a crewman on a what looked like a cargo ship raised his hand.

We waved back.

He flashed a peace sign.

A crew member waves. CBS News

Iran and the U.S. fight for control

The calm on the strait’s surface does not reflect the reality underneath.

In recent weeks, Iran has moved to assert control over who can pass through the waterway and has reportedly mined part of it. At the same time, the United States has imposed a naval blockade targeting ships entering or leaving Iranian ports, part of a broader effort to pressure Tehran’s own energy exports after negotiations broke down.

The result is not a simple closure. It is something more complicated.

Some ships are moving. Others are waiting. Many are hedging, delaying, or turning back altogether.

For the global economy, even that level of disruption matters. A narrow waterway, carrying a fifth of the world’s oil, does not need to fully shut down to send shockwaves through markets.

A waiting ship. CBS News

New agreements don’t necessarily mean stability

When our time on the dhow was up, we turned back toward shore.

We thanked Sharif. Paid him. Watched as he prepared to head out again if another customer appeared.

On the drive back, our phones started lighting up.

Iran’s foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, announced that the strait would be fully reopened to commercial shipping during a ceasefire linked to fighting in Lebanon. That agreement, a 10-day pause between Israel and Lebanon, is part of a broader attempt to stop the conflict from spreading further.

At the same time, President Trump signaled that U.S. pressure on Iran, including the naval blockade, would remain in place unless a wider deal is reached.

Some ships have already started moving again. But here, movement does not necessarily mean stability or a return to normal.

The strait may be open, at least for now. But passage is still controlled. The risks have not disappeared. And the ceasefires that are holding things together are temporary.

If a broader agreement comes together, this moment may mark the peak of one of the most volatile periods for global energy in years.

If it does not, what we saw out on the water may become the new normal: Ships waiting. Others moving carefully. Everyone adjusting in real time.

In the Strait of Hormuz, even the calmest water can sit atop something far more fragile.

伊朗官员：船只过霍尔木兹海峡需与革命卫队协调

2026年4月18日 00:02 / 联合早报

伊朗官员说，船只通行将仅限于伊朗认为安全的航道，军舰仍然禁止通过霍尔木兹海峡。 （路透社）

一名伊朗高级官员告诉路透社，所有船只均可通过霍尔木兹海峡，但这需要与伊朗伊斯兰革命卫队（IRGC）协调。他还补充说，把伊朗资金解冻是协议的一部分。

伊朗外交部长阿拉格齐星期五（4月17日）在社交媒体X网站上撰文称，在黎巴嫩达成停火协议后，霍尔木兹海峡已经开放。

美国总统特朗普说，他相信结束伊朗战争的协议“很快”就会达成，具体时间仍不明朗。

这名伊朗官员说，船只通行将仅限于伊朗认为安全的航道，并补充说，军舰仍然禁止通过霍尔木兹海峡。

目前尚不清楚这是否包括或不包括自20世纪70年代以来国际航运使用的、用于进出波斯湾的既定交通分离方案（TSS）航道。

他说：“即使是美国船只也可以通行，但军舰除外。”

官员补充说，途经霍尔木兹海峡的某些航线将继续开放，但这些航线的安全状况需要由伊朗方面来认定。

伊朗官员：船只过霍尔木兹海峡需与革命卫队协调

2026年4月18日 00:02 / 联合早报

伊朗官员说，船只通行将仅限于伊朗认为安全的航道，军舰仍然禁止通过霍尔木兹海峡。 （路透社）

一名伊朗高级官员告诉路透社，所有船只均可通过霍尔木兹海峡，但这需要与伊朗伊斯兰革命卫队（IRGC）协调。他还补充说，把伊朗资金解冻是协议的一部分。

伊朗外交部长阿拉格齐星期五（4月17日）在社交媒体X网站上撰文称，在黎巴嫩达成停火协议后，霍尔木兹海峡已经开放。

美国总统特朗普说，他相信结束伊朗战争的协议“很快”就会达成，具体时间仍不明朗。

这名伊朗官员说，船只通行将仅限于伊朗认为安全的航道，并补充说，军舰仍然禁止通过霍尔木兹海峡。

目前尚不清楚这是否包括或不包括自20世纪70年代以来国际航运使用的、用于进出波斯湾的既定交通分离方案（TSS）航道。

他说：“即使是美国船只也可以通行，但军舰除外。”

官员补充说，途经霍尔木兹海峡的某些航线将继续开放，但这些航线的安全状况需要由伊朗方面来认定。