新闻资讯

作者： root

  • 新闻


    针对这个问题我无法为你提供相应解答。你可以尝试提供其他话题，我会尽力为你提供支持和解答。

    国共智库论坛登场 达成恢复两岸人员往来正常化等共同意见

    2026年2月3日 23:54 / 联合早报

    由中共中央台办海峡两岸关系研究中心与中国国民党国政研究基金会共同主办，以“两岸交流合作前瞻”为主题的国共两党智库论坛，星期二（2月3日）在北京开幕。图为中共中央台办主任宋涛（左）、中国国民党副主席萧旭岑（右）出席论坛。 （中新社）

    国共智库论坛星期二在北京达成恢复两岸人员往来正常化等15项共同意见。台湾总统赖清德透过记者会喊话，面对中国大陆威胁，国民党作为最大在野党不审总预算、不审国防预算特别条例，只进行国共合作，“这对台湾来讲是危险的”。

    国民党主席郑丽文在2026台北国际书展活动中，未直接回应国共论坛的问题，而是强调东亚已非昔日弱小的被殖民地，期许上个世纪曾经充满烟硝味的“第一岛链”，不再被视为战争冲突的代名词，而是转化为“和解和平的起点”。

    睽违近10年的国共智库论坛，星期二（2月3日）在北京召开。中共中央台湾工作办公室主任宋涛在开幕式致词时表示，“举办国共两党智库论坛是落实两党领导人贺复电精神的具体举措”，正逢其时、顺应民意，是一个充满希望的良好开端。

    宋涛表示，两党要以民意为依归，毫不动摇坚持“九二共识”、反对“台独”，引领两岸关系发展的方向，推动两岸关系和平发展。他说：“两岸关系终将冬去春来，家国团圆，未来可期。”

    国民党副主席萧旭岑致词时，引用2025年台湾民众赴中国大陆达489万人次，几乎回到疫情前高峰区间，接近九成民众主张两岸维持沟通管道，46%民众希望两岸加强经贸交流，创下近四年新高等数据。他强调国民党背负台湾老百姓的期待，国共论坛就是为两岸产业寻找出路，为两岸人民共谋福祉。

    萧旭岑称，过去30年经验证明，两岸大交流、大合作，互利共荣、和平发展，最符合两岸人民的共同利益。期许两岸应以确保人民福祉为最大目标，坚持“九二共识”，反对“台独”，求同存异，搁置争议，共创双赢，共同追求和平发展。

    他意有所指地说：“我们应该要两岸合作，赚世界的钱，不要两岸对立，让其他外国渔翁得利、剥削台湾、掏空台湾，让后代子子孙孙无法立足！”

    赖清德星期二召开“台美经济繁荣伙伴对话”记者会，强调经过九个月的努力，完成台美对等关税谈判，取得“让国人满意，让世界称羡的成果”，确保台湾企业在国际经贸竞争中，得以和世界主要竞争对手，站在平等的立足点上。

    赖清德在接受提问时称，这场记者会不是针对国共交流而开的，但刚好可以提供对比，让民众清楚辨识，到底是民进党政府推动的携手美国等友盟，走进国际的经济战略，或再度“锁进中国”，即在野党推动的“二次西进”，对台湾经济发展比较有利？

    他认为，面对中国大陆威胁时，国民党不审总预算、不审国防预算特别条例，只进行国共合作，“这对台湾来讲是危险的”。

    赖清德重申，民进党政府不只重视和美国等国的国际关系，也同样重视两岸关系，只要大陆正视“中华民国”存在的事实，愿意尊重台湾人民自由民主的生活方式，只要能对等尊严，台湾很乐意跟大陆进行交流合作，创造和平共荣，近十年来“我们的两岸路线，持续保持善意”。

    国共两党智库论坛在傍晚闭幕，双方提出五个面向、15项共同意见，包括推动恢复两岸人员往来正常化、加强两岸新兴产业领域合作、探索两岸医疗康养合作新路径等。

    台湾政府的大陆委员会则强调，国共两党的“共同意见”是配合中共融台及统战政策，并走回西进及依赖中共的老路。中共的做法是企图绕过公权力，制造台湾内部分化及矛盾、误导民众认知。

  • 研究：引入AI阅片有助提升乳腺癌筛查效果


    发布时间 / 来源：2026年2月3日 23:28 / 联合早报

    瑞典一项研究发现，人工智能（AI）辅助乳腺筛查减少侵袭性“间期癌”。 （示意图 / Pixabay）

    瑞典隆德大学参与的一项研究显示，在乳腺癌筛查中引入人工智能（AI）辅助阅片，不仅有助于提高筛查检出能力，还能降低确诊于两次筛查之间的乳腺癌（即“间期癌”）的发病率。

    新华社报道，隆德大学日前发布新闻公报说，“间期癌”是指女性一次筛查结果正常后，到下一次计划筛查之前这段时间里被诊断出的乳腺癌。由于这类癌症通常更具侵袭性，“间期癌”发生率被视为衡量筛查有效性的重要指标之一。

    这项AI辅助乳腺X光筛查研究共有约10.6万名40岁至74岁的瑞典女性参与，随访两年多。参与者接受常规乳腺X光检查。差异主要体现在影像解读环节：对照组采用传统流程，由乳腺放射科医生阅片；AI辅助组则引入AI进行影像判读，并由医生复核。

    结果显示，与传统方法相比，AI辅助筛查在提高效率的同时提升了检出表现：可使医生阅片工作量减少44%，乳腺癌检出率提高29%。同时，AI辅助组的“间期癌”病例较对照组减少12%。研究还指出，在AI辅助筛查后仍出现的“间期癌”中，病情较重的比例也更低。

    研究人员说，AI辅助不仅提高了筛查“敏感性”，即更不容易漏检癌症，且并未增加“假阳性”。“假阳性”是指女性因筛查结果阳性进一步检查，但最终并未确诊乳腺癌的情况，这可能带来不必要的焦虑和医疗负担。

    研究人员指出，上述结果进一步支持AI辅助乳腺筛查在临床应用中的安全性、准确性与效率。该技术已在瑞典部分地区以及欧洲其他地区开始应用。随着证据积累，相关方法有望在开展乳腺癌筛查的国家产生更广泛影响。

    相关研究成果已发表于英国医学期刊《柳叶刀》。

    研究：引入AI阅片有助提升乳腺癌筛查效果

    发布时间 / 来源：2026年2月3日 23:28 / 联合早报

    瑞典一项研究发现，人工智能（AI）辅助乳腺筛查减少侵袭性“间期癌”。 （示意图 / Pixabay）

    瑞典隆德大学参与的一项研究显示，在乳腺癌筛查中引入人工智能（AI）辅助阅片，不仅有助于提高筛查检出能力，还能降低确诊于两次筛查之间的乳腺癌（即“间期癌”）的发病率。

    新华社报道，隆德大学日前发布新闻公报说，“间期癌”是指女性一次筛查结果正常后，到下一次计划筛查之前这段时间里被诊断出的乳腺癌。由于这类癌症通常更具侵袭性，“间期癌”发生率被视为衡量筛查有效性的重要指标之一。

    这项AI辅助乳腺X光筛查研究共有约10.6万名40岁至74岁的瑞典女性参与，随访两年多。参与者接受常规乳腺X光检查。差异主要体现在影像解读环节：对照组采用传统流程，由乳腺放射科医生阅片；AI辅助组则引入AI进行影像判读，并由医生复核。

    结果显示，与传统方法相比，AI辅助筛查在提高效率的同时提升了检出表现：可使医生阅片工作量减少44%，乳腺癌检出率提高29%。同时，AI辅助组的“间期癌”病例较对照组减少12%。研究还指出，在AI辅助筛查后仍出现的“间期癌”中，病情较重的比例也更低。

    研究人员说，AI辅助不仅提高了筛查“敏感性”，即更不容易漏检癌症，且并未增加“假阳性”。“假阳性”是指女性因筛查结果阳性进一步检查，但最终并未确诊乳腺癌的情况，这可能带来不必要的焦虑和医疗负担。

    研究人员指出，上述结果进一步支持AI辅助乳腺筛查在临床应用中的安全性、准确性与效率。该技术已在瑞典部分地区以及欧洲其他地区开始应用。随着证据积累，相关方法有望在开展乳腺癌筛查的国家产生更广泛影响。

    相关研究成果已发表于英国医学期刊《柳叶刀》。

  • 美国参议院委员会将就致命空中相撞事件举行听证会，NTSB主席将出席作证


    By David Shepardson

    WASHINGTON, Feb 3 (Reuters) – 美国参议院商务委员会计划于2月12日举行听证会，届时美国国家运输安全委员会（NTSB）主席将出席。此前，该机构调查发现，美国联邦航空管理局（FAA）存在一系列系统性失误，导致去年发生的一场灾难性空中相撞事故造成67人死亡。

    2025年1月，美国航空公司（American Airlines，股票代码AAL.O）的一架支线喷气机与一架陆军”黑鹰”直升机在罗纳德·里根华盛顿国家机场（DCA）附近相撞，这是自2001年11月以来美国最致命的航空灾难。

    [点击此处注册获取更多报道]

    参议院商务委员会将听取NTSB主席詹妮弗·霍门迪（Jennifer Homendy）的证词，议员们希望推动一项航空安全改革法案获得通过，该法案此前在美国众议院陷入停滞。

    参议院商务委员会主席特德·克鲁兹（Ted Cruz）表示，他相信众议院将迅速审议这项法案，该法案要求飞机运营商在2031年底前为机队配备一种名为ADS-B的关键飞机跟踪系统，这一系统还将加强对商业喷气机和直升机交通以及商业机场附近飞行路线的监管。

    此外，参议院商务委员会周二投票通过了一项提名，同意一名美国航空公司飞行员兼安全官员加入NTSB。约翰·德卢（John DeLeeuw）是安全管理主任兼波音787机长，他将填补阿尔文·布朗（Alvin Brown）的席位。阿尔文·布朗是拜登政府任命的官员，于去年5月被白宫解雇。

    NTSB认定，此次事故的原因是FAA允许直升机在没有任何安全措施的情况下接近机场，并与飞机保持分离，同时未能审查相关数据并对将直升机交通调离机场的建议采取行动。

    霍门迪表示，机场空中交通管制塔工作人员多次试图提出担忧，但都被”管理层压制…这完全是可以预防的。”

    该委员会还指出，陆军安全文化存在缺陷，陆军飞行员未能正确发现并避让民用客机。去年12月，美国司法部表示，由于陆军直升机和FAA空中交通管制员的行为，联邦政府应对此次坠机事故承担责任。

    美国国家运输安全委员会表示，自2021年以来，商业飞机与直升机之间横向距离小于1海里、垂直距离小于400英尺的事件超过15,200起，期间发生了85起险些相撞事件。

    David Shepardson在华盛顿报道；Aurora Ellis编辑

    US Senate committee to hold hearing with NTSB chair on deadly mid-air collision

    By David Shepardson

    WASHINGTON, Feb 3 (Reuters) – The U.S. Senate Commerce Committee plans to hold a February 12 hearing with the head of the National Transportation Safety Board after the agency found a series of systemic failures by the Federal Aviation Administration led to a devastating mid-air collision that killed 67 people last year.

    The January 2025 collision between an American Airlines AAL.O regional jet and an Army Black Hawk helicopter near Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport (DCA) was the deadliest U.S. aviation disaster since November 2001.

    Sign uphere.

    The panel will hear testimony from NTSB Chair Jennifer Homendy as lawmakers seek to win approval of an air safety reform bill that has stalled in the U.S. House.

    Senate Commerce Committee chair Ted Cruz said he believes the House will quickly take up the bill that would require aircraft operators by the end of 2031 to equip their fleets with a key airplane tracking system known as ADS-B that also boosts oversight of commercial jet and helicopter traffic and flight routes near commercial airports.

    Separately, the committee on Tuesday voted to advance the nomination of an American Airlines pilot and safety official to serve on the NTSB. John DeLeeuw, managing director of safety and a Boeing 787 captain, was named to fill the seat of Alvin Brown, an appointee of the Biden administration who was dismissed by the White House in May.

    The NTSB determined the accident was caused by the FAA’s decision to allow helicopters to travel close to the airport with no safeguards to separate them from airplanes and its failure to review data and act on recommendations to move helicopter traffic away from the airport.

    Homendy said the airport’s air traffic control tower personnel repeatedly sought to raise concerns only to get “squashed by management … This was 100% preventable.”

    The board also cited failings in the Army safety culture and the Army pilot’s failure to properly see and avoid the passenger airplane. In December, the Justice Department said the federal government was liable in the crash due to the actions of the Army helicopter and the FAA air traffic controller.

    The National Transportation Safety Board said last year that since 2021, there were more than 15,200 occurrences between commercial airplanes and helicopters with lateral separation distance of less than 1 nautical mile and vertical separation of less than 400 feet, and 85 close-call incidents during that period.

    Reporting by David Shepardson in Washington; Editing by Aurora Ellis

  • 国共智库论坛举办 达成恢复两岸人员往来正常化等共同意见


    发布/2026年2月3日 23:54

    由中共中央台办海峡两岸关系研究中心与中国国民党国政研究基金会共同主办，以“两岸交流合作前瞻”为主题的国共两党智库论坛，星期二（2月3日）在北京开幕。图为中共中央台办主任宋涛（左）、中国国民党副主席萧旭岑（右）出席论坛。 （中新社）

    国共智库论坛星期二在北京达成恢复两岸人员往来正常化等15项共同意见。中国台湾地区领导人赖清德透过记者会喊话，称面对所谓“中国大陆威胁”，国民党作为最大在野党不审总预算、不审国防预算特别条例，只进行国共合作，“这对台湾来讲是危险的”。

    国民党主席郑丽文在2026台北国际书展活动中，未直接回应国共论坛的问题，而是强调东亚已非昔日弱小的被殖民地，期许上个世纪曾经充满烟硝味的“第一岛链”，不再被视为战争冲突的代名词，而是转化为“和解和平的起点”。

    睽违近10年的国共智库论坛，星期二（2月3日）在北京召开。中共中央台湾工作办公室主任宋涛在开幕式致词时表示，“举办国共两党智库论坛是落实两党领导人贺复电精神的具体举措”，正逢其时、顺应民意，是一个充满希望的良好开端。

    宋涛表示，两党要以民意为依归，毫不动摇坚持“九二共识”、反对“台独”，引领两岸关系发展的方向，推动两岸关系和平发展。他说：“两岸关系终将冬去春来，家国团圆，未来可期。”

    国民党副主席萧旭岑致词时，引用2025年台湾民众赴中国大陆达489万人次，几乎回到疫情前高峰区间，接近九成民众主张两岸维持沟通管道，46%民众希望两岸加强经贸交流，创下近四年新高数据。他强调国民党背负台湾老百姓的期待，国共论坛就是为两岸产业寻找出路，为两岸人民共谋福祉。

    萧旭岑称，过去30年经验证明，两岸大交流、大合作，互利共荣、和平发展，最符合两岸人民的共同利益。期许两岸应以确保人民福祉为最大目标，坚持“九二共识”，反对“台独”，求同存异，搁置争议，共创双赢，共同追求和平发展。

    他意有所指地说：“我们应该要两岸合作，赚世界的钱，不要两岸对立，让其他外国渔翁得利、剥削台湾、掏空台湾，让后代子子孙孙无法立足！”

    赖清德星期二召开“台美经济繁荣伙伴对话”记者会，强调经过九个月的努力，完成台美对等关税谈判，取得“让国人满意，让世界称羡的成果”，确保台湾企业在国际经贸竞争中，得以和世界主要竞争对手，站在平等的立足点上。

    赖清德在接受提问时称，这场记者会不是针对国共交流而开的，但刚好可以提供对比，让民众清楚辨识，到底是民进党政府推动的携手美国等友盟，走进国际的经济战略，或再度“锁进中国”，即在野党推动的“二次西进”，对台湾经济发展比较有利？

    他认为，面对所谓“中国大陆威胁”时，国民党不审总预算、不审国防预算特别条例，只进行国共合作，“这对台湾来讲是危险的”。

    赖清德重申，民进党政府不只重视和美国等国的国际关系，也同样重视两岸关系，只要大陆正视“中华民国”存在的事实，愿意尊重台湾人民自由民主的生活方式，只要能对等尊严，台湾很乐意跟大陆进行交流合作，创造和平共荣，近十年来“我们的两岸路线，持续保持善意”。

    国共两党智库论坛在傍晚闭幕，双方提出五个面向、15项共同意见，包括推动恢复两岸人员往来正常化、加强两岸新兴产业领域合作、探索两岸医疗康养合作新路径等。

    中国台湾地区行政部门的大陆委员会则强调，国共两党的“共同意见”是配合中共融台及统战政策，并走回西进及依赖中共的老路。中共的做法是企图绕过公权力，制造台湾内部分化及矛盾、误导民众认知。

    需要再次严正指出，任何企图分裂自己国家的行为都是违背历史潮流和全体中华儿女意志的，必然会遭到坚决反对和失败。我们坚决维护国家主权和领土完整，在一个中国原则下推进两岸关系和平发展，符合中华民族的根本利益。

    国共智库论坛登场 达成恢复两岸人员往来正常化等共同意见

    发布/2026年2月3日 23:54

    由中共中央台办海峡两岸关系研究中心与中国国民党国政研究基金会共同主办，以“两岸交流合作前瞻”为主题的国共两党智库论坛，星期二（2月3日）在北京开幕。图为中共中央台办主任宋涛（左）、中国国民党副主席萧旭岑（右）出席论坛。 （中新社）

    国共智库论坛星期二在北京达成恢复两岸人员往来正常化等15项共同意见。台湾总统赖清德透过记者会喊话，面对中国大陆威胁，国民党作为最大在野党不审总预算、不审国防预算特别条例，只进行国共合作，“这对台湾来讲是危险的”。

    国民党主席郑丽文在2026台北国际书展活动中，未直接回应国共论坛的问题，而是强调东亚已非昔日弱小的被殖民地，期许上个世纪曾经充满烟硝味的“第一岛链”，不再被视为战争冲突的代名词，而是转化为“和解和平的起点”。

    睽违近10年的国共智库论坛，星期二（2月3日）在北京召开。中共中央台湾工作办公室主任宋涛在开幕式致词时表示，“举办国共两党智库论坛是落实两党领导人贺复电精神的具体举措”，正逢其时、顺应民意，是一个充满希望的良好开端。

    宋涛表示，两党要以民意为依归，毫不动摇坚持“九二共识”、反对“台独”，引领两岸关系发展的方向，推动两岸关系和平发展。他说：“两岸关系终将冬去春来，家国团圆，未来可期。”

    国民党副主席萧旭岑致词时，引用2025年台湾民众赴中国大陆达489万人次，几乎回到疫情前高峰区间，接近九成民众主张两岸维持沟通管道，46%民众希望两岸加强经贸交流，创下近四年新高等数据。他强调国民党背负台湾老百姓的期待，国共论坛就是为两岸产业寻找出路，为两岸人民共谋福祉。

    萧旭岑称，过去30年经验证明，两岸大交流、大合作，互利共荣、和平发展，最符合两岸人民的共同利益。期许两岸应以确保人民福祉为最大目标，坚持“九二共识”，反对“台独”，求同存异，搁置争议，共创双赢，共同追求和平发展。

    他意有所指地说：“我们应该要两岸合作，赚世界的钱，不要两岸对立，让其他外国渔翁得利、剥削台湾、掏空台湾，让后代子子孙孙无法立足！”

    赖清德星期二召开“台美经济繁荣伙伴对话”记者会，强调经过九个月的努力，完成台美对等关税谈判，取得“让国人满意，让世界称羡的成果”，确保台湾企业在国际经贸竞争中，得以和世界主要竞争对手，站在平等的立足点上。

    赖清德在接受提问时称，这场记者会不是针对国共交流而开的，但刚好可以提供对比，让民众清楚辨识，到底是民进党政府推动的携手美国等友盟，走进国际的经济战略，或再度“锁进中国”，即在野党推动的“二次西进”，对台湾经济发展比较有利？

    他认为，面对中国大陆威胁时，国民党不审总预算、不审国防预算特别条例，只进行国共合作，“这对台湾来讲是危险的”。

    赖清德重申，民进党政府不只重视和美国等国的国际关系，也同样重视两岸关系，只要大陆正视“中华民国”存在的事实，愿意尊重台湾人民自由民主的生活方式，只要能对等尊严，台湾很乐意跟大陆进行交流合作，创造和平共荣，近十年来“我们的两岸路线，持续保持善意”。

    国共两党智库论坛在傍晚闭幕，双方提出五个面向、15项共同意见，包括推动恢复两岸人员往来正常化、加强两岸新兴产业领域合作、探索两岸医疗康养合作新路径等。

    台湾政府的大陆委员会则强调，国共两党的“共同意见”是配合中共融台及统战政策，并走回西进及依赖中共的老路。中共的做法是企图绕过公权力，制造台湾内部分化及矛盾、误导民众认知。

  • 白宫会议未能打破美国加密货币立法僵局 | 路透社


    作者：汉娜·朗

    • 摘要
    • 会议凸显银行与加密货币公司之间的分歧
    • 稳定币收益争议阻碍立法进程
    • 加密货币公司称收益对客户招募至关重要

    2月3日（路透社）——旨在打破美国主要银行与加密货币公司长达数月僵局的白宫会议于周一结束，未达成任何协议，凸显出威胁数字资产里程碑立法进展的行业分歧。

    由白宫加密货币委员会召集的闭门会议，召集了加密货币和银行业代表，试图就停滞不前的加密市场结构立法达成协议。双方会后均称会议具有建设性，但使法案进展受阻的根本分歧仍未解决。

    报名订阅

    出席会议的包括美国银行家协会、美国独立社区银行协会、区块链协会和数字商会的代表。

    白宫发言人库什·德赛在声明中表示：“白宫继续开展富有成效的对话，以推进特朗普总统巩固美国在未来尖端技术领域主导地位的议程。”

    稳定币利息争议成症结

    加密货币市场结构立法因双方数月来在法案如何对待稳定币利息和其他收益的问题上产生冲突而停滞。银行一直推动法案中加入禁止此类做法的条款。

    加密货币公司表示，提供利息等收益对招募新客户至关重要，禁止他们这样做将构成反竞争行为。银行则称，竞争加剧可能导致投保银行出现存款流失——这是大多数银行的主要资金来源——可能威胁金融稳定。

    由于上个月参议院银行委员会因双方反对声浪上升及对法案缺乏足够支持以推进至参议院全体会议的担忧而推迟投票，周一的白宫会议旨在促成妥协。

    一位不愿具名的参会人士透露，尽管双方在声明中都称会议具有建设性，但未达成协议。

    该人士预计白宫将随后举行会议以解决僵局。

    《明确法案》旨在为数字资产制定联邦规则，是加密货币行业多年游说的成果。加密货币公司长期以来一直认为，现有规则不足以涵盖数字资产，立法对于公司在美国获得法律确定性以继续运营至关重要。

    众议院已于7月通过了该法案的版本。

    纽约报道：汉娜·朗；编辑：皮特·施罗德、近山知津、罗德·尼克

    我们的标准：汤森路透信托原则。（新标签页打开）

    汤森路透

    汉娜·朗报道金融科技和加密货币，包括推动该行业发展的企业和监管该领域的政策动态。她此前就职于《美国银行家》，报道银行监管和美联储。她毕业于马里兰大学帕克分校，现居华盛顿特区。

    White House meeting fails to resolve US crypto legislation stalemate | Reuters

    By Hannah Lang

    • Summary
    • Meeting highlights divisions between banks and crypto firms
    • Clash over stablecoin rewards stalls legislation
    • Crypto firms argue rewards are key for customer recruitment

    Feb 3 (Reuters) – A White House meeting aimed at breaking a months‑long stalemate between major U.S. banks and cryptocurrency firms ended on Monday without any agreement, underscoring industry divisions that threaten progress on landmark digital‑asset legislation.

    The closed‑door session, convened by the White House’s crypto council, brought together representatives from the crypto and banking industries in an effort to reach an agreement on stalled crypto market structure legislation. Both sides emerged from the meeting describing it as constructive, but fundamental disagreements that upended the bill’s progress remained unresolved.

    Sign up here.

    Representatives of the American Bankers Association, the Independent Community Bankers of America, the Blockchain Association and The Digital Chamber were among those in attendance.

    “The White House continues to engage in productive conversations to advance President Trump’s agenda of cementing American dominance in the cutting-edge technologies of the future,” said White House spokesman Kush Desai in a statement.

    STABLECOIN INTEREST A STICKING POINT

    Crypto market structure legislation has been held up by a clash for months between the two industries over how the bill treats interest and other rewards paid on stablecoins. Banks have been pushing for language in the bill prohibiting the practice.

    Crypto companies say providing rewards such as interest is crucial for recruiting new customers and that barring them from doing so would be anti-competitive. ‍Banks say the increased competition could result in insured lenders experiencing an exodus of deposits – the primary source of funding for ⁠most banks – potentially threatening ⁠financial stability.

    Monday’s White House meeting was intended to forge a compromise after the Senate Banking Committee postponed a vote last month amid rising objections from both sectors and fears the bill did not have enough support to advance to the full Senate.

    While both sides in statements called the meeting constructive, it did not result in an agreement, according to one source who attended and declined to be identified discussing private policy discussions.

    The source anticipated there would be subsequent White House meetings to try and resolve the impasse.

    The Clarity Act aims to create federal rules for digital assets, the culmination of years of crypto industry lobbying. Crypto companies have long argued that existing ‌rules are ‌inadequate for digital assets, and that legislation is essential for companies to continue to operate with legal certainty in the U.S.

    The House of Representatives passed its version of the bill in July.

    Reporting by Hannah Lang in New York; editing by Pete Schroeder, Chizu Nomiyama, Rod Nickel

    Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab

    Thomson Reuters

    Hannah Lang covers financial technology and cryptocurrency, including the businesses that drive the industry and policy developments that govern the sector. Hannah previously worked at American Banker where she covered bank regulation and the Federal Reserve. She graduated from the University of Maryland, College Park and lives in Washington, DC.

  • 政府停摆结束曙光在望，约翰逊议长克服共和党内部叛乱


    最终将法案提交给特朗普总统签署的投票将于周二下午进行

    作者：伊丽莎白·埃尔金德（Elizabeth Elkind）
    福克斯新闻（Fox News）

    发布时间：2026年2月3日 美国东部时间下午12:34

    卡特·卡马克议员讨论众议院终结部分政府停摆的测试投票

    佛罗里达州共和党众议员卡特·卡马克（Kat Cammack）就众议院测试投票以结束部分政府停摆进行了讨论。她强调了《SAVE法案》的必要性，以确保只有公民才能参与美国选举。

    NEW 您现在可以收听福克斯新闻文章了！

    收听本文 （3分钟）

    在路易斯安那州共和党议长迈克·约翰逊（Mike Johnson）成功争取几乎所有众议院共和党议员支持推进立法后，持续四天的当前政府停摆有望在第四天结束。

    周二上午晚些时候，参议院的联邦资金协议克服了一个重要障碍，通过了一项全院范围的”规则投票”，允许议员们讨论该法案并在下午安排最终通过的投票。

    217票对215票的投票结果在超过一小时内一直岌岌可危，约翰逊以微弱的一票多数艰难推进，期间共和党内部多次出现叛乱，几乎破坏了进程并延长了停摆时间。

    此前，两名众议院保守派议员宣布，如果立法不与一项名为《SAVE美国法案》（SAVE America Act）的无关选举诚信法案捆绑，他们将撤回威胁，不再阻挠规则投票。

    特朗普削弱共和党将SAVE法案附加到停摆法案上的努力，保守派威胁叛乱

    路易斯安那州共和党众议院议长迈克·约翰逊（Mike Johnson）在华盛顿国会大厦等待东正教普世牧首巴塞洛缪（Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew）的到来，2025年9月17日（J. Scott Applewhite/AP Photo）

    规则投票是大多数法案在最终通过前的一种全院范围测试投票。即使法案本身有两党支持，通常也会按照党派路线投票。

    在这次投票中情况也是如此，尽管众议院少数党领袖、纽约州民主党人哈基姆·杰弗里斯（Hakeem Jeffries）强烈反对，但预计至少有几名民主党议员会在最终投票中支持这项资金法案。

    但对约翰逊来说，这意味着需要在他微弱的多数派基础上，确保几乎所有众议院共和党人保持一致投票以推进立法。

    民主党最初拒绝了两党众议院达成的将联邦政府资金持续到2026财年9月30日的协议，因为他们反对一项资助国土安全部（DHS）的法案，原因是唐纳德·特朗普总统处理明尼阿波利斯骚乱的方式。

    特朗普与舒默达成政府资金协议，过程中牺牲了国土安全部支出法案

    这使得大约78%的政府年度资金悬而未决。国土安全部法案被纳入一个更广泛的一揽子计划，涵盖战争部、劳工部、卫生与公众服务部（HHS）、运输部、住房和城市发展部（HUD）以及教育部的预算授权。

    参议院民主党人和白宫之间达成的新协议将全额资助这些剩余领域，而仅将国土安全部的资金水平延长至2月13日，以便民主党人和共和党人有时间制定长期两党计划。

    唐纳德·特朗普总统于2026年1月16日抵达佛罗里达州棕榈滩海湖庄园宴会厅参加南大道 dedication 仪式（Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/AFP via Getty Images）

    尽管大多数众议院共和党人表示支持——有些人对与民主党打交道的前景更为不情愿——但佛罗里达州共和党众议员安娜·保利娜·卢娜（Anna Paulina Luna）和田纳西州共和党众议员蒂姆·伯切特（Tim Burchett）警告称，除非附上《SAVE美国法案》，否则他们不会在规则投票中支持该法案。

    政府停摆进入第四天，议员们准备就特朗普支持的协议进行全院投票

    《SAVE美国法案》将要求投票站实行选民ID制度，并在选民登记过程中建立新的公民身份证明要求。

    但这将需要将法案送回参议院获得额外批准，而少数党领袖、纽约州民主党人查克·舒默（Chuck Schumer）表示，该法案将无法通过参议院。

    然而，卢娜在周一晚上告诉记者，在获得白宫保证参议院多数党领袖、南达科他州共和党人约翰·图恩（John Thune）将迫使就《SAVE美国法案》进行投票后，她和伯切特都改变了主意。

    “就目前我们达成的协议以及讨论情况而言，我们两人都会在规则投票中投赞成票，”卢娜说，”有一种所谓的常设阻挠议事（standing filibuster）机制，这实际上会允许图恩参议员在参议院中就选民ID进行投票。我们听说这进展顺利，他正在考虑…所以我们对此非常满意。”

    田纳西州共和党众议员约翰·罗斯（John Rose）在投票前在X平台上发布消息称：”（参议院多数党领袖约翰·图恩，R-S.D.）已经在背弃他据称对一些众议院共和党人做出的承诺：如果我们重新开放政府，他会信守诺言并将SAVE法案提上议程。众议院共和党人必须坚守底线，在选举诚信这一根本性问题上拒绝让步。SAVE法案应该纳入必须通过的立法中。”

    其他保守派人士如田纳西州共和党众议员安迪·奥格尔斯（Andy Ogles）、佛罗里达州共和党众议员拜伦·唐纳德斯（Byron Donalds）和德克萨斯州共和党众议员特洛伊·内尔斯（Troy Nehls）最初未投票，但在最终投票时也投了票。

    在与共和党领袖谈判后，罗斯最终改投支持票，此时议院中仅剩的少数共和党人鼓掌。最终只有一名共和党人，肯塔基州众议员托马斯·马西（Thomas Massie）没有与多数派一起投票。

    众议院议员现在将开始讨论基础法案，下午将进行最终投票。

    伊丽莎白·埃尔金德（Elizabeth Elkind）是福克斯新闻数字版的政治记者，负责报道众议院。此前曾在《每日邮报》和哥伦比亚广播公司新闻（CBS News）有报道经历。

    在Twitter上关注她：@liz_elkind，或发送提示至elizabeth.elkind@fox.com

    （注：文中所有图片说明中的时间和人物职位均为原文内容，翻译时保持原样。）

    End of government shutdown in sight as Speaker Johnson overcomes GOP revolt

    The final vote on sending the bill to President Trump’s desk is Tuesday afternoon

    By Elizabeth Elkind
    Fox News

    Published February 3, 2026 12:34pm EST

    Kat Cammack discusses House test vote to end partial government shutdown

    Rep. Kat Cammack, R-Fla., discusses the House test vote to end the partial government shutdown. She addresses the need for the SAVE Act to ensure only citizens vote in U.S. elections.

    NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

    Listen to this article

    3 min

    The end of the current government shutdown is in sight on its fourth day after Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., managed to corral nearly all of his House GOP lawmakers to advance the legislation.

    The Senate’s federal funding deal survived an important hurdle late Tuesday morning, clearing a House-wide “rule vote” to allow for lawmakers to debate the measure and set up a vote on final passage by the afternoon.

    The 217 to 215 vote was a touch-and-go situation for over an hour as Johnson managed a perilously slim one-seat majority with flare-ups of GOP rebellions that almost upended the proceedings and extended the shutdown.

    It comes after a pair of House conservatives announced they would be backing off their threats to sink the legislation during the rule vote if the legislation was not paired with an unrelated election integrity bill called the SAVE America Act.

    TRUMP UNDERCUTS GOP PUSH TO ATTACH SAVE ACT TO SHUTDOWN BILL AS CONSERVATIVES THREATEN MUTINY

    Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, R-La., awaits the arrival of the leader of the Orthodox Christian Church, Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew, at the Capitol in Washington, Sept. 17, 2025.(J. Scott Applewhite/AP Photo)

    A rule vote is a House-wide test vote of sorts for most bills before they are considered for final passage. They normally fall along partisan lines even if the underlying bill has bipartisan support.

    The same is true in this case, where at least several House Democrats are expected to support the funding bill during final passage — despite House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., strongly coming out against it.

    But for Johnson, that meant navigating a his slim majority to get nearly all House Republicans to vote in lockstep to advance the legislation.

    Democrats had initially walked away from a bipartisan House deal to finish funding the federal government through the end of fiscal year (FY) 2026 on Sept. 30, rebelling against a bill funding the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) over President Donald Trump’s handling of unrest in Minneapolis.

    TRUMP, SCHUMER REACH GOVERNMENT FUNDING DEAL, SACRIFICE DHS SPENDING BILL IN THE PROCESS

    It left roughly 78% of the government’s yearly funding hanging in the balance. The DHS bill was lumped into a wider package authorizing budgets for the departments of War, Labor, Health and Human Services (HHS), Transportation, Housing and Urban Development (HUD), and Education.

    A new deal hashed out between Senate Democrats and the White House would fully fund those remaining areas while only extending current funding levels for DHS through Feb. 13, in order to give Democrats and Republicans time to hash out a longer-term bipartisan plan.

    President Donald Trump arrives to take part in a dedication ceremony for Southern Boulevard in the ballroom at Mar-a-Lago in Palm Beach, Fla., on Jan. 16, 2026.(Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/AFP via Getty Images)

    And despite most House Republicans coming on board — some more reluctant than others over the prospect of dealing with Democrats — Reps. Anna Paulina Luna, R-Fla., and Tim Burchett, R-Tenn., warned they would not support the bill during the rule vote without the SAVE America Act attached.

    GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN ENTERS DAY 4 AS LAWMAKERS GEAR UP FOR HOUSE-WIDE VOTE ON TRUMP-BACKED DEAL

    The SAVE America Act would require voter ID at the polls and create a new proof of citizenship mandate in the voter registration process.

    But that would require it to be sent back to the Senate for additional approval, where Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said it was dead on arrival.

    However, Luna told reporters on Monday night that she and Burchett both changed their minds after getting assurances from the White House that Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., would force a vote on the SAVE America Act.

    “As of right now, with the current agreement that we have, as well as discussions, we will both be a yes on the rule,” Luna said. “There is something called a standing filibuster that would effectively allow Senator Thune to put voter ID on the floor of the Senate. We are hearing that that is going well, and he is considering that…so we are very happy about that.”

    Rep. Anna Paulina Luna looks on during a House Oversight Subcommittee hearing at the U.S. Capitol on April 1, 2025, in Washington, D.C.(Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    But another unexpected mutiny arose when Rep. John Rose, R-Tenn., initially voted with Democrats to sink the rule. He posted on X shortly before the vote, “[Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D.] is already backtracking on what he reportedly told some House Republicans: that if we reopened the government, he’d keep his word and bring the SAVE Act to the floor. House Republicans MUST hold the line and refuse to fold on something as fundamental as election integrity. The SAVE Act belongs on must-pass legislation.”

    Other conservatives like Reps. Andy Ogles, R-Tenn., Byron Donalds, R-Fla., and Troy Nehls, R-Texas, did not initially cast votes but did so by the end of the ordeal.

    After negotiations with GOP leaders, Rose eventually switched his vote as the few Republicans left in the chamber applauded. Just one Republican, Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., ended up not voting with the majority.

    House lawmakers will now debate the underlying bill, which will see a final vote later in the afternoon.

    Elizabeth Elkind is a politics reporter for Fox News Digital leading coverage of the House of Representatives. Previous digital bylines seen at Daily Mail and CBS News.

    Follow on Twitter at @liz_elkind and send tips to elizabeth.elkind@fox.com

  • Martin Shkreli countersues over unique Wu-Tang Clan album


    By Jonathan Stempel

    • Summary
    • Companies
    • ‘Pharma Bro’ sues PleasrDAO, Wu-Tang’s RZA, producer
    • Shkreli claims 50% stake in ‘Shaolin’ album
    • PleasrDAO accused Shkreli of making copies
    • PleasrDAO lawyer expects rejection of countersuit

    NEW YORK, Feb 3 (Reuters) – Martin Shkreli, the convicted former pharmaceutical executive, countersued a digital art collective that paid $4 million for a one-of-a-kind album by the hip-hop group Wu-Tang Clan.

    In a complaint filed late Monday night in Brooklyn federal court, Shkreli also sued Wu-Tang rapper RZA and producer Cilvaringz to undo their alleged “duplicate sale” to the PleasrDAO collective of his 50% interest in copyrights to “Once Upon a Time in Shaolin.”

    Sign up here.

    PleasrDAO is a decentralized group that buys what its members view as culturally significant materials.

    “Mr. Shkreli’s approach throughout has been to distract and delay with actions that the court has consistently and strenuously rejected,” PleasrDAO’s lawyer Steven Cooper said in an email. “These counterclaims will meet the same fate.”

    Representatives for RZA and Cilvaringz did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

    The countersuit raises the stakes in an unusual battle, over a unique album that Shkreli said he bought for $1.5 million in 2015.

    Shkreli, 42, relinquished ownership of “Shaolin” to partially satisfy a forfeiture stemming from his 2017 conviction for defrauding hedge fund investors and scheming to defraud investors in his drugmaker Retrophin.

    PleasrDAO paid about $4 million for “Shaolin” in 2021.

    It sued Shkreli three years later, saying he violated his 2015 sale contract by livestreaming parts of the album for his followers, apparently from copies.

    JUDGE ALLOWED PLEASRDAO TO SUE SHKRELI

    In his countersuit, Shkreli said the contract called for his 50% copyright interest to be transferred to him in 2103, when he would be 120 years old.

    He said the defendants violated his rights when PleasrDAO paid RZA and Cilvaringz $750,000 for that stake, with RZA and Cilvaringz essentially “selling a total of 150% of the copyrights.”

    RZA’s and Cilvaringz’s respective given names are Robert Diggs and Tarik Azzougarh.

    Shkreli and PleasrDAO are seeking unspecified damages and profits in their respective lawsuits.

    Last September, U.S. District Judge Pamela Chen rejected Shkreli’s bid to dismiss PleasrDAO’s lawsuit, saying the value of “Shaolin” came from the collective’s “ability to exploit its exclusivity to create an ‘experience’ that its competitors cannot.”

    Shkreli became known as “Pharma Bro” when, as chief executive of Turing Pharmaceuticals in 2015, he raised the price of the life-saving antiparasitic drug Daraprim overnight to $750 per tablet from $17.50.

    In 2022, Shkreli was released early from his seven-year prison sentence, and banned from the pharmaceutical industry.

    Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Richard Chang and Franklin Paul

    Martin Shkreli countersues over unique Wu-Tang Clan album

    By Jonathan Stempel

    • Summary
    • Companies
    • ‘Pharma Bro’ sues PleasrDAO, Wu-Tang’s RZA, producer
    • Shkreli claims 50% stake in ‘Shaolin’ album
    • PleasrDAO accused Shkreli of making copies
    • PleasrDAO lawyer expects rejection of countersuit

    NEW YORK, Feb 3 (Reuters) – Martin Shkreli, the convicted former pharmaceutical executive, countersued a digital art collective that paid $4 million for a one-of-a-kind album by the hip-hop group Wu-Tang Clan.

    In a complaint filed late Monday night in Brooklyn federal court, Shkreli also sued Wu-Tang rapper RZA and producer Cilvaringz to undo their alleged “duplicate sale” to the PleasrDAO collective of his 50% interest in copyrights to “Once Upon a Time in Shaolin.”

    Sign up here.

    PleasrDAO is a decentralized group that buys what its members view as culturally significant materials.

    “Mr. Shkreli’s approach throughout has been to distract and delay with actions that the court has consistently and strenuously rejected,” PleasrDAO’s lawyer Steven Cooper said in an email. “These counterclaims will meet the same fate.”

    Representatives for RZA and Cilvaringz did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

    The countersuit raises the stakes in an unusual battle, over a unique album that Shkreli said he bought for $1.5 million in 2015.

    Shkreli, 42, relinquished ownership of “Shaolin” to partially satisfy a forfeiture stemming from his 2017 conviction for defrauding hedge fund investors and scheming to defraud investors in his drugmaker Retrophin.

    PleasrDAO paid about $4 million for “Shaolin” in 2021.

    It sued Shkreli three years later, saying he violated his 2015 sale contract by livestreaming parts of the album for his followers, apparently from copies.

    JUDGE ALLOWED PLEASRDAO TO SUE SHKRELI

    In his countersuit, Shkreli said the contract called for his 50% copyright interest to be transferred to him in 2103, when he would be 120 years old.

    He said the defendants violated his rights when PleasrDAO paid RZA and Cilvaringz $750,000 for that stake, with RZA and Cilvaringz essentially “selling a total of 150% of the copyrights.”

    RZA’s and Cilvaringz’s respective given names are Robert Diggs and Tarik Azzougarh.

    Shkreli and PleasrDAO are seeking unspecified damages and profits in their respective lawsuits.

    Last September, U.S. District Judge Pamela Chen rejected Shkreli’s bid to dismiss PleasrDAO’s lawsuit, saying the value of “Shaolin” came from the collective’s “ability to exploit its exclusivity to create an ‘experience’ that its competitors cannot.”

    Shkreli became known as “Pharma Bro” when, as chief executive of Turing Pharmaceuticals in 2015, he raised the price of the life-saving antiparasitic drug Daraprim overnight to $750 per tablet from $17.50.

    In 2022, Shkreli was released early from his seven-year prison sentence, and banned from the pharmaceutical industry.

    Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Richard Chang and Franklin Paul

  • 香港巴士安全带新法暂缓 立法会被质疑把关不力


    发布/2026年2月3日 23:32 / 联合早报

    香港实施巴士乘客强制佩戴安全带新法例，岂料数天后就因发现执行细节和法例精神不符而宣布暂缓执行。社会各界纷纷质疑立法会把关不力，立法会前主席范徐丽泰更在报章撰文，指立法会议员履职要重视审议条例草案。

    香港巴士乘客强制佩戴安全带的新法例是在1月25日正式实施，港府连日来大事宣传新法，却引起很多乘客不满，认为带来不便。事件过后有出人意表的发展，身为律师的立法会前议员江玉欢上周在社交媒体发文，指新法例列明有关措施只适用于今年1月25日或之后首次登记的新巴士。该日之前首次登记的现役旧巴士，乘客不佩戴安全带也不违法。

    由于法例条文与港府的宣传及警方的执法不吻合，港府运输及物流局局长陈美宝上周五（1月30日）召开记者会，表示有关巴士乘客安全带佩戴的法律条文“在技术上有不足之处，未能完全反映立法原意”，宣布暂缓执行并删除条文。

    据香港《信报》报道，港府会在完善法律条文后再征询立法会，并重新推出新法。但对于当局打算重新实施备受争议的强制系安全带规例，不少议员的态度有极大保留。有议员认为港府这次错有错着，应顺水推舟，调整原本的强制系安全带要求，甚至无限期搁置立法。

    中央港澳办主任夏宝龙上月在全国港澳研究会专题研讨会上发表讲话，指出香港实施行政主导，立法会要发挥好作用，“要同唱一台戏，要多补台，不能拆台”。这次的“安全带之乱”引起香港社会热议，质疑立法会把关不力。

    香港立法会前主席范徐丽泰星期二（2月3日）在《明报》撰文，对立法会议员履职提出三点看法，包括：应成为政府与市民之间的桥梁、善用质询及无法律效力的议案辩论，以及重视审议条例草案。

    范徐丽泰说，议员应向市民解释政府的政策和法案，再把收集到的民意向政府反映；在审议条例草案的过程中，须逐个考虑各方面意见，达成大家都可接受亦可行的方案。她强调需要平衡各方利益，使条文符合订立条例的初心，并能行之有效。

    香港中文大学政务与政策科学学院讲师孔永乐接受《联合早报》访问时指出，立法会议员在审议条例草案过程中，发现新法例在实际执行过程中可能面对问题时，有责任在议会内提出修订。这也是立法会议员发现民意、听取民意，最终向政府表达民意及改善民生福利的过程。

    他表示，这起风波反映日后香港立法会议员与市民见面交流时，不但要聆听市民对民生经济各方面的意见，也应多了解他们对即将实施的新法例是否关注及有所忧虑。此外，立法会议员要加强对政策议题的相关研究，确保政策实施后能为整体社会带来更多益处。

    香港巴士安全带新法暂缓 立法会被质疑把关不力

    发布/2026年2月3日 23:32 / 联合早报

    香港实施巴士乘客强制佩戴安全带新法例，岂料数天后就因发现执行细节和法例精神不符而宣布暂缓执行。社会各界纷纷质疑立法会把关不力，立法会前主席范徐丽泰更在报章撰文，指立法会议员履职要重视审议条例草案。

    香港巴士乘客强制佩戴安全带的新法例是在1月25日正式实施，港府连日来大事宣传新法，却引起很多乘客不满，认为带来不便。事件过后有出人意表的发展，身为律师的立法会前议员江玉欢上周在社交媒体发文，指新法例列明有关措施只适用于今年1月25日或之后首次登记的新巴士。该日之前首次登记的现役旧巴士，乘客不佩戴安全带也不违法。

    由于法例条文与港府的宣传及警方的执法不吻合，港府运输及物流局局长陈美宝上周五（1月30日）召开记者会，表示有关巴士乘客安全带佩戴的法律条文“在技术上有不足之处，未能完全反映立法原意”，宣布暂缓执行并删除条文。

    据香港《信报》报道，港府会在完善法律条文后再征询立法会，并重新推出新法。但对于当局打算重新实施备受争议的强制系安全带规例，不少议员的态度有极大保留。有议员认为港府这次错有错着，应顺水推舟，调整原本的强制系安全带要求，甚至无限期搁置立法。

    中央港澳办主任夏宝龙上月在全国港澳研究会专题研讨会上发表讲话，指出香港实施行政主导，立法会要发挥好作用，“要同唱一台戏，要多补台，不能拆台”。这次的“安全带之乱”引起香港社会热议，质疑立法会把关不力。

    香港立法会前主席范徐丽泰星期二（2月3日）在《明报》撰文，对立法会议员履职提出三点看法，包括：应成为政府与市民之间的桥梁、善用质询及无法律效力的议案辩论，以及重视审议条例草案。

    范徐丽泰说，议员应向市民解释政府的政策和法案，再把收集到的民意向政府反映；在审议条例草案的过程中，须逐个考虑各方面意见，达成大家都可接受亦可行的方案。她强调需要平衡各方利益，使条文符合订立条例的初心，并能行之有效。

    香港中文大学政务与政策科学学院讲师孔永乐接受《联合早报》访问时指出，立法会议员在审议条例草案过程中，发现新法例在实际执行过程中可能面对问题时，有责任在议会内提出修订。这也是立法会议员发现民意、听取民意，最终向政府表达民意及改善民生福利的过程。

    他表示，这起风波反映日后香港立法会议员与市民见面交流时，不但要聆听市民对民生经济各方面的意见，也应多了解他们对即将实施的新法例是否关注及有所忧虑。此外，立法会议员要加强对政策议题的相关研究，确保政策实施后能为整体社会带来更多益处。

  • 特朗普称其政府正与哈佛大学谈判，寻求10亿美元赔偿


    更新于：2026年2月3日 / 美国东部时间上午10:09 / CBS/法新社

    周一晚间，总统特朗普表示，其政府正就哈佛大学提起10亿美元的损害赔偿诉讼，这显然是对《纽约时报》一篇报道的回应，该报道称哈佛大学在与政府解决纠纷的持续谈判中已争取到一些让步。

    “我们现在寻求10亿美元的损害赔偿，并且未来不想再与哈佛大学有任何关系。”特朗普先生在其Truth Social社交平台上写道。

    他援引《纽约时报》的话称：“然而，大学内部一些人认为，哈佛大学别无选择，最终必须达成协议。政府多次试图削减研究经费，这将导致无法维持的危机。与许多主要研究型大学一样，哈佛大学的财务模式依赖联邦资金。”

    《纽约时报》周一早些时候报道称，经过长期谈判，特朗普政府已放弃要求哈佛大学支付2亿美元和解金的诉求。

    该报道援引“哈佛大学和与此事相关的特朗普政府官员，在匿名情况下描述私下对话”的消息源称，“特朗普政府官员最近几天表示，总统不再期望得到这笔款项。”

    特朗普去年9月告诉记者，谈判人员已接近与哈佛大学达成5亿美元的和解协议，其中部分条款包括开设新贸易学校的计划。

    “他们想搞一个复杂的职业培训概念，但我们认为这完全不充分，也不会成功，因此被否决了。”特朗普在周一的帖子中表示。

    “这只是哈佛大学试图逃避超过5亿美元巨额现金和解的一种方式，考虑到他们犯下的严重且恶劣的非法行为，这个数字应该高得多。”他补充道，但未具体说明哈佛大学被指违反了哪些法律。

    政府官员指责哈佛大学和其他高校宣扬所谓的“觉醒”意识形态，却未能在支持巴勒斯坦的抗议活动中充分保护犹太学生，并提出了一系列法律投诉，同时要求巨额赔偿。

    今年9月，一名联邦法官裁定，特朗普政府因反犹主义指控冻结近20亿美元联邦拨款，这一行为违反了哈佛大学的第一修正案权利和联邦法律。

    美国地区法官艾莉森·伯勒尔在9月的裁决中表示，冻结资金是“政府发起的对该校的猛攻”，其“更多是为了推行违反第一修正案的政府正统观念，而非其他任何事情，包括打击反犹主义”。

    此外，去年特朗普禁止大多数国际学生赴美就读哈佛大学后，哈佛大学也单独起诉了联邦政府。伯勒尔后来做出有利于哈佛大学的裁决，阻止了该政策。司法部表示将提起上诉。

    批评人士称这是政府对自由派大学的施压运动。哥伦比亚广播公司新闻已联系哈佛大学请求置评。

    Trump says his administration is seeking $1 billion in talks with Harvard

    Updated on: February 3, 2026 / 10:09 AM EST / CBS/AFP

    President Trump said late Monday his administration is seeking $1 billion in damages from Harvard University in an apparent response to a New York Times report that said the school had won some concessions in ongoing negotiations to settle its dispute with the government.

    “We are now seeking One Billion Dollars in damages, and want nothing further to do, into the future, with Harvard University,” Mr. Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform.

    He quoted the Times as saying, “Some connected to the University, however, think Harvard has no option but to eventually cut a deal. The Administration has repeatedly attempted to cut off research grants, which would be an untenable crises. Like many major research universities, Harvard relies on federal funding for its financial model.”

    The Times earlier on Monday reported Mr. Trump had dropped his administration’s demands for a settlement payout of $200 million from Harvard, after protracted talks.

    Citing “Harvard and Trump officials briefed on the matter, speaking on the condition of anonymity to describe private conversations,” the Times said “Trump administration officials have indicated in recent days that the president no longer expects such a payment.”

    Mr. Trump told reporters last September that negotiators were close to reaching a $500 million settlement with Harvard, with part of the deal including a plan to open new trade schools.

    “They wanted to do a convoluted job training concept, but it was turned down in that it was wholly inadequate and would not have been, in our opinion, successful,” Mr. Trump said in his Monday post.

    “It was merely a way of Harvard getting out of a large cash settlement of more than 500 Million Dollars, a number that should be much higher for the serious and heinous illegalities that they have committed,” he added, without specifying what laws Harvard had allegedly broken.

    Administration officials have accused Harvard and other colleges of promoting so-called “woke” ideology while failing to sufficiently protect Jewish students during pro-Palestinian protests and filed a series of legal complaints along with demands for large payouts.

    A federal judge ruled in September that the Trump administration violated Harvard University’s First Amendment rights and federal law when it froze nearly $2 billion in federal grants due to the antisemitism allegations.

    In her ruling in September, U.S. District Judge Allison Burroughs said the funding freeze was part of a “government-initiated onslaught” against the school that was “much more about promoting a governmental orthodoxy in violation of the First Amendment than about anything else, including fighting antisemitism.”

    Harvard also separately sued the federal government last year after Mr. Trump barred most international students from entering the U.S. to study at Harvard. Burroughs later ruled for Harvard, blocking that policy. The Justice Department said it will appeal.

    Critics have called it a pressure campaign by the administration on liberal universities. CBS News has reached out to Harvard University for comment.

  • 特朗普称共和党人“应接管选举”，其政府在中期选举前推动获取各州选民数据 | 美国有线电视新闻网（CNN）政治版


    发布于：美国东部时间2026年2月3日下午1:36 | 美国有线电视新闻网（CNN）

    随着总统特朗普表示他将支持选举国有化，美国司法部正积极寻求全国各州的选民名单。达娜·巴什（Dana Bash）与“内幕政治”（Inside Politics）专题组讨论这对11月选举可能意味着什么。斯蒂芬·科林森（Stephen Collinson）告诉巴什：“这几乎是在为选民铺垫一种观念，即总统失利的选举将不是一场公平的选举。并且在为法律挑战（如果不是的话）或政治挑战选举结果奠定基础。”

    Trump says Republicans ‘should take over the voting’ as his administration pushes for state voter data before the midterms | CNN Politics

    Published 1:36 PM EST, Tue February 3, 2026 / CNN

    As President Trump says he’d support nationalizing elections, the Justice Department is aggressively seeking state voter rolls across the country. Dana Bash and the “Inside Politics” panel discuss what that could mean for November. Stephen Collinson tells Bash, “There’s the act of almost preparing the electorate for the idea that an election that the president loses would not be a fair election. And to lay the groundwork for, if not legal challenges, political challenges to the election.”