2026年3月24日 下午2:51 UTC / 路透社
- 摘要
- 公司
- Anthropic 挑战五角大楼的国家安全风险认定
- 国防部称 Claude 使用条款限制军方应用
- Anthropic 反对人工智能用于监视和自主武器
3月24日（路透社）- 美国一名法官将于周二听取 Anthropic 提起的诉讼的口头辩论，该公司试图阻止五角大楼因拒绝放宽对其 Claude 人工智能模型的某些限制而将其列入黑名单。
Anthropic 在加州联邦法院提起的诉讼指控国防部长皮特·希格斯（Pete Hegseth）在将 Anthropic 认定为国家安全供应链风险时越权。政府可将这一标签适用于可能使军事系统面临对手潜在渗透或破坏的公司。
立即通过《每日 docket》通讯获取最新法律新闻，直接发送到您的收件箱。 点击此处注册。
广告 · 向下滚动继续阅读
Anthropic 高管在3月9日表示，希格斯的这一史无前例举动（此前 Anthropic 拒绝允许军方使用 Claude 用于美国监视或自主武器）阻止了 Anthropic 获得某些军事合同。这可能导致该公司今年损失数十亿美元的业务，并造成声誉损害。
该公司表示，人工智能模型的可靠性不足以安全用于自主武器，且反对国内监视，认为这侵犯了权利。
Anthropic 是美国首家被如此认定的公司
旧金山联邦地区法官 Rita Lin（拜登任内任命的民主党总统任命的法官）定于太平洋时间下午1:30（格林尼治标准时间20:30）举行听证会，审议 Anthropic 要求在案件审理期间发布初步命令阻止该认定的请求。
广告 · 向下滚动继续阅读
Anthropic 的认定是美国公司首次根据一项鲜为人知的政府采购法规被公开认定为供应链风险，该法规旨在保护军事系统免受外国破坏。
在3月9日的诉讼中，Anthropic 指控政府根据宪法第一修正案，因报复其对人工智能安全的看法而侵犯了其言论自由权。该公司表示，未获机会对该认定提出异议，违反了其第五修正案正当程序权利。
诉讼称该决定不合法、缺乏事实依据，且与军方过去对 Claude 的赞扬相矛盾。
根据法院文件，司法部反驳称，Anthropic 拒绝接受合同条款导致了该认定，而非其对人工智能安全的看法。
Anthropic 还在华盛顿特区提起另一项诉讼，涉及另一项五角大楼供应链风险认定，可能导致其被排除在民用政府合同之外。
杰克·奎因（Jack Queen）报道于纽约；由 Noeleen Walder、Rod Nickel 编辑
我们的标准：路透社信托原则。
US judge to weigh Anthropic’s bid to undo Pentagon blacklisting
March 24, 2026 2:51 PM UTC / Reuters
- Summary
- Companies
- Anthropic challenges Pentagon’s national security risk designation
- Defense Department says Claude usage terms constrain military
- Anthropic opposes AI use in surveillance and autonomous weapons
March 24 (Reuters) – A U.S. judge is set to hear oral arguments on Tuesday in a lawsuit by Anthropic seeking to block the Pentagon’s blacklisting of the artificial intelligence lab over its refusal to lift certain restrictions on its Claude AI model.
Anthropic’s lawsuit in California federal court alleges that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth overstepped his authority when he designated Anthropic a national security supply chain risk. The government can apply that label to companies that expose military systems to potential infiltration or sabotage by adversaries.
Jumpstart your morning with the latest legal news delivered straight to your inbox from The Daily Docket newsletter. Sign up here.
Advertisement · Scroll to continue
Hegseth’s unprecedented move, which followed Anthropic’s refusal to allow the military to use Claude for U.S. surveillance or autonomous weapons, blocks Anthropic from certain military contracts. It could cost the company billions of dollars this year in lost business and reputational harm, Anthropic executives said on March 9.
The company says AI models are not reliable enough to be safely used in autonomous weapons and that it opposes domestic surveillance as a violation of rights.
ANTHROPIC DESIGNATION FIRST FOR U.S. COMPANY
U.S. District Judge Rita Lin in San Francisco, an appointee of former Democratic President Joe Biden, is set to hold a hearing at 1:30 p.m. PT (2030 GMT) over Anthropic’s request for an initial order blocking the designation while the case plays out.
Advertisement · Scroll to continue
Anthropic’s designation was the first time a U.S. company has been publicly designated a supply chain risk under an obscure government-procurement statute aimed at protecting military systems from foreign sabotage.
In its March 9 lawsuit, Anthropic alleged the government violated its right to free speech under the First Amendment of the Constitution by retaliating against its views on AI safety. The company said it was not given a chance to dispute the designation, in violation of its Fifth Amendment right to due process.
The lawsuit says the decision was unlawful, unsupported by facts and inconsistent with the military’s past praise of Claude.
The Justice Department countered that Anthropic’s refusal to lift the restrictions could cause uncertainty in the Pentagon over how it could use Claude and risk disabling military systems during operations, according to a court filing.
The government said the designation stemmed from Anthropic’s refusal to accept contractual terms, not its views on AI safety.
Anthropic has a second lawsuit pending in Washington, D.C., over a separate Pentagon supply chain risk designation that could lead to its exclusion from civilian government contracts.
Reporting by Jack Queen in New York; Editing by Noeleen Walder, Rod Nickel
Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.
节点运行失败
发表回复