阿利托向律师们通俗解释“日”的含义 最高法院权衡邮寄选票争议


阿利托称“选举日”一词意味着“一切事务发生的那一天”

By Ashley Oliver
Fox News

Published March 23, 2026 4:36pm EDT

最高法院周一就各州是否可以合法接受选举日后邮寄但印有选举日邮戳的选票举行听证会,大法官塞缪尔·阿利托(Samuel Alito)强调了“日”这个词的字面含义。

NEW 您现在可以收听福克斯新闻文章了!

收听本文

4分钟

最高法院周一就各州是否可以合法接受选举日后邮寄但印有选举日邮戳的选票举行听证会,大法官塞缪尔·阿利托(Samuel Alito)强调了“日”这个词的字面含义。

“我们有很多包含两个词的短语,第二个词是‘日’,比如劳动节、阵亡将士纪念日、乔治·华盛顿诞辰日、独立日、生日和选举日,它们都是特定的日子,”由前总统乔治·W·布什任命的阿利托表示。

阿利托补充道:“如果我们从这个角度出发,如果我只看‘选举日’这个短语,我认为这是一切事务发生的那一天,或者几乎所有事务都会在这一天发生。”

这位大法官的评论是在共和党全国委员会(RNC)起诉密西西比州一项法律之后发表的,该法律允许邮戳日期为选举日的邮寄选票在选举日后五天内被计票。2024年,美国第五巡回上诉法院在该案件中支持了RNC,导致密西西比州请求最高法院介入。

选举完整性组织向最高法院施压 要求选票必须在选举日当天提交

2022年10月7日,美国最高法院副大法官塞缪尔·阿利托在华盛顿特区(Alex Wong/Getty Images)

阿利托是周一对密西西比州法律持怀疑态度并希望推翻该法律的多位保守派大法官之一。预计今年夏天会做出裁决,这可能会影响十几个接受选举日后邮寄选票的州。

虽然一些大法官似乎认为选举日应被视为选举周期中的单一最终日,但由乔治·W·布什任命的首席大法官约翰·罗伯茨(John Roberts)和奥巴马任命的大法官埃琳娜·卡根(Elena Kagan)表示担忧,如果法院严格坚持对选举日的解释,那么提前投票也可能受到影响。

“如果‘日’包括选举日后的一段时间,那么它是否包括选举日前的一段时间?”罗伯茨向密西西比州副检察长斯科特·斯图尔特(Scott Stewart)问道。“或者你的逻辑需要不同的考虑?”

前美国副检察长、著名保守派律师保罗·克莱门特(Paul Clement)为RNC辩护,称选举的原始含义涉及“投票和选举官员接收投票的联合行动”。

共和党全国委员会在最高法院就迟到邮寄选票提出挑战

2024年10月,美国最高法院大楼外观(Valerie Plesch/picture alliance via Getty Images)

“所有人都同意联邦官员选举必须在国会规定的选举日结束,所有人都同意没有选票接收就无法举行选举,并且必须有一些选票接收的截止日期,”克莱门特表示。“尽管如此,密西西比州坚持认为选票可以在选举日后几天甚至几周内陆续到达。就文本、先例、历史和常识而言,这种立场是错误的。”

该案件正值总统唐纳德·特朗普将选举安全作为重点关注问题之际。RNC和一些选举完整性组织在案件中表示,最高法院应禁止选举日后到达的邮寄选票,军事选票除外,因为它们会引发对选举的不信任。

“今天在沃森诉RNC案中的口头辩论清楚地表明最高法院应该做出什么裁决:允许计票选举日后收到的选票的州法律违反联邦法律,使选举面临延误,引发欺诈,并助长公众对民主进程的怀疑,”诚实选举项目执行董事杰森·斯尼德(Jason Snead)在提供给福克斯新闻数字版的声明中表示。

2022年11月3日,宾夕法尼亚州匹兹堡阿勒格尼县选举部门仓库内,工人扫描邮寄和缺席选票(AP Photo/Gene J. Puskar)

目前至少有14个州和华盛顿特区在选举日后收到印有按时邮戳的选票仍会计票。

支持第五巡回上诉法院的裁决可能会使这些政策无效,并要求选票必须在投票结束时到达选举官员手中,这一决定预计将影响2026年中期选举。批评者表示,即使所有选票都在选举日收到,一些州的选举官员可能仍在计票,因为各州有各自的计票流程。

点击此处获取福克斯新闻应用

根据《统一军事和海外公民缺席投票法》管理的军事和海外选票可能不受影响。

自2024年中期选举以来,四个共和党控制的州——堪萨斯州、俄亥俄州、犹他州和北达科他州——已要求选票必须在选举日当天收到。

福克斯新闻的比尔·米尔斯(Bill Mears)对本报道有贡献。

阿什利·奥利弗(Ashley Oliver)是福克斯新闻数字版和福克斯商业频道的记者,报道司法部和法律事务。请将新闻线索发送至ashley.oliver@fox.com。

Alito gives lawyers plain-English lesson on meaning of ‘day’ as Supreme Court weighs late-ballot fight

Alito says the phrase ‘Election Day’ implies ‘the day in which everything is going to take place’

By Ashley Oliver
Fox News

Published March 23, 2026 4:36pm EDT

Justice Samuel Alito emphasized the literal meaning of the word “day” as the Supreme Court heard arguments Monday about whether states can legally accept late-arriving ballots that are postmarked by Election Day.

NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

Listen to this article

4 min

Justice Samuel Alito emphasized the literal meaning of the word “day” as the Supreme Court heard arguments Monday about whether states can legally accept late-arriving ballots that are postmarked by Election Day.

“We have lots of phrases that involve two words, the last of which, the second of which is ‘day,’ Labor Day, Memorial Day, George Washington’s birthday, Independence Day, birthday and Election Day, and they’re all particular days,” Alito, an appointee of former President George W. Bush, said.

Alito added, “If we start with that, if I have nothing more to look at than the phrase ‘Election Day,’ I think this is the day in which everything is going to take place, or almost everything.”

The justice’s remarks came after the Republican National Committee sued over a Mississippi law that allows mail ballots postmarked by Election Day to be counted if they are received five days after that day. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit sided with the RNC in the case in 2024, leading Mississippi to ask the Supreme Court to weigh in.

ELECTION INTEGRITY GROUPS PRESS SUPREME COURT TO REQUIRE BALLOTS BY ELECTION DAY

U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice Samuel Alito on Oct. 7, 2022, in Washington, D.C.(Alex Wong/Getty Images)

Alito was among multiple conservative justices on Monday who appeared skeptical of Mississippi’s law and intent on striking it down. A decision is expected by the summer and would likely affect more than a dozen states that accept postmarked ballots after Election Day.

While some of the justices seemed persuaded that Election Day should be viewed as a single and final day in an election cycle, Chief Justice John Roberts, a George W. Bush appointee, and Justice Elena Kagan, an Obama appointee, raised concerns that if the interpretation of Election Day was strictly upheld by the court, then early voting might also be affected.

“If ‘day’ includes a period after a particular day of the election, does it include a particular day before the day of the election?” Roberts asked Mississippi Solicitor General Scott Stewart. “Or does your logic require a different consideration?”

Former U.S. Solicitor General Paul Clement, a prominent conservative lawyer, argued in support of the RNC, saying the original meaning of an election involved the “combined action” of offering up a vote and an election official receiving the vote.

RNC GETS DAY AT SUPREME COURT TO CHALLENGE LATE-ARRIVING MAIL BALLOTS

The facade of the U.S. Supreme Court building is seen in October 2024.(Valerie Plesch/picture alliance via Getty Images)

“All agree that elections for federal office have to end on the day of the election specified by Congress, and all agree that you can’t have an election unless you receive ballots, and there must be some deadline for ballot receipt,” Clement said. “Nonetheless, Mississippi insists that ballots can trickle in days or even weeks after Election Day. That position is wrong as a matter of text, precedent, history and common sense.”

The case comes as President Donald Trump has made election security a top focus. The RNC and several election integrity groups that weighed in on the case argued that the Supreme Court should ban late-arriving ballots, except for military ballots, because they sow distrust in elections.

“Today’s oral arguments in Watson v. RNC clearly show where the Supreme Court should come down: state laws that count ballots received after Election Day violate federal law, expose elections to delays, invite fraud, and fuel public doubt in the democratic process,” Jason Snead, executive director of the Honest Elections Project, said in a statement provided to Fox News Digital.

Allegheny County workers scan mail-in and absentee ballots at the Allegheny County Election Division Elections warehouse in Pittsburgh, Thursday, Nov. 3, 2022.(AP Photo/Gene J. Puskar)

At least 14 states and Washington, D.C., currently count ballots received after Election Day if postmarked on time.

A ruling upholding the 5th Circuit could invalidate those policies and require ballots to be in election officials’ hands by the close of polls, a decision that is expected to affect the 2026 midterms. Critics say election officials could still be counting mail ballots in some states even if the ballots are all received by Election Day because of states’ individual tabulating processes.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Military and overseas ballots, which are governed by the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act, would likely remain unaffected.

Since the 2024 midterm elections, four Republican-controlled states, Kansas, Ohio, Utah and North Dakota, have moved to require receipt by Election Day.

Fox News’ Bill Mears contributed to this report.

Ashley Oliver is a reporter for Fox News Digital and FOX Business, covering the Justice Department and legal affairs. Email story tips to ashley.oliver@fox.com.

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注