发布时间:2026年3月20日,美国东部时间下午1:09 | 来源:CNN
作者:Alayna Treene、Zachary Cohen、Natasha Bertrand、Jim Sciutto、Kevin Liptak
阿联酋霍姆兹海峡附近,一艘阿联酋海军舰艇与一艘货船并排航行(2026年3月11日,星期三,从阿联酋Khor Fakkan拍摄)。
Altaf Qadri/AP
多名美国政府和情报官员向CNN透露,美国官员正“狂怒地”试图避免霍尔木兹海峡可能出现的长达数月的关闭,他们私下承认,重新开放这一关键水道是一个没有明确解决方案的难题,至少部分取决于唐纳德·特朗普总统愿意采取何种程度的行动来迫使伊朗政权屈服。
“这场冲突的核心难题之一是,伊朗人在此问题上拥有真正的影响力,而且没有明显的解决办法。”一位情报官员在谈及重新开放海峡的努力时表示。
五角大楼内部近期流传的一份国防情报局(DIA)内部评估报告显示,伊朗可能会将该海峡关闭1至6个月,熟悉该文件的四名消息人士告诉CNN。但白宫和五角大楼官员坚称,该评估(尤其是较长的时间框架,部分人认为这是最坏情况)并未被认真考虑。
一位高级白宫官员表示,国防部长Pete Hegseth并未看过该报告,特朗普也未就此接受简报,他也没有用该报告来指导其政策决策。
五角大楼发言人Sean Parnell在一份声明中表示:“国防情报局是五角大楼内众多为所有可能出现的最坏结果做计划的情报机构之一。”
“一份评估报告并不意味着它就是可行的,媒体挑选最坏情况来吓唬美国民众是危险的。”Parnell说,“我参加了所有关于此事的简报会,霍尔木兹海峡被关闭六个月是不可能的,并且这对国防部长来说是完全不可接受的。五角大楼已为伊朗政权试图关闭海峡做好了充分准备,我们正应总司令的指示处理这一挑战。”
白宫新闻秘书Karoline Leavitt在一份声明中说:“正如白宫长期以来所坚持的,特朗普总统及其国家安全团队已为伊朗政权试图关闭海峡做好了充分准备,美国军方正全力系统地消除恐怖主义伊朗政权破坏能源自由流动的能力。”
国防情报局在一份声明中表示:“DIA既不能证实也不能否认所谓的参考评估报告。”
情报和政府官员告诉CNN,霍尔木兹海峡关闭的时长变量几乎每天都在变化,因为美国和以色列的军事行动持续削弱伊朗发动攻击的能力。官员们表示,关闭时间线部分取决于这些攻击对伊朗武器储备的影响程度,以及伊朗剩余军事能力的不确定性。
美国已加强军事努力以清理海峡,参谋长联席会议主席Dan Caine将军本周详细介绍了用于对抗伊朗无人机攻击和控制航道的多种武器系统,其中包括A-10“疣猪”攻击机用于攻击海峡内的船只。
尽管如此,五角大楼高级官员表示,美国确实已经损害了伊朗的能力,但伊朗的短程导弹储备尚未被完全摧毁。不过,一位白宫官员强调,这场战争预计将持续4至6周,目前仅进入第三周。而且,尽管美国和以色列成功摧毁了伊朗的海军和导弹库,但据西方官员称,伊朗仍有其他针对通过海峡油轮的选择,包括小型船只、小型潜艇甚至摩托艇——这些小型船只可能被装载爆炸物以执行自杀式任务,对油轮造成破坏。
官员们表示,即使美国成功摧毁伊朗的导弹和无人机制造能力,来自这些更小规模、更粗糙行动的风险仍可能持续数周。通过海峡的护航任务每艘油轮需要数艘驱逐舰。一位消息人士称,伊朗人仍然有能力用小型船只布放水雷。
特朗普也不能简单地命令船只通过海峡,这意味着美国必须以一种让那些决定是否冒险的人感到安心的方式证明,伊朗的能力要么已被摧毁,要么可以近乎确定地减轻威胁。
地面部队部署
CNN此前报道,特朗普政府低估了伊朗阻止关键通道的意愿,认为此举对伊朗的伤害至少与对美国的伤害相当或更大。但现在伊朗已冒此风险,美国必须面对现实:重新开放霍尔木兹海峡比政府为这场战争设定的其他目标要困难得多。
“与伊朗的空中优势(本质上是不可避免的)不同,这个石油问题不同。潜在结果的范围要广泛得多,目前修复海峡的结果并不确定。”一位情报官员表示。
特朗普曾试图建立一个国际联盟来监控海峡,但未能成功,他抨击盟友的不情愿,并公开暗示在“完成”伊朗之后,他可能会将此事交由盟友处理。
“这将让一些不合作的‘盟友’迅速行动起来!!!”他在Truth Social上写道。
地理挑战是其中之一:海峡近100英里长。特朗普可以向海峡内的岛屿派遣美军,这将提供拦截伊朗船只或导弹的战略位置,但这也会使美国民众的生命安全面临风险。
“人们完全低估了海峡的广阔程度。从后勤角度看,它的海岸线很长,约100英里,因此很难采取单一行动来有效消除伊朗的威胁。”情报官员补充道,“伊朗人可以在海岸线的任何地方部署。”
杠杆点:官员们私下考虑了一些可能促使伊朗退缩的措施,包括夺取Kharg岛——伊朗约90%原油出口的经济生命线,或有效摧毁该岛的石油基础设施。
多位官员将上周美国军方对Kharg岛的攻击描述为向伊朗发出的信号,表明特朗普愿意采取何种程度的行动来削弱政权。一位情报官员称:“(对Kharg岛的)攻击是一个信号,但问题在于总统愿意做什么才能让伊朗人认为‘将此作为封锁点不再符合我们的利益’,因为这才是解决问题的关键。”
白宫官员认为,夺取Kharg岛将“彻底破产”伊朗伊斯兰革命卫队,一位官员称,这可能导致战争迅速结束。但政府内部许多人对这一举措持谨慎态度,尤其是考虑到这需要大量地面部队才能实现。周四在椭圆形办公室,特朗普表示他“不会在任何地方部署军队”。
“如果我要部署,我当然不会告诉你,但我不会部署。”他告诉记者。
与此同时,海峡的关闭正在国内产生重大政治和经济影响。
随着海峡持续关闭,油价继续上涨,美国国内的平均汽油价格稳步攀升。全球约20%的石油通过霍尔木兹海峡运输,而美国政府在寻找弥补日益减少的供应的解决方案时面临困难。
US furiously seeks to avert potential monthslong closure of Strait of Hormuz
Published Mar 20, 2026, 1:09 PM ET | CNN
By Alayna Treene, Zachary Cohen, Natasha Bertrand, Jim Sciutto, Kevin Liptak
A United Arab Emirates navy ship sails next to a cargo ship in the Strait of Hormuz as seen from Khor Fakkan, United Arab Emirates, on Wednesday, March 11.
Altaf Qadri/AP
US officials are furiously trying to avert a potential monthslong closure of the Strait of Hormuz, privately acknowledging that reopening the key waterway is a problem without a clear solution and dependent at least in part on what lengths President Donald Trump is willing to go to force the Iranian regime’s hand, multiple administration and intelligence officials tell CNN.
“One of the core conundrums of this conflict is the Iranians have real leverage with this, and there’s not an obvious fix for it,” an intelligence official said of efforts to reopen the strait.
A recent internal assessment from the Defense Intelligence Agency that was circulating inside the Pentagon in recent weeks determined that Iran could potentially keep the passage shut for anywhere from one to six months, four sources familiar with the document told CNN. But White House and Pentagon officials insisted that the assessment — particularly the longer end timeframe, which some consider a worst-case scenario — was not being seriously considered.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth had not seen it, and Trump has not been briefed on it, nor was he using it to inform his policy decisions, one senior White House official said.
Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell said in a statement that the Defense Intelligence Agency was “one of many intelligence agencies at the Pentagon that plans for every worst possible outcome.”
“One assessment does not mean the assessment is plausible, and it’s dangerous for the media to cherry pick the worst case scenario to scare the American people,” Parnell said. “I have been present for every briefing on this matter, and the six month closure of the Strait of Hormuz is an impossibility and completely unacceptable to the Secretary of War. The Pentagon was well prepared for the Iranian regimes attempts to close the Strait, and we are working to address this challenge at the direction of the Commander in Chief.”
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement: “As the White House has long maintained, President Trump and his national security team were well prepared for the Iranian regime’s attempts to close the Strait, and the U.S. military is zeroed in on systematically eliminating the terrorist Iranian regime’s ability to disrupt the free flow of energy.”
The Defense Intelligence Agency said in a statement, “DIA can neither confirm nor deny the alleged referenced assessment.”
The variables for how long the Strait of Hormuz will be closed shift on an almost daily basis, the intelligence and administration officials told CNN, as the US and Israeli military operations continue to damage Iran’s capabilities to launch attacks. The timeline of the closure, the officials said, depends in part on how much those attacks are able to impact the Iranians’ weapons stockpiles and the lack of certainty around Iran’s remaining military capabilities.
The US has stepped up military efforts to clear the strait, with Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Dan Caine this week detailing a number of weapons systems used to counter Iranian drone attacks and control the passage. Among them was an A-10 Warthog to attack ships in the strait.
The US has undeniably damaged Iran’s capabilities, but its short-range missile stockpile has not been completely destroyed, top Pentagon officials have said, though a White House official stressed that the war is only in week three of an anticipated four-to-six week timeline. And while the US and Israel have found success wiping out Iran’s navy and missile arsenal, the country still has other options in targeting tankers transiting the strait, according to western officials. That includes smaller craft, small submarines and even jet skis, the officials said. The smaller crafts could potentially be packed with explosives to inflict damage on tankers during suicide missions.
Even if the US is successful in taking out Iran’s missile and drone making abilities, the risks from the smaller, rougher operations could remain for weeks, the officials said. Escort missions through the strait would require several destroyers per tanker. And one source said the Iranians still have extensive ability to lay mines with smaller boats.
Trump, too, cannot simply order ships to transit the strait, meaning the US must prove in a way that gives peace of mind to those deciding whether to take the risk that Iran’s capability is either destroyed, or say with near certainty that the threat can be mitigated, sources said.
Boots on the ground
CNN has previously reported that the Trump administration underestimated Iran’s willingness to choke off the key passageway, believing the move would hurt Iran as much or more than it would the US. But now that Iran has taken the gamble, the US has to confront the reality that reopening the Strait of Hormuz is a far greater challenge than the other objectives laid out by the administration for the war, the officials said.
“Unlike the air dominance of Iran, which was essentially inevitable, this oil issue is different. The spectrum of potential outcomes is way broader, and the outcome to fix the strait is not inevitable at this point,” one intelligence official said.
Trump unsuccessfully sought an international coalition to police the strait, blasting allies over their reluctance and musing publicly he might just leave the matter in their hands after having “finished off” Iran.
“That would get some of our non-responsive ‘Allies’ in gear, and fast!!!” he wrote on Truth Social.
One challenge is geographical: the strait is nearly 100 miles long. Trump could send US troops to islands in the strait itself, which would provide strategic positioning to intercept Iranian boats or missiles. But it would also make for a risky mission putting American lives at risk.
A satellite view shows the Strait of Hormuz in January 2025.
Gallo Images/Orbital Horizon/Copernicus Sentinel Data 2025/Getty Images
“People totally underestimate just how vast the strait is. Logistically, it’s such a long shoreline, some 100 miles, that it’s difficult to do any one thing to effectively neuter the threat from Iran,” the intelligence official added. “The Iranians can be set up anywhere along the shoreline.”
Then there are the leverage points that might persuade Iran to back off. Among those that officials have weighed privately: capturing Kharg Island — an economic lifeline for Iran that handles roughly 90% of the country’s crude exports — or effectively wiping out the island’s oil infrastructure.
Multiple officials described the US military’s attack on Kharg Island last week as a signal to Iran at how far Trump is willing to go to weaken the regime. The island is internally viewed as a key leverage point that could, potentially, force Iran to agree to reopen the strait.
“(The attack on) Kharg Island was a signal, but the question is what is (the president) willing to do to make the Iranians go, ‘This is no longer in our interest to keep this as a chokepoint.’ Because that’s what it’s going to take,”the intelligence official said.
White House officials believe that taking Kharg Island would “totally bankrupt” Iran’s Revolutionary Guard, one official said, and could potentially lead to a swift end of the war. But many inside the administration are wary of such a move, particularly given it would require a significant number of ground troops to achieve. On Thursday in the Oval Office, Trump said he was “not putting troops anywhere.”
“If I were, I certainly wouldn’t tell you, but I’m not putting troops,” he told reporters.
The strait’s closure, meanwhile, is having significant political and economic implications back home.
Oil prices have continued to rise as the strait remains closed, with average gas prices in the US steadily ticking higher. Roughly 20% of the world’s oil travels through it, and the administration has struggled with solutions to make up for the dwindling supply.
发表回复