2026年3月17日 美国东部时间下午7:47 / 路透社
作者：约翰·克鲁泽
节点运行失败
图片说明：2026年2月24日，美国华盛顿特区，美国总统唐纳德·特朗普在最高法院首席大法官约翰·罗伯茨旁边抵达国会大厦众议院会议厅，向国会联席会议发表国情咨文演讲。路透社/凯文·拉马尔克/资料图片
- 摘要
- 特朗普谴责裁定对其不利的”腐败法官”
- 他在关税裁定后抨击最高法院大法官
- 罗伯茨称对法官的人身攻击”相当危险”
华盛顿，3月17日（路透社） – 美国首席大法官约翰·罗伯茨周二表示，针对法官的人身敌意”既危险且必须停止”，这番评论距美国总统唐纳德·特朗普在社交媒体上再次抨击那些对其及政府不利的法官仅隔数日。
罗伯茨在休斯顿莱斯大学活动中的讲话未提及这位共和党总统的名字，但领导美国最高法院二十余年的罗伯茨表示，虽然对司法判决的批评值得欢迎且往往是有益的，但针对法官个人的攻击则越过了界限。
订阅每日法讯：立即获取最新法律新闻，直接发送到您的收件箱。点击此处注册
广告 · 滚动继续阅读
罗伯茨表示：”问题有时在于，批评会从聚焦法律分析转向针对个人，您会看到…这种批评更具针对性和个人色彩。坦率地说，这可能相当危险。”
“全国各地的法官都非常努力地力求公正。如果他们未能做到，其判决意见理应受到批评。但针对个人的敌意是危险的，必须停止。”
特朗普及其政府高级成员对去年重返总统职位后一系列阻碍其议程的法官裁定表示轻蔑。
广告 · 滚动继续阅读
总统周日在社交媒体帖子中再次抨击华盛顿联邦地区法官詹姆斯·博阿斯伯格，这位法官上周阻止了由特朗普任命的检察官让娜·皮罗对美联储主席杰罗姆·鲍威尔发起刑事调查的传票。
特朗普要求将博阿斯伯格排除在任何与特朗普相关的案件之外，并补充称该法官应与”众多其他腐败法官”一同”受到严肃纪律处分”。
特朗普去年曾呼吁国会弹劾博阿斯伯格，并将其称为”激进左翼”，此举促使罗伯茨斥责总统，称弹劾”并非对司法判决异议的适当回应”。
罗伯茨与最高法院中占6-3多数的其他保守派大法官在过去一年的一系列紧急裁决中支持特朗普。然而，法院上月以罗伯茨撰写的裁定推翻了他的全球关税令，认定其违法。特朗普周日在社交媒体上再次抨击那六位在关税令问题上支持最高法院判决（基于国家紧急状态法律）的大法官。
在该裁定发布后，特朗普立即抨击这六位大法官——包括他在第一任期内任命的尼尔·戈萨奇和艾米·科尼·巴雷特——同时赞扬支持他的三位大法官。特朗普表示：”我认为这对他们的家人来说是一种耻辱，你想知道真相，是这两个人。”
特朗普在这些评论中还声称法院”受到外国利益的影响”，但未提供任何证据。
罗伯茨在2024年年底报告中特别指出，暴力、恐吓、虚假信息和威胁不服从合法判决是”非法活动”，这些行为”威胁到法官的独立性，而法官独立性是法治的根基”。
约翰·克鲁泽报道；波士顿内特·雷蒙德补充报道；威尔·邓纳姆编辑
我们的标准：汤森路透信托原则。
US Supreme Court’s Roberts says personal hostility aimed at judges has ‘got to stop’
March 17, 2026 7:47 PM UTC / Reuters
By John Kruzel
节点运行失败
U.S. President Donald Trump, next to Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, arrives to deliver the State of the Union address to a joint session of Congress in the House Chamber at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C., U.S., February 24, 2026. REUTERS/KEVIN LAMARQUE/File Photo
- Summary
- Trump has decried “corrupt judges” who ruled against him
- He denounced Supreme Court justices after tariffs ruling
- Roberts calls personal attacks on judges “quite dangerous”
WASHINGTON, March 17 (Reuters) – U.S. Chief Justice John Roberts said on Tuesday that hostility directed in personal terms at judges is “dangerous and it’s got to stop,” commenting just days after President Donald Trump’s latest social media broadside against judges who have ruled against him and his administration.
Roberts did not mention the Republican president by name in his remarks at an event at Rice University in Houston. But Roberts, who has led the U.S. Supreme Court for more than two decades, said that while criticism of judicial decisions is welcome and often healthy, attacks of a personal nature against judges cross a line.
Jumpstart your morning with the latest legal news delivered straight to your inbox from The Daily Docket newsletter. Sign up here.
Advertisement · Scroll to continue
“The problem sometimes is that the criticism can move from a focus on legal analysis to personalities, and you see … that it’s more directed in a personal way,” Roberts said. “And that, frankly, can be quite dangerous.”
“Judges around the country work very hard to get it right. And if they don’t, their opinions are subject to criticism,” Roberts added. “But personally directed hostility is dangerous and it’s got to stop.”
Trump and senior members of his administration have heaped scorn on judges who have issued a series of rulings impeding his agenda since his return to the presidency last year.
Advertisement · Scroll to continue
The president in a social media post on Sunday resumed his criticism of Washington-based U.S. District Judge James Boasberg, who last week blocked subpoenas issued in a criminal investigation into Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell pursued by Trump-appointed prosecutor Jeanine Pirro.
He called for Boasberg’s removal from any Trump-related cases, adding that the judge should “suffer serious disciplinary action” along with “numerous other corrupt judges.”
Trump last year called for Boasberg’s impeachment by Congress and referred to him as “radical left,” prompting Roberts to rebuke the president and describe impeachment as “not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision.”
Roberts and the other conservative justices who hold a 6-3 majority on the Supreme Court have sided with Trump in a series of emergency rulings in the past year. The court, however, last month struck down his sweeping global tariffs as unlawful in a ruling authored by Roberts. Trump in his social media post on Sunday renewed his attacks on the six justices who ruled against his imposition of the tariffs under a law meant for national emergencies.
Immediately after that ruling, Trump lashed out at those six justices – including two who he appointed during his first term as president, Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett – while hailing the three justices who backed him. “I think it’s an embarrassment to their families, you wanna know the truth, the two of them,” Trump said, referring to Gorsuch and Barrett.
Trump in those remarks also claimed that the court “has been swayed by foreign interests,” but did not provide any evidence.
Roberts in his 2024 end-of-year report singled out violence, intimidation, disinformation and threats to defy lawfully entered judgments as areas of “illegitimate activity” that “threaten the independence of judges on which the rule of law depends.”
Reporting by John Kruzel; Additional reporting by Nate Raymond in Boston; Editing by Will Dunham
Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.
发表回复