2026年3月2日 / 美国东部时间下午2:33 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻
华盛顿讯 — 随着共和党应对周末针对伊朗发动的大规模美以军事行动，该党内部的裂痕已显现。当议员们本周面临是否限制特朗普总统在未经国会授权情况下对伊朗采取进一步军事行动的权力的投票时，这些分歧进一步加剧。
从党内一贯反对总统的人士到一些最坚定的支持者，美国在伊朗的行动在共和党内部引发了强烈反对。
肯塔基州共和党众议员托马斯·马西与加利福尼亚州民主党众议员罗·卡纳共同牵头推动国会战争权力相关措施。马西严厉批评了这些打击行动，称该做法不符合”美国优先”议程，同时表示议员们必须在这个问题上明确表态。
肯塔基州共和党参议员兰德·保罗是参议院战争权力决议的联合提案人之一，他也谴责了未经国会批准对伊朗采取军事打击的行为，称立法部门有权宣战。
众议院和参议院本周将就战争权力决议进行投票，该决议要求总统在对伊朗使用武力前必须寻求国会批准。尽管这些努力主要得到民主党支持，但它们对共和党构成了关键考验。
俄亥俄州共和党众议员沃伦·戴维森呼吁政府为对伊朗战争提出令人信服的理由。在周末袭击前，戴维森表示，在没有新信息的情况下，他将支持众议院的战争权力决议。
戴维森周一在X平台上写道：”本周我们要么看到真实情报，听到有明确使命的有说服力的解释，并宣布开战/授权行动，要么国会必须通过这项战争权力决议并停止在伊朗的军事行动。”
然而，许多共和党人对总统打击伊朗并除掉伊朗最高领袖阿里·哈梅内伊的举措表示赞赏。即使是党内更温和的一些成员，似乎也不太可能支持本周晚些时候限制这场军事行动的战争权力投票。
内布拉斯加州共和党众议员唐·培根最近投票限制特朗普总统进一步打击委内瑞拉的权力，他表示将投票反对伊朗决议。但他在上周接受哥伦比亚广播公司新闻采访时表示，他希望特朗普为”扩大行动”获得国会授权。
他说：”当你连续多天多次进行行动，而且持续很长时间时，我认为你有必要来国会。”总统周一表示，他预计这场行动将持续四到五周，但”我们有能力比这持续更久”。
培根周日在SiriusXM电台接受史蒂夫·斯库利采访时辩称，国会不应回避战争权力投票。
“我们不应该害怕战争权力决议，”他说，”我们有责任和权力参与这一决策。”
路易斯安那州共和党众议院议长迈克·约翰逊周一在接受电台采访时表示，特朗普完全有权作为总司令采取他已采取的行动。约翰逊称此次袭击是”防御性打击”，”不是宣战”。他还表示，即将到来的战争权力投票是”鲁莽的民主党人”进行的”危险策略”。
除国会外，此次打击行动还遭到包括保守派评论员塔克·卡尔森在内的特朗普核心支持者团体（MAGA）中知名人士的强烈批评。卡尔森告诉美国广播新闻，总统对伊朗发动袭击的决定”绝对令人作呕和邪恶”。
曾坚定支持总统的佐治亚州前众议员玛乔丽·泰勒·格林在与总统公开闹翻后已离开国会，她在一系列社交媒体帖子中抨击了总统对伊朗的打击行动。格林强调，她和一些所谓的”美国优先”共和党人曾承诺结束对外战争、不寻求政权更迭。
“我们想要的只是美国优先，而这并非如此，”她说。
在另一篇帖子中，格林指出政治阵营正在重新划分。
“就这样，我们不再是左右分裂的国家，现在我们是一个分裂为为以色列而战和希望和平、能够负担账单和医疗保险的人的国家，”她说。
Iran strikes highlight fractures in GOP ahead of war powers votes in Congress
March 2, 2026 / 2:33 PM EST / CBS News
Washington — Fractures within the Republican Party have become apparent as the GOP grapples with the massive U.S. and Israeli military operation launched on Iran over the weekend. And the breaks come as lawmakers face votes this week on whether to rein in President Trump’s ability to pursue further military action against Iran without congressional authorization.
From the president’s usual opponents in his party to some of his most stalwart supporters, the U.S. actions in Iran have prompted strong pushback in pockets of the GOP.
Republican Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky is leading the House war powers effort alongside Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna of California. Massie has criticized the strikes in strong terms, claiming the approach is not in line with the “America First” agenda, while saying that lawmakers must go on the record on the issue.
GOP Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, a co-sponsor of the war powers resolution in the upper chamber, has also condemned the move to strike Iran without Congress’ approval, citing the legislative branch’s authority to declare war.
The House and Senate are set to vote on war powers resolutions this week that would require the president to seek congressional approval to use military force on Iran. And while the efforts are mostly backed by Democrats, they pose key tests for the GOP.
Rep. Warren Davidson, an Ohio Republican, has called on the administration to lay out compelling reasons for the war in Iran. Ahead of this weekend’s attack, Davidson said he would support the war powers resolution in the House “in the absence of new information.”
“This week we’ll either see real intel, hear a persuasive explanation with a defined mission, and declare war / authorize a mission, or Congress must pass this War Powers Resolution and cease work in Iran,” Davidson wrote on Xon Monday.
Still, many Republicans have hailed the president’s move to strike Iran and take out Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Even some of the conference’s more moderate members have appeared unlikely to back war powers votes later this week to rein in the campaign.
Republican Rep. Don Bacon of Nebraska, who recently voted to limit Mr. Trump’s ability to further strike Venezuela, has said he’ll vote against the Iran resolution. But he wants Mr. Trump to get congressional authorization for “extended operations,” he told CBS News in an interview last week.
“When you do multiple operations multiple days in a row for a long time, I think you’re required to come to Congress,” he said. The president said Monday he expects the campaign to last four to five weeks, but “we have [the] capability to go far longer than that.”
In an interview Sunday with Steve Scully on SiriusXM, Bacon argued that Congress shouldn’t shy away from a war powers vote.
“We shouldn’t fear a war powers resolution,” he said. “We have a congressional responsibility and authorities to be a part of this decision.”
House Speaker Mike Johnson, a Louisiana Republican, said in a radio interview Monday that Mr. Trump was “fully within his authority as commander in chief to do what he’s done.” Johnson said the attack was a “defensive strike” and “not a declaration of war.” He also said the upcoming war powers vote is a “dangerous gambit” by “reckless Democrats.”
Beyond Congress, the strikes have drawn heavy criticism from prominent figures in the MAGA orbit, including conservative commentator Tucker Carlson, who told ABC News that the president’s decision to attack Iran was “absolutely disgusting and evil.”
Former Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia, a once-staunch supporter of the president who left Congress after the two had a public falling out, has lambasted the president’s strikes on Iran in a slew of social media posts. Greene stressed that she and a number of so-called America First Republicans campaigned on a commitment to ending foreign wars and not seeking regime change.
“All we wanted was America FIRST. This is not it,” she said.
In another post, Greene posited that the political lines are being redrawn.
“And just like that we are no longer a nation divided by left and right, we are now a nation divided [by] those who want to fight wars for Israel and those who just want peace and to be able to afford their bills and health insurance,” she said.
发表回复