美国法官永久阻止公布特朗普文件案报告


2026年2月23日 14:20 UTC / 路透社

  • 摘要
  • 坎农法官由特朗普任命
  • 坎农以”公正性”为由阻止报告发布
  • 报告详述了机密文件指控
  • 坎农在2024年驳回了特别检察官的指控

2月23日(路透社)- 美国一名联邦法官周一永久禁止司法部公布一份检察官关于总统唐纳德·特朗普(Donald Trump)的刑事案报告。该报告指控特朗普在其第一任期结束后非法保留机密文件。

佛罗里达州联邦地区法官艾琳·坎农(Aileen Cannon)裁定,公布该报告将对这位共和党总统及其两名共同被告造成”明显不公”,因为报告将详细披露一起从未进入陪审团审判的案件中大量涉嫌刑事犯罪的指控。

路透社”内幕追踪”通讯是您了解全球体育重大事件的必备指南。立即订阅。

广告 · 继续滚动

坎农法官2020年由特朗普任命,她在2024年驳回了所有指控。

特朗普被特别检察官杰克·史密斯(Jack Smith)指控非法将与美国国防相关的文件(包括美国核计划)存放在其海湖庄园社交俱乐部,并妨碍美国政府取回这些材料。坎农认定,史密斯是在民主党前总统乔·拜登(Joe Biden)任内由司法部非法任命的。

坎农在周一的裁决中写道:”披露史密斯的报告将违背司法程序中的基本公平正义原则,因为在刑事指控提出后尚未对被告定罪。”

这一命令意味着,特朗普卸任期间面临的四起刑事案件中,有一起的大量信息可能不会向公众披露。

特朗普和他的两名共同被告——私人助手沃尔特·诺塔(Walt Nauta)和海湖庄园经理卡洛斯·德奥利维拉(Carlos de Oliveira)——对所有指控均不认罪,并辩称此案是政治动机滥用司法系统。他们敦促坎农禁止公布这份详述史密斯寻求指控理由的报告。

特朗普任内的司法部支持这些论点,称该报告属于机密文件。

拜登任内的司法部在特朗普赢得2024年大选后,放弃了重新起诉特朗普的企图。

特别检察官(负责领导某些政治敏感调查)必须向美国司法部长提交报告,详细说明是否寻求起诉。司法部曾公开公布史密斯关于特朗普另一案件的报告(该案件已被驳回,指控特朗普策划推翻2020年选举失利)。

坎农最初以诺塔和德奥利维拉的案件仍在审理为由,禁止向国会披露文件案报告。在特朗普去年重返白宫后,司法部撤销了对诺塔和德奥利维拉的指控。

在周一的裁决中,坎农还对披露机密大陪审团信息表示担忧,并认定史密斯撰写报告的行为规避了她此前认定其任命非法的命令。

报道:安德鲁·古兹沃德(Andrew Goudsward);编辑:威尔·邓纳姆(Will Dunham)和 近山千津(Chizu Nomiyama)

我们的标准:汤森路透信托原则。

US judge permanently blocks release of report on Trump documents case

February 23, 2026 2:20 PM UTC / Reuters

  • Summary
  • Judge Cannon was appointed to the bench by Trump
  • Cannon cites fairness in blocking report release
  • Report detailed classified documents charges
  • Cannon dismissed the special counsel’s charges in 2024

Feb 23 (Reuters) – A U.S. judge permanently barred the Justice Department on Monday from releasing a prosecutor’s report on the criminal case accusing President Donald Trump of unlawfully retaining classified documents following his first term in office.

Florida-based U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon found that releasing the report would be a “manifest injustice” to the Republican president and two former associates who were charged alongside him because it would detail substantial allegations of criminal wrongdoing in a case that never reached a jury.

The Reuters Inside Track newsletter is your essential guide to the biggest events in global sport. Sign up here.

Advertisement · Scroll to continue

节点运行失败

Cannon, who Trump appointed to the bench in 2020, in 2024 dismissed all the charges.

Trump was accused in the case pursued by Special Counsel Jack Smith of illegally storing documents related to U.S. national defense, including the American nuclear program, at his Mar-a-Lago social club and obstructing U.S. government efforts to retrieve the material. Cannon found that Smith had not been lawfully appointed by the Justice Department during Democratic former President Joe Biden’s administration.

Disclosure of Smith’s report “would contravene basic notions of fairness and justice in the process, where no adjudication of guilt has been reached following initiation of criminal charges,” Cannon wrote in Monday’s ruling.

Advertisement · Scroll to continue

The order means substantial information about one of the four criminal cases Trump faced in his years out of office may not be disclosed to the public.

Trump and his two co-defendants, personal aide Walt Nauta and Mar-a-Lago manager Carlos de Oliveira, pleaded not guilty to all charges and argued the case was a politically motivated abuse of the legal system. They urged Cannon to bar the release of the report, which details Smith’s justification for seeking charges.

The Justice Department under Trump supported those arguments, arguing the report was a confidential document.

The Justice Department under Biden dropped an attempt to revive the case against Trump after he won the 2024 election.

Special counsels, who are appointed to lead certain politically sensitive investigations, are required to draft reports to the U.S. attorney general detailing their conclusions on whether to seek charges. The Justice Department publicly released Smith’s report detailing his other since-dismissed case against Trump, which accused Trump of plotting to overturn his defeat in the 2020 election.

Cannon initially barred disclosure of the documents case report to Congress, citing the ongoing case against Nauta and de Oliveira. The Justice Department dropped charges against Nauta and de Oliveira after Trump returned to office last year.

In Monday’s ruling, Cannon also cited concerns about releasing confidential grand jury information and concluded that Smith’s drafting of the report circumvented her order finding him unlawfully appointed.

Reporting by Andrew Goudsward; Editing by Will Dunham and Chizu Nomiyama

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注