作者：斯蒂芬·索拉奇 | 福克斯新闻
发布时间：2026年2月21日 美国东部时间下午1:09
唐纳德·特朗普总统在最高法院周五驳回其广泛关税权力的裁决后，揭晓了他心目中的“新英雄”是哪位最高法院大法官。
特朗普周六上午在其Truth Social社交平台上发表声明，此前一天最高法院以6:3的投票结果阻止了特朗普依据《国际紧急经济权力法》(IEEPA)行使的关税权力。
帖子中写道：“我的新英雄是美国最高法院大法官布雷特·卡瓦诺，当然还有克拉伦斯·托马斯大法官和塞缪尔·阿利托大法官。毫无疑问，他们都希望‘让美国再次伟大’！”
尽管三位大法官都投了少数派票，但卡瓦诺撰写了一篇措辞激烈的异议意见，称最高法院的裁决“不合逻辑”。
特朗普回应最高法院驳回广泛关税权力裁决：“这是一种耻辱”
唐纳德·特朗普总统于2026年1月27日星期二抵达爱荷华州克莱夫的集会，就经济发表讲话。(查理·内伯格/美联社照片)
卡瓦诺写道：“以他们对法律条文的解读为例，总统可以阻止所有来自中国的进口商品，但甚至不能对来自中国的商品征收1美元的关税。这种做法不太合理。”
卡瓦诺断言，《国际紧急经济权力法》“并没有在配额和禁运与关税之间做出如此奇怪的区分”，相反，它授权总统在国家紧急状态期间使用配额、禁运和关税等工具来管理进口。
大法官布雷特·卡瓦诺在具有里程碑意义的最高法院裁决中对特朗普的紧急关税提出异议。(美联社照片/苏珊·沃尔什，档案照片)
特朗普去年绕过国会，单方面援引《国际紧急经济权力法》对全球几乎所有国家征收关税。总统辩称，来自中国、墨西哥和加拿大的非法药物大量涌入，以及贸易逆差摧毁了美国制造业，这些都构成了紧急情况，有正当理由实施关税。
斯科特·贝森特称最高法院在关税裁决上虽判决不利却以‘严酷手段’加强了特朗普的权力
周五就裁决发表讲话时，特朗普称赞卡瓦诺“才华横溢且能力出众”，并补充说他“为任命（卡瓦诺）感到非常自豪”。
卡瓦诺在异议意见中写道，尽管他不同意法院的裁决，但由于“众多其他联邦法规”允许总统征收关税，该裁决可能不会“实质性地限制”总统未来下令征收关税的能力。
唐纳德·特朗普总统于2025年4月2日在华盛顿特区白宫玫瑰园举行的“让美国再次富裕”贸易公告活动上。(奇普·索莫迪维拉/盖蒂图片社)
卡瓦诺补充说，然而，法院的裁决可能会产生重大的临时影响。
点击此处下载福克斯新闻应用程序
卡瓦诺写道：“美国可能需要向已缴纳《国际紧急经济权力法》关税的进口商退还数十亿美元，尽管一些进口商可能已经将成本转嫁给了消费者或其他人。正如口头辩论中所承认的，退款流程可能会是一场‘混乱’。”
他还表示，最高法院的裁决可能会“对政府宣称的与包括中国、英国和日本在内的外国达成的价值数万亿美元的贸易协议产生不确定性”。
周六，特朗普将全球关税从周五最高法院裁决后宣布的10%提高到了15%。他援引1974年《贸易法》第122条宣布了这一新的征税措施。
President Donald Trump praises Justice Brett Kavanaugh after his fiery dissent to Supreme Court’s tariff ruling
By Stephen Sorace | Fox News
Published February 21, 2026 1:09pm EST
President Donald Trump revealed which Supreme Court justice he considers to be his “new hero” after a high court ruling rejected his sweeping tariff powers on Friday.
Trump made the declaration in a post on his Truth Social platform on Saturday morning, a day after the Supreme Court voted 6-3 to block Trump’s tariff powers under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).
“My new hero is United States Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh and, of course, Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito,” the post read. “There is no doubt in anyone’s mind that they want to, MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!”
While all three justices voted with the minority, Kavanaugh wrote a fiery dissent that called the high court’s decision “illogical.”
TRUMP RESPONDS TO SUPREME COURT RULING REJECTING SWEEPING TARIFFS POWERS: ‘A DISGRACE’
President Donald Trump arrives to speak about the economy at a rally Tuesday, Jan. 27, 2026, in Clive, Iowa.(Charlie Neibergall/AP Photo)
“As they interpret the statute, the President could, for example, block all imports from China but cannot order even a $1 tariff on goods imported from China,” Kavanaugh wrote. “That approach does not make much sense.”
Kavanaugh asserted that the IEEPA “does not draw such an odd distinction between quotas and embargoes on the one hand and tariffs on the other,” but rather empowers the president to regulate imports during national emergencies using tools such as quotas, embargoes and tariffs.
Justice Brett Kavanaugh dissented in a pivotal Supreme Court decision striking down Trump’s emergency tariffs.(AP Photo/Susan Walsh, File)
Trump last year bypassed Congress and unilaterally levied tariffs on nearly every country in the world by invoking the IEEPA. The president argued that an influx of illicit drugs from China, Mexico and Canada and a trade deficit that has decimated American manufacturing constituted emergencies that justified the tariffs.
SCOTT BESSENT SAYS SUPREME COURT STRENGTHENED TRUMP WITH ‘DRACONIAN’ MOVE DESPITE RULING ON TARIFFS
Trump, in a Friday speech remarking on the decision, praised Kavanaugh for “his genius and his great ability,” adding he was “very proud of that appointment.”
Kavanaugh wrote in his dissent that while he disagrees with the court’s ruling, its decision may not “substantially constrain” a president’s ability to order tariffs going forward because of “numerous [other federal statutes]” that allow the president to impose tariffs.
President Donald Trump during a “Make America Wealthy Again” trade announcement event in the Rose Garden at the White House on April 2, 2025, in Washington, D.C.(Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
The justice added that the court’s decision may, however, have substantial interim effects.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
“The United States may be required to refund billions of dollars to importers who paid the IEEPA tariffs, even though some importers may have already passed on costs to consumers or others,” Kavanaugh wrote. “As was acknowledged at oral argument, the refund process is likely to be a ‘mess.’”
He added that the high court’s decision could “generate uncertainty” regarding what the government has said were trade deals worth trillion of dollars with foreign nations, including with China, the United Kingdom and Japan.
Trump on Saturday raised the global tariff to 15% — up from the 10% global tariff he announced Friday in the wake of the Supreme Court ruling. He cited Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 in announcing the new levy.
发表回复