2026-07-14T18:40:43.511Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/07/14/politics/house-vote-daylight-savings-time
美国众议院将于周二就一项在全美推行全年夏令时的法案进行投票,这让国会再次陷入这个长期困扰议员们的议题,同时也引发了家长、农民及其他持截然不同观点群体的强烈呼吁。
若该法案获得通过,将提交参议院审议,之后再交由总统签署成为法律——不过该法案在参议院的通过前景仍不明朗。支持者认为,这项法案能让美国人不必再调整时钟,避免打乱幼儿的睡眠节奏,也有望减少季节性抑郁的发生。但反对者称,此举可能产生经济后果,对农民而言尤为如此,他们将不得不应对更晚的日出。
唐纳德·特朗普总统长期以来一直抨击美国人每年调整两次时钟的惯例,不过他对于美国应该采用标准时间还是夏令时的立场曾发生过变化。
今年5月众议院能源与商业委员会通过这项《阳光保护法案》时,特朗普曾对此表示支持。他在Truth Social的帖子中写道:“每年都有数以亿计的美元被民众、城市和州花费在被迫调整时钟这件事上。”
“现在是时候让人们不再为‘时钟’操心了,更不用说为这种荒唐的一年两次的调整花费的精力和金钱。这也将是共和党非常棒的一次胜利。支持这项法案!”该帖子写道。
多个州已准备好迎接这一转变。根据全国州议会会议的数据,已有19个州出台法案,若国会批准,将转为全年夏令时。但该法案也允许各州在生效前选择退出,这可能影响夏威夷、亚利桑那州大部分地区以及多个美国海外领地的居民,这些地区目前采用标准时间。
和特朗普一样,国会议员们长期以来一直致力于推动“废除时钟调整”、将夏令时永久化的立法。该议题引发了游说团体的积极游说和大力支持,包括高尔夫行业、电影制片人、农民和教育工作者。支持和反对的声音并未严格按照党派界限划分。
周二这项法案的支持者认为,取消时钟调整将带来诸多好处,包括让美国人不必在春季损失一小时睡眠,以及避免其他诸多不便。他们还表示,更多的工作时间处于日照时段,意味着季节性抑郁会减少,娱乐和经济活动会增加,晚间的犯罪率也会降低。
“关于这个问题已有大量科学研究,真正的问题是,我们为什么还在调整时钟?这是我们每次不得不调整时钟时都会问的问题,而现在越来越难找到合理的解释了,”民主党众议员弗兰克·帕洛内在周一的众议院委员会听证会上说道。
但反对这一变革的人士也提出了同样的论点——指出其对经济和美国人健康的益处。来自农业选区的议员警告称,农民可能会因冬季清晨日出时间过晚而遭受重创,尤其是在一些地区要到上午9点后才会日出的选区。还有一些倡导者认为,这可能会危及那些在黑暗中通勤上学的学生的安全。
另有一些议员或许也支持废除时钟调整,但他们表示,采用永久标准时间比全年夏令时更合理。
“如果我们要做出影响所有美国人的永久性改变,我们应该遵循科学,优先考虑美国人的健康,尤其是儿童的健康,”众议员玛丽·盖伊·斯坎伦在周一的委员会听证会上表示,她当时正支持转为永久标准时间。
议员们在这个问题上的复杂态度,很大程度上反映了美国民众的观点。民调显示,美国人不喜欢调整时钟,但在解决方案上无法达成共识。
“我对这项法案还不太确定,但我们已经清晰地听到民众的声音:他们不想再调整时钟了,”代表纽约州布法罗部分地区的共和党众议员尼克·兰沃西在周一的委员会听证会上说道。
美国国会此前曾尝试推行永久夏令时:1974年在美国经历能源危机期间,国会通过了一项相关法案,但由于民众强烈反对,议员们很快便推翻了这项决定——周二法案的反对者经常提及这一事件。
但这并未阻止议员们再次尝试这一想法。
2022年,参议院通过了一项夏令时法案,但众议院未对其进行全院投票。2025年,两党参议员团体曾请求一致同意通过一项类似法案,但遭到了来自阿肯色州的共和党参议员汤姆·科顿的阻挠。
Daylight Saving Time could be year-round if new bill passes
2026-07-14T18:40:43.511Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/07/14/politics/house-vote-daylight-savings-time
The US House will vote Tuesday on a measure to enact year-round Daylight Saving Time across the country, springing Congress forward into an issue that has long stumped lawmakers and spurred impassioned pleas by parents, farmers and others with sharply divergent views.
If the measure passes, it will head to the Senate for approval before going to the president for his signature — though its chances in the upper chamber remain unclear. Proponents argue it would spare Americans from having to change their clocks, disrupting young children’s sleep schedules and arguably causing more seasonal depression. But detractors say it could have economic consequences, particularly for farmers who would have to wrestle with later sunrises.
President Donald Trump has long decried the semiannual ritual of Americans changing their clocks, though his position on whether the country should default to standard or saving time has evolved.
He cheered Tuesday’s bill, the Sunshine Protection Act, when it advanced out of the House Energy and Commerce Committee in May. “Hundreds of Millions of Dollars are spent every year by people, Cities, and States, being forced to change their Clocks,” he said in a Truth Social post.
“It’s time that people can stop worrying about the ‘Clock,’ not to mention all of the work and money that is spent on this ridiculous, twice-yearly production. It will also be a very nice WIN for the Republican Party. Take it!” the post said.
Many states are ready to embrace the shift. According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, 19 states have enacted legislation to switch to year-round Daylight Saving Time if Congress allows it. But the bill also allows states to opt out if they act before it takes effect, which could affect residents in Hawaii, much of Arizona, and various US territories who observe standard time.
Like Trump, congressional lawmakers have long taken an interest in passing laws to “ditch the switch” and make Daylight Saving Time permanent. The issue has generated zealous lobbying and strong advocacy from interest groups including the golf industry, filmmakers, farmers and educators. Support and opposition do not fall on clean party lines.
Proponents of Tuesday’s measure argue dropping the clock change would come with a raft of benefits, including sparing Americans from losing an hour of sleep in the spring and other inconveniences. They argue more work hours in sunlight means less seasonal depression, more recreational and economic activity, and less crime in the evenings.
“There’s a lot of science on this, and really the question is, why do we still change our clocks? That’s a question many of us ask every time we have to do it, and it’s getting harder and harder to justify,” Democratic Rep. Frank Pallone said at a House committee hearing Monday.
But detractors of the change make the same arguments — pointing to economic benefits and the health of Americans. Lawmakers hailing from agricultural districts warn farmers could be devastated by long winter mornings that see the sun rise later, especially in districts where some won’t see sunlight until after 9 a.m. And some advocates argue it could endanger the lives of students who would commute to school in the dark.
And there are some lawmakers who may favor abandoning the clock change but say adopting permanent standard time makes more sense than year-round Daylight Saving Time.
“If we’re going to make a permanent change that affects every American, we should follow the science and prioritize Americans’ health, particularly that of the children,” Rep. Mary Gay Scanlon said, speaking in favor of switching to permanent standard time at a committee hearing Monday.
Lawmakers’ mixed feelings about the issue largely mirror those of the American public. Polling has showed Americans don’t like changing their clocks but can’t agree on a solution.
“I’m a little undecided as to where I go on this bill, but we’ve heard loud and clear that people don’t want to change the clocks,” Republican Rep. Nick Langworthy, who represents parts of Buffalo, New York, said at Monday’s committee hearing,
Congress has previously tried to move to permanent Daylight Saving Time, adopting a measure in 1974 as the US was experiencing an energy crisis. But lawmakers quickly reversed course amid deep unpopularity — a fact that opponents of Tuesday’s bill regularly reference.
The episode hasn’t deterred lawmakers from toying with the idea again.
In 2022, the Senate passed a version of a daylight savings bill, but it did not get a floor vote in the House. A bipartisan group of senators in 2025 sought unanimous consent to pass a similar measure, but were thwarted by Republican Sen. Tom Cotton of Arkansas.
发表回复