特朗普抵达北约峰会,伊朗分歧笼罩联盟会谈


2026年7月7日 美国东部时间凌晨5:00 / 福克斯新闻网

惠特克大使称特朗普对西班牙等国在空袭行动中拒绝提供飞越权感到“失望”
作者:摩根·菲利普斯 福克斯新闻网

美国驻北约大使马修·惠特克详细阐述了唐纳德·特朗普总统对伊朗近期回应和平协议的强硬立场,称其“完全不可接受”。惠特克强调,美国的战略军事存在和经济制裁是关键的杠杆手段。他进一步解释了“北约3.0”的愿景,强调盟友需要增加国防开支、提升作战能力,以避免依赖美国。

NEW 您现在可以收听福克斯新闻的文章了!

blob:https://www.foxnews.com/ba982920-178c-42d3-8f43-ada6df5a8b27

收听本文
6 分钟

唐纳德·特朗普总统正抵达土耳其主办的北约峰会,他对多个欧洲盟友针对美国牵头的对伊行动的回应感到新的不满,这为他长期以来在摊派负担方面向该联盟施压的运动开辟了新战线。

此次峰会于周二和周三在土耳其安卡拉举行,预计将聚焦国防开支、乌克兰问题以及北约对俄罗斯的长期战略。

但此次峰会将让特朗普与北约内部的几位主要对手正面交锋,其中包括西班牙,西班牙首相佩德罗·桑切斯称美国对伊朗的战争“非法、荒谬且残酷”。

美国驻北约大使马修·惠特克周三表示,特朗普仍对那些在行动期间拒绝允许美军使用军事基地或飞越权的盟友,以及批评空袭的政治言论感到“失望”。

2025年7月14日,华盛顿白宫椭圆形办公室,唐纳德·特朗普总统与北约秘书长马克·吕特会晤。(凯文·迪奇/盖蒂图片社摄)

北约国防开支失衡持续数十年的原因

“总统对我们的几个盟友不愿支持我们使用其境内基地的行为表示失望,”惠特克说,“同样重要的是,他也对‘史诗之怒’行动发起前后发表的政治言论感到极其失望。”

预计这些分歧将笼罩此次峰会,届时特朗普将再次敦促盟友增加国防开支,同时也会引发更广泛的质疑:北约成员国是否准备好在联盟传统关注的欧洲之外的冲突中支持美国。

特朗普的不满也已公开表露。

峰会召开前,他表示自己参会主要是因为与土耳其总统雷杰普·塔伊普·埃尔多安的关系,同时再次批评部分北约盟友在国防开支方面的表现,并质疑他们对联盟的承诺。

“要不是这次峰会在土耳其由埃尔多安总统主办,我想我根本不会去,”特朗普6月24日在白宫对记者说。

在同一场记者会上,他再次批评西班牙和其他北约盟友拒绝支持美国针对伊朗的行动,宣称“西班牙存在问题”。

2024年?不,原文是2025?不,原配图说明是July 14, 2025,不对,峰会是2026年7月,哦不,配图是之前的会晤。重新看:
2025年7月14日,华盛顿白宫椭圆形办公室,唐纳德·特朗普总统与北约秘书长马克·吕特会晤。(凯文·迪奇/盖蒂图片社摄)

此次峰会于周二和周三在土耳其安卡拉举行,预计将聚焦国防开支、乌克兰问题以及北约对俄罗斯的长期战略。(本·斯坦索尔/路透社泳池供图)

惠特克表示,此次行动也凸显了联盟内部军事能力的差距,他指出,一些北约成员国拥有“精良的作战能力”,而另一些则无力为美国牵头的大规模军事行动做出有意义的贡献。

本届政府的不满源于欧洲盟友在“史诗之怒”行动期间做出的一系列决定。

英国最初拒绝允许美军从英国基地发起对伊朗的空袭,后在伊朗袭击升级后改变了立场。西班牙拒绝将其领土和领空用于作战行动,同时桑切斯公开批评美国牵头的这场战役。

意大利也试图与此次行动保持距离,坚称从意大利境内基地起飞的美国航班仅限于后勤支援任务,而非作战任务。而德国虽作为关键的后勤枢纽,但并未公开支持这场军事行动。

欧洲各国政府为其立场辩护,称其受制于国内法律约束,且担心被拖入更广泛的中东冲突。英国最初拒绝批准后又允许美军空袭,而西班牙继续反对这场行动,意大利将支持限制在非作战行动范围内,德国则将其角色限定在后勤领域。

欧洲1160亿美元战斗机项目“失败”,引发对无需美国庇护自我防卫能力的新质疑

若干盟友后来同意支持旨在恢复霍尔木兹海峡商业航运的海上安全行动,但政府官员表示,最初不愿支持美国战役的态度仍在影响特朗普参会前的看法。

虽然中东问题预计不会占据正式议程的主导地位,但它凸显了特朗普带到土耳其的关于负担分摊的更广泛问题,以及北约盟友是否准备好超越联盟传统的欧洲关注范围来支持美国。

围绕伊朗的紧张局势是建立在特朗普多年来对北约的批评之上的,他多次指责北约过度依赖美国。在其第一和第二任期内,特朗普都质疑华盛顿是否应该继续为未能履行开支承诺的盟友提供防卫,有时甚至暗示完全退出北约。

唐纳德·特朗普总统预计将在峰会上敦促盟友达到北约新的国防开支基准:占国内生产总值的5%。(官方图片/拉美通讯社 via 路透社连线)

“如果他们不付钱,我就不会保卫他们,”特朗普3月6日说,“如果美国陷入困境,我们召唤他们……你觉得他们会来保护我们吗?他们本应该这么做。但我不太确定。”

特朗普预计将在峰会上敦促盟友达到北约新的国防开支基准:占国内生产总值的5%。

“美国在北约上的开支远超其他任何国家,显然是为了保护他们,却没有从中获得任何好处,”他周四在Truth Social平台上写道。

惠特克暗示,本届政府越来越认为负担分摊不仅仅局限于国防预算。

“我们认为,付出更多的国家应该从付出更多中获得好处,”他说。

惠特克证实,政府正在考虑对未达到国防开支目标的盟友采取反制措施。他补充说,贡献更多的国家可能获得一系列优势,从国防采购优先权到与美国领导人更多的接触机会。

虽然峰会公开议程预计将聚焦国防开支、乌克兰问题以及北约对俄罗斯的长期战略,但分析人士表示,“史诗之怒”行动的余波可能会影响特朗普与几位欧洲领导人的私下会谈。

点击此处下载福克斯新闻APP

前国防部副助理部长伊恩·布热津斯基在新闻发布会上表示,近期的冲突为此次峰会带来了“两份摆在桌面上的计分卡”——北约传统的加强对俄罗斯威慑的优先事项,以及特朗普对哪些盟友在伊朗冲突期间最支持美国的评估。

“由于一些未被列入议程的问题正在影响会议氛围,我们对此的预期不高,”大西洋理事会跨大西洋安全倡议主任托里·陶西格说。

Trump arrives at NATO summit as Iran rift looms above alliance talks

July 7, 2026 5:00am EDT / Fox News

Ambassador Whitaker says Trump is ‘disappointed’ by Spain and others who denied overflight rights during the strikes

By Morgan Phillips Fox News

U.S. Ambassador to NATO Matthew Whitaker details President Donald Trump’s firm stance on Iran’s recent peace deal response, calling it ‘totally unacceptable.’ Whitaker highlights American strategic military presence and economic sanctions as key leverage points. He further explains the vision for ‘NATO 3.0,’ emphasizing the need for allies to boost defense spending and enhance war-fighting capabilities to avoid dependencies on the United States.

NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

blob:https://www.foxnews.com/ba982920-178c-42d3-8f43-ada6df5a8b27

Listen to this article

6 min

President Donald Trump is arriving at the Turkey-held NATO summit with fresh frustration toward several European allies over their responses to the U.S.-led operations against Iran, opening a new front in his long-running campaign to pressure the alliance over burden-sharing.

The summit, which takes place Tuesday and Wednesday in Ankara, Turkey, is expected to focus on defense spending, Ukraine and NATO’s long-term strategy toward Russia.

But it will bring Trump face to face with some of his biggest foes in NATO, including Spain, whose Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez has called the U.S. war in Iran “illegal, absurd and cruel.”

U.S. Ambassador to NATO Matthew Whitaker said Wednesday that Trump remains “disappointed” by allies that declined to allow U.S. forces to use military bases or overflight rights during the operation, as well as by political statements criticizing the strikes.

President Donald Trump meets with NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte in the Oval Office at the White House on July 14, 2025, in Washington.(Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

WHY NATO’S DEFENSE SPENDING IMBALANCE LASTED FOR DECADES

“The president has expressed disappointment in both a couple of our allies’ unwillingness to support us using our bases in their countries,” Whitaker said. “And, as importantly, he’s also incredibly disappointed in the political statements that came out around the time of the launch of Epic Fury.”

The disagreements are expected to loom over a summit where Trump will once again press allies to increase defense spending, while also raising broader questions about whether NATO members are prepared to back the United States during conflicts beyond the alliance’s traditional focus on Europe.

Trump’s frustration has been evident publicly as well.

Ahead of the summit, he said he was attending largely because of his relationship with Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, while again criticizing some NATO allies over defense spending and questioning their commitment to the alliance.

“Except for the fact that it was being held in Turkey by President Erdogan, I don’t think I would have gone to it,” Trump told reporters at the White House on June 24.

During the same appearance, he renewed criticism of Spain and other NATO allies over their refusal to support U.S. operations against Iran, declaring, “There’s a problem with Spain.”

The summit, which takes place Tuesday and Wednesday in Ankara, Turkey, is expected to focus on defense spending, Ukraine and NATO’s long-term strategy toward Russia.(Ben Stansall/Pool via Reuters)

Whitaker said the operation also highlighted disparities in military capabilities across the alliance, noting that while some NATO members possess “exquisite capabilities,” others lack the capacity to contribute meaningfully to a large-scale U.S.-led military operation.

The administration’s frustration stems from a series of decisions by European allies during Operation Epic Fury.

The United Kingdom initially declined to allow U.S. forces to launch strikes against Iran from British bases before later reversing course after Iranian attacks escalated. Spain denied the use of its territory and airspace for combat operations while Sánchez publicly criticized the U.S.-led campaign.

Italy also sought to distance itself from the operation, insisting U.S. flights from bases on Italian soil were limited to logistical support rather than combat missions, while Germany served as a key logistics hub but stopped short of publicly endorsing the military campaign.

European governments defended their positions by citing domestic legal constraints and concerns about being drawn into a wider Middle East conflict. Britain later allowed U.S. strikes after initially withholding approval, while Spain continued opposing the campaign, Italy restricted its support to noncombat operations and Germany limited its role to logistics.

EUROPE’S $116B FIGHTER JET ‘FAILURE’ RAISES FRESH DOUBTS ABOUT ABILITY TO DEFEND ITSELF WITHOUT US

Several allies later agreed to support maritime security operations aimed at restoring commercial shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, but administration officials say the initial reluctance to back the U.S. campaign continues to shape Trump’s view heading into the summit.

While the Middle East is not expected to dominate the formal agenda, it underscores broader questions Trump is bringing to Turkey about burden-sharing and whether NATO allies are prepared to back the United States beyond the alliance’s traditional focus on Europe.

The tensions over Iran build on years of Trump’s criticism of NATO, which he has repeatedly accused of relying too heavily on the U.S. During both his first and second terms, Trump has questioned whether Washington should continue defending allies that fail to meet spending commitments and has at times floated withdrawing from the alliance altogether.

President Donald Trump is expected to use the summit to press allies to meet NATO’s new benchmark of spending 5% of GDP on defense.(Handout / Latin America News Agency via Reuters Connect)

“If they don’t pay, I’m not going to defend them,” Trump said March 6. “If the United States was in trouble, and we called them … you think they’re going to come and protect us? They’re supposed to. I’m not so sure.”

Trump is expected to use the summit to press allies to meet NATO’s new benchmark of spending 5% of GDP on defense.

“The United States spends more money on NATO than any other country, by far, to protect them, without getting any benefit from so doing,” he wrote on Truth Social Thursday.

Whitaker suggested the administration increasingly views burden-sharing as extending beyond defense budgets alone.

“We believe that those that are doing more should get benefits from doing more,” he said.

Whitaker confirmed the administration was considering countermeasures for allies that don’t meet defense spending goals. He added that countries contributing more could receive advantages ranging from priority in defense procurement to greater engagement with U.S. leaders.

While the summit is expected to focus publicly on defense spending, Ukraine and NATO’s long-term strategy toward Russia, analysts say the fallout from Operation Epic Fury is likely to shape private conversations between Trump and several European leaders.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense Ian Brzezinski said during a press briefing the recent conflict has created “two scorecards on the table” for the summit — NATO’s traditional priorities of strengthening deterrence against Russia and Trump’s assessment of which allies proved most supportive of the United States during the Iran conflict.

“We have low expectations because of the issues not on the agenda, but that are driving the atmospherics,” Torey Taussig, director of the Transatlantic Security Initiative at the Atlantic Council, said.

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注