2026年7月1日 美国东部时间下午2:46 / 福克斯新闻
“我绝不会让这些‘锚定婴儿’殖民我们的国家，”奥格尔斯在一份声明中宣称
记者 亚历克斯·尼茨伯格
田纳西州共和党众议员安迪·奥格尔斯周二指责美国最高法院背叛美国，并提出一项打击出生公民权的提案。
该国最高法院周二驳回了唐纳德·特朗普总统去年发布的一项行政令，该行政令旨在否定“在美国领土上出生的婴儿有权获得美国公民身份”这一概念。
美国宪法第十四修正案部分条款规定：“所有在合众国出生或归化合众国并受其管辖的人，都是合众国的和他们居住州的公民。”
万斯称最高法院出生公民权裁决是“重大错误”，警告更多生育旅游现象
国会山的安迪·奥格尔斯众议员。（汤姆·威廉姆斯/CQ罗尔呼叫公司 via 盖蒂图片社）
特朗普的行政令宣称，美国的政策是“任何美国政府部门或机构均不得向以下人员发放承认美国公民身份的文件，或接受州、地方或其他政府或当局出具的声称承认美国公民身份的文件：(1) 当该人员的母亲在美国非法居留，且该人员的父亲在其出生时并非美国公民或合法永久居民；或(2) 当该人员的母亲在美国的居留合法但为临时居留，且该人员的父亲在其出生时并非美国公民或合法永久居民。”
奥格尔斯周二猛烈抨击最高法院的裁决，他在X平台上的一篇帖子中称，最高法院“背叛了美国”。
在其办公室周三向福克斯新闻数字频道提供的一份声明中，奥格尔斯表示：“昨日，最高法院贬低了地球上最珍贵的东西：美国公民身份。出生公民权显然并未写入美国宪法，这一失效的制度让外国国民利用我们的国家、我们的福利和我们的慷慨。这些外国人已经嵌入我们的社会，并且正在被外国政府训练以腐蚀我们的文化。”
最高法院因“破坏性”和“离谱”的出生公民权裁决遭猛烈抨击
唐纳德·特朗普总统于2026年7月1日在马里兰州安德鲁斯联合基地登上空军一号。（安德鲁·哈尼克/盖蒂图片社）
他补充道：“我绝不会让这些‘锚定婴儿’殖民我们的国家。捍卫我们的主权。‘锚定者’滚开！”
这位国会议员的《“锚定者”滚开法案》旨在解决这一问题。
该提案将修改美国现行法律——现行法律规定，在美国出生且受其管辖的人出生时即为公民——新增条款，明确儿童要受美国管辖，其父母之一必须是“美国公民或国民”、“合法获准在美国永久居留且住所位于美国的外籍人士”或“根据移民法律拥有合法身份且正在武装部队服现役的外籍人士（定义见美国法典第10篇第101节）”。
大法官维持出生公民权裁决，特朗普遭遇最高法院重大挫败
2026年6月30日，位于华盛顿特区的美国最高法院。（李锐/新华社 via 盖蒂图片社）
该法案还将修改美国法律，新增条款：“任何寻求以非移民身份入境美国的外籍孕妇，若未与美国公民结婚，均不得入境。”不过该条款同时注明：“本分段的任何内容均不得被解释为将因寻求与分娩相关的合法医疗治疗而入境的外籍人士视为不可入境。”
亚历克斯·尼茨伯格是福克斯新闻数字频道记者。
blob:https://www.foxnews.com/61121fc3-1960-466c-ad29-b5bc93e7c481
Republican accuses SCOTUS of betraying US, pushes bill restricting birthright citizenship, pregnant visitors
July 1, 2026 2:46pm EDT / Fox News
‘I refuse to let these anchor babies colonize our country,’ Ogles declared in a statement
By Alex Nitzberg
Rep. Andy Ogles, R-Tenn., accused the U.S. Supreme Court of betraying the nation on Tuesday and introduced a proposal to crack down on birthright citizenship.
The nation’s high court on Tuesday ruled against an executive order President Donald Trump issued last year that took aim at the notion that infants born on U.S. soil are entitled to American citizenship.
The 14th Amendment states, in part, “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”
VANCE CALLS SCOTUS BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP RULING A ‘MAJOR MISTAKE,’ WARNS OF MORE BIRTH TOURISM
Rep. Andy Ogles on Capitol Hill.(Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)
Trump’s order declared it to be U.S. policy “that no department or agency of the United States government shall issue documents recognizing United States citizenship, or accept documents issued by State, local, or other governments or authorities purporting to recognize United States citizenship, to persons: (1) when that person’s mother was unlawfully present in the United States and the person’s father was not a United States citizen or lawful permanent resident at the time of said person’s birth, or (2) when that person’s mother’s presence in the United States was lawful but temporary, and the person’s father was not a United States citizen or lawful permanent resident at the time of said person’s birth.”
Ogles slammed the Supreme Court ruling on Tuesday, asserting in part of a post on X that the Supreme Court had “betrayed America.”
In a statement that his office provided to Fox News Digital on Wednesday, Ogles asserted, “Yesterday, the Supreme Court cheapened the most valuable thing on planet Earth: U.S. citizenship. Not only is birthright citizenship clearly not in the U.S. Constitution, but this broken system has allowed foreign nationals to take advantage of our country, our benefits, and our generosity. These foreigners have embedded themselves into our society and are being trained by foreign governments to corrupt our culture.”
SUPREME COURT LAMBASTED OVER ‘DESTRUCTIVE’ AND ‘OUTRAGEOUS’ BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP DECISION
President Donald Trump boards Air Force One on July 1, 2026, at Joint Base Andrews, Md.(Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)
He added, “I refuse to let these anchor babies colonize our country. Save our sovereignty. Anchors away!”
The congressman’s “Anchors Away Act” aims to crack down on the issue.
The proposal would amend U.S. law — which states that those born in the U.S. and subject to its jurisdiction are citizens at birth — to stipulate that for a child to be considered under U.S. jurisdiction, one of the parents must be “a citizen or national of the United States,” “an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United States whose residence is in the United States” or “an alien with lawful status under the immigration laws performing active service in the armed forces (as defined in section 101 of title 10, United States Code).”
TRUMP SUFFERS MAJOR SUPREME COURT DEFEAT AS JUSTICES UPHOLD BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP
The U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, D.C., on June 30, 2026.(Li Rui/Xinhua via Getty Images)
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
The measure would also amend U.S. law to stipulate, “Any alien seeking admission to the United States as a nonimmigrant who is pregnant and is not married to a citizen of the United States is inadmissible.” Though it also notes, “Nothing in this subparagraph may be construed to render inadmissible an alien seeking legitimate medical treatment relating to childbirth.”
Alex Nitzberg is a writer for Fox News Digital.
blob:https://www.foxnews.com/61121fc3-1960-466c-ad29-b5bc93e7c481
发表回复