2026-07-01T08:00:25.638Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/07/01/politics/american-priorities-aipac-democratic-socialists
两年前,美国以色列公共事务委员会(AIPAC)通过其超级政治行动委员会斥巨资,试图击败两位直言不讳的以色列批评者:密苏里州众议员科里·布什和纽约州众议员贾马尔·鲍曼。
“AIPAC,我来推翻你的王国了,”布什在败选演讲中发誓道。
如今,AIPAC的对手们认为自己掌握了主动权——而一个名为“美国优先”(American Priorities)的新组织在其中发挥了重要作用。
这个仅成立六个月的超级政治行动委员会已迅速成为众议院民主党初选的一支有影响力的力量,已斥资至少560万美元支持那些强烈批评以色列、其在加沙的战争以及AIPAC对民主党初选影响力的民主党人。“美国优先”帮助两位民主社会主义者——达里亚利扎·阿维拉·谢瓦利耶和克莱尔·巴尔德斯——在近期的纽约初选中获胜,还为第三位候选人梅拉特·基罗斯提供了支持,助其在周二击败科罗拉多州众议员戴安娜·德盖特。
该组织的开支仍远不及AIPAC的超级政治行动委员会“联合民主项目”,后者在本选举周期已斥资至少3400万美元。双方尚未在多场初正面交锋,而是更务实地选择各自的战场。但对于早已习惯在资金上被大幅碾压的进步人士来说,“美国优先”已成为出人意料的救星。
“2024年对我们来说是‘艰难的一年,但也是真正的奠基之年’,”正义民主党(Justice Democrats)的发言人乌萨马·安德拉比说道。该进步组织在初选中常与“美国优先”立场一致。“我们在本选举周期看到了这些努力的成果。”
“美国优先”的一位发言人表示,该组织的成立源于一种信念,即初选中“几乎不存在能与AIPAC抗衡的力量”。
“我们的理念是打造一支支出力量,支持那些直言不讳地表达大多数民主党选民——实际上也是大多数美国人——早已持有的观点的人,这样一来,说出真相就不会再成为被对手以三比一的资金优势击败的理由,”发言人格雷格·克里格在一份声明中说道。
“美国优先”对长期以来不仅谴责AIPAC的支出,还谴责所有政治领域大额资金的进步人士构成了意识形态考验。到目前为止,这也是AIPAC回应“美国优先”的依据。
“对AIPAC超级政治行动委员会的审查标准,也应适用于反以色列的秘密资金,”联合民主项目的发言人帕特里克·多顿在接受CNN就本文提出的置评请求时表示。
当被问及“美国优先”是否对AIPAC的初选战略产生了影响时,多顿表示,该超级政治行动委员会“会根据对每场竞选的评估做出独立决定”。
正寻求夺回原席位的布什将于8月参加初选,她最近告诉CNN,她对“美国优先”了解不多,但AIPAC的对手们现在明白,他们“需要全力以赴”对抗其影响力。
“我真心认为我们需要将大额资金赶出政坛,”布什说道。“但现在,有一个能与AIPAC以及……大型加密货币企业、大型房地产商、大型制药公司、战争牟利者、移民海关执法局承包商相抗衡的力量……对我们来说会很有用,因为我们常面临的问题之一就是我们是草根组织。”
根据美国联邦选举委员会的备案,截至6月3日,“美国优先”已筹得550万美元。与AIPAC的超级政治行动委员会动辄八位数字的资金相比,这只是一笔 modest 的款项——该委员会仅在马里兰州最近一场众议院初选中就花费了近600万美元,其支持的候选人最终获胜。
但“美国优先”愿意在个别竞选活动中斥资超100万美元,并在竞选的关键节点投入资金,这代表了反AIPAC左翼的新实力。工作人员表示,其激进作风在阿维拉·谢瓦利耶的初选中尤为关键,当时她面临一场激烈的后期广告轰炸——部分资金来自AIPAC——内容针对她过去有争议的推文。
“美国优先”在初选的最后几天投放了多档电视和数字广告,强调阿维拉·谢瓦利耶获得纽约市市长佐赫兰·曼达尼的支持,并将其与现任议员阿德里亚诺·埃斯帕利亚特对比,称其在应对美国移民与海关执法局方面态度更强硬。
正义民主党在一份声明中表示,如果没有“美国优先”的支持,阿维拉·谢瓦利耶“不可能获胜”。
“美国优先”已在八场初选中投入资金,包括为费城开放众议院席位的民主社会主义者克里斯·拉布,以及达勒姆县专员尼达·阿拉姆,后者在初选中挑战北卡罗来纳州众议员瓦莱丽·富西。拉布成功获胜,而阿拉姆则是“美国优先”目前唯一的败绩,此前该组织为支持她投入了100万美元。
该组织在周二的科罗拉多州初选中进行了最后一搏,在最后一周斥资15万美元投放电视广告支持基罗斯。
正义民主党和“美国优先”是2024年后合作更为紧密的一系列组织的一部分,它们共同对抗AIPAC,其中还包括参议员伯尼·桑德斯的政治团队以及中东研究所理解政策项目。隶属于该政策项目的新政治行动委员会政治主任阿米拉·哈桑表示,“本选举周期的一大教训是,我们所有人都必须步调一致,高度协调。”
但“美国优先”因其资金实力脱颖而出。
该超级政治行动委员会的顶级捐赠者每人捐赠了100万美元,分别是奥马尔·哈桑和穆罕默德·瓦卡斯·贾韦德。公众对他们知之甚少,他们向联邦选举委员会提供的信息也极少:瓦卡斯自称是纽约市居民,是Showcase Commerce Inc.的首席执行官——这家公司几乎没有公开信息——而哈桑自称是加利福尼亚州雷德伍德城的退休人员。
两人也曾是支持曼达尼2025年市长竞选的超级政治行动委员会的顶级捐赠者,每人捐赠了约25万美元。
两位捐赠者均未回应置评请求。但一位不愿具名的“美国优先”相关人士表示,他们未获授权公开讨论该组织的捐赠者,称其许多贡献者在曼达尼的竞选活动之前都很少参与政治活动,正是这场竞选“激发了他们的灵感,让他们加入了这个阵营”。受曼达尼获胜的鼓舞,他们开始筹划如何在全国范围内就巴勒斯坦人权问题影响民主党。
该人士还表示,他们希望表明民主党不应将穆斯林群体视为理所当然。
“部分原因是巴勒斯坦问题,部分是为了抗衡AIPAC,但也是为了给一个长期被忽视的群体——这个群体对任何民主党多数派都至关重要——在我们的政治中发出真正的声音,”该人士说道。
“美国优先”迄今为止在新泽西州第12选区的民主党初选中投入最多,该组织支持了亚当·哈马维——一位曾在加沙一家医院做志愿者的整形外科医生。哈马维最初作为政治素人开启竞选,但在“美国优先”投入160万美元后,他在十多位候选人中脱颖而出,如今有望进入国会,因为该选区在11月的大选中 strongly 倾向民主党。
“美国优先”投放的广告突出了哈马维的医疗背景,包括他在加沙的经历,以及他获得桑德斯的支持——桑德斯在一段广告中表示,哈马维有“勇气反抗政治建制派”。
“‘美国优先’在这次选举中提供了极大的帮助,”哈马维竞选团队的高级策略师文森特·韦尔图乔说道。“这真是一个惊喜,我们对此非常高兴。”
哈马维曾在奥马尔·阿卜杜勒-拉赫曼的审判中担任辩方证人,这位失明的神职人员因与1993年世贸中心爆炸案相关的煽动性阴谋罪被定罪。哈马维的竞选团队表示,他谴责阿卜杜勒-拉赫曼的行为和言论,称哈马维在被捕前就认识这位神职人员,两人同属新泽西州一个关系密切的穆斯林社区。
哈马维初选中的第二名、东布兰斯维克市市长布拉德·科恩自称是AIPAC成员,他明确支持以色列,但表示民主党应将重点放在选民日常更关心的问题上。他表示,对AIPAC未在本次初选中投入资金感到“失望”,称这是一场“本可以发挥其影响力的竞选”。
“我根本无法与‘美国优先’的投入水平竞争,”科恩说道。“(哈马维)无处不在。”
联合民主项目的发言人多顿拒绝置评。
科恩和其他与“美国优先”支持的候选人竞争的候选人认为,该组织的支出违背了进步人士长期以来消除政治领域大额资金的承诺。
在该组织为纽约州第7国会选区的巴尔德斯的初选投入资金后,另外两位候选人——布鲁克林区长安东尼奥·雷诺索和市议员朱莉·元——联合发表声明,指责巴尔德斯违背了拒绝超级政治行动委员会支持的誓言。“这种虚伪令人震惊,”他们说道。
韦尔图乔表示,竞选财务改革仍是进步人士的“北极星”,但他们“有义务动用手头的每一种工具来赢得胜利”。
“美国优先”的批评者也越来越关注该组织的一位捐赠者、德克萨斯州商人侯赛因“萨姆”马鲁克,因为除了向该组织捐赠62.5万美元外,马鲁克还在2024年向该州的两大共和党领导人——州长格雷格·雅培和副州长丹·帕特里克捐赠了12.5万美元。元与雷诺索表示,巴尔德斯“受益于一个由MAGA共和党大捐赠者资助的超级政治行动委员会”。埃斯帕利亚特在与阿维拉·谢瓦利耶的辩论中多次提及马鲁克。
阿维拉·谢瓦利耶在其中一场辩论中表示,她直到在《纽约时报》上看到相关报道才知道“美国优先”的支出。但她表示,这并不让她感到意外。
“有民主党捐赠者存在是合理的,他们和民主党选民一样,想要反击AIPAC及其对我们民主的影响力,”她说道。
马鲁克是一位汽车行业企业家,他表示自己出生在约旦的一个巴勒斯坦难民营。在回应通过电子邮件提出的一系列问题时,他称自己是一名“独立商人”,其政治捐赠遵循的信念包括“美国在中东的外交政策应尊重该地区所有人民的尊严”。
“我理解人们可能会从党派立场解读我的捐赠,但这从来不是我的行事方式——我支持的是人,而非政党,多年来我一直支持不同背景的领导人,因为我相信他们的价值观会加强我们伟大的德克萨斯州和我们的国家,”他说道。
“美国优先”的发言人克里格淡化了该超级政治行动委员会受任何单一捐赠者约束的说法。他表示,该组织“从众多人群中筹集资金——这里没有亿万富翁发号施令——所以参与者的背景真正多样化”。
“美国优先”拒绝透露其下一个目标是哪些初选。但反AIPAC运动中的许多人都将目光投向了密苏里州布什的初选——她将挑战2024年击败她的众议员韦斯利·贝尔——以及密歇根州的参议院初选。两场初选均在8月4日举行。
在密歇根州,AIPAC的超级政治行动委员会已斥资超700万美元支持众议员黑利·史蒂文斯,对抗底特律前卫生总监阿卜杜勒·赛义德。赛义德是以色列的直言不讳的批评者,他自称对AIPAC来说“构成威胁”。
克里格表示,密歇根州的情况“恰好是像我们这样的组织能够发挥作用的地方”。
How a new super PAC formed to counter AIPAC is fueling democratic socialists’ wins
2026-07-01T08:00:25.638Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/07/01/politics/american-priorities-aipac-democratic-socialists
Two years ago, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee spent millions of dollars through its super PAC to defeat two vocal critics of Israel, Reps. Cori Bush of Missouri and Jamaal Bowman of New York.
“AIPAC, I’m coming to tear your kingdom down,” Bush vowed in her concession speech.
Now AIPAC’s opponents believe that they are on the offensive – and a new group called American Priorities has a lot to do with it.
The super PAC, which started just six months ago, has quickly emerged as an influential force in House Democratic primaries, spending at least $5.6 million to boost Democrats who are fiercely critical of Israel, its war in Gaza and AIPAC’s influence in Democratic primaries. American Priorities helped two democratic socialists – Darializa Avila Chevalier and Claire Valdez – pull off wins in the recent New York primaries and also chipped in to help a third, Melat Kiros, defeat Colorado Rep. Diana DeGette on Tuesday.
The group’s spending is still dwarfed by that of AIPAC’s super PAC, the United Democracy Project, which has spent at least $34 million this election cycle. The two sides have not gone head-to-head in many primaries yet, picking their fights more pragmatically. But to progressives who had gotten used to being vastly outspent, American Priorities has become something of an unexpected savior.
The 2024 election year was a “bruising cycle for us, but it was a real building cycle,” said Usamah Andrabi, a spokesperson for Justice Democrats, a progressive group that is often aligned with American Priorities in primaries. “We are seeing this cycle the fruits of this labor.”
A spokesperson for American Priorities said the group was created out of a belief that there was “nothing close to a countervailing force” to AIPAC in primaries.
“The idea was to build a spending force that would back people who speak plainly about what most Democratic voters – and indeed most Americans – already believe, so that telling the truth stops being the thing that gets you outspent three to one,” the spokesperson, Greg Krieg, said in a statement.
American Priorities poses an ideological test for progressives who have long denounced not just AIPAC’s spending, but also all big money in politics. So far, that has been the basis of AIPAC’s response to American Priorities.
“The same scrutiny that’s applied to the AIPAC super PAC should be applied to anti-Israel dark money as well,” Patrick Dorton, a spokesman for United Democracy Project, told CNN in response to requests for comment for this story.
Asked whether American Priorities was having an impact on AIPAC’s strategy in primaries, Dorton said the super PAC makes “our own independent decisions based on evaluating each race.”
Bush, who is making a comeback bid for her old seat in an August primary, told CNN recently that she does not know much about American Priorities but that AIPAC’s opponents now know they “need to go full force” to combat its influence.
“I truly believe that we need to get the big money out of politics,” Bush said. “But right now, having a counterweight to AIPAC and … the big cryptocurrency folks and big real estate, big pharma, the war profiteers, ICE contractors … will be useful to us because often one of the issues we have is we are grassroots.”
American Priorities has raised $5.5 million as of June 3, according to its filings with the Federal Election Commission. That’s a modest sum compared to the eight-figure funding of AIPAC’s super PAC, which spent nearly $6 million alone in one recent House primary in Maryland in which its preferred candidate won.
But American Priorities’ willingness to spend upwards of $1 million in individual races – and to spend at critical junctures in campaigns – represents a new capacity for the anti-AIPAC left. Operatives say its aggressiveness was especially crucial in Avila Chevalier’s primary, where she faced a fierce late ad blitz – partly funded by AIPAC – focused on her past controversial tweets.
American Priorities ran multiple TV and digital ads in the primary’s final days, emphasizing Avila Chevalier’s support from New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani and contrasting with the incumbent, Rep. Adriano Espaillat, as tougher against US Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
Justice Democrats said in a statement that Avila Chevalier would not have won “without the support of American Priorities.”
American Priorities has spent in eight primaries, including for democratic socialist Chris Rabb for an open House seat in Philadelphia and Durham County Commissioner Nida Allam in her primary challenge to North Carolina Rep. Valerie Foushee. Rabb won while Allam’s race has been American Priorities’ only loss so far, coming after the group spent $1 million backing her.
The group made a late play in Tuesday’s Colorado primaries, spending $150,000 on TV ads boosting Kiros in the final week.
Justice Democrats and American Priorities are part of a constellation of groups that are working more closely after 2024 to combat AIPAC, also including Sen. Bernie Sanders’ political team and the Institute for Middle East Understanding Policy Project. Amira Hassan, political director for a new PAC affiliated with the policy project, said “one of the big lessons in this cycle is it takes all of us being on the same page and being highly, highly in coordination.”
American Priorities, however, has stood out for its money.
The super PAC’s top donors, at $1 million apiece, have been Omer Hassan and Mohammad Waqas Javed. Little is publicly known about them, and the information they have provided the FEC is minimal: Waqas identifies as a resident of New York City and the CEO of Showcase Commerce Inc. – a company with little public footprint – while Hassan identifies as a retiree from Redwood City, California.
Both were also top donors to a super PAC that supported Mamdani’s 2025 mayoral campaign, giving about $250,000 each.
Neither donor responded to requests for comment. But a person close to American Priorities, speaking on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to publicly discuss its donors, said many of its contributors weren’t very politically active until Mamdani’s campaign, which was the “moment that inspired them and brought them into the fold.” Emboldened by Mamdani’s win, they began strategizing about how to influence the party nationally on the issue of Palestinian human rights.
They also want to show the Democratic Party should not take Muslims for granted, the person said.
“Part of it’s Palestine, part of it’s countering AIPAC, but it’s also about giving a long-overlooked community, which is critical to any Democratic majority, a real voice in our politics,” the person said.
American Priorities has spent the most so far in the Democratic primary for New Jersey’s 12th District, where it backed Adam Hamawy, a plastic surgeon who volunteered at a Gaza hospital during the war. Hamawy started the primary as a political unknown, but after $1.6 million in spending from American Priorities, he finished ahead of a dozen other candidates and is now likely headed to Congress because the district heavily favors Democrats in November.
American Priorities ran ads that highlighted Hamawy’s medical background, including in Gaza, and his support from Sanders, who said in one spot that Hamawy has “the guts to stand up to the political establishment.”
“American Priorities was extremely helpful in this election,” said Vincent Vertuccio, a senior strategist for Hamawy’s campaign. “It was a really pleasant surprise and something that we’re really glad to see.”
Hamawy served as a defense witness in the trial of Omar Abdel-Rahman, a blind cleric who was convicted of seditious conspiracy in a case related to the 1993 World Trade Center bombing. Hamawy’s campaign has said he condemns Abdel-Rahman’s actions and rhetoric, saying Hamawy knew the cleric before his arrest as part of a closeknit Muslim community in New Jersey.
The runner-up in Hamawy’s primary, East Brunswick Mayor Brad Cohen, is a self-described AIPAC member who was open in his support for Israel but said the party should focus on issues more important to voters on a daily basis. He said he was “disappointed” AIPAC did not spend in the primary, calling it a “race where their influence would’ve mattered.”
“I could not nearly have competed on that level” with American Priorities, Cohen said. “(Hamawy) was everywhere.”
Dorton, the spokesman for the United Democracy Project, declined to comment.
Cohen and other candidates who have gone up against candidates backed by American Priorities argue its spending flies in the face of long-running progressive promises to rid politics of big money.
After the group started spending in the primary for Valdez in New York’s 7th Congressional District, two other candidates – Brooklyn Borough President Antonio Reynoso and City Councilwoman Julie Won – issued a joint statement accusing Valdez of breaking a pledge to reject super PAC support. “The hypocrisy is staggering,” they said.
Vertuccio said that campaign finance reform is still progressives’ “north star,” but they “have an obligation to use every tool at our disposal to win” in the meantime.
Critics of American Priorities have also increasingly focused on one of the group’s donors, Texas businessman Hussein “Sam” Mahrouq, because in addition to giving the group $625,000, Mahrouq also donated $125,000 in 2024 to his state’s top two Republican leaders, Gov. Greg Abbott and Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick. Won and Reynoso said Valdez was “benefiting from a super PAC funded by a MAGA Republican megadonor.” Espaillat alluded to Mahrouq multiple times in debates against Avila Chevalier.
Avila Chevalier, speaking in one of those debates, said she did not know about American Priorities’ spending until she read about it in The New York Times. But she said it did not surprise her.
“It makes sense that there are Democratic donors out there, who, just like Democratic voters, want to fight back against AIPAC and its influence over our democracy,” she said.
Mahrouq is an auto industry entrepreneur who has said he was born in a Palestinian refugee camp in Jordan. In response to a list of questions over email, he called himself an “independent businessman” whose political giving is guided by beliefs including “a US foreign policy in the Middle East that respects the dignity of all people in the region.”
“I understand people may try to read contributions through a partisan lens, but that’s never been my approach – I support people, not parties, and over the years I’ve backed leaders from different backgrounds whose values I believed would strengthen the great state of Texas and our country,” he said.
Krieg, the American Priorities spokesperson, downplayed the idea that the super PAC was beholden to any single donor. He said the group “raises from a pool of people – there’s no billionaire dictating decisions here – so there’s real variety in who’s involved.”
American Priorities declined to say which primaries it is targeting next. But many in the anti-AIPAC movement are looking ahead to Bush’s primary in Missouri against Rep. Wesley Bell, who defeated her in 2024, and the primary for Senate in Michigan. Both are on August 4.
In Michigan, AIPAC’s super PAC has already spent over $7 million boosting Rep. Haley Stevens against Abdul El-Sayed, the former Detroit public health director. El-Sayed is a vocal critic of Israel who has touted himself as “dangerous” to AIPAC.
Krieg said the circumstances in Michigan make it “exactly the kind of place a group like ours ends up mattering.”
发表回复