众议院共和党人背离特朗普,阻挠保护其关税权力的动议


更新于:2026年2月10日 / 美国东部时间晚上10:16 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻

华盛顿 — 周二,一群众议院共和党人违抗党内领导层,否决了一项关键程序性投票,该投票本可阻止议员推翻特朗普总统的全面全球关税政策。

在共和党领导层与白宫试图说服持不同意见者的过程中,将投票推迟了7小时后,三名共和党议员与所有民主党议员联手挫败了这一努力。

周一,众议院规则委员会以党派路线投票通过了一项条款,禁止议员在7月31日前提出挑战特朗普关税的决议。该条款被附加在一项与关税无关的立法的程序性决议(即“规则”)中。在对该立法进行最终通过投票之前,众议院首先必须批准这项规则,而这通常由多数党通过。然而,共和党人目前的多数优势极其微弱,在全院投票中只能承受一次叛党。

此前,针对关税反对决议的禁令已于1月到期,民主党人计划本周就终止特朗普对加拿大的关税进行投票,在此背景下,共和党人将该条款插入规则中。

“这不是规则的用途,”加利福尼亚州共和党众议员凯文·凯利周二在投票前表示。“规则是为了将法案提交至全院审议并设定辩论参数。其目的不是为了偷偷加入无关条款,以牺牲我们成员的利益来扩大领导层的权力。”

肯塔基州共和党众议员托马斯·马西和内布拉斯加州共和党众议员唐·培根也加入了凯利的行列,反对关税相关条款。

去年年初,特朗普利用其紧急权力对来自加拿大、墨西哥和中国的商品征收高额关税,指责这些国家未能充分阻止芬太尼和非法移民流入美国。符合美墨加自由贸易协定的加拿大商品可豁免这些关税,但随着两国关系恶化,特朗普多次威胁要对加拿大施加额外关税。总统还威胁要对数十个其他国家征收更高关税,以解决他认为的不公平贸易做法。

参议院去年曾两次投票阻止特朗普对加拿大征收关税,当时有四名共和党人与民主党人共同投票。

但这些投票几乎没有实际效力,因为总统可以否决任何反对意见,而国会两院需要三分之二多数才能推翻总统否决,这一可能性不大。

最高法院在11月的口头辩论中似乎对特朗普单方面施加关税的权力持怀疑态度。该法院对这一争议的裁决可能在6月底或7月初夏季休会前的任何时间做出。

“这样做的理由是,只是将其延长到7月,以允许最高法院对这个所有人都在关注和等待的案件做出裁决。这个过程一直在进行。我认为允许这一过程继续是合乎逻辑的,”路易斯安那州共和党人、众议院议长迈克·约翰逊在其每周新闻发布会上告诉记者。

路易斯安那州共和党人、众议院多数党领袖史蒂夫·斯卡利斯表示,在程序性投票前,领导层和白宫正向成员施压,要求他们服从。

尽管共和党成员批评这一阻挠行为,约翰逊仍对能够最终通过该法案保持乐观。

杰拉·布朗对本报道有贡献。

House Republicans break with Trump, blocking a bid to protect his tariff authority

Updated on: February 10, 2026 / 10:16 PM EST / CBS News

Washington — A group of House Republicans defied leadership on Tuesday to sink a key procedural vote that would have barred lawmakers from overturning President Trump’s sweeping global tariffs.

Three Republicans joined all Democrats to defeat the effort, after GOP leaders delayed the vote by seven hours as they and the White House tried to sway holdouts.

In a party-line vote on Monday, the House Rules Committee approved language that would prevent members from bringing up resolutions to challenge Mr. Trump’s tariffs through July 31. The language was attached to a procedural resolution — known as a rule — on unrelated legislation. Before a vote on final passage on the legislation, the House first had to approve the rule, which is typically passed by the majority party. Republicans, however, have a razor-thin majority and can only afford one defection during floor votes.

The move to insert language into the rule comes after a previous ban on resolutions disapproving of the tariffs expired in January, and as Democrats planned to force a vote on terminating Mr. Trump’s tariffs on Canada this week.

“This isn’t what rules are for,” Republican Rep. Kevin Kiley of California said Tuesday before the vote. “The rule is to bring bills to the floor and set the parameters for debate. The purpose is not to sneak in unrelated language that expands the power of leadership at the expense of our members.”

Kiley was joined by GOP Reps. Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Don Bacon of Nebraska in opposing the tariff language.

Early last year, Mr. Trump used his emergency powers to impose steep tariffs on goods from Canada, Mexico and China, accusing the countries of not doing enough to stop the flow of fentanyl and undocumented migrants into the United States. Canadian goods that are compliant with U.S.-Mexico-Canada free trade agreement are exempt from those tariffs, though Mr. Trump has repeatedly threatened to impose additional levies against Canada as relations between the two countries sour. The president has also threatened higher tariffs on dozens of other countries to resolve what he views as unfair trade practices.

The Senate voted twice last year to block Mr. Trump from imposing tariffs on Canada, with four Republicans voting with Democrats.

But the votes carry little weight beyond offering a rare rebuke of the president by Republicans as the president can veto any disapproval. Both chambers would need a two-thirds majority to overturn a presidential veto, which is unlikely.

The Supreme Court appeared skeptical of Mr. Trump’s authority to unilaterally impose tariffs during oral arguments in November. The court’s decision in the dispute could come anytime before its summer recess begins in late June or early July.

“The rationale for this, for just extending this for a little bit longer to July, is to allow the Supreme Court to rule on this case that everybody’s watching and waiting for. That process has been playing out. I think it’s logical to allow that to continue,” House Speaker Mike Johnson, a Louisiana Republican, told reporters at his weekly news conference.

House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, a Louisiana Republican, said leadership and the White House were putting pressure on members to fall in line ahead of the procedural vote.

Johnson remained optimistic that they could get it across the finish line, even as GOP members criticized the blockade.

Jaala Brown contributed to this report.

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注