众议院否决众议员拉希达·特莱布针对黎巴嫩的第二项战争权力决议


2026年6月30日 / 美国东部时间下午2:32 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻
作者:凯特琳·伊利克 政治记者

凯特琳·伊利克是哥伦比亚广播公司新闻网驻华盛顿特区的政治记者。她曾供职于《华盛顿考察家报》和《国会山报》,并入选美国国家新闻基金会2022年保罗·米勒华盛顿报道奖学金项目。

阅读完整简历

华盛顿讯——众议院周二第二次投票反对限制特朗普总统在未经国会授权的情况下动用美军参与黎巴嫩境内军事行动的权力。

这项由密歇根州民主党众议员拉希达·特莱布提出的战争权力决议,是本月早些时候一项未能通过的法案的更新版本,当时民主党领导层就已对该法案表示反对。

周二的投票结果为189票赞成、235票反对,否决了限制总统军事权限的提案。

新版本获得了民主党领导层的支持,原本要求总统在决议通过后的7天内将美军撤出“黎巴嫩境内的任何敌对行动”。该决议并不会限制所有军事活动,其中明确规定:“本联合决议案的任何内容均不得被解释为阻止或限制与黎巴嫩武装部队的安全合作,或保护外交设施。”

最初版本的决议曾要求总统在决议通过后的7天内将美军“撤出黎巴嫩”。

众议院少数党领袖哈基姆·杰弗里斯、民主党党鞭凯瑟琳·克拉克以及民主党核心小组主席皮特·阿吉拉尔在本月早些时候的一份解释调整原因的声明中表示:“目前,没有美国军人参与黎巴嫩境内的作战行动或敌对活动。”

黎巴嫩南部的紧张局势威胁到美伊之间的最终和平协议。作为华盛顿和德黑兰结束战争协议的一部分,伊朗和真主党要求以色列军队完全撤出该地区。但上周以色列和黎巴嫩政府签署的结束黎巴嫩南部战斗的协议,将以色列从该地区撤军与真主党解除武装挂钩。然而,真主党拒绝放弃武器。

特莱布周一在议会辩论中表示,此次投票旨在“立即终止美国参与以色列政府针对黎巴嫩人民的暴力袭击”。她指责以色列政府通过在黎巴嫩南部的轰炸行动实施“种族清洗和领土扩张”。

众议院外交事务委员会资深成员、纽约州民主党众议员格雷戈里·米克斯表示,更新后的版本“纠正了此前法案的缺陷”。

他说:“这不会损害美国在黎巴嫩的国家安全利益,同时确保我们不会卷入另一场不符合我们国家利益的无休止战争。我要明确指出,据我所知,美国军队目前并未在黎巴嫩与以色列军方进行任何积极的敌对行动。尽管如此,这项决议确保了这种情况若要改变,必须经过国会授权。”

众议院外交事务委员会主席、佛罗里达州共和党众议员布莱恩·马斯特表示,更新后的决议“这次不像上次那么荒谬……但仍然非常荒谬”。他称该决议是“恐怖分子的胜利”。

马斯特说:“真主党是阻碍以色列和黎巴嫩之间实现和平的唯一阻挠者。黎巴嫩政府希望停止战斗,以色列也希望停止战斗。那谁希望战斗继续下去?就是这项决议所支持的那个实体,也就是真主党。”

House sinks Rep. Rashida Tlaib’s second war powers resolution on Lebanon

June 30, 2026 / 2:32 PM EDT / CBS News
By Caitlin Yilek Politics Reporter
Caitlin Yilek is a politics reporter at CBSNews.com, based in Washington, D.C. She previously worked for the Washington Examiner and The Hill, and was a member of the 2022 Paul Miller Washington Reporting Fellowship with the National Press Foundation.

Read Full Bio

Washington— For a second time, the House on Tuesday voted against limiting President Trump’s authority to engage the U.S. military in warfare in Lebanon without congressional authorization.

The war powers resolution, which was introduced by Democratic Rep. Rashida Tlaib of Michigan, is an updated version of a measure that also failed earlier this month after Democratic leaders came out against it.

Tuesday’s vote ended with 189 voting in favor and 235 voting in opposition of constraining the president’s authority.

The new version, which had the approval of Democratic leaders, would have directed the president to remove U.S. armed forces “from any hostilities in Lebanon” within seven days of the measure’s adoption. It would not have constrained all military activity, stipulating, “Nothing in this concurrent resolution may be construed to prevent or limit security cooperation with the Lebanese Armed Forces or the protection of diplomatic facilities.”

The original measure would have directed the president to remove U.S. armed forces “from Lebanon” within seven days of the measure’s adoption.

“Currently, there are no U.S. service members involved in combat operations or hostilities in Lebanon,” House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, Democratic Whip Katherine Clark and Democratic Caucus Chair Pete Aguilar said in a statement earlier this month explaining the change.

Tensions in southern Lebanon have threatened a final peace deal between the U.S. and Iran. Iran and Hezbollah have demanded the full withdrawal of Israeli forces from the region as part of the deal between Washington and Tehran to end the war. But an agreement signed last week between the Israeli and Lebanese governments to end the fighting in southern Lebanon links Israel’s removal of forces from the area with Hezbollah’s disarmament. Hezbollah, however, has refused to give up its weapons.

Tlaib said Monday during floor debate that the vote was about “immediately ending all U.S. participation in the Israeli government’s violent assault against the people of Lebanon.” She accused the Israeli government of carrying out an “ethnic cleansing and territory expansion” through its bombing campaign in southern Lebanon.

Democratic Rep. Gregory Meeks of New York, the ranking member on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, said the updated version “corrected the flaws” of the earlier measure.

“It will not infringe upon America’s national security interests in Lebanon, while ensuring we stay out of another forever war that is not in our national interest,” he said. “I will state for the record that, to my knowledge, United States forces are not currently engaged in any active hostilities in Lebanon with the Israeli military. Nonetheless, this resolution ensures that does not change without congressional authorization.”

Republican Rep. Brian Mast of Florida, the chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, said the updated measure is “not quite as ridiculous this time as it was the last time … but still significantly ridiculous.” He called the resolution “a win for terrorists.”

“Hezbollah is the one holdout that is standing in the way of peace between Israel and Lebanon,” Mast said. “The Lebanese government wants the fighting to stop. Israel wants the fighting to stop. Who is it that wants the fighting to continue? That would be the one entity that is supported by this resolution, and that’s Hezbollah.”

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注