2026年6月29日 美国东部时间13:52 / 福克斯新闻
这份以5票赞成、4票反对的裁决认定，联邦法律并未规定选票必须在何时收到才能被计入有效票
作者：安德鲁·马克·米勒 福克斯新闻
发布于2026年6月29日美国东部时间下午1:52
周一，最高法院大法官艾米·科尼·巴雷特出具多数意见裁决支持密西西比州一项法律，允许在选举日后收到的邮寄选票仍可计入选举结果，随即在社交媒体上遭到保守派的强烈抨击。
此次裁决以5票对4票作出，由特朗普总统任命的巴雷特撰写多数意见，首席大法官约翰·罗伯茨以及索尼娅·索托马约尔、埃琳娜·卡根和凯坦吉·布朗·杰克逊大法官加入了这一意见。
巴雷特的意见认为，就联邦法律而言，选举日是选民必须完成对心仪候选人选择的截止日期，但相关法律并未规定选票必须在何时收到才能被视为有效。
巴雷特随即遭到保守派评论人士和政客的批评。
艾米·科尼·巴雷特称罗伊诉韦德案是法官“强行解读进”宪法的“飘忽不定”裁决
2025年9月10日，美国最高法院大法官艾米·科尼·巴雷特在加利福尼亚州约巴林达的尼克松总统图书馆及博物馆接受尼克松基金会董事会成员休·休伊特的采访。（保罗·伯瑟巴赫/媒体新闻集团/橙县纪事报）
“这一意见大错特错，”共和党参议员埃里克·施密特在X平台上发帖称，“巴雷特大法官与自由派大法官联手认定，联邦选举法不会 preempt 那些允许统计逾期邮寄选票的州。这对选举诚信而言极为糟糕。这也是我们必须通过完整的《拯救美国法案》（SAVE American Act）的又一理由。”
“巴雷特是自苏特以来最糟糕的保守派司法灾难，”保守派作家汉斯·曼克在X平台上发帖称，“区别在于，几乎没有保守派曾对苏特抱有太多期待，而巴雷特本应是最高法院的未来。最糟糕的是，她还将在未来40年里推行左翼政策。”
“艾米·科尼·巴雷特在太多备受瞩目的案件中持续令人失望，”政治评论员乔希·哈默在X平台上发帖称。
“还记得选举日吗？”共和党众议员艾贝·哈马德的办公室在X平台上发帖称，“巴雷特大法官出具的这一灾难性最高法院裁决，确保我们会持续背离选举日原则——因为我们神圣的选举将被无休止的邮寄选票和永无止境的计票拖入泥潭。”
“艾米·科尼·巴雷特是所有共和党籍大法官中最差的选择，”退役美国陆军上尉赛斯·凯谢尔在X平台上发帖称，“包括罗伯茨在内都是如此。她太令人失望了。”
记者手记：共和党考虑“摧毁” filibuster 以通过特朗普的《拯救法案》
2026年6月18日，华盛顿特区美国最高法院大楼上空乌云密布。（奇普·索莫德维拉/盖蒂图片社）
“她援引了《联邦党人文集》第59篇中的亚历山大·汉密尔顿言论，谈及建国者的意图，并反复以历史为指导，”宪法律师克里斯安·霍尔在X平台上发帖称，“但当历史证据变得不便时，巴雷特会悄悄将其搁置一旁。巴雷特将司法激进主义伪装成选择性原旨主义。”
诚实选举项目执行主任杰森·斯尼德在一份声明中表示，该裁决“令人深感失望，未切中要害”。
“联邦法律明确规定：所有选票必须在选举日前收到才能被计入，”斯尼德写道，“最高法院错失了强化选举诚信的重大机会，反而站在了加州式混乱的一边。正如阿利托大法官在异议意见中明确指出的那样，看着选举日后陆续收到的选票翻转选举结果，只会损害公众对我们政府体系的信任。”
前联邦选举委员会委员、美国企业研究所埃德温·米斯三世法治研究所高级法律研究员汉斯·冯·斯帕科夫斯基在一份声明中称，该裁决“令人极度失望”。
“正如塞缪尔·阿利托大法官在其联合其他三名大法官的异议意见中所说，艾米·科尼·巴雷特大法官的意见不仅与这些法律的字面文本、历史惯例和先例不符，还‘有可能进一步削弱美国人对选举诚信的信心’，”冯·斯帕科夫斯基写道。
这一裁决促使许多人重申《拯救法案》的重要性——这是特朗普长期以来推动的选民身份证和公民身份验证立法，包括共和党众议员格雷格·斯特鲁布在X平台上发帖称：“参议院的议事阻挠规则是唯一的障碍。摧毁它！”
点击此处下载福克斯新闻应用程序
[image_4]
2020年10月12日，最高法院提名人艾米·科尼·巴雷特在国会山参议院司法委员会的确认听证会上宣誓就职。（佚名）
特朗普在Truth Social平台上对该裁决作出回应，称这是“巨大损失”，并强调所有选民必须出示带照片的身份证件和公民身份证明，且除特定例外情况外“不应存在邮寄选票”。
“没有任何理由让政客或其他人反对以上三项要求，”特朗普写道，“反对的唯一原因——作弊！”
特朗普补充道：“众议院已经三次通过了这项至关重要的法案。美国参议院似乎无法做到这一点。在我们国家正经历一场比第一次世界大战、第二次世界大战、珍珠港事件或911事件都更危险的强大共产主义运动之际，所有民主党人，以及我们的五名共和党参议院摇摆票：丽莎·穆尔科斯基、苏珊·柯林斯、汤姆·蒂利斯、比尔·卡西迪和米奇·麦康奈尔，必须投票拯救我们的国家。不能再有任何借口了！”
福克斯新闻数字频道的罗伯特·施马德和安德斯·哈格斯塔姆为本报告撰稿。
安德鲁·马克·米勒是福克斯新闻记者。可在推特@andymarkmiller关注他，或发送爆料邮件至AndrewMark.Miller@Fox.com。
Conservatives revolt after Trump-appointed Barrett joins liberals in ‘shockingly wrong’ mail ballot ruling
2026-06-29 13:52 EDT / Fox News
The 5-4 decision held that federal law sets no standard for when ballots must be received to be counted
By Andrew Mark Miller Fox News
Published June 29, 2026 1:52pm EDT
Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett faced the wrath of conservatives on social media on Monday after she authored the majority opinion ruling in favor of a Mississippi law allowing mail-in ballots to be counted in elections even if they are received after Election Day.
The court was split 5-4 on the ruling with Barrett, appointed by President Donald Trump, writing the majority opinion joined by Chief Justice John Roberts, as well as justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson.
Barrett’s opinion held that Election Day, in the context of federal law, set a deadline for when voters must make a choice regarding their preferred candidate but said that relevant laws have no standard for when ballots must be received to be considered valid.
Barrett was quickly criticized by conservative commentators and politicians.
AMY CONEY BARRETT CALLS ROE V WADE ‘FREE-FLOATING’ DECISION THAT JUDGES ‘READ INTO’ CONSTITUTION
U.S. Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett is interviewed by Nixon Foundation board member Hugh Hewitt at the Nixon Presidential Library and Museum in Yorba Linda, Calif., on Sept. 10, 2025.(Paul Bersebach/MediaNews Group/Orange County Register)
“A shockingly wrong opinion,” Republican Sen. Eric Schmitt posted on X. “Justice Barrett joins with the liberal justices to hold that federal election law does not preempt states who allow late mail-in ballots to be counted. This is terrible for election integrity. Another reason we must pass the full SAVE American Act.”
“Barrett is the biggest conservative judicial disaster since Souter,” conservative author Hans Mahncke posted on X. “The difference is that few conservatives expected much from Souter whereas Barrett was supposed to be the future of the Court. The worst part is that she’ll be there pushing leftist policies for another 40 years.”
“Amy Coney Barrett continues to disappoint in far too many high-profile cases,” political commentator Josh Hammer posted on X.
“Remember Election Day?” Republican Rep. Abe Hamadeh’s office posted on X. “This disastrous SCOTUS decision, authored by Justice Barrett, guarantees we’ll keep drifting away from it — as our sacred elections get bogged down by endless mail-in ballots and never-ending counts.”
“Amy Coney Barrett is the worst choice ever among all GOP justices,” retired U.S. Army captain Seth Keshel posted on X. “And that includes Roberts. What a disappointment she is.”
REPORTER’S NOTEBOOK: GOP WEIGHS ‘NUKING’ FILIBUSTER TO PASS TRUMP’S SAVE ACT
Rain clouds roll over the United States Supreme Court building in Washington, D.C., on June 18, 2026.(Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
“She quotes Alexander Hamilton in Federalist No. 59, speaks of the Framers’ intent, and repeatedly invokes history as its guide,” Constitutional attorney Krisanne Hall posted on X. “But when the historical evidence becomes inconvenient, Barrett quietly sets it aside. Barrett engages in judicial activism disguised as selective originalism.”
Jason Snead, executive director of Honest Elections Project, said in a statement that the ruling is “deeply disappointing and misses the mark.”
“Federal law is clear: all ballots must be received by Election Day to be counted,” Snead wrote. “The Court missed a major opportunity to reinforce election integrity and instead sides with California-style chaos. As Justice Alito makes clear in his dissent, watching ballots trickle in after Election Day and flip races does nothing but damage public trust in our system of government.”
Hans von Spakovsky, a former Federal Election Commissioner and Senior Legal Fellow in AAF’s Edwin Meese III Institute for the Rule of Law, said in a statement that the ruling is a “grave disappointment.”
“As Justice Samuel Alito says in his dissent, joined by three other justices, not only is Justice Amy Comey Barrett’s opinion inconsistent with the plain text of those laws and historical practice and precedents, it ‘risks further undermining Americans’ confidence in election integrity,’” von Spakovsky wrote.
The ruling prompted many to reiterate the importance of the SAVE Act, Trump’s long-sought voter ID and citizenship verification legislation, including Republican Rep. Greg Steube who posted on X, “The Senate filibuster is the only thing standing in the way. Nuke it!”
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
[image_4]
Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett is sworn in during a confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington, on Oct. 12, 2020.(Unknown)
Trump reacted to the ruling on Truth Social, calling it a “tremendous loss” and stressing the importance that all voters must show a photo ID and proof of citizenship and that there should be “no mail-in” ballots except for specific exceptions.
“There is no excuse for a politician, or otherwise, to be against the above three requirements,” Trump wrote. “There is only one reason to oppose — CHEATING!”
Trump added, “The House of Representatives has approved this vital Act, THREE TIMES. The United States Senate seems unable to do so. In a time when there is a powerful Communist Movement taking place in our Country, one more dangerous than World War I, World War II, Pearl Harbor, or September 11th, all Dumocrats, and our five Republican Senate Hold Outs, Lisa Murkowski, Susan Collins, Thom Tillis, Bill Cassidy, and Mitch McConnell must vote to SAVE OUR COUNTRY. There can be no more excuses!”
Fox News Digital’s Robert Schmad and Anders Hagstrom contributed to this report.
Andrew Mark Miller is a reporter at Fox News. Find him on Twitter @andymarkmiller and email tips to AndrewMark.Miller@Fox.com.
发表回复