美国多州起诉加州标志性塑料包装法案


2026-06-23 / 路透社

作者:乔纳森·斯坦普尔

2026年6月23日 1:42 协调世界时 1小时前更新

image
2024年1月25日,美国加利福尼亚州阿卡迪亚市,工人们在回收中心等候。路透社/马里奥·安祖奥尼

6月23日(路透社)——17个美国州起诉加利福尼亚州,要求废除该州一项旨在限制一次性塑料使用、推动回收利用的新州法。

这些州均由共和党总检察长牵头,周一在加州萨克拉门托联邦法院提交诉状,指控加州试图通过其《塑料污染预防和包装生产者责任法案》,将自身的政策偏好“强加给整个国家”。

通过《每日案卷》新闻简报接收最新法律资讯,开启您的晨间阅读。点击此处订阅。

  • 该法案由民主党州长加文·纽瑟姆于2022年签署,于5月1日生效。法案要求生产商到2032年将包装和餐饮服务用品的一次性塑料使用量减少25%,并确保所有此类用品均可回收或可堆肥。
  • 以内布拉斯加州为首的各州表示,该法案实质性地加重了州际商业负担,违反了美国宪法的商业条款。
  • 他们还表示,该法案将推高消费者价格,通胀效应将尤其重创低收入美国人,因为生产商将转嫁转型各类产品和运营模式所需的“极高昂成本”。
  • 内布拉斯加州总检察长迈克·希格斯在一份声明中表示:“加州再次试图推行一项对美国其他地区造成负面影响的政策。如果不加制止,消费者将被迫为基本生活必需品支付更高费用。”
  • 全国批发商分销商协会也作为原告方参与诉讼。
  • 被告包括加州资源回收与回收部门主任佐伊·赫勒,以及负责实施该法案的“循环行动联盟”——这是一家“生产者责任组织”。这家非营利组织称,其同时也是科罗拉多州、马里兰州、明尼苏达州、俄勒冈州和华盛顿州唯一的此类组织。
  • 赫勒所在的加州资源回收局(CalRecycle)周二未立即回应置评请求。循环行动联盟也未立即回应类似的置评请求。

乔纳森·斯坦普尔在纽约报道;安德里亚·里奇编辑

我们的报道准则:汤姆森路透社信托原则。

US states sue California over landmark plastics packaging law

2026-06-23 / Reuters

By Jonathan Stempel

June 23, 2026 1:42 PM UTC Updated 1 hour ago

Workers wait at a recycling center in Arcadia, California, U.S., January 25, 2024. REUTERS/Mario Anzuoni

June 23 (Reuters) – California has been sued by 17 U.S. states, which are seeking to undo a new state law designed to limit ​the use of single-use plastic and promote recycling.

In a complaint filed ‌on Monday in the Sacramento, California federal court, the states, each with a Republican attorney general, accused California of trying to “impose its own policy preferences on the ​entire nation” with its Plastic Pollution Prevention and Packaging Producer Responsibility ​Act.

Jumpstart your morning with the latest legal news delivered straight to your inbox from The Daily Docket newsletter. Sign up here.

  • The law was signed by Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom in ⁠2022, and took effect on May 1. It requires producers to ​reduce single-use plastic for packaging and food service items by 25%, and ensure ​that all such items are recyclable or compostable by 2032.
  • States led by Nebraska said the law violates the U.S. Constitution’s Commerce Clause by substantially burdening interstate commerce.
  • They also ​said the law will boost prices for consumers, with inflationary effects ​hitting lower-income Americans especially hard, as producers pass on the “extremely expensive” costs of transforming a ‌wide ⁠range of products and practices.
  • “Once again, California is trying to enact a policy that negatively impacts the rest of the country,” Nebraska Attorney General Mike Hilgers said in a statement. “If California goes unchecked, consumers will be ​forced to pay ​more for basic ⁠necessities.”
  • The National Association of Wholesaler-Distributors is also a plaintiff.
  • Defendants include Zoe Heller, who is director of the California ​Department of Resources Recycling & Recovery, and the Circular Action ​Alliance, a “producer ⁠responsibility organization” charged with implementing the law. The nonprofit said it is also the only such organization in Colorado, Maryland, Minnesota, Oregon and Washington.
  • CalRecycle, as ⁠Heller’s office ​is known, did not immediately respond on ​Tuesday to a request for comment. The Circular Action Alliance did not immediately respond to ​a similar request.

Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Andrea Ricci

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注