文字记录:民主党众议员杰森·克劳做客《与玛格丽特·布伦南面对全国》节目,2026年6月21日
2026-06-21T12:27:17-0400 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻
以下是科罗拉多州民主党众议员杰森·克劳的采访文字记录,该采访于2026年6月21日在《与玛格丽特·布伦南面对全国》节目中播出。
玛格丽特·布伦南: 欢迎回到《面对全国》。现在我们来连线科罗拉多州民主党众议员杰森·克劳。祝您父亲节快乐。
众议员杰森·克劳(D-科罗拉多州): 谢谢,玛格丽特。
玛格丽特·布伦南: 议员先生,您任职于武装部队委员会和情报委员会,所以我想聊聊您的部分职责,尤其是情报领域的工作。我们刚刚采访了格雷厄姆参议员,谈及国家情报总监办公室高层的动向以及监控权限过期的问题。目前,比尔·普尔特担任代理国家情报总监。他被指控利用抵押贷款信息追踪总统的政治对手。我知道美国政府问责局目前正在调查此事,但他如今身处这个职位,可能会造成什么危害?如果有的话,民主党有没有权力阻止这一情况?
众议员克劳: 显然,我担心这个人是个政治打手,他最大的资历就是对唐纳德·特朗普忠心耿耿,愿意出手对付特朗普的敌人。但我更直接的担忧是,这个职位至关重要。他是我国情报机构的最高负责人。根据法律,国会规定该职位的人选必须具备丰富的情报工作经验,因为他们必须确保我们保护美国人的安全,而这恰恰是比尔·普尔特无法做到的。所以我每天都更担心美国人会面临风险,因为这个机构的负责人能力不足。
玛格丽特·布伦南: 但民主党真的会再次延长《外国情报监控法》的授权吗?您刚才也听到格雷厄姆参议员将这两个问题联系起来,称监控关键权限过期才是更大的风险。我知道该法案在众议院投票时,您曾为自己投票反对该监控工具的重新授权感到自豪。您认为民主党这边在此事上判断失误了吗?
众议员克劳: 不,完全没有。我的意思是,我之前一直都投票支持《外国情报监控法》。我在情报委员会任职,知道这项法案有多重要,但我不愿意为了该项目的临时延期,牺牲美国人的宪法权利、隐私和基本公民自由。我就是不愿意这么做。没错,这就是本届政府要求我们做的事。他们说,放弃你们的宪法权利,放弃美国人的权利和隐私,我们就能确保你们的安全。我的天,这就是专制政权的说辞。我不会这么做。我愿意讨论我们需要设置哪些监督机制。短期延期的话,我不会让他们给这个项目三年的实施期限。本届政府做了什么能让我们相信他们会遵纪守法?先进行短期延期,之后我们再谈。
玛格丽特·布伦南: 但作为情报委员会的民主党领导层主席,吉姆·海姆斯称他没有看到违规行为。您却说特朗普政府正在这么做?我的意思是,您这是在和本党领导层唱反调吗?
众议员克劳: 不,我没有和吉姆意见相左。吉姆和我经常沟通,我们在这件事上立场一致。有很多公开报道,多达数千起疑似违规事件。更具体地说,这些公开报道指控特朗普政府使用过滤工具——这都是公开信息——来绕过通常为保护美国人的隐私权和公民权利而设置的审查和搜查令要求。现在我们已经向特朗普政府提出要求,告诉我们这是错误的,向我们证明为什么这是错误的,如果我们能对此有信心,我们才能着手确定需要采取哪些措施。他们完全没有回应我们。那在没有任何回应、存在这些指控以及大量公开违规报道的情况下,我们为什么要盲目投票延长这个项目?我们这么做简直太荒谬了——
玛格丽特·布伦南: 好吧——
众议员克劳:——您知道,我们肩负着选民和美国民众的信任,我们不会辜负这份信任。
玛格丽特·布伦南: 好吧,在参议院方面,目前的博弈中,沃纳参议员表示他认为特朗普希望这项监控工具的授权继续过期,因为如果美国遭遇某种袭击,他就可以将责任推给民主党。您怎么看?另外,您需要什么条件才会同意重新授权《外国情报监控法》?因为我从您刚才的话里没听到解决方案。
众议员杰森·克劳: 没错,首先,我同意沃纳参议员的看法。我认为唐纳德·特朗普根本不在乎美国人的国家安全和人身安全。多年来,他的所作所为已经非常清楚:他不惜以美国公民的安危为代价,将国防、军队、情报机构和司法部当作政治武器,用来打击敌人、捞取政治资本。我的天,今年2月这家伙还想把我送进监狱,仅仅因为我告诉士兵们必须遵守法律,必须忠于他们的誓言——所以这是真的。我们需要从本届政府那里获得非常具体的保证。我想要知道真相:他们是否在违法,是否在绕过相关规定?第一,第二,增设保障措施。我们上次授权该项目时,增设了55项额外保障措施。从那以后,我们了解到还需要更多保障措施。
玛格丽特·布伦南: 但这一切都需要时间。
众议员杰森·克劳: 第三,短期延期,短期延期。不,这不需要花太多时间。他们只需几天就能向我们提供相关信息,我们就能弄清楚情况,然后就可以投票通过相关法案,快速解决问题。
玛格丽特·布伦南: 让我问问您,本周武装部队委员会还有其他消息。赫格西特部长宣布,美国将对美国在欧洲的军事部署进行为期六个月的评估。他威胁称,如果欧洲国家不增加军费开支,美国将削减对北约的会费。他还表示,北约不愿协助美国对伊朗发动空袭,这似乎与美国可能削减在欧洲驻军有关。您有没有收到相关信息,了解这意味着什么,部队会从哪里撤离?情况会是怎样?
众议员杰森·克劳: 好吧,本届政府在两党组成的武装部队委员会面前会很难办。该委员会以压倒性的两党共识明确表示,除非他们向委员会解释为什么撤军或调整部署符合我国的国家安全利益,否则不会同意任何从欧洲撤军或调整部署的计划。我们已经多次重申这一立场,上个月我们在审议年度国防预算时再次明确了这一点。所以他们既没有来找我们,也没有提供任何相关细节。我并不是一概反对调整驻军部署,但我反对那些不符合我国国家安全利益的调整。如果他们想在欧洲调动部队,没问题,我们可以展开讨论,但从欧洲撤军实际上会损害美国人的利益。
玛格丽特·布伦南: 我想问问您关于伊朗的问题。抵达瑞士的代表团乘坐的飞机机身上印有“Minab 168”字样,这指的是造成168人死亡的轰炸事件,其中大多数是学童。美国军方仍在调查此事,您能透露一下美国应承担什么责任,以及调查的进展吗?
众议员杰森·克劳: 是的,不幸的是,我能透露的不多。我一直在向中央司令部司令库珀海军上将等人极力争取相关事实。这可能是美国军事历史上造成平民伤亡最多的单次事件*。我们需要真相。我们必须正视此事,承担责任,弥补过错。作为“冲突中保护平民核心小组”的创始人,我多年来一直致力于保护平民在冲突中的权益,因为我在战争中的亲身经历让我明白,杀害无辜平民不仅在道义上造成毁灭性影响,还会损害我们的国家安全。我们需要得到答案。而他们显然在故意拖延我们。没错,本届政府想让我们看到打击行动、军事行动的视频时,就毫不犹豫地发布,但当他们不想让我们看到时,就故意拖延。这里显然就是这种情况。所以我们会全力施压,以求得到答案。
玛格丽特·布伦南: 好的,我们会持续关注此事。科罗拉多州众议员杰森·克劳。非常感谢您。我们稍后回来。
编者注:* 克劳随后澄清,他原本想说的是,伊朗一所学校的爆炸是“现代”军事历史上造成平民伤亡最多的事件,而非“美国”军事历史上。
Transcript: Democratic Rep. Jason Crow on “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan,” June 21, 2026
2026-06-21T12:27:17-0400 / CBS News
The following is the transcript of the interview with Democratic Rep. Jason Crow of Colorado that aired on “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan” on June 21, 2026.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Welcome back to Face the Nation. We go now to Colorado Democratic Congressman Jason Crow. Happy Father’s Day to you.
REPRESENTATIVE JASON CROW (D-CO): Thanks, Margaret.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Congressman, you’re on Armed Services and you’re on the Intelligence Committee, so I want to get to some of your responsibilities here, particularly on the Intel front. We were just speaking with Senator Graham about what’s happening at the top of the Office of National Intelligence and the lapse of the surveillance authority. Right now, Bill Pulte is the acting Director of National Intelligence. He is someone who has been accused of using mortgage information to go after the president’s political enemies. I know that’s under investigation currently by the GAO, but the fact that he’s in the role right now, what harm can be done, if any? And do Democrats have any power to stop that?
REP. CROW: Well, I’m obviously concerned that this is somebody who’s a political attack dog, and his single biggest qualification is that he’s loyal to Donald Trump and is willing to go after Donald Trump’s enemies. But my more immediate concern is the fact that this is a really important position. This sits atop our intelligence agencies. And by law Congress mandated this person have significant intelligence experience because they have to make sure that we’re keeping Americans safe, which is not what Bill Pulte is capable of doing. So, I’m just more worried day to day that Americans are at risk because we have someone who’s incompetent at the head of this agency.
MARGARET BRENNAN: But will Democrats actually still reauthorize FISA. You heard Senator Graham again link the two issues here and said that’s really the bigger risk, the lapse of this key surveillance authority. I know when this was up for a vote in front of the House, you were proud of having voted against reauthoriza- reauthorization of this surveillance tool. Do you think your party miscalculated here?
REP. CROW: Yeah, no, not at all. I mean, I’ve always voted for FISA before. I’m on the intelligence committee, I know how important it is, but I’m unwilling to trade Americans’ constitutional rights, privacy, and essential civil liberties for temporary extension to this program. I’m just unwilling to do it. Right, that’s what this administration is asking us to do. They say, give up your constitutional rights, give up Americans’ rights and privacy, and we’ll just make sure we keep you protected. I mean, that’s what autocracies say. I’m not going to do that. I’m willing to have a discussion about what checks we need to put in place. A short-term extension, I’m not going to give them a three-year runway on this program. What about this administration would give us confidence that they’re going to follow the law? Short term extensions, then we can talk.
MARGARET BRENNAN: But the chair of the Intelligence Committee, in terms of the Democratic leadership there, Jim Himes said he hadn’t seen violations. You’re saying that the Trump administration is doing that? I mean, you’re disagreeing with your own Democratic leadership.
REP. CROW: No, I’m not disagreeing with Jim. Jim and I talk frequently, and we’re aligned on this. There are- there are public reports, many public reports of potentially thousands of violations, and to be more specific, these public reports allege that the Trump administration is using a filtering tool, again this is all public, a filtering tool to bypass the checks and the warrant requirements that would normally be in place to prevent the violation of privacy rights and civil rights of Americans. Now we’ve gone to the Trump administration and said, tell us this is wrong, show us why this is wrong, and if we have confidence, then we can kind of move forward to figure out what we need to do. They have not responded to us at all. So, why would we sit here with no response, all of these allegations, numerous public reports of violations, and just vote blindly to extend this program? It would be absurd for us to do that–
MARGARET BRENNAN: Well–
REP. CROW: –and you know we have the trust of our constituents and Americans, and we’re not going to violate that trust.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Well, on the Senate side, where the fight currently is, Senator Warner said he thinks Trump wants the expiration of this surveillance tool to stay, because he could then blame Democrats if some sort of attack happened here. So, what do you make of that? And what will it take for you to reauthorize FISA? Because it does- I don’t hear a solution from what you just said.
REP. JASON CROW: Yeah, well, first of all, I agree with Senator Warner. I don’t think Donald Trump cares about Americans’ national security and safety. I think he has shown very clearly over the years his willingness to weaponize national defense, the military, the intelligence community, the Department of Justice against his enemies to score political points at the jeopardy of American citizens. I mean, hell, the guy tried to put me in prison back in February, simply because I told soldiers that they have to follow the law and obey the- obey their oaths, so that that is true. What we need to do is we need very specific guarantees from this administration. I want the facts: are they violating the law, are they skirting around the requirement? Number one, number two, additional safeguards. The last time we authorized this program, we put 55 additional safeguards in place. We’ve learned between now and then there are more safeguards that are necessary.
MARGARET BRENNAN: This all takes time.
REP. JASON CROW: And number three, a shorter term extension, a shorter term extension. No, it wouldn’t take that much time. In a matter of days, they could give us that information, we could figure that out, we could vote on something that we could get it done.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Let me ask you, because there was other news this week on the Armed Services Committee. Secretary Hegseth announced the U.S. is going to conduct a six month review of U.S. force posture in Europe. He threatened to cut American dues to NATO if European nations don’t boost military spending. He said NATO reluctance to assist in the American strikes on Iran seem to be linked here to a potential reduction of U.S. forces in Europe. Have you received any information on what this means, where the troops would be pulled from? What does this look like?
REP. JASON CROW: Well, this administration is going to have a heck of a time in front of the bipartisan Armed Services Committee, which, in an overwhelming bipartisan manner, has said very clearly no troop withdrawals or changes from Europe unless they come to the committee and explain why that’s in our national security interests. Over and over, we’ve done that, and we just did that last month when we marked up the annual defense budget, so they haven’t come to us, they haven’t given us any, any of those details. I’m not presumptively against troop changes, but what I am against troop changes is when they’re not tied to our national security, you know? If they want to move troops around Europe, fine, let’s have that discussion, but pulling them out of Europe would actually be detrimental to Americans.
MARGARET BRENNAN: I want to ask you about Iran. The delegation that arrived in Switzerland was on board a plane that had painted on the side the word “Minab 168” that’s a reference to the bombing that killed 168 people, most of them school children. The U.S. military is still investigating, but what can you tell us about American culpability and that probe?
REP. JASON CROW: Yeah, unfortunately not very much. I’ve been pushing extremely hard, CENTCOM, Central Command Commander Admiral Cooper, and others for facts on this. This could be the large, single largest civilian casualty incident in U.S. military history*. We need facts. We need to make sure that we own up to it, that we take accountability, that we make it right. And you know, as the founder of the Protection of Civilians in Conflict Caucus, I actually have done work for years around protection of civilians and conflict, because my own time at war taught me the devastating effects, not just morally, but to our national security when we kill innocents. We need answers to this. And they’re clearly slow rolling us. Right, this administration has no problem putting, posting videos of strikes, posting videos of operations when they want us to see it, and then when they don’t want us to see it, they slow roll it. That’s clearly what’s happening here. So we’re going to push hard to get answers.
MARGARET BRENNAN: All right, we’ll be tracking it. Jason Crow, Congressman from Colorado. Thank you very much. We’ll be right back.
Editor’s Note: * Crow later said he meant to call the bombing of a school in Iran the largest civilian casualty incident in “modern” military history, not the largest in “U.S.” military history.
发表回复