2026年6月20日 美国东部时间上午10:20 / 福克斯新闻频道
鲁比奥和赫格塞特曾将削弱伊朗导弹能力称为“史诗之怒行动”的核心目标
作者：摩根·菲利普斯 福克斯新闻
2026年6月20日 美国东部时间上午10:20 发布
特朗普在G7双边会晤中谈论伊朗与美印关系
唐纳德·特朗普总统在与印度总统纳伦德拉·莫迪的双边会晤中，详细阐述了伊朗协议的复杂细节，并强调了美国无与伦比的军事实力。
NEW 您现在可以收听福克斯新闻的文章！
数月来，特朗普政府高级官员辩称，伊朗的弹道导弹库为德黑兰的核野心提供了掩护，这也是美国对伊朗发动“史诗之怒行动”打击的关键原因。
而如今，唐纳德·特朗普总统却暗示，伊朗拥有导弹可能根本算不上问题。
“如果其他国家都有导弹，那不让他们拥有就有点不公平。如果沙特阿拉伯和卡塔尔都有一些，我认为相对而言，这是可以接受的，”特朗普在周三的G7国际论坛上表示，“我能让沙特阿拉伯拥有导弹，却不让伊朗拥有吗？这行不通。”
“导弹不是问题。它们只会对局部地区造成一点伤害，但不会炸掉整个地球。”
“海湾国家将解决非核问题，我们也会谈到弹道导弹，”总统补充道，“我们还会谈到他们所拥有的恐怖主义代理势力——我们不希望这种情况发生。”
一张地图展示了伊朗发射的弹道导弹的射程范围，重点标出了其打击范围内的区域。（福克斯新闻）
以色列官员 reportedly 警告称，伊朗的弹道导弹可能引发以色列单独针对德黑兰的军事行动
特朗普是在法国埃维昂莱班举行的G7新闻发布会上发表上述言论的，当时美伊谅解备忘录的细节刚刚公布。
这番表态与近几个月来政府高级官员的多次论调大相径庭，后者曾将伊朗的弹道导弹部队称为对地区安全的重大威胁，同时也是伊朗核计划的保护伞。
“伊朗永远不能拥有核武器，我们不会允许伊朗借助大规模短期弹道导弹库存的豁免权，或制造和发射导弹的能力来掩盖其核计划，”国务卿马可·鲁比奥在3月3日的新闻发布会上告诉记者，“他们长期以来一直试图做的，就是建立常规武器能力作为掩护。”
特朗普誓言在摧毁伊朗近90%的政权导弹后，将对伊朗“狠狠打击”
其他高级官员也多次将削弱伊朗导弹能力称为“史诗之怒行动”的核心目标。
在行动开始几天后的3月2日白宫讲话中，特朗普表示：“我们的目标很明确。首先，我们要摧毁伊朗的导弹能力……以及他们制造新导弹的能力。”
战争部长皮特·赫格塞特随后在3月4日表示，此次任务“精准聚焦”于摧毁伊朗的导弹及其生产设施，而白宫新闻秘书卡洛琳·莱维特当天也表示，政府的主要目标之一是“摧毁该政权的致命弹道导弹，并彻底摧毁其导弹工业”。
2024年9月25日，在伊朗德黑兰的巴哈雷斯廷广场，为纪念与伊拉克长达八年的战争（被称为“神圣防御周”）44周年，人们展示了包括弹道导弹、防空系统和无人机在内的重型武器。（法特梅·巴哈拉米/安纳多卢通讯社通过盖蒂图片社拍摄）
鲁比奥在整个行动期间反复强调这一主题，称削弱伊朗导弹力量是必要之举，以防止伊朗利用常规军事力量作为未来核武器计划的掩护。
特朗普称美以已摧毁伊朗军事能力，敦促对手投降：“举手投降”
“这关乎非常具体的目标，”鲁比奥在3月30日告诉记者，“总统在行动的第一晚就阐明了这些目标……以下就是这些目标——你们应该记下来。第一，摧毁他们的空军。第二，摧毁他们的海军。第三，大幅削弱他们的导弹发射能力。第四，摧毁他们的工厂，这样他们就无法再制造更多导弹和无人机，未来继续威胁我们。所有这一切都是为了让他们永远无法以此为掩护获取核武器。这从一开始就是我们的目标，现在依然如此。”
莱维特当天也发表了类似言论，称“史诗之怒行动”的目标包括“摧毁他们的弹道导弹”，并拆除用于生产导弹的基础设施，同时确保伊朗永远不会获得核武器。
特朗普在G7的言论也引发了人们对政府伊朗核计划政策的质疑，此前官员们对该问题的态度要强硬得多。
特朗普的言论发布之际，政府正与伊朗谈判达成一份谅解备忘录，该备忘录未能解决核谈判中的核心争议之一：伊朗浓缩项目的未来。
根据近日公布的框架协议，美伊双方同意用60天时间谈判伊朗近900磅、浓度接近武器级的60%浓缩铀库存的命运，以及未来的浓缩活动。政府官员表示，目前讨论的最低结果将是在国际原子能机构监督下稀释这批材料，同时承认最终协议的关键细节仍未敲定。
官员们称伊朗愿意稀释其库存是一项重大让步，但也承认该谅解备忘录并未解决伊朗最终是否被允许保留任何浓缩能力的问题。
特朗普重申对伊朗核协议的强硬立场：“绝不允许任何铀浓缩活动”
政府此前在伊朗核计划问题上的立场要强硬得多。（内森·莱恩/彭博新闻社通过盖蒂图片社拍摄）
特朗普在G7会议上谈论伊朗获取核电能力时，语气似乎更为温和。
“不过，当你说某人想要核电，而其他国家都有，周边国家也有，却不让他们为了电力之类的用途拥有核电，这有点难办，”特朗普说，“这总是有点棘手。你得用点常识。”
点击此处下载福克斯新闻应用
政府此前在伊朗核计划问题上的立场要强硬得多。特别特使史蒂夫·威特科夫表示，美国不能允许伊朗保留哪怕“1%”的浓缩能力，而白宫官员多次将终止伊朗浓缩活动视为红线。
当被要求进一步置评时，白宫援引了特朗普最近关于导弹的言论。
“我们将尊重总统的表态，”国务院发言人在被问及此事时表示。
记者未能立即联系到五角山庄置评。
Trump says Iran missiles ‘aren’t the problem’ after White House made them central to war rationale
June 20, 2026 10:20am EDT / Fox News
Rubio and Hegseth had described degrading Iran’s missile capabilities as a central objective of Operation Epic Fury
By Morgan Phillips Fox News
Published June 20, 2026 10:20am EDT
Trump discusses Iran, US-India relations during G7 bilateral meeting
President Donald Trump outlines the intricate details of the Iran deal, asserting America’s unparalleled military power during his bilateral meeting with Indian President Narendra Modi.
NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!
For months, senior Trump administration officials argued that Iran’s ballistic missile arsenal helped shield Tehran’s nuclear ambitions and was a key reason the U.S. launched Operation Epic Fury attacks on the country.
Now, President Donald Trump is suggesting Iran having missiles may not be a problem at all.
“If other countries have them, it’s a little bit unfair for them not to have some. If Saudi Arabia and Qatar, and they all have some, I would say that in relative proportion, I think it’s okay,” Trump said at the G7 international forum Wednesday. “Am I going to let Saudi Arabia have missiles, but (Iran) can’t have them? It doesn’t work that way.”
“Missiles aren’t the problem. They hurt a little location, but they don’t blow up the planet.”
“The Gulf nations will address the nonnuclear issues, as we’ll be talking about the ballistic missiles,” the president added. “And we’ll talk, also, about the terrorist proxies that they have that — we don’t want that to happen.”
A map displays the range of ballistic missiles fired from Iran, highlighting areas within reach.(Fox News)
ISRAELI OFFICIALS REPORTEDLY WARN IRAN’S BALLISTIC MISSILES COULD TRIGGER SOLO MILITARY ACTION AGAINST TEHRAN
Trump made the remarks while discussing whether Iran should be permitted to retain missile capabilities in a news conference at the G7 in Évian-les-Bains, France, just as details of the memorandum of understanding between the U.S. and Iran were being released.
The comments strike a much different tone than arguments repeatedly made by senior administration officials in recent months, who described Iran’s ballistic missile force as both a major threat to regional security and a protective shield for Iran’s nuclear program.
“Iran can never have a nuclear weapon, and we will not allow Iran to hide behind the immunity of a massive short-term ballistic missile inventory, or the ability to make them or launch them,” Secretary of State Marco Rubio told reporters in a press conference March 3. “What they are trying to do, and have been trying to do for a very long time, is build a conventional weapons capability as a shield to hide behind.”
TRUMP VOWS TO HIT IRAN ‘VERY HARD’ AFTER OBLITERATING NEARLY ’90 PERCENT’ OF REGIME MISSILES
Other senior officials repeatedly described degrading Iran’s missile capabilities as a central objective of Operation Epic Fury.
In remarks at the White House on March 2, days after the start of the operation, Trump said, “Our objectives are clear. First, we’re destroying Iran’s missile capabilities … and their capacity to produce brand new ones.”
War Secretary Pete Hegseth later said March 4 the mission was “laser-focused” on obliterating Iran’s missiles and the facilities that produce them, while White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said the same day one of the administration’s primary goals was to “destroy the regime’s deadly ballistic missiles and completely raze their missile industry to the ground.”
Heavy weapons, including ballistic missiles, air defense systems and unmanned aerial vehicles, are displayed during the 44th anniversary of the eight-year war with Iraq, known as Holy Defense Week, at Baharestan Square in Tehran, Iran, on Sept. 25, 2024.(Photo by Fatemeh Bahrami/Anadolu via Getty Images)
Rubio repeatedly returned to the theme throughout the operation, arguing that degrading Iran’s missile force was necessary to prevent Iran from using conventional military power as cover for a future nuclear weapons program.
TRUMP SAYS US, ISRAEL SHATTERED IRANIAN MILITARY CAPABILITIES, PRESSES LEADERS TO SURRENDER: ‘CRY UNCLE’
“This is about very specific objectives,” Rubio told reporters March 30. “The President laid them out on the first night of the operation… Here they are — you should write them down. No. 1, the destruction of their air force. No. 2, the destruction of their navy. No. 3 the severe diminishing of their missile launching capability. And number four, the destruction of their factories so they can’t make more missiles and more drones to threaten us in the future. All of this so that they can never hide behind it to acquire a nuclear weapon. That was our objective from the beginning; that remains our objective now.”
Leavitt made similar comments the same day, saying the objectives of Operation Epic Fury included “destroying their ballistic missiles” and dismantling the infrastructure used to produce them while ensuring Iran never obtains a nuclear weapon.
Trump’s remarks at the G7 also raised questions about the administration’s approach to Iran’s nuclear program, another issue that administration officials had previously described in far less flexible terms.
Trump’s comments also come as the administration pursues a memorandum of understanding with Iran that leaves unresolved one of the central disputes in the nuclear negotiations: the future of Iran’s enrichment program.
Under the framework agreement unveiled in recent days, the United States and Iran agreed to spend 60 days negotiating the fate of Iran’s nearly 900-pound stockpile of near-weapons-grade 60% enriched uranium and any future enrichment activities. Administration officials said the minimum outcome under discussion would involve down-blending the material under International Atomic Energy Agency supervision, while acknowledging that key details of a final agreement remain unsettled.
Officials described Iran’s willingness to dilute its stockpile as a significant concession, but also acknowledged that the memorandum does not resolve whether Iran will ultimately be permitted to retain any enrichment capability.
TRUMP REAFFIRMS HARD LINE ON IRAN NUCLEAR DEAL: ‘WILL NOT ALLOW ANY ENRICHMENT OF URANIUM’
The administration previously had drawn a much harder line on Iran’s nuclear program.(Nathan Laine/Bloomberg via Getty Images)
Trump appeared to strike a more accommodating tone when discussing Iran’s access to nuclear power at the G7.
“It is a little hard, though, when you say that somebody wants it, other people have it, other, adjoining states have it. And you’re not letting them have it for purposes of electricity and things like that,” Trump said. “It’s always a little tough. You have to use a little common sense.”
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
The administration previously had drawn a much harder line on Iran’s nuclear program. Special envoy Steve Witkoff said the United States could not allow Iran to retain “even 1%” enrichment capability, while White House officials repeatedly described the end of Iranian enrichment as a red line.
The White House referred back to Trump’s recent remarks on missiles when asked for additional comment. “
“We are going to let the President’s comments stand,” a State Department spokesperson said when asked for comment.
The Pentagon could not immediately be reached for comment.
发表回复