特朗普的伊朗协议相比奥巴马的协议“付出更多,收获更少”,参议员称


2026年6月17日 美国东部时间下午4:46 / 福克斯新闻

参议员蒂姆·凯恩表示,据报道的协议条款让伊朗获得了更多让步,却未能解决伊朗的核浓缩问题
作者:亚历克斯·米勒、摩根·菲利普斯 福克斯新闻

NEW 您现在可以收听福克斯新闻的文章了!

唐纳德·特朗普总统与伊朗达成的初步协议已在媒体上流传,但仍未提交给国会山的议员们。

那些看过相关报道的人对政府计划在周五正式签署的谅解备忘录(MOU)看法不一。

一些人表示,这比前总统巴拉克·奥巴马时期的伊朗核协议——《联合全面行动计划》(JCPOA)——结果更糟,特朗普在第一任期内就退出了该协议。

https://www.foxnews.com/video/6398661868112

议员们等待美伊谅解备忘录的细节
福克斯新闻记者艾莎·哈斯尼和特雷·英斯特解读了唐纳德·特朗普总统关于美伊新协议的七国集团峰会言论。阿拉巴马州共和党参议员凯蒂·布里特也加入了《美国新闻室》节目,讨论如果达成和平协议可能采取的后续步骤。

特朗普政府公布拟议伊朗协议的全面条款


一名参议员表示,唐纳德·特朗普总统与伊朗达成的初步协议比前总统巴拉克·奥巴马时期的伊朗核协议结果更糟。(斯特凡尼·雷诺兹/彭博社)

“我看到的所有消息,比如彭博社的报道以及该协议的相关解读,都表明我们付出的比《联合全面行动计划》时期多得多,收获却少得多,”弗吉尼亚州民主党参议员蒂姆·凯恩说道。

“不过在我亲眼看到谅解备忘录之前,我不能百分百确定,但迄今为止所有报道都显示,相比唐纳德·特朗普上台前的情况,我们付出的更多,收获的更少,”他补充道。

对这份谅解备忘录的分歧也并非党派对立。

特朗普的伊朗协议引发共和党人要求投票,国会仍被蒙在鼓里
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6398679512112

“里根在九泉之下不得安宁,”路易斯安那州共和党参议员比尔·卡西迪在X平台上写道。“伊朗的核野心没有得到遏制,他们已经意识到威胁霍尔木兹海峡是有效的,未来无疑会利用这一点。如今,根据这份协议,伊朗将能够建造全新的核基础设施。”

政府官员周三向记者披露了这项计划,并详细说明了立即豁免伊朗石油出口、为至少3000亿美元的重建和经济发展提供框架,以及为期60天的谈判期,旨在就伊朗核项目达成最终协议。

但就目前形式而言,该协议未能解决最初引发争端的核心问题:伊朗的核项目。

共和党人挫败限制特朗普战争权力的提案,和平协议近在咫尺


林赛·格雷厄姆参议员在2026年2月14日于德国慕尼黑举行的第62届慕尼黑安全会议上,为伊朗人权问题进行抗议期间发言。(汉内斯·马格施泰特/盖蒂图片社)

相反,协议规定双方将作为最终协议的一部分,就伊朗浓缩铀库存和未来浓缩活动的命运进行谈判。

凯恩曾在奥巴马政府时期推动《伊朗核协议审查法案》(INARA),该法案要求国会对任何与伊朗的核协议进行审查。他表示,据他所知,这份谅解备忘录“可能涉及了足够多的核项目内容,因此必须提交给国会”。

南卡罗来纳州共和党参议员林赛·格雷厄姆本周早些时候曾对这项日益成型的协议持怀疑态度,现在似乎表示支持。当被问及卡西迪对谅解备忘录的看法时,格雷厄姆说:“我欣赏比尔,但我认为他不太清楚这里到底发生了什么。”

“我不认为这份谅解备忘录是一份协议,它只是达成协议的框架,”格雷厄姆说道。“其中有些内容我并不喜欢。我的看法是,如果你能找到外交解决方案来解决伊朗的核野心,那就去做。而这份谅解备忘录为此搭建了平台。”

点击此处下载福克斯新闻应用程序

当被问及是否同意解除对伊朗石油出口的制裁时,格雷厄姆表示短期内可以接受,也认可由此流入的资金,“因为如果协议失效,所有这一切都会停止。”

“我担心的不是错失这次寻求外交解决方案的机会,”他说。“因为如果失败了,剩下的就只有战争了。”

亚历克斯·米勒是福克斯新闻数字频道的撰稿人,报道美国参议院事务。

Trump’s Iran deal ‘giving a lot more to get a lot less’ than Obama’s, senator says

June 17, 2026 4:46pm EDT / Fox News

Sen. Tim Kaine says the reported terms offer Iran far more concessions while failing to address nuclear enrichment

By Alex Miller , Morgan Phillips, Fox News

NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

President Donald Trump’s preliminary agreement with Iran is making its way through the media, but it still hasn’t made its way into the hands of lawmakers on Capitol Hill.

Those who have read the reports are split on the memorandum of understanding (MOU) that the administration intends to finalize in a ceremonial signing on Friday.

Some say it’s a worse outcome than former President Barack Obama’s Iranian nuclear agreement, known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), which Trump ripped up in his first term.

https://www.foxnews.com/video/6398661868112

Lawmakers await details of US-Iran memorandum

Fox News correspondents Aishah Hasnie and Trey Yingst break down President Donald Trump’s G7 comments on the new U.S.-Iran deal. Sen. Katie Britt, R-Ala., also joins ‘America’s Newsoom’ to discuss the potential next steps if peace is reached.

TRUMP ADMINISTRATION UNVEILS SWEEPING TERMS OF PROPOSED IRAN AGREEMENT

One senator said President Donald Trump’s early agreement with Iran is a worse outcome than former President Barack Obama’s Iranian nuclear agreement.(Stefani Reynolds/Bloomberg)

“Everything I’ve seen is, like, what’s being reported by Bloomberg or the read-out on this thing is, we are giving a lot more to get a lot less than we got in the JCPOA,” Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., said.

“Now, I can’t say that with an exclamation point on it until I actually see the memorandum, but every bit of reporting, thus far, says, we’re giving a lot more to get a lot less than what we had before Donald Trump,” he continued.

The schism on the MOU doesn’t follow party lines, either.

TRUMP’S IRAN DEAL SPARKS GOP DEMANDS FOR VOTE AS CONGRESS REMAINS IN THE DARK

https://www.foxnews.com/video/6398679512112

“Reagan is rolling over in his grave,” Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La., said on X. “Iran’s nuclear ambitions were not curbed, and they have learned that threatening the Strait of Hormuz works and will undoubtedly leverage it in the future. Now, Iran gets to build brand-new infrastructure under this deal.”

Administration officials revealed the plan to reporters on Wednesday and detailed plans for immediate waivers on Iranian oil exports, a framework for at least $300 billion in reconstruction and economic development, and a 60-day negotiation period aimed at securing a final agreement on Iran’s nuclear program.

But the agreement, in its current form, falls short of dealing with the central issue that started the war in the first place: Iran’s nuclear program.

REPUBLICANS BAT DOWN BID TO HANDCUFF TRUMP’S WAR POWERS AS PEACE DEAL NEARS

Sen. Lindsey Graham speaks during a demonstration for human rights in Iran at Theresienwiese during the 62nd Munich Security Conference on Feb. 14, 2026, in Munich, Germany.(Hannes Magerstaedt/Getty Images)

Instead, it commits both sides to negotiate the fate of Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile and future enrichment activities as part of a final agreement.

Kaine, who pushed the Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act (INARA) during the Obama administration that requires congressional review of any nuclear deal with Iran, said that from what he’s seen, the memorandum “probably touches enough on the nuclear program that it would have to be submitted to Congress.”

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., who was previously skeptical of the burgeoning deal earlier in the week, now appears to support it. When asked about Cassidy’s take on the MOU, Graham said, “I like Bill, but I don’t think he quite understands what’s going on here.”

“I don’t think the MOU is a deal, it’s a framework of how to get a deal,” Graham said. “There are parts of it I don’t like. The way I look at it, is if you can find a diplomatic solution to the Iranian nuclear ambitions, go for it. And the MOU puts it in place.”

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

When asked if he was OK with sanctions being lifted on Iranian oil exports, Graham said he was fine with the idea in the short-term and the money that would flow in, “Because if the deal doesn’t work, all that stops.”

“What I’m worried about is not taking an opportunity here to find a diplomatic solution,” he said. “Because if you fail, then what is left is war.”

Alex Miller is a writer for Fox News Digital covering the U.S. Senate.

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注