特朗普在伊朗协议上面临3000亿美元难题


2026-06-16T18:06:49.531Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/06/16/politics/trump-obama-iran-money

  • 特朗普政府官员暗示,这项即将达成的伊朗协议可能让德黑兰从其他国家获得至多3000亿美元资金。
  • 唐纳德·特朗普总统曾多次指责前总统贝拉克·奥巴马在2015年伊核协议中允许伊朗获得远少于此的资金,以此资助恐怖主义。
  • 本届政府强调,新的资金将来自海湾国家,且取决于伊朗是否遵守相关条件。

本文由AI生成摘要,经CNN编辑审核。

唐纳德·特朗普总统与伊朗达成的初步协议眼下正面临诸多问题,许多保守派人士对此表示反对,但最核心的问题或许是流向德黑兰的资金。

在周一上午接受哥伦比亚广播公司新闻采访时,副总统J·D·万斯似乎默认了伊朗可能获得价值至多3000亿美元重建基金的说法。

自那次采访后,政府一直在竭力澄清情况。他们强调这笔资金不会来自美国纳税人,而是来自其他海湾国家,且只有在伊朗遵守和平协议的前提下才能动用。

万斯周一晚间在福克斯新闻频道表示,“我们将邀请其他国家——不是我们,而是其他国家——对伊朗进行投资”。他周二在接受梅根·凯利采访时重申了这一观点,称美国不会允许阿联酋等国“对伊朗投资,除非伊朗改变其行为”。

这听起来合情合理。

但问题在于,这些区别在过去曾被共和党人——尤其是特朗普本人——驳斥甚至严厉批评过。

而那时涉及的金额远低于3000亿美元。

2015年奥巴马政府与其他国家同伊朗达成核协议时,曾允许伊朗解冻其在外国银行被制裁冻结的本国资产,当时的估算金额约为500亿美元。但这一细节几乎从未出现在特朗普的言论中。他称这项让步相当于给这个世界头号恐怖主义资助国提供了一笔横财,甚至 falsely 声称这笔钱是“现金”。他将其描述为不可理喻的行为,是美国领导人软弱和谈判能力低下的体现。

这些言论如今可能会反噬他。

“伊朗获得1500亿美元横财,这无疑将在全球范围内资助恐怖主义,”他在2015年9月《今日美国》的专栏文章中写道。特朗普经常援引1500亿美元这一被夸大的数字。

同年同月在俄克拉荷马城,他表示:“我们给他们1500亿美元,就是为了在全世界制造恐怖。”

在2015年12月的共和党总统辩论中,特朗普称这是“一项可怕、恶心、完全无能的伊朗协议,他们从中获得1500亿美元”,并补充道:“他们是恐怖主义国家。”

“我就是不明白,我们怎么能达成协议,给一个恐怖主义国家1500亿美元,”次月在艾奥瓦城他又说道。

两种情况并非完全相同,解冻的伊朗资产不同于来自其他国家的资金。但两者都涉及并非来自美国纳税人的资金,且都作为协议中的激励措施突然向伊朗开放。

共和党人在2015年经常辩称,这类资金具有“可替代性”——也就是说,即使这些资金不能直接用于恐怖主义,它们也可以替代原本可能被转移用于恐怖活动的资金。

在第一任期后期与伊朗关系紧张期间,以及2020年竞选连任失败期间,特朗普多次重拾这一论调。

“所以他们拿到了1500亿——150亿,想想看,”2019年9月在白宫活动中他说道,“你怎么能——怎么可能做出这种事?他们用现金支付了所有这笔钱。”

(重申一下,美国并没有用现金支付这笔钱,金额也不是1500亿美元。)

2020年1月下令暗杀伊朗指挥官卡西姆·苏莱曼尼后,他补充道:“奥巴马政府扶持并助长了伊朗政权。他们给了伊朗1500亿美元,其中包括17亿美元的硬通货。你能想象吗?”

(这17亿美元指的是1979年被冻结的4亿多美元伊朗资金的和解方案。)

“奥巴马总统签署的伊朗核协议给了他们1500亿美元,也就是从那时起真正的恐怖活动开始了,”次日在接受福克斯新闻采访时他补充道。

在2020年竞选临近尾声时,特朗普多次预测,如果乔·拜登当选总统,将会达成类似的协议。

“如果拜登当选,他们会再给伊朗1500亿美元,就像他们做过的那样,”2020年8月在亚利桑那州尤马市他说道,“这是我见过最愚蠢的协议。”

“伊朗还会达成另一项疯狂协议,他们会给他们1500亿美元,或者18亿美元现金,”2020年10月在坦帕市他说道。

即使在2020年大选失败后,在佐治亚州参议院决选期间为共和党候选人拉票时,特朗普仍警告这种情况可能重演。

“我认为他们想重启这项协议。你能想象吗?”特朗普在佐治亚州瓦尔多斯塔说道,“我想知道他们会不会给他们1500亿美元?不,他们会给2500亿。”

周一,特朗普自己的副总统暗示伊朗可能获得的基金规模甚至超过了这一数字。

Trump’s $300 billion problem on the Iran agreement

2026-06-16T18:06:49.531Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/06/16/politics/trump-obama-iran-money

  • Trump administration officials have suggested that the emerging Iran agreement could give Tehran access to as much as $300 billion from other countries.
  • President Donald Trump repeatedly accused former President Barack Obama of funding terrorism by allowing Iran access to far less money in the 2015 deal.
  • The administration emphasizes the new funds would come from Gulf nations and depend on Iran’s compliance with conditions.

AI-generated summary was reviewed by a CNN editor.

President Donald Trump’s nascent agreement with Iran is beset by problems right now as many conservatives balk at it, but at the top of the list may be the issue of money flowing to Tehran.

In an interview with CBS News Monday morning, Vice President JD Vance seemed to tacitly confirm the premise that Iran could be given “access” to a reconstruction fund worth as much as $300 billion.

Ever since that interview, the administration has strained to clarify things. It has emphasized that this money wouldn’t come from US taxpayers. Instead, it would be money from other Gulf countries that would only be available if Iran complies with a peace deal.

Vance said late Monday on Fox News that “we would invite other countries — not us, but other countries — to invest in” Iran. He echoed that Tuesday, telling Megyn Kelly that the US wouldn’t let the United Arab Emirates, for example, “invest in Iran, unless the Iranians change their behavior.”

Fair enough.

Except these are distinctions that Republicans — and Trump especially — have dismissed or even excoriated in the past.

And that’s when the dollar amount was significantly smaller than $300 billion.

When the Obama administration and other countries cut a nuclear deal with Iran in 2015, it included giving Iran access to billions of dollars. In that case, it wasn’t money from other countries, but instead Iran’s own assets that had been frozen in foreign banks under sanctions. Estimates generally placed the dollar figure around $50 billion.

But this nuance was almost always absent from Trump’s rhetoric. He said the concession amounted to providing the world’s leading sponsor of terrorism with a financial windfall, even falsely claiming it was in “cash.” He cast it as unthinkable and a sign of American leaders’ weakness and poor negotiating skills.

Those comments could come back to bite him today.

“Iran receives a windfall of $150 billion, which will no doubt fund terrorism around the world,” he wrote in a September 2015 op-ed in USA Today. Trump often cited the inflated figure of $150 billion.

He said that same month in Oklahoma City that “we’re giving them $150 billion in order to create terror all over the world.”

At a December 2015 Republican presidential debate, Trump called it a “horrible, disgusting, absolutely incompetent deal with Iran where they get $150 billion,” adding: “They’re a terrorist nation.”

“I just don’t understand how we could have made a deal where we’re giving somebody that’s a terror nation $150 billion,” he said the next month in Iowa City.

The situations aren’t completely parallel, in that unfrozen Iranian assets aren’t the same as money from other countries. But both involve money that isn’t from US taxpayers but is suddenly being made available to Iran as an incentive in a deal.

Republicans had frequently argued in 2015 that such money was “fungible” — i.e. that even if the funds can’t be used directly for terrorism, they could be used to replace money that could then be diverted for terrorist uses.

Trump returned to the talking point amid tensions with Iran late in his first term and during his failed 2020 reelection race.

“So they paid $150 [billion] — 150, think of that,” he said at a White House event in September 2019. “And how can you do — how could you possibly do a thing like that? They paid all of that money in cash.”

(Again, the US did not pay the money in cash, and it wasn’t $150 billion.)

He added after ordering the killing Iranian commander Qasem Soleimani in January 2020 that “the Obama administration enabled and emboldened the Iranian regime. They gave Iran $150 billion, including $1.7 billion in hard, cold cash. Can you imagine?”

(The $1.7 billion refers to a settlement reached over $400 million in Iranian funds that were frozen in 1979.)

“The Iran nuclear deal signed by President Obama gave them $150 billion, and that’s when the real terror started,” Trump added the next day in an interview with Fox News.

And toward the end of the 2020 campaign, Trump repeatedly predicted that, if Joe Biden won the election, similar deals would result.

“If Biden ever got in, they’d give them another $150 billion, like they did,” Trump said in August 2020 in Yuma, Arizona. “The dumbest deal I’ve ever seen.”

“Iran will make another crazy deal where they give them $150 billion or $1.8 billion in cash,” he said in October 2020 in Tampa.

Even after losing the 2020 election, while campaigning for GOP Senate candidates in Georgia runoffs, Trump warned of a repeat.

“I think they want to start it up again. Can you believe this?” Trump said in Valdosta, Georgia. “I wonder if they’ll give them $150 billion? But, no, they’ll give them 250.”

On Monday, Trump’s own vice president suggested Iran could be given access to a fund with even more than that.

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注