最高法院驳回重启卡特·佩奇诉联邦调查局涉特朗普通俄调查监听案


2026年6月15日 美国东部时间上午10:47 / 福克斯新闻

佩奇近期已与联邦政府达成125万美元和解,但仍试图追究个别官员的责任

——布拉德福德·贝茨 福克斯新闻

【新功能】您现在可以收听福克斯新闻文章了!

最高法院周一驳回了前特朗普竞选顾问卡特·佩奇提起的诉讼,该案质疑联邦调查局在调查俄罗斯与唐纳德·特朗普2016年总统竞选所谓关联期间实施的监听行为。

大法官们驳回了佩奇的上诉,维持下级法院的裁决,实际上终结了他要求前联邦调查局局长詹姆斯·科米及其他前政府官员就其指控的非法监听承担个人责任的诉求。大法官凯坦吉·布朗·杰克逊未参与本案审理。

作为特朗普2016年竞选团队的外交政策顾问,佩奇是2016年至2017年外国情报监控法院批准的秘密监听令的目标,这也是联邦调查局“跨火飓风”调查的一部分。

他从未被指控犯罪,并长期否认自己充当俄罗斯特工的指控。

特朗普下令联邦调查局解密“跨火飓风”通俄调查相关文件

卡特·佩奇,唐纳德·特朗普2016年总统竞选团队前外交政策顾问,2020年1月14日在纽约市天狼星XM演播室参加SiriusXM Patriot频道125的《大卫·韦布秀》节目。(斯莱文·弗拉西奇/盖蒂图片社为天狼星XM拍摄)

在司法部监察长的一份报告指出联邦调查局提交的监听佩奇的申请存在重大错误和遗漏后,该案成为特朗普通俄调查中最具争议的章节之一。参与批准监听申请的前联邦调查局和司法部官员后来表示,如果他们知晓调查人员指出的全部问题,就不会在这些申请上签字。

卡特·佩奇,当选总统唐纳德·特朗普的前顾问,2016年12月12日在俄罗斯莫斯科的一场 presentations 活动上向观众发表讲话。

针对监察长的调查结果,联邦调查局实施了数十项整改措施,旨在提高未来监听申请的准确性和完整性。

佩奇起诉科米及其他前官员,指控他们提交存在缺陷的申请以获取监听授权,侵犯了他的宪法权利。下级法院驳回了此案,理由包括佩奇并未起诉直接实施监听的官员。

佩奇近期已就监听索赔与联邦政府达成125万美元的和解,但仍试图继续追究个别前官员的责任。

联邦调查局对约翰·布伦南、詹姆斯·科米启动刑事调查:司法部消息人士透露

最高法院未就拒绝受理此案作出解释,这是驳回上诉时的惯例。

美国最高法院大楼夜间亮灯,展示主入口、带有大理石山墙的西立面以及“法律之下人人平等”的题字。(尼古拉斯·埃科诺穆/努图片/盖蒂图片社)

点击此处下载福克斯新闻应用程序

该判决标志着通俄调查引发的最新法律进展,该调查旨在查明特朗普2016年竞选团队成员是否与莫斯科影响大选的行动存在协调。特别检察官罗伯特·穆勒最终认定俄罗斯干涉了大选,但未证实特朗普竞选团队成员与俄罗斯存在刑事共谋。

本文由美联社撰稿。

布拉德福德·贝茨是福克斯新闻数字频道突发新闻记者,报道犯罪、政治议题等诸多领域。

https://www.foxnews.com/video/6380467520112

Supreme Court declines to revive Carter Page lawsuit over FBI surveillance tied to Trump-Russia probe

June 15, 2026 10:47am EDT / Fox News

Page recently reached a $1.25M settlement with the federal government but sought to hold individual officials liable

By Bradford Betz, Fox News

NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

The Supreme Court on Monday declined to revive a lawsuit brought by former Trump campaign advisor Carter Page challenging FBI surveillance conducted during the bureau’s investigation into alleged ties between Russia and Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign.

The justices denied Page’s appeal, leaving lower court rulings in place and effectively ending his effort to hold former FBI Director James Comey and other former government officials personally liable for what he alleged was unlawful surveillance. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson did not participate in the case.

Page, who served as a foreign policy advisor to Trump’s 2016 campaign, was the subject of secret surveillance warrants approved by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court in 2016 and 2017 as part of the FBI’s Crossfire Hurricane investigation.

He was never charged with a crime and has long denied allegations that he acted as an agent of Russia.

TRUMP ORDERS FBI TO DECLASSIFY DOCUMENTS FROM ‘CROSSFIRE HURRICANE’ RUSSIA INVESTIGATION

Carter Page, Former Foreign-Policy adviser to Donald Trump during his 2016 Presidential Election Campaign visits “The David Webb Show” On SiriusXM Patriot Channel 125 at SiriusXM Studios on January 14, 2020 in New York City.(Slaven Vlasic/Getty Images for SiriusXM)

The case became one of the most controversial chapters of the Trump-Russia investigation after a Justice Department inspector general report identified significant errors and omissions in the FBI’s applications to surveil Page. Former FBI and Justice Department officials involved in approving the warrants later said they would not have signed off on the applications had they known the full extent of the problems identified by investigators.

Carter Page, former advisor to President-elect Donald Trump, addresses the audience during a presentation in Moscow, Russia, on Dec. 12, 2016.

In response to the watchdog findings, the FBI implemented dozens of corrective measures aimed at improving the accuracy and completeness of future surveillance applications.

Page sued Comey and other former officials, alleging they violated his constitutional rights by submitting flawed applications to obtain surveillance authority. Lower courts dismissed the case, finding, among other things, that Page had not sued the officials who directly carried out the surveillance.

Page recently reached a $1.25 million settlement with the federal government related to the surveillance claims but sought to continue pursuing claims against individual former officials.

FBI LAUNCHES CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS OF JOHN BRENNAN, JAMES COMEY: DOJ SOURCES

The Supreme Court offered no explanation for declining review, as is customary when turning away appeals.

The Supreme Court of the United States building is illuminated at night in Washington, D.C., showing the main entrance, the West Facade with the marble pediment, and the inscription “Equal Justice Under Law.”(Nicolas Economou/NurPhoto/Getty Images)

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

The decision marks the latest legal chapter stemming from the Russia investigation, which examined whether members of Trump’s 2016 campaign coordinated with Moscow’s efforts to influence the election. Special counsel Robert Mueller ultimately concluded that Russia interfered in the election but did not establish that members of the Trump campaign criminally conspired with Russia.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Bradford Betz is a Fox News Digital breaking reporter covering crime, political issues, and much more.

https://www.foxnews.com/video/6380467520112

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注