2026-01-25T11:30:00-0500 / CBS新闻
更新时间:2026年1月25日 / 美国东部时间下午12:10 / CBS新闻
以下是2026年1月25日在《与玛格丽特·布伦南面对国家》节目中播出的对明尼阿波利斯警察局局长布莱恩·奥哈拉的采访实录。
*
玛格丽特·布伦南:我们现在请到了本市警察局局长布莱恩·奥哈拉。局长,欢迎来到《面对国家》节目。
明尼阿波利斯警察局局长 布莱恩·奥哈拉:早上好,玛格丽特。
玛格丽特·布伦南:关于这起枪击事件,您能了解到什么情况?因为我们刚刚听到了诺姆部长和博维诺先生的说法,以及他们对事件经过的描述。视频和证据是否支持他们的说法?
奥哈拉:很遗憾,我们没有收到联邦执法部门关于事件的任何官方信息。即使我们的警员最初到达现场,值班指挥官也没有得到在涉及执法人员枪击事件中通常会提供的最基本信息,这些信息本应确保没有其他受害者。从那以后,应我的要求,明尼苏达州刑事调查局(BCA)前往现场。他们昨天被阻止进入现场,但之后他们返回了现场,现在正在寻找更多目击者和可能存在的证据。
玛格丽特·布伦南:所以您是说明尼苏达州今天才刚刚开始调查?
奥哈拉:昨天有人试图开始调查。我不知道昨天是否有什么事情被调查了。我确实知道,当他们在现场时,不止一次被禁止进入,之后现场就被污染了。
玛格丽特·布伦南:对于我们的观众来说,明尼苏达州有点不同。有一个刑事调查局,它是负责调查使用武力事件的州机构——
奥哈拉:是的。
玛格丽特·布伦南:——它与您的警察部门是分开的。
奥哈拉:是的。
玛格丽特·布伦南:但根据您在公共场合看到的情况以及从联邦官员那里听到的信息,有没有任何证据表明普雷蒂(Pretti)在袭击联邦官员,正如边境巡逻队负责人声称的那样?
奥哈拉:嗯,我和全国数千人一样,也看到了这些视频,视频本身说明了一切。我认为人们所说的事情令人深感担忧。这个人是一名城市居民。看来他当时在场,行使他的第一修正案权利记录执法活动,同时也在合法地在城市公共空间携带武器,行使他的第二修正案权利。所以我认为非常明显,有很多严重的问题被提出。我认为更大的问题是,即使调查最终证明枪击时是合法的,我认为这在目前来看并不重要,因为目前城市中发生的事情引发了太多的愤怒和担忧。
玛格丽特·布伦南:您说现在不重要是什么意思?您是说当地的局势已经……留下了这种印象?
奥哈拉:人们已经受够了。这是不到三周内的第三起枪击事件。明尼阿波利斯警察局去年全年从街头回收了约900支枪,逮捕了数百名暴力犯罪者,而且我们没有向任何人开枪。而现在这是第二个美国公民被杀害。这是三周内的第三起枪击事件。人们一直在发声,说这还会再次发生。我认为每个人都在等待双方能够走到一起,解决这个问题。这是不可持续的。我们警察局只有600名警察。我们被压得喘不过气来。在管理所有这些混乱的同时,还要作为一个大城市的警察部门,这付出了巨大的代价。这太多了。
玛格丽特·布伦南:您是在呼吁美国移民和海关执法局(ICE)离开吗?
奥哈拉:我们理解,只要有ICE,明尼苏达州就有移民执法。问题不在于执法正在发生。显然是这些事情发生的方式。这些策略显然是不安全的,并且在社区中引起了很多愤怒和恐惧。
玛格丽特·布伦南:让我问问我们所知道的情况,因为国土安全部声称普雷蒂身上有武器。您说普雷蒂——当您说他是一名有持枪许可证的合法枪支拥有者时,您暗示普雷蒂在事件发生时携带了武器。您知道武器是隐蔽携带还是曾被挥舞过?
奥哈拉:我看到不同的专家和人士分析了视频并发表了相关声明。我无法猜测,但我没有看到任何证据表明武器被挥舞过。
玛格丽特·布伦南:好的,因为我们查阅了明尼苏达州的枪支许可证规定,允许隐蔽携带,并且在抗议活动中携带没有限制。
奥哈拉:是的,没错。
玛格丽特·布伦南:但国土安全部部长说他身上除了枪之外还有两发子弹。“我不认识任何一个和平的抗议者会带着枪和弹药而不是标语来参加抗议。”联邦调查局局长说,“你不能在任何抗议活动中携带装有多个弹匣的枪支。”在明尼苏达州,他们的说法是否有坚实的法律依据?
奥哈拉:在美国,你有第二修正案赋予的拥有枪支的权利,明尼苏达州对此有一些限制。我们看到的所有情况,我们所了解的情况表明,他没有违反任何这些限制。他不是重刑犯,并且他确实有手枪携带许可证。
玛格丽特·布伦南:那么他在现场是否有装满弹药的弹匣?因为美国总统和边境安全负责人都说他有,而博维诺直接指责您没有公开说明这一点。他说警察局长忽略了嫌疑人有枪和装满弹药的弹匣这一事实。
奥哈拉:嗯,他们忽略的是,他们没有向我们分享任何信息,并且他们阻止了州执法部门——该机构负责处理绝大多数警察涉枪事件——进入现场。所以我不知道我应该如何向公众分享他们没有向我们提供的信息。
玛格丽特·布伦南:所以您没有看到有多个弹匣的证据,但——但如果真的有,那是否是违法的?
奥哈拉:我认为如果有人合法行使其第二修正案赋予的携带武器的权利,这并不相关。唯一的问题是他们是否将武器用于非法目的。
玛格丽特·布伦南:我想问问副总统关于地方当局的一些言论。副总统说,当移民当局拨打911请求帮助处理包围他们的人群时,地方警察被命令“退一步”。您是否曾被下令退一步?警察是否被告知不要保护移民和海关执法局(ICE)?
奥哈拉:有人质疑和贬低明尼阿波利斯警察局工作人员的辛勤工作,这令人深感失望。2020年城市遭受破坏后,这里只剩下600名警察,他们正在做一项了不起的工作。大约有十几名我们的警察在应对街头混乱时受伤。每当城市面临生命威胁、公共安全或破坏时,我们的警员都会做出回应。不管是因为ICE在场还是社区里的人在场,我们都在尽一切努力管理这种混乱。但这里只有600名警察,而有数千名移民局特工。
玛格丽特·布伦南:是的,据我们所知将近3000人。副总统和诺姆部长说 Minneapolis 局势特别混乱。但他们也指出了庇护城市政策,并说如果没有这些政策——这些政策禁止您协助联邦移民行动——这一切本不会发生。您如何回应这种说法,即因为庇护城市政策,您才被迫处于这种境地?
奥哈拉:嗯,这里几十年来一直有这些政策和法律,并不是明尼阿波利斯警察局或当地执法部门要把在监狱里的人交出去。城市警察不运营县一级的监狱,监狱是州一级的,所以我们一直遵守法律。我不知道还能要求这个非常、非常人手不足、过度劳累的警察部门做什么。
玛格丽特·布伦南:而且我知道现在有国民警卫队在协助您。现在有国民警卫队支持,这种情况可持续吗?您知道这些抗议活动会持续多久吗?
奥哈拉:是的。我的意思是,昨天,我们不得不紧急召回。我们向州、县和整个都会区的地方执法部门请求互助。这显然是一场紧急情况,我们请求了国民警卫队。截至今天早上,我们已经撤回了所有互助力量以及国民警卫队伙伴,现在只有明尼阿波利斯警察回应呼叫并试图保护城市。但这绝对不可持续。我们的警察很累。他们已经很紧张了,而我们有工作要做,努力保护这个城市的人民安全。
玛格丽特·布伦南:在这次枪击事件之前,哥伦比亚广播公司(CBS)报道说,至少有10名来自明尼阿波利斯美国检察官办公室的人员辞职。我们知道,一名联邦调查局特工在被告知停止调查开枪击毙Renee Good的警官后辞职。除了您的警察之外,当地执法部门(包括美国检察官办公室和当地联邦调查局)还经历了什么?
奥哈拉:我是说,遗憾的是,过去几年我们与所有联邦执法部门合作,将真正的罪犯——帮派成员、在这里开枪的人、走私芬太尼到这个城市的人——绳之以法,做了大量工作。我们与所有住在明尼苏达州的联邦执法人员合作,看到这么多人被贬低,这么多人离开,这令人非常痛心,因为这正在摧毁明尼苏达州打击暴力犯罪的基础,而过去几年我们取得了显著成效。
玛格丽特·布伦南:奥哈拉局长,我们祝愿您和您的城市平安。感谢您今天早上的宝贵时间。《面对国家》节目将在一分钟后回来。请继续收看。
Transcript: Minneapolis Police Chief Brian O’Hara on “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan,” Jan. 25, 2026
2026-01-25T11:30:00-0500 / CBS News
Updated on: January 25, 2026 / 12:10 PM EST / CBS News
The following is the transcript of the interview with Minneapolis Police Chief Brian O’Hara that aired on “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan” on Jan. 25, 2026.
*
MARGARET BRENNAN: We are joined now by the city’s police chief, Brian O’Hara. Chief, welcome to Face the Nation.
MINNEAPOLIS POLICE CHIEF, BRIAN O’HARA: Good morning, Margaret.
MARGARET BRENNAN: What have you been able to learn about the shooting? Because we did just hear the claims by Secretary Noem and Mr. Bovino and their version of what happened. Do the videos and evidence back up their descriptions?
O’HARA: So, unfortunately, we don’t have any official information from federal law enforcement about what has happened. Even when our officers initially responded to the scene, our watch commander was not given even the most basic information that is typical in a, in a law enforcement involved shooting, just to ensure that there is potentially no other victims. Since then, the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension responded to the scene at my request. They were blocked from the scene yesterday, but they have since returned to the scene and are, are now canvassing for additional witnesses and evidence that may be there.
MARGARET BRENNAN: So do I understand you saying that Minnesota has just begun its investigation today?
O’HARA: There were attempts yesterday to begin the investigation. I do not know what, if anything, was conducted yesterday. I do know that while they were at the scene, more than once, they were not permitted to enter before the scene then was contaminated.
MARGARET BRENNAN: And for our viewers, Minnesota is a little bit different. There is
this Bureau of Criminal Apprehension that is the state agency that investigates use of force incidents–
O’HARA: Yes.
MARGARET BRENNAN: –They are separate from your police force.
O’HARA: Yes.
MARGARET BRENNAN: But from what you have seen in the public space and heard from federal officials, is there any evidence that you know of that Pretti was assaulting the federal officers, as the Border Patrol chief claims?
O’HARA: Well, I have seen the videos, just as thousands of people around the country have, and the videos speak for themselves. I think it’s deeply concerning the things that are being said. This is an individual that was a city resident. It appears that he was present, exercising his First Amendment rights to record law enforcement activity and also exercising his Second Amendment rights to lawfully be armed in a public space in the city. So I think very obviously, there are serious questions that are being raised. And I think the greater issue is, even if there is an investigation that ultimately proves that at the time of the shooting it was legally justified, I don’t think that even matters at this point, because there just- there is so much outrage and concern around what is happening in the city.
MARGARET BRENNAN: What do you mean it does not matter at this point? You mean the situation on the ground is already- the impression is left?
O’HARA: People have had enough. This is the third shooting now in less than three weeks. The Minneapolis Police Department went the entire year last year recovering about 900 guns from the street, arresting hundreds and hundreds of violent offenders, and we didn’t shoot anyone. And now this is the second American citizen that has been killed. It’s the third shooting within three weeks. People have been speaking out, saying that this was going to happen again. And I think everyone is kind of waiting for folks on both sides to come together and just figure this thing out. This is not sustainable. This police department has only 600 police officers. We are stretched incredibly thin. This is taking an enormous toll trying to manage all of this chaos, on top of having to be the police department for a major city. It’s too much.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Are you calling on ICE to leave?
O’HARA: We understand that for as long as there has been ICE, there has been immigration enforcement in Minnesota. The problem is not that enforcement is happening. It’s clearly the manner in which these things are happening. These tactics are very obviously not safe, and it is generating a lot of outrage and fear in the community.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Let me ask you about what we know, because DHS claims that Pretti had a weapon on him. You said that Pretti- you implied Pretti was carrying at the time of the incident, when you said he was a legal firearm owner with a license to carry. Do you know if the weapon remained concealed or was it ever brandished?
O’HARA: I have seen different experts and people analyzing the video that have made statements about that. I cannot speculate, but I do not have any, any evidence that I’ve seen that suggests that the weapon was brandished.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Okay, because we checked the Minnesota gun permit rules allow for concealed carry, and there are no restrictions on carrying in a protest.
O’HARA: Yes, that’s right.
MARGARET BRENNAN: But the homeland security secretary said that he had two cartridges on him in addition to the gun. “I don’t know of any peaceful protester that shows up with a gun and ammunition rather than a sign.” The FBI director said, “You cannot bring a firearm loaded with multiple magazines to any sort of protest.” Are they on firm legal ground in Minnesota?
O’HARA: You have a Second Amendment right in the United States to possess a firearm, and there are some restrictions around that in Minnesota. And everything that we see, that we are aware of, shows that he did not violate any of those restrictions. He is not a convicted felon, and he is someone that did have a permit for the handgun to carry it.
MARGARET BRENNAN: So did he have magazines full of ammunition at the scene? Because both the president of the United States and the border security chief said that he did, and Bovino directly accused you of not saying that publicly. He said the police chief omitted the fact that the suspect had a gun and magazines full of ammunition.
O’HARA: Well, that- what they are omitting is that they are not sharing any information with us, and that they blocked state law enforcement, which is the agency that conducts the overwhelming majority of police involved shootings from the scene. So I don’t know how I’m supposed to share information with the public that they are not sharing with us.
MARGARET BRENNAN: So you have not seen evidence that there were multiple magazines, but- but would it even be illegal if that were the case?
O’HARA: I don’t think there is any relevance if someone is lawfully exercising their Second Amendment right to carry. The only question would be if they were using the weapon in a- for an unlawful purpose.
MARGARET BRENNAN: I want to ask you about some of the things that the vice president also has said about local authorities. The vice president said that local police have been told to stand down when immigration authorities call 911 asking for help dealing with crowds surrounding them. Were you ever ordered to stand down? Have police been told not to protect ICE?
O’HARA: It is deeply disappointing to have anyone question and disparage the hard work of the men and women of the Minneapolis Police Department. There are 600 police officers that are left here after the destruction of the city in 2020, and they are doing an incredible job. About a dozen of our cops have been injured responding to a lot of the chaos that has resulted on the streets. Our officers respond every time there’s a threat to someone’s life, to public safety or destruction in the city. And it doesn’t matter whether it’s because ICE is there or someone from the community is there. We are doing everything that we can to manage this chaos. But there’s only 600 cops here, and there’s thousands of immigration agents here.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Right, nearly 3000 as we understand it. The vice president and Secretary Noem said Minneapolis is uniquely chaotic. But they also pointed to sanctuary city policies and said that if those policies weren’t in place, these are policies that prohibit you from assisting federal immigration operations, that none of this would really be happening. How do you respond to that claim that because of the sanctuary city policies, you are being forced into this position?
O’HARA: Well, there’s policies and laws that have been the case here for decades, and it’s not on the Minneapolis Police Department or local law enforcement, you know, to hand folks over that are in jails. The city police do not operate a jail that’s at the county level and the prisons are at the state level, so we are complying with the law as we have been for many years. And I don’t know what else could possibly be asked of this very, very, you know, understaffed and overstretched police department.
MARGARET BRENNAN: And now you have the National Guard, I understand, assisting you. Is this sustainable now that you have the guard supporting you? Do you have any idea of how long these protests will last?
O’HARA: Yeah. I mean, yesterday, we had to do an emergency recall. We asked for mutual aid from the state, county and all of local law enforcement around the metro. It was very clearly an emergency, and we requested the National Guard. As of this morning, we have released all of mutual aid, as well as the National Guard partners, and it’s back to just the Minneapolis Police responding to calls and trying to protect the city. But this is absolutely not sustainable. Our cops are tired. They are thin stretched as it is, and we have a job to do, trying to keep the people of this city safe.
MARGARET BRENNAN: So before this shooting, CBS reported that there were at least 10 people from the Minneapolis U.S. Attorney’s Office who had resigned. We know the FBI agent resigned after being told to stop investigating the officer who shot Renee Good. What is local law enforcement experiencing beyond your officers, but in the U.S. Attorney’s Office, in your local FBI?
O’HARA: I mean the sad part of this is the incredible work that we have done with all of federal law enforcement over the last few years to get real criminals put away, gang members, people that are shooting folks out here, bringing, smuggling fentanyl into this city. We’ve worked with all of these federal law enforcement agents that live in Minnesota, and it’s so- it’s so upsetting to see so many of them disparaged and so many of them walking away because it is destroying the foundation of addressing violent crime in Minnesota that’s produced incredible results over the last few years.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Police Chief O’Hara, we wish you well and peace for your city. Thank you for your time this morning. Face the Nation will be back in one minute. Stay with us.
发表回复