2026年6月11日 美国东部时间17:11:00 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻
撰文
更新于：2026年6月11日 / 美国东部时间下午6:40 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻
两名熟悉外交斡旋的消息人士透露，美国与伊朗之间的意向书或谅解备忘录很可能将于下周初签署，为双方就一项持久的美伊协议展开进一步谈判铺平道路。
这份谅解备忘录的签署将启动为期60天的谈判，以敲定美伊协议的细节。多名消息人士表示，这一时间框架可根据需要延长。
初步举措包括通过排雷和开放霍尔木兹海峡来确保“贸易自由”。原则上，伊朗将承诺在15至20年内暂停铀浓缩活动，并拆除其核设施。作为伊朗采取这些举措的回报，将随时间推移分阶段向伊朗提供金融救济，且救济进度与伊朗的履约情况挂钩。
美国情报界评估认为，伊朗目前并未拥有核武器，也没有寻求拥有核武器，而是试图达到核武器门槛。伊朗政权还拒绝允许国际原子能机构的核核查人员进入伊朗，以核实其声称的和平核计划性质。以色列情报机构的评估则与此不同。
周四，特朗普总统在Truth Social平台上表示，他已“取消了当晚对伊朗的预定空袭和轰炸行动”，因为一项潜在协议的最终条款已获得包括美国和中东国家在内的“所有相关方”批准——他列出了这些国家，但伊朗不在其中。
总统表示，签署仪式的“时间和地点”将“很快公布”。预计他将于下周前往法国出席全球最大经济体聚会七国集团峰会，此次峰会预计将把战争对全球贸易造成的冲击列为核心议题。
特朗普总统周四下午在椭圆形办公室一场无关的活动中提及了此次签署事宜，并表示他本人不会出席，副总统JD·万斯将代为出席。总统称，签署仪式最早可能于本周末在欧洲举行。副总统办公室将记者的问询转交白宫，白宫未立即回应置评请求。
“协议签署后，海峡就会立即开放，”总统说道。
特朗普发布有关潜在协议的帖子后不久，与伊朗伊斯兰革命卫队有关联的法尔斯新闻社援引一名“接近伊朗谈判团队的知情人士”的话称，总统有关初步协议已达成的说法不实，并表示“与美国的初步谅解备忘录尚未有任何文本获得批准”。
以色列尚未就此置评，但特朗普总统表示，他已与以色列总理本雅明·内塔尼亚胡以及多位阿拉伯国家领导人进行了交谈。
美伊之间的这份谅解备忘录将包括由国际原子能机构的联合国核查人员处理特朗普所称的“核尘埃”，并对核设施进行核查。去年6月，美国和以色列轰炸了福特奥、纳坦兹和伊斯法罕的三处核设施。据评估，这些地点的废墟下仍埋藏着浓缩核材料。
在椭圆形办公室，特朗普总统谈及伊朗时表示：“他们不会拥有核武器——他们已经同意了这一点”，并补充称，伊朗也绝不会“以任何形式、任何方式”购买或研发核武器。
多名消息人士告诉哥伦比亚广播公司新闻，美伊谅解备忘录中提及了涉及伊朗代理真主党的黎巴嫩战争，但细节尚不明朗。今年3月，真主党向以色列边境发射火箭弹后，以色列对黎巴嫩发动了地面入侵；就在上周，以色列还轰炸了贝鲁特外围地区。这场暴力冲突威胁到美国推动黎巴嫩和以色列政府实现关系正常化、共同对抗真主党民兵的努力。
本月早些时候，美国国务卿马可·卢比奥在参议院外交关系委员会作证时，阐述了该协议的部分参数。他表示，伊朗必须重新开放霍尔木兹海峡，允许国际船只“不受炮击、无需缴费”地通行。
他还对委员会表示，在第二阶段，伊朗必须承诺“就深埋在某处山体中的高浓缩铀的处置方式进行非常具体的谈判”。他补充道，伊朗必须“同意就严格且长期的限制措施进行谈判，或取消浓缩活动”。
他称，对伊朗的制裁救济将“与其承诺和履约情况挂钩”。
奥利维亚·加齐斯、凯瑟琳·沃森、比尔·奥赖利、萨拉·库克为本报道撰稿。
U.S.-Iran memorandum of understanding likely to be signed next week
2026-06-11 17:11:00 EDT / CBS News
By
Updated on: June 11, 2026 / 6:40 PM EDT / CBS News
A letter of intent or memorandum of understanding between the U.S. and Iran is likely to be signed early next week, opening the way to further negotiations about an enduring U.S.-Iran agreement, two sources familiar with the diplomatic efforts said.
The signing of the memorandum would kick off 60 days of talks to negotiate details of a U.S.-Iran agreement. That time period could be extended as needed, according to multiple sources.
First steps include ensuring “freedom of trade” by demining and opening the Strait of Hormuz. In principle, Iran would commit to a lockout of 15-20 years during which it would not enrich uranium and would dismantle its nuclear sites. In exchange for taking these steps, Iran would receive financial relief staggered over time and sequenced to correspond with compliance.
The U.S. intelligence community does not assess that Iran has a nuclear weapon or sought one, but rather, that it sought to be at the threshold of one. The regime also refused to allow International Atomic Energy Agency nuclear inspectors into Iran to verify what it claimed was the peaceful nature of its program. Israeli intelligence has a different assessment.
On Thursday, President Trump said on Truth Social, he had “canceled the scheduled strikes and bombings against Iran this evening” because the final points of a potential deal have been approved by “all parties involved,” including the U.S. and Middle East countries, which he listed, though Iran was not among them.
The president said a “time and place” for a signing would be “announced shortly.” He’s expected to travel next week to a gathering of the world’s largest economies at the G7 summit in France, where the disruption to global trade caused by the war was expected to be a key topic.
Mr. Trump mentioned the signing during an unrelated Oval Office event Thursday afternoon and said he would not be present for it, but Vice President JD Vance would attend. The president said it could take place as early as this weekend in Europe. The vice president’s office referred questions to the White House, and the White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
“The strait will open as soon as we have it signed,” the president said.
Shortly after Mr. Trump’s post on the potential deal, the Fars News Agency, associated with the Iran Revolutionary Guard Corps, quoted a “knowledgeable source close to the Iranian negotiating team” who denied the president’s claim about an agreement on an initial deal and stated that “no text of the initial memorandum of understanding with the United States has been approved.”
Israel has not yet commented, but the president said he had spoken with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, as well as several Arab leaders.
The understanding between the U.S. and Iran would include having United Nations inspectors from the IAEA dispose of what Mr. Trump refers to “nuclear dust” and to inspect the nuclear sites. Last June the U.S. and Israel bombed three nuclear sites, at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan. The enriched nuclear material is assessed to be under the rubble at those locations.
In the Oval Office, the president said of Iran, “They will not have a nuclear weapon — they’ve agreed to that,” adding that Iran would also not purchase or develop a nuclear weapon “in any way shape or form.”
The war in Lebanon involving Iranian proxy Hezbollah is mentioned in the memorandum, but details are scarce, multiple sources told CBS News. Israel launched a ground invasion into Lebanon in March after Hezbollah launched rockets across the border, and just this past week, Israel bombed outside of Beirut. The violence threatened to disrupt U.S. attempts to get the Lebanese and Israeli governments to normalize relations and work together against the Hezbollah militia.
Earlier this month, Secretary of State Marco Rubio testified before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and laid out some of the parameters for a deal. He said that Iran must reopen the Strait of Hormuz and allow international ships to sail through “without being fired upon without paying a toll.”
He also told the panel that in phase 2, Iran must commit to “very specific negotiations on highly enriched disposition of the highly enriched uranium that still is buried deep in a mountain somewhere.” He added that Iran must “agree on negotiating severe and long-term limitations, and or cancelation of enrichment in activity.”
Sanctions relief for Iran, he said, would be “associated with their commitment and compliance.”
Olivia Gazis, Kathryn Watson, Bill O’Reilly, Sara Cook contributed to this report.
发表回复