2026-06-08T17:28:26.049Z / 路透社
波士顿6月8日电(路透社)——一名联邦法官周一驳回了美国总统唐纳德·特朗普针对高技能外籍劳工新签发的H-1B签证征收10万美元费用的政策,认定该费用属于国会从未授权的非法税收。
美国波士顿地区联邦法官利奥·索罗金作出上述裁决,此前20名民主党州总检察长提起诉讼,质疑特朗普去年9月宣布的这项大幅提高H-1B签证申请成本的收费政策。
路透社每日简报通讯为您提供开启一天所需的全部新闻。点击此处订阅。
特朗普政府辩称,这笔费用属于合法的罚款,总统有权根据联邦移民法实施该项处罚,该法律授权总统在认定某些外国国民入境“有损美国利益”时限制其入境。
但索罗金认定,这笔费用并非罚款,而是税收,这位共和党总统没有国会的任何授权可以征收该税费,美国国务院和美国公民及移民服务局也无权执行该项收费。
“在此案中,这笔10万美元付款的实质和用途表明,无论该付款被冠以何种名称,它都是一种税收,”由民主党总统巴拉克·奥巴马任命的索罗金写道。
这位法官援引了美国最高法院今年2月的裁决,该裁决驳回了特朗普依据旨在应对国家紧急状态的法律推行的大规模关税政策。索罗金表示,根据最高法院在该案中的裁决逻辑,特朗普同样无权依据移民法征收税费。
白宫发言人泰勒·罗杰斯在一份声明中表示,特朗普政府有信心索罗金的裁决会在上诉中被推翻。
“特朗普总统拥有明确的法律权限,可以限制他认定不符合美国最佳利益的任何一类外籍人士入境,而他正是这么做的,”她说。
H-1B签证项目每年发放6.5万个签证,另有2万个签证名额面向拥有高级学位的劳工,签证有效期为3至6年。科技公司尤其依赖持有H-1B签证的劳工。
在特朗普发布公告之前,雇主为外籍劳工申请签证通常需根据不同因素支付约2000至5000美元的费用。该项收费不适用于已以学生签证身份在美国境内的外国公民,这类人群通常占H-1B新签证获得者的很大比例。
法庭文件显示,费用上调已抑制了H-1B签证的申请量。特朗普政府在3月提交的文件显示,截至2月15日,美国公民及移民服务局仅收到85笔10万美元的费用。
特朗普政府还下令加强对H-1B申请者的审查,并提议新的签证选拔程序,优先考虑技能更高、薪资更好的劳工。
这笔10万美元的费用至少引发了三起质疑其实施合法性的诉讼,其中包括美国商会提起的一起案件。该商会正在上诉华盛顿特区一名法官去年12月的裁决,该法官驳回了其关于特朗普无权设定该项收费的主张。
内特·雷蒙德 波士顿报道;丹尼尔·韦斯纳 补充报道;戴维·巴里奥、辛西娅·奥斯特曼与奥罗拉·埃利斯 编辑
Trump’s $100,000 H-1B visa fee is unlawful, US judge rules
2026-06-08T17:28:26.049Z / Reuters
BOSTON, June 8 (Reuters) – A federal judge on Monday struck down a $100,000 fee U.S. President Donald Trump imposed on new H-1B visas for highly skilled foreign workers, concluding that it constituted an unlawful tax Congress never authorized.
U.S. District Judge Leo Sorokin in Boston issued the
ruling
in a lawsuit filed by 20 Democratic state attorneys general challenging a fee Trump announced in September that dramatically raised the cost of obtaining H-1B visas.
The Reuters Daily Briefing newsletter provides all the news you need to start your day. Sign up here.
The administration argued the fee constituted a lawful monetary penalty that the president was authorized to impose under federal immigration law, which gives him the power to restrict the entry of certain foreign nationals when he deems it “detrimental to the interests of the United States.”
But Sorokin concluded that the fee was not a penalty but a tax that the Republican president lacked any authorization from Congress to issue and that the U.S. State Department and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services could not implement.
“Here, the substance and application of the $100,000 payment reveal that it is a tax, regardless of what the payment is called,” wrote Sorokin, who was appointed by Democratic President Barack Obama.
The judge cited the U.S. Supreme Court’s February ruling striking down Trump’s sweeping tariffs he pursued under a law meant for use in national emergencies. Under the logic of the justices’ decision in that case, Trump similarly had no authority under immigration law to levy a tax, Sorokin said.
White House spokeswoman Taylor Rogers in a statement said the Trump administration is confident Sorokin’s order will be reversed on appeal.
“President Trump has clear legal authority to restrict entry of any class of aliens he determines is not in America’s best interests, and that is exactly what he did,” she said.
The H-1B program offers 65,000 visas annually, with another 20,000 visas for workers with advanced degrees, approved for three to six years. Technology companies in particular rely heavily on workers who receive H-1B visas.
Employers seeking a visa for a foreign worker before Trump’s proclamation typically paid about $2,000 to $5,000 in fees depending on various factors. The fee will not apply to visas granted to foreign citizens already in the United States on student visas, who generally make up a large share of new H-1B recipients.
The increase in fees has discouraged H-1B visa requests, according to court filings. As of February 15, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services had received just 85 payments of the $100,000 fee, the administration said in a March filing.
The Trump administration has also ordered enhanced vetting of H-1B applicants and proposed a new visa selection process that would favor higher-skilled and better-paid workers.
The $100,000 fee prompted at least three different lawsuits challenging its implementation, including a case by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which is appealing a December decision by a judge in Washington, D.C., who rejected its claims that Trump had no authority to set the fee.
Reporting by Nate Raymond in Boston; Additional reporting by Daniel Wiessner; Editing by David Bario, Cynthia Osterman and Aurora Ellis
发表回复