2026-06-07T19:00:12-0400 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻
本文为2026年3月1日首次发布报道的更新版。原版视频可在此处观看。
*
去年2月最高法院驳回特朗普总统的关税政策时,总统对自己提名的两名大法官发起抨击,称他们是傻瓜和走狗。每当法官作出不利于他的裁决时,总统都会频繁怒斥这些法官。而紧随其后的往往是其支持者针对这些法官的一连串暴力威胁。正如我们在3月首次报道的那样,我们采访了26名联邦法官——其中9名由民主党任命,17名由共和党任命,包括在职和退休法官。在职法官告诉我们,他们感到被围攻。大多数人不愿露面,担心自身安全。由罗纳德·里根任命的约翰·卡根努尔法官是少数愿意出镜的人之一。他曾阻止特朗普总统终止出生公民权的企图。当时他并未料到后续会发生什么。
约翰·卡根努尔法官:我和妻子在家时,门铃响了。我去开门,发现有五名带着长枪的副警长在那里——
比尔·惠特克:他们是拔枪出现的吗?
约翰·卡根努尔法官:哦没错。是的,是的。长枪,非常吓人的枪。他们对我说:“先生,我们能见见您的妻子吗?”我问:“为什么?”他们说,先生,我们接到举报说你谋杀了自己的妻子。
那是一场残忍的恶作剧。第二天呢?又有炸弹威胁。对华盛顿州联邦地区法院法官约翰·卡根努尔来说,这还没完。
约翰·卡根努尔法官:有一名国会议员制作了一张通缉令。顶部用大字写着“通缉”,然后是我们几个人的照片。上面除了“无论死活”之外什么都写了。
他的麻烦始于特朗普总统签署行政命令,终止第14修正案对非公民在美国领土上出生的婴儿的公民权保障。卡根努尔法官裁定该命令“公然违宪”。随后威胁便纷至沓来。
约翰·卡根努尔法官:其中一些内容非常非常恶劣,充满威胁。
比尔·惠特克:是死亡威胁吗?
约翰·卡根努尔法官:哦没错,是的,有几十条。就算没有上百条,也有几十条。
约翰·卡根努尔 接受《60分钟》采访
卡根努尔法官告诉我们,威胁是这份工作的一部分。他曾审判过一名基地组织炸弹制造者和蒙大拿州民兵成员,需要全天候安保。但他表示,自己从未像在出生公民权案件中收到过这么多死亡威胁。
约翰·卡根努尔法官:我从事这行已经44年了。我从未见过这个国家的司法系统遭遇过像过去一年这样的敌意。我不认为这是因为我们作出了糟糕的裁决。我认为这是因为有人觉得可以通过批评联邦司法系统大做政治文章。
特朗普总统(2025年):“此外,我们不能让一小撮共产主义激进左翼法官阻挠我们法律的执行,篡夺完全属于美国总统的职责。”
当特朗普总统在驱逐移民的法庭诉讼中败诉时,他称这名法官是疯子。当移民执法行动被裁定为非法时,他称这些法官是怪物。正是这类煽动性言论引发了铺天盖地的死亡威胁。
我们的调查发现,数百条威胁被留在了法官的语音信箱里。以下是一名法官裁定总统违反第一修正案后收到的威胁录音:
威胁录音:我希望你的全家和所有你爱的人都在你面前被强奸,然后被砍头。
还有一段是在一名法官裁定总统不得削减某些政府福利后收到的。
威胁录音:真希望有人他妈的暗杀你这个混蛋。
这是一座喷发的仇恨火山
威胁录音:我倒要看看你敢不敢指控唐纳德·J·特朗普。你这个狗娘养的。
美国法警局的职责是甄别可能演变为实际暴力行为的口头威胁。法官们告诉我们,法警局已经不堪重负。去年,有400名联邦法官成为严重威胁的目标,四年内增长了78%。
琼斯法官:用最直白的话说:如果我们不小心,就会有法官被杀害。情况就是这么严峻。
比尔·惠特克:情况有这么严重吗?
琼斯法官:情况就是这么严重。
约翰·琼斯法官是宾夕法尼亚州的退休联邦法官,由乔治·W·布什任命。他和其他55名退休法官对此深感担忧,于是组建了两党团体,游说白宫停止妖魔化法官。
约翰·琼斯法官 接受《60分钟》采访
琼斯法官:现在的环境充满了恶意,人们携带武器,能够查到法官的住址——然后就可以袭击法官或其家人。
比尔·惠特克:那么当特朗普总统称法官为 rogue、精神错乱、腐败的人时,你认为他在做什么,为什么要这么做?
琼斯法官:我认为他是在试图让联邦法院失去合法性。
比尔·惠特克:他为什么要这么做?这么做对他有什么好处?
琼斯法官:这是一个被放大的总统任期。我认为国会非常怠惰,而总统真想说了算。嗯,你知道,公民课教过我,国会制定法律,总统忠实地执行国家的法律。但现在我们完全本末倒置了。
琼斯法官告诉我们,本届白宫正在试探总统权力的边界。如今,特朗普政府面临近800起诉讼,挑战其从移民政策到裁员计划的各项议程。法官们恰好陷入了交火之中。
埃丝特·萨拉斯法官:作为一名宣誓维护宪法、捍卫法治的法官,我有责任发声。这就是我接受采访的原因。
埃丝特·萨拉斯法官是新泽西州的联邦地区法院法官。由巴拉克·奥巴马任命的她,已成为反对针对法官的人身攻击的领军人物——这也让她成为了死亡威胁的目标。她清楚其中的利害关系。2020年,一名败诉的诉讼当事人来到她家门前,枪杀了她的儿子丹尼尔,打伤了她的丈夫马克。那次袭击并非出于政治动机,但她担心如今这种煽动性言论会让这类惨剧更有可能发生。
埃丝特·萨拉斯法官:我现在比我唯一的儿子被谋杀后更担心——
比尔·惠特克:为什么?
埃丝特·萨拉斯法官:因为我认为针对司法系统的攻击只会——愈演愈烈。我现在看到的情况和过去截然不同。这种攻击从我们的国家领导人开始,自上而下。
萨拉斯法官告诉我们,诋毁法官正在侵蚀人们对法院的信任。
埃丝特·萨拉斯法官:如果你不同意我们作出的裁决,那就上诉。如果你不同意我们作出的判决,那就上诉。正确的做法不是将我们非人化。而我认为,这就是近期一直在推行的主动议程。有时候我觉得我们的政治领导人在拿我们的生命玩俄罗斯轮盘赌。
比尔·惠特克:你认为这种言论会助长暴力吗?
埃丝特·萨拉斯法官:我认为会。这很危险。
埃丝特·萨拉斯法官 接受《60分钟》采访
白宫在一份声明中表示:“作为经历过两次暗杀企图的幸存者,没有人比特朗普总统更了解政治暴力的危险。”声明接着指责司法机构“公然违抗”其“非法裁决”。
时任副司法部长托德·布兰奇称这是一场战争。
托德·布兰奇:我们经常因为当地法官不遵守法律而被暂停执行裁决或被推翻,完完全全。而且,不是同一批法官,但有一批法官反复这么做。这显然不是巧合。这是故意的。这就是一场战争,伙计。
托德·布兰奇拒绝了我们的采访请求。他在给我们的声明中表示,一些法官继续发布“过于宽泛甚至毫无道理的禁令”,但补充道“威胁和恐吓联邦官员是非法的”。
约翰·卡根努尔法官告诉我们,宪法是法官的北极星。
比尔·惠特克:那么对于那些说你是政治代理人,试图阻挠总统目标的人,你会怎么说?
约翰·卡根努尔法官:我会说你不明白我们的工作。我们适用宪法。在这个国家过去250年的历史中,一直都是由法官来判定某件事是否符合宪法。如果没有人来做这个决定,没有人来执行宪法,那宪法就会和俄罗斯的宪法一样了。
威胁并非只来自右翼。2020年,参议院少数党领袖查克·舒默警告称,大法官尼尔·戈萨奇和布雷特·卡瓦诺将为限制堕胎的行为“付出代价”,他后来道歉了。2022年,一名潜在刺客试图在卡瓦诺大法官的家中刺杀他,随后被逮捕。但共和党任命的琼斯法官表示,右翼的暴力言论无人能及。
琼斯法官:双方的全国性言论可能随着时间的推移都变得更糟了。但我不会承认民主党或民主党公职人员的行为有任何一点本届政府针对联邦司法系统的那种做法。根本没有证据证明这一点。
罗恩·扎亚斯:如果你看看数据库,上面有数百名民选官员和法官的姓名和地址——
罗恩·扎亚斯是Ironwall公司的首席执行官,该公司负责从网络上删除法官的个人信息。
罗恩·扎亚斯:这是我们收到的另一起针对法官的威胁。
扎亚斯告诉我们,14年来,他从未见过像今天这么多的暴力威胁。
罗恩·扎亚斯:你知道,如果你把这条信息传播给一百万人,你只需要其中一个人付诸行动。这就是法官们如今不得不面对的可怕之处。
扎亚斯还会浏览暗网——互联网上的犯罪天堂,匿名威胁者试图在现实世界中造成伤害。如今,扎亚斯担心一种新型威胁。
罗恩·扎亚斯与比尔·惠特克 接受《60分钟》采访
罗恩·扎亚斯:过去的威胁是“你判我输了,我要杀了你”。现在我们看到的这类威胁——有一个全新的领域在说“我想影响你的判决”。这是暴民心态。他们想威胁你,这样你就会做出“正确”的决定。
法警局还在调查一种引人注目的新型恐吓手段:全国各地向法官及其子女寄送了数百份不请自来的披萨。这是一种看似无害的快递,却带着险恶的信息:
埃丝特·萨拉斯法官:我们知道你住在哪里。我们知道你的孩子住在哪里。你想落得和萨拉斯法官的儿子一样的下场吗?
至少有20份披萨是以萨拉斯法官已故儿子的名义寄送到各家各户的。
埃丝特·萨拉斯法官:订单上有我被杀害的儿子的名字。他们在利用我的孩子。他们在利用丹尼尔的名字来恐吓法官。
比尔·惠特克:我知道这很令人震惊,但这一定让你非常非常痛苦。
埃丝特·萨拉斯法官:哦,你知道。那一次彻底击垮了我。更不用说,更添一层痛苦的是,我至今未见过司法部长或副司法部长站在讲台前谴责这类恐吓行为。
前司法部长帕姆·邦迪也拒绝了我们的采访请求。萨拉斯法官和其他许多人一样告诉我们,法治正面临危机。
埃丝特·萨拉斯法官:我坐在这里,既是丹尼尔的母亲,也是一位失去独子的女性。马克和我经历了地狱般的日子。当我看到我们的政治领导人和掌权者做出这种不负责任的行为时,我感到难过。我非常担心,因为我担心我们的民主,真的很担心。
制作:希瑟·雅培。助理制片人:宝琳娜·斯莫林斯基。广播助理:玛丽亚·约翰逊。剪辑:肖恩·凯利。
https://www.cbsnews.com/video/threats-against-judges-60-minutes-video-2026-03-01/
Federal judges who’ve ruled against Trump administration denounce threats against themselves, their families
2026-06-07T19:00:12-0400 / CBS News
This is an updated version of a story first published on March 1, 2026. The original video can be viewed here.
*
When the Supreme Court struck down President Trump’s tariffs last February, the president lashed out against two Supreme Court Justices he nominated calling them fools and lapdogs. The president has frequently railed against judges when they rule against him. What often happens next is a barrage of violent threats from his followers against those judges. As we first reported in March, we spoke with 26 federal judges – nine Democratic appointees, 17 Republican, both sitting and retired. The sitting judges told us they feel under siege. Most would not appear on camera, fearful for their safety. Judge John Coughenour – appointed by Ronald Reagan – is one of the few who would. He blocked President Trump’s bid to end birthright citizenship. He wasn’t prepared for what happened next.
Judge John Coughenour: My wife and I are at home. And the doorbell rings. And I go to the door. And there’s, I think, five sheriff’s deputies there with long rifles –
Bill Whitaker: And they show up with guns drawn?
Judge John Coughenour: Oh yeah. Yes, yes. Long guns, very intimidating guns. And they said to me, “Sir, could we see your wife?” And I said, “whatever for?” And they said, well, sir, we’ve had a report that you’ve murdered your wife.”
It was a cruel hoax. The next day? A bomb threat. For John Coughenour, a federal district court judge in Washington state, it didn’t end there.
Judge John Coughenour: There was a congressman that had a wanted poster. It just said Wanted in big letters at the top and then a picture of several of us. It said everything except “dead or alive”.
His trouble started when President Trump signed an executive order to end the 14th Amendment’s guarantee of citizenship for infants born on U.S. soil to non-citizens. Judge Coughenour ruled it, quote, “blatantly unconstitutional.” The threats poured in.
Judge John Coughenour: Some of it was very very ugly, and very threatening.
Bill Whitaker: Death threats?
Judge John Coughenour: Oh yes, yes dozens of em. Dozens if not hundreds.
Judge John Coughenour 60 Minutes
Judge Coughenour told us threats come with the turf. He has sentenced an al Qaeda bomber and Montana militia members and needed round the clock protection. But he said he’d never had as many death threats as with the birthright citizenship case.
Judge Coughenour: I’ve been at this for 44 years. I have never encountered the hostility toward the judiciary that has existed in this country in the, the last year. And I don’t think it’s’ because we’re making bad decisions. I think it’s because there are people who think that they can make a lot of political hay out of criticizing the federal judiciary.
President Trump (in 2025): “And also we cannot allow a handful of communist radical left judges to obstruct the enforcement of our laws and assume the duties that belong solely to the president of the United States.”
When President Trump lost a battle in court to deport migrants, he called the judge a lunatic. When immigration crackdowns were ruled illegal, he called the judges monsters. It’s incendiary comments like that that have provoked a torrent of death threats.
Our reporting found hundreds of threats were left on judges voicemails. This one after a judge ruled the president had violated the First Amendment:
Recording of threat: I hope your whole family and everybody you love is raped in front of you and has their heads cut off.
And this one after a judge ruled the president couldn’t cut certain government benefits.
Recording of threat: I wish somebody would f assassinate your ass.
It’s a volcano of vitriol
Recording of threat: I double dare you to try to put charges on Donald J. Trump. You son of a bitch.
It falls to the U.S. Marshals to pinpoint the verbal threats that might lead to physical violence. Judges told us the Marshals are overwhelmed. Last year 400 federal judges were targets of serious threats, a 78% jump in four years.
Judge Jones: In very plain English: if we’re not careful we’re gonna get a judge killed. It’s just that stark.
Bill Whitaker: It’s that serious
Judge Jones: It’s that serious.
Judge John Jones is a retired federal judge from Pennsylvania, a George W. Bush appointee. He – and 55 other retired judges – were so concerned they formed a bipartisan group to lobby the White House to stop demonizing judges.
Judge John Jones 60 Minutes
Judge Jones: This is such a toxic environment, where people are taking arms, and can identify where a judge lives – can strike out against that judge or the judge’s family members.
Bill Whitaker: So when President Trump attacks judges as rogue, deranged, corrupt, what do you think he’s doing and, and why?
Judge Jones: I think that he’s attempting to delegitimize the federal courts.
Bill Whitaker: Why would he do that? What’s the benefit to him?
Judge Jones: It’s a presidency sort of on steroids. And you have a very dormant, I think, United States Congress, and a president who means to really say what the law is. Well, you know, civics taught me that Congress makes the law, and the president faithfully executes the laws of the country. We’ve turned that on its head right now.
Judge Jones told us this White House is testing the bounds of presidential power. Today the Trump administration is facing nearly 800 lawsuits contesting its agenda, from immigration to job cuts. Judges are caught squarely in the crossfire.
Judge Esther Salas: As a judge who has taken an oath to uphold the Constitution and defend the rule of law, I have a duty to call this out. That’s why I’m talking to you.
Judge Esther Salas is a federal district court judge in New Jersey. A Barack Obama appointee, she has become a leading voice against the personal attacks on judges – which has made her the target of death threats. She knows the stakes. In 2020 a failed litigant came to her front door, shot her son Daniel dead, and wounded her husband Mark. It was not driven by politics, but she fears today’s inflammatory rhetoric makes such horrors more likely.
Judge Esther Salas: I’m more concerned right now than I was after my only child was murdered —
Bill Whitaker: Why?
Judge Esther Salas: Because I think that the attacks against the judiciary are only– getting worse. What I am seeing now is far different than what I have seen in the past. This is coming from our national leader on down.
Judge Salas told us vilifying judges is eroding trust in the courts.
Judge Esther Salas: If you disagree with a ruling that we make, appeal us. If you disagree with a sentence we render, appeal us. The answer is not to dehumanize us. And that has been, I think, the active agenda as of late. I feel like sometimes our political leaders are playing Russian roulette with our lives.
Bill Whitaker: Do you think the rhetoric emboldens people?
Judge Esther Salas: I do. I think it’s dangerous.
Judge Esther Salas 60 Minutes
In a statement the White House said, “as a survivor of two assassination attempts no one understands the dangers of political violence more than President Trump.” It went on to accuse the judiciary of “brazen defiance” with its “unlawful rulings”
Then Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche called it a war.
Todd Blanche: We are routinely getting stays and getting reversals because of local judges um just not following the law, full stop. And and it’s the same judges or not the same judges but there’s a group of judges that are repeat players. And that’s obviously not by happenstance. That’s intentional. And it’s a, it’s a war, man.
Todd Blanche declined our request for an interview. In a statement to us, he said some judges continue to issue “overbroad and even unreasoned injunctions,” but adding “threats and intimidation of federal officials is unlawful.”
Judge John Coughenour told us the constitution is a judge’s north star.
Bill Whitaker: So to someone who says that you are a political agent and trying to thwart the goals of the president you would say?
Judge Coughenour: I would say you don’t understand what we do. We apply the Constitution. For the last 250 years in this country it’s been the judges that that say this is either constitutional or it isn’t. If if nobody is going to make that decision and nobody’s gonna enforce the Constitution it becomes like the Constitution of Russia.
The threats aren’t just coming from the right. In 2020, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer warned that Supreme Court Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh would, quote pay the price for restricting abortion. He later apologized. In 2022, a would-be assassin was arrested for trying to kill Justice Kavanaugh at his home. But Judge Jones – a Republican appointee – told us the violent language of the right has no match.
Judge Jones: The national rhetoric from both sides has probably gotten worse over time. However I would not concede that the Democratic party or or that Democratic office holders have conducted themselves in any way that’s similar to what this is administration is doing with respect to the federal judiciary. There’s simply no evidence of that.
Ron Zayas: And when you look at the database, it’s the names and addresses of hundreds of elected officials and judges —
Ron Zayas is the CEO of Ironwall, a company that scrubs judges’ personal data from the web.
Ron Zayas: So here is another threat that we have toward a judge
Zayas told us in 14 years, he has never seen as many violent threats as today.
Ron Zayas: You know, if you broadcast that message to a million people, you just need one to act on it. and that’s the terrifying part that judges are having to deal with today.
Zayas also combs through the dark web,a criminal haven on the internet where anonymous threat actors try to cause real-world harm. These days, Zayas is worried about a new type of threat.
Ron Zayas and Bill Whitaker 60 Minutes
Ron Zayas: The threats used to be, “you ruled against me. And I wanna kill you.” Now the kind of threats we’re seeing — there’s a whole other sphere of saying “I wanna influence what you do.” It’s mob mentality. They wanna threaten you so that you make the right decision.
The Marshals are also investigating a striking new form of intimidation: hundreds of unsolicited pizzas sent to judges and their children across the country, an innocuous delivery with an ominous message:
Judge Esther Salas: We know where you live. We know where your children live. And do you want to end up like Judge Salas’s son?
At least 20 were sent to homes in the name of Judge Salas’ late son.
Judge Esther Salas: The order form had my murdered son’s name on it. They’re weaponizing my baby boy. They’re weaponizing Daniel’s name to inflict fear on judges.
Bill Whitaker: I know that’s shocking, but it must be so, so painful
Judge Esther Salas: Oh, you know. That one took me. And you add to that, for flavor, that I have yet to see the attorney general or the deputy attorney general stand at a podium and denounce these forms of intimidation.
Former Attorney General Pam Bondi also declined our request for an interview. Judge Salas – among many others – told us the rule of law is at stake.
Judge Esther Salas: I sit here as Daniel’s mom. I sit here as a woman who lost her only child. Mark and I have been to hell and back. And when I see that kind of irresponsible behavior coming from our political leaders and people in power, it makes me sad. And it makes me very worried, because I worry for our democracy, I really do.
Produced by Heather Abbott. Associate producer, Paulina Smolinski. Broadcast associate, Mariah Johnson. Edited by Sean Kelly.
https://www.cbsnews.com/video/threats-against-judges-60-minutes-video-2026-03-01/
发表回复