2026年6月5日 美国东部时间下午1:05 / 美国有线电视新闻网（CNN）
作者：普里西拉·阿尔瓦雷斯
更新于1小时37分钟前
更新于2026年6月5日，美国东部时间下午1:58
发布于2026年6月5日，美国东部时间下午1:05
香农·斯台普顿/路透社/资料图
内容提要
- 一名联邦法官驳回了特朗普政府暂停庇护审理流程并冻结部分移民申请的政策。
- 约翰·麦克康奈尔法官在其长达135页的裁决书中批评称，有确凿证据表明这些政策带有反移民敌意。
- 这些政策导致数百万移民在六个多月的时间里无法获得工作许可或合法身份。
AI生成的摘要已由CNN编辑审核。
一名联邦法官周五在一份措辞严厉的法庭裁决中，推翻了特朗普政府针对寻求庇护者和申领福利移民的一系列政策。
去年，该政府无限期暂停庇护审理流程，并冻结了受旅行禁令影响人群的移民申请等多项措施，导致美国境内数百万移民陷入法律悬置状态。
约翰·J·麦克康奈尔小法官在其长达135页的判决书中承认了这一不确定性。
“（这些受质疑的政策）将无数人的生活搁置一旁——仅仅因为他们的出生国，”曾由前总统巴拉克·奥巴马提名的麦克康奈尔写道。“六个多月后，这些人中许多人仍然没有工作、没有合法身份，也没有任何有意义的规划未来的能力。”
麦克康奈尔随后严厉抨击了他所说的“确凿的反移民敌意证据”。
“政府实际上是在邀请法院视而不见，无视摆在面前的反移民敌意的有力证据，”这位法官写道。“这样做需要法院抱有极度的天真。不幸的是，对于政府来说，这个邀请是本法院必须拒绝的。”
美国公民及移民服务局去年在一名阿富汗裔男子在华盛顿特区枪击两名国民警卫队成员后实施了这些政策。该男子已提出无罪抗辩。
倡导组织“民主前进”总裁兼首席执行官斯凯·佩里曼在一份声明中表示，这一裁决“重申了一项基本原则：联邦政府不能关闭合法的移民通道，也不能基于人们的出身地进行歧视”。
“我们很高兴法院认识到这些政策造成的毁灭性人道主义后果。我们的社区理应得到由法律监管的公平程序，而非植根于恐惧和歧视的政治 targeted 行为，”佩里曼补充道。
美国国土安全部总法律顾问詹姆斯·珀西瓦尔抨击了周五的这一裁决。
“自2017年以来，左翼一直在用所谓的‘敌意’主张玩同样的伎俩。这是披着法律外衣的破坏行为，”珀西瓦尔在一份声明中说道。“他们的逻辑是：（1）本届政府是种族主义者，（2）因此我不喜欢的政策是出于种族动机，（3）因此该政策无效。他们几乎在特朗普时代国土安全部的每一项政策上都使用了这一套路。”
本文已更新，加入了国土安全部的评论。
Federal judge strikes down Trump admin limits on asylum and immigration applications
2026-06-05 1:05 PM ET / CNN
By Priscilla Alvarez
Updated 1 hr 37 min ago
Updated Jun 5, 2026, 1:58 PM ET
PUBLISHED Jun 5, 2026, 1:05 PM ET
A citizenship candidate holds a flag during the US Citizenship and Immigration Services naturalization ceremony at Rockefeller Plaza in New York, in September 2019.
Shannon Stapleton/Reuters/File
Summary
- A federal judge struck down Trump administration policies that suspended asylum processing and froze certain immigration applications.
- Judge John McConnell criticized what he described as strong evidence of anti-immigrant animus in his 135-page ruling.
- The policies left millions of immigrants without work authorization or legal status for over six months.
AI-generated summary was reviewed by a CNN editor.
A federal judge struck down a series of Trump administration policies targeting asylum seekers and immigrants seeking benefits in a scathing court ruling Friday.
Last year, the administration indefinitely suspended asylum adjudications and froze immigration applications for people who fell under the travel ban, among other measures, leaving millions of immigrants in the United States in legal limbo.
Judge John J. McConnell Jr. acknowledged that uncertainty in his 135-page opinion.
“(T)he Challenged Policies placed the lives of countless individuals on hold – solely by virtue of their countries of birth,” wrote McConnell, a nominee of former President Barack Obama. “Over six months later, many of those individuals remain without work, without legal status, and without any meaningful ability to plan for their futures.”
McConnell went on to lambast what he described as “strong evidence of anti-immigrant animus.”
“The Government effectively invites the Court to shut its eyes and ignore the strong evidence of anti-immigrant animus before it,” the judge wrote. “Doing so would require profound naiveté on the Court’s part. Unfortunately for the Government, that is an invitation that this Court will have to decline.”
US Citizenship and Immigration Services enacted the changes last year after an Afghan national shot two National Guard members in Washington, DC. He has pleaded not guilty.
Skye Perryman, president and CEO of Democracy Forward, an advocacy organization, said in a statement that the ruling “reaffirms a basic principle: the federal government cannot shut down lawful immigration pathways or discriminate against people based on where they come from,”
“We are pleased that the court recognized the devastating human consequences of these policies. Our communities deserve a fair process governed by law, not political targeting rooted in fear and discrimination,” Perryman added.
DHS General Counsel James Percival blasted Friday’s decision.
“The Left has been running the same gambit with so called ‘animus’ claims since 2017. It is sabotage dressed in legal clothing,” Percival said in a statement. “It goes like this: (1) the admin is racist, (2) therefore a policy I don’t like is motivated by race, (3) therefore it is invalid. They have used it on virtually every Trump era Department of Homeland Security policy.”
This story has been updated with comment from DHS.
发表回复