2026年2月8日 / 美国东部时间下午5:13 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻
华盛顿电 — 随着解决分歧并为国土安全部（DHS）拨款的最后期限临近，国会中的共和党人和民主党人在改革美国移民执法行动的问题上陷入了僵局。
上周，国会通过了一揽子资金措施，以结束为期四天的部分政府停摆，并为大部分机构拨款至9月。然而，僵局出现在对国土安全部资金的争议上，该部门负责监督美国移民和海关执法局（ICE）及海关与边境保护局（CBP）。议员们最终批准了一项权宜之计，以维持国土安全部的资金——但仅持续至2月13日。
这项短期资金补丁旨在为议员们争取更多时间，以协商如何约束政府的移民执法行动。此前，上月明尼阿波利斯发生两起联邦探员致命枪击事件，移民执法行动受到审查。但到目前为止，双方似乎远未达成一致。
多名消息人士向哥伦比亚广播公司新闻证实，参议院民主党人已向共和党人提交了国土安全部资金法案的草案。立法语言反映了民主党人在上周参议院少数党领袖查克·舒默（Chuck Schumer）和众议院少数党领袖哈基姆·杰弗里斯（Hakeem Jeffries）的一封信中提出的ICE改革建议。
舒默和杰弗里斯上周发布了一份要求清单，旨在对国土安全部实施”护栏”措施，包括限制移民执法人员佩戴口罩、要求其出示身份证件并使用随身摄像头。他们还要求禁止探员在没有司法令状的情况下进入私人财产，以及要求探员在拘留移民前必须核实其非美国公民身份等。共和党人迅速批评这些要求”不切实际且不严肃”。
2026年1月8日，众议院少数党领袖哈基姆·杰弗里斯和参议院少数党领袖查克·舒默举行新闻发布会。Sarah L. Voisin/The Washington Post via Getty Images
周日，杰弗里斯在接受美国有线电视新闻网（CNN）的《国情咨文》节目采访时被问及是否正在就拟议改革进行谈判，他表示民主党尚未收到白宫或国会共和党领袖对这些要求的回应。
“在我们看来，现在球在共和党人手中，”杰弗里斯说，”要么他们同意对ICE和其他移民执法机构的运作方式进行重大改革，使其行为与美国其他执法机构一致；要么他们就会明确决定关闭海岸警卫队、联邦紧急事务管理局和运输安全管理局，这将是非常不幸的。”
如果议员们无法就国土安全部的拨款达成协议，或无法批准另一项维持该部门资金的短期措施，其监督的机构将于2月14日资金到期，停摆程序预计将开始。但移民行动将继续，因为ICE和CBP在去年的《美丽法案》中获得了大量资金注入。
尽管如此，杰弗里斯表示，”我们需要积极推进，并确保在任何国土安全部支出法案中纳入立法变革，因为这是改变行为的途径。”
这位纽约民主党人认为”这些是常识性改变”，并列举了要求配备随身摄像头、司法令状要求和探员无口罩政策等作为例证。
共和党人似乎对部分拟议政策持开放态度，包括强制佩戴随身摄像头和结束流动巡逻。但部分要求是共和党人的红线。
2026年2月8日，德克萨斯州共和党众议员托尼·冈萨雷斯（Tony Gonzales）出现在哥伦比亚广播公司新闻的《面对国家》节目中。
德克萨斯州共和党众议员托尼·冈萨雷斯周日出现在《面对国家》节目中，他表示”有些事情是合理的，很多事情则不然。”
“就在几天前，这还是两党投票通过的，突然之间，民主党人试图将国家作为人质，”冈萨雷斯补充道。
冈萨雷斯称，任何关于国土安全部资金的协议都不会包含”为非法移民提供特赦”或”剥夺试图保护自己的执法人员的保护措施”。他表示，”如果暴徒可以戴口罩，那么执法人员也可以戴口罩。”
这位德克萨斯州共和党人还表示反对要求司法令状，这是目前共和党人和民主党人之间的主要争议点。根据美国宪法第四修正案，除非有法官签发的令状，否则禁止搜查美国公民。而政府目前依赖的是行政令状，由移民官员而非法官签署。
“行政令状有效，”冈萨雷斯说，”我希望给执法部门一切必要工具，以抓捕在我们社区中逍遥法外的已定罪罪犯。对我来说，这很有道理。为什么要束缚自己的执法部门来保护社区安全，这对我来说毫无意义。”
冈萨雷斯称，共和党人可能支持的措施包括强制佩戴随身摄像头，他提到政府最近在明尼阿波利斯推行的佩戴摄像头政策。他表示，另一个改进领域是沟通。
“我认为，如果ICE在所有社区都配备沟通联络官，将非常关键，”他说，”这不是改变政策，而是分享社区的沟通——比如城市经理或市议会、社区领袖——与政府之间的双向沟通。”
Lawmakers locked in standoff over ICE reforms as DHS funding deadline approaches
February 8, 2026 / 5:13 PM EST / CBS News
Washington — Republicans and Democrats in Congress are locked in a standoff over reforming the nation’s immigration enforcement operation as a deadline to reach a resolution and fund the Department of Homeland Security approaches.
Last week, Congress passed a package of funding measures to reopen the government and fund the bulk of agencies through September after a four-day partial shutdown. The stalemate came amid a dispute over funds for DHS, which oversees Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Customs and Border Protection. Lawmakers ultimately approved a stopgap measure to keep the department funded — but only through Feb. 13.
The short-term funding patch was designed to give lawmakers more time to negotiate how to rein in the administration’s immigration’s enforcement operation, which came under scrutiny after two deadly shootings by federal agents in Minneapolis last month. But so far, the two sides appear far from an agreement.
Senate Democrats submitted draft legislation of the DHS funding measure to Republicans, multiple sources confirmed CBS News. The legislative language reflects Democrats’ proposals to reform ICE as outlined in a letter last week from Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries .
Schumer and Jeffries released a list of demands last week to impose “guardrails” on DHS, including by restricting immigration agents from wearing masks and requiring them to display an ID and use body cameras. They also demanded agents be banned from entering private property without judicial warrants, along with requiring agents to verify that someone is not a U.S. citizen before holding them in immigration detention, among other things. Republicans were quick to criticize the demands as “unrealistic and unserious.”
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer hold a news conference on Jan. 8, 2026. Sarah L. Voisin/The Washington Post via Getty Images
Asked Sunday on CNN’s “State of the Union” whether there are negotiations going on about the proposed reforms, Jeffries said Democrats haven’t heard back from the White House or Republican leaders in Congress about the demands.
“In our view, the ball is in the court right now of the Republicans,” Jeffries said. “Either they’re going to agree to dramatically reform the way in which ICE and other immigration enforcement agencies are conducting themselves so that they’re behaving like every other law enforcement agency in the country, or they’re making the explicit decision to shut down the Coast Guard, shut down FEMA and shut down TSA, and that would be very unfortunate.”
If lawmakers are unable to come to an agreement on how to fund DHS or approve another short-term measure to keep the department funded, funding would lapse for the agencies it oversees on Feb. 14, and shutdown procedures would be expected to begin. But immigration operations would continue, since ICE and CBP received an influx of funds in last year’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act.
Still, Jeffries said “we need to press forward aggressively and ensure that there are legislative changes enacted as part of any DHS spending bill, because that’s the way that you change behavior.”
The New York Democrat argued that “these are common sense changes,” citing the demand for body cameras, judicial warrant requirements and a no-mask policy for agents, among other things.
Republicans have appeared open to some of the proposed policies, including the mandatory body cameras and bringing an end to roving patrols. But some of the demands are red lines for the GOP.
Rep. Tony Gonzales on “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan,” Feb. 8, 2026. CBS News
Rep. Tony Gonzales, a Texas Republican who appeared on “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan” on Sunday, said “there are some things that make sense, there’s a lot of things that don’t.”
“Just a few days ago, this was a bipartisan vote, and all of a sudden, now the Democrats are trying to hold the country hostage,” Gonzales added.
Gonzales said any deal on DHS funding will not include “amnesty for illegal aliens” or “stripping away protections for law enforcement officers that are trying to protect themselves.” He said “if rioters get to wear masks, then law enforcement gets to wear masks as well.”
The Texas Republican also expressed opposition to requiring judicial warrants, which is a key point of contention between Republicans and Democrats so far. Under the 4th Amendment of the Constitution, a search on a U.S. citizen is prohibited unless there is a warrant issued by a judge. The administration has relied on administrative warrants, which are signed by immigration officials, not judges.
“Administrative warrants work,” Gonzales said. “I want to give law enforcement every tool they need to go out and apprehend these convicted criminals that are loose in our community. To me, that makes a lot of sense. Why you would want to shackle your own law enforcement from keeping our community safe makes no sense to me.”
Among the things that could see support from Republicans, Gonzales cited the mandate for body cameras, pointing to the recent move by the administration to require cameras be worn in Minneapolis. He said another area for improvement is communication.
“I think it’d be very, very key if there were communication liaisons in all the communities that ICE has,” he said. “Not changing policy, just sharing communication from the community — let’s say the city manager or let’s say city council, community leaders — up to the administration and back down.”
发表回复