2026年5月8日 15:12:44 UTC / 路透社
戴维·劳德 撰稿
2026年5月8日 下午3:12 UTC 更新于20分钟前
2026年4月2日，美国贸易代表杰米森·格里尔在华盛顿白宫接受记者采访。路透社/埃文·武奇/资料图片 购买授权许可
华盛顿5月8日（路透社）——美国贸易代表杰米森·格里尔周五表示，特朗普政府预计将在上诉中胜诉，此前国际国际贸易法院裁定其临时10%全球关税不合规，该关税旨在替代被最高法院推翻的关税。
格里尔在接受福克斯商业频道《早安玛丽亚》节目采访时表示，国际贸易法院以2比1的投票结果裁定特朗普根据1974年《贸易法》第122条实施的关税不当，这一裁决存在错误。
订阅《每日案卷》新闻简报，将最新法律新闻直接发送至您的收件箱，开启您的晨间阅读。[点击此处注册]。
广告 · 滚动继续阅读
该法律允许在150天内征收最高15%的临时关税，以纠正美国“大规模且严重的”国际收支逆差。但法院称，当前情形并不适用于贸易逆差。
格里尔说：“他们实质上表示国会通过了一项无法被启用的法律，而我们法律界都清楚，法律不应如此解释。”“法律本应被解读为可以付诸实施的。因此我们有信心在上诉中取得成功。”
特朗普政府尚未正式对该裁决提起上诉，在上诉程序推进期间，除涉案原告外，该临时关税仍对其他主体有效。
广告 · 滚动继续阅读
今年2月，最高法院推翻了特朗普根据《国际紧急经济权力法》实施的范围最广、影响最深的全球关税，随后特朗普政府立即实施了第122条关税，该关税预计将于7月到期。
格里尔是一名资深贸易律师，他称投票支持多数意见的国际贸易法院法官“显然一门心思要从中国进口商品”。
格里尔指出，该法院去年在最初针对特朗普的《国际紧急经济权力法》关税的裁决中曾表示，第122条是另一部可供征收关税使用的现行法律。尽管该裁决未明确说明该法规可被使用的具体情形，但格里尔表示，周五的裁决与2025年5月的意见相矛盾。
戴维·劳德 撰稿；保罗·西mao 编辑
我们的准则：汤森路透信托原则。
Trump administration will win appeal of ruling against temporary tariffs, US trade chief says
2026-05-08 15:12:44 UTC / Reuters
By David Lawder
May 8, 2026 3:12 PM UTC Updated 20 mins ago
U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer speaks with reporters at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., April 2, 2026. REUTERS/Evan Vucci/File Photo Purchase Licensing Rights
WASHINGTON, May 8 (Reuters) – U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said on Friday the Trump administration expects to prevail in an appeal of the Court of International Trade’s ruling against its temporary 10% global tariffs to replace duties struck down by the Supreme Court.
Greer told Fox Business Network’s “Mornings with Maria” program that the Court of International Trade made a flawed decision in its 2-1 ruling that Trump’s tariffs under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 were inappropriate.
Jumpstart your morning with the latest legal news delivered straight to your inbox from The Daily Docket newsletter. Sign up here.
Advertisement · Scroll to continue
The statute allows temporary tariffs of up to 15% for 150 days to correct “large and serious” U.S. balance of payments deficits. But the court said this scenario did not apply to trade deficits.
“They essentially said that Congress passed a law that can’t be used, which we all know in the legal community, that’s not how law should be interpreted,” Greer said. “They should be interpreted to be used. So we’re confident that on appeal we’ll be successful.”
The Trump administration has not yet formally appealed the decision, which leaves the temporary tariffs in place for all but the plaintiffs while the appeal process plays out.
Advertisement · Scroll to continue
The Section 122 duties were put in place immediately after the Supreme Court struck down Trump’s broadest and deepest global tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act in February, and are expected to expire in July.
Greer, a veteran trade lawyer, said the Court of International Trade judges voting in the majority “are apparently just hell-bent on importing from China.”
That court last year in its initial ruling against Trump’s IEEPA tariffs said Section 122 was another law on the books that could be used for tariffs, Greer noted. Although the ruling did not specify the circumstances under which the statute could be used, Greer said Thursday’s ruling contradicted the May 2025 opinion.
Reporting by David Lawder; Editing by Paul Simao
Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.
发表回复