2026-05-04T22:28:11.575Z / 路透社
作者:乔纳森·斯坦普尔、道格拉斯·吉利森、克里斯·普伦蒂斯
2026年5月4日 美国东部时间晚上10:28 更新于34分钟前
节点运行失败
2023年7月30日,美国加利福尼亚州旧金山市中心,即时通讯平台X(前身为推特)总部楼顶的X标志。路透社/卡洛斯·巴里娅/档案照片
- SEC指控马斯克延迟披露信息节省了1.5亿美元
- 马斯克与SEC过往诉讼纠纷频发
- 马斯克未承认违规行为
华盛顿/纽约,5月4日(路透社)——埃隆·马斯克已与美国证券交易委员会的民事诉讼达成和解。该诉讼指控这位全球首富在2022年迟迟未披露其对推特(现更名为X)的首批收购行为。
根据周一在华盛顿特区联邦法院披露的和解协议,以马斯克名义设立的信托基金将支付150万美元的民事罚款。
想要了解影响企业和政府的最新ESG趋势,请订阅路透社《可持续发展转型》新闻简报。点击此处注册。
马斯克未承认违规,也无需偿还据称因延迟披露而节省的1.5亿美元。
广告 · 滚动继续阅读
该和解协议需获得美国地区法官斯帕克·苏克南南的批准,她曾在2月份驳回了马斯克驳回此案的申请。
这结束了马斯克与该监管机构长达七年多的激烈对抗,纠纷始于2018年9月,当时SEC指控他证券欺诈,原因是他在推特上发文称已“获得”资金,可能将其电动汽车公司特斯拉私有化。
马斯克当时通过支付2000万美元民事罚款、允许特斯拉律师提前审核部分推特帖子、辞去特斯拉董事长一职达成和解。
“正如我们从一开始就说的那样,马斯克先生现已就推特收购相关的文件迟交问题洗脱所有指控,”他的律师亚历克斯·斯皮罗在一份声明中表示。
广告 · 滚动继续阅读
SEC拒绝置评。
前SEC主席助手称这是SEC“尴尬的一天”
SEC在2025年1月的诉讼中称,马斯克在2022年3月底至4月初推迟11天披露其最初持有的5%推特股份,让他得以在最终披露9.2%的持股前,以人为压低的价格购入价值逾5亿美元的股票。
SEC曾主张马斯克应支付民事罚款,并偿还据称以不知情投资者为代价节省的1.5亿美元。
马斯克称延迟披露是无意之举,并指控SEC针对他的行为违反了他的言论自由权。
SEC在美国前总统乔·拜登离开白宫、唐纳德·特朗普接任的六天前提起了诉讼。现任SEC主席保罗·阿特金斯一直在重新调整该监管机构的执法重点。
“对SEC来说,这是尴尬的一天,”加里·根斯勒时期的前办公厅主任阿曼达·费舍尔说道。根斯勒在拜登政府期间担任该监管机构主席。她表示,此次和解“应该让公众质疑SEC是否在牺牲普通投资者利益的同时保护白宫内部人士”。
马斯克曾领导特朗普政府的政府效率部,该部门专注于削减成本,他于去年5月离职。
纽约戴纳密斯律师事务所合伙人罗伯特·弗兰奇曼表示,150万美元的罚款“对这位全球首富来说只是一笔小数目”,但可能会威慑其他人犯下类似违规行为。
“这向市场传递了一个信号:规则适用于所有人,即使是埃隆·马斯克,”他说道。
马斯克于2022年10月完成了440亿美元的推特收购交易。
他后来将推特并入其人工智能公司xAI,随后又将xAI并入其火箭公司SpaceX。《福布斯》杂志称马斯克的身家为7899亿美元。
和解案发生在SEC执法负责人离职之后
双方曾于3月17日披露,他们正在进行和解谈判,而就在一天前,SEC执法负责人玛格丽特·瑞安在任职仅六个多月后突然离职。
据知情人士透露,瑞安的离职与该机构其他领导层在执法问题上的冲突有关。
瑞安的律师周一未立即回复置评请求。
一位熟悉和解协议的人士表示,马斯克的民事罚款是SEC历史上针对其所涉违规类型的最高罚款。
此案与另一桩民事诉讼相互独立。3月20日,旧金山的一个陪审团裁定马斯克在宣布收购推特后欺诈推特股东负有责任。
该集体诉讼的原告股东称,马斯克质疑推特充斥着虚假和垃圾账号(即机器人账号),目的是迫使推特重新谈判收购价格或让他退出交易。
股东们表示,马斯克的言论导致推特股价下跌,他们以低迷价格出售股票蒙受了损失。他们估计损失总额可能达到25亿美元。
包括斯皮罗在内的马斯克的律师希望驳回此案或进行重审,称该判决“是对这位引发争议的被告存在偏见和成见的结果”。
乔纳森·斯坦普尔在纽约、道格拉斯·吉利森在华盛顿特区报道;大卫·加芬、迪帕·巴宾顿、索纳利·保罗编辑
我们的报道准则:汤姆森路透社信任原则。
Elon Musk settles SEC lawsuit over Twitter disclosures, $1.5 million fine imposed
2026-05-04T22:28:11.575Z / Reuters
By Jonathan Stempel, Douglas Gillison and Chris Prentice
May 4, 2026 10:28 PM UTC Updated 34 mins ago
节点运行失败
‘X’ logo is seen on the top of the headquarters of the messaging platform X, formerly known as Twitter, in downtown San Francisco, California, U.S., July 30, 2023. REUTERS/Carlos Barria/File Photo
- SEC alleged Musk saved $150 million by delaying disclosures
- Musk, SEC had fraught history of litigation
- No admission of wrongdoing
WASHINGTON/NEW YORK, May 4 (Reuters) – Elon Musk settled the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s civil lawsuit accusing the world’s richest person of waiting too long in 2022 to disclose his initial purchases of Twitter, now known as X.
A trust in Musk’s name will pay a $1.5 million civil fine, under the settlement disclosed on Monday in the Washington, D.C., federal court.
Make sense of the latest ESG trends affecting companies and governments with the Reuters Sustainable Switch newsletter. Sign up here.
Musk did not admit wrongdoing, and won’t have to give up any of the $150 million he allegedly saved from the delay.
Advertisement · Scroll to continue
The settlement requires approval by U.S. District Judge Sparkle Sooknanan, who in February rejected Musk’s bid to dismiss the case.
It ends more than seven years of fraught battles between Musk and the regulator, starting in September 2018 when the SEC charged him with securities fraud for tweeting he had “secured” funding to potentially take his electric car company Tesla private.
Musk settled that case by paying a $20 million civil fine, letting Tesla lawyers review some Twitter posts in advance, and giving up his role as Tesla’s chairman.
“Mr. Musk has now been cleared of all issues related to the late filing of forms in the Twitter acquisition, as we said from the outset he would be,” his lawyer Alex Spiro said in a statement.
Advertisement · Scroll to continue
The SEC declined to comment.
‘EMBARRASSING DAY,’ FORMER SEC CHIEF’S AIDE SAYS
In its January 2025 lawsuit, the SEC said Musk’s 11-day delay in revealing his initial 5% Twitter stake in late March and early April 2022 let him buy more than $500 million of shares at artificially low prices, before he finally revealed a 9.2% stake.
The SEC had argued that Musk should pay a civil fine and repay the $150 million he allegedly saved at the expense of unsuspecting investors.
Musk called the delay inadvertent, and accused the SEC of violating his free speech rights by targeting him.
The SEC sued Musk six days before former U.S. President Joe Biden left the White House and was replaced by Donald Trump. Current SEC Chairman Paul Atkins has been refocusing the regulator’s enforcement priorities.
“It’s an embarrassing day for the SEC,” said Amanda Fischer, former chief of staff to Gary Gensler, who chaired the regulator during the Biden administration. She said the settlement “should cause the public to question whether the SEC is protecting White House insiders at the expense of ordinary investors.”
Musk led the Trump administration’s Department of Government Efficiency, which focused on cost-cutting, before leaving last May.
Robert Frenchman, a partner at the Dynamis law firm in New York, said the $1.5 million penalty was a “modest sum for the richest person on the planet” but could deter similar violations by others.
“That is a statement to the market that the rules apply to everyone, even to Elon Musk,” he said.
Musk completed the $44 billion Twitter purchase in October 2022.
He later folded Twitter into his artificial intelligence company xAI, and then folded xAI into his rocket company SpaceX. Forbes magazine says Musk is worth $789.9 billion.
SETTLEMENT FOLLOWS SEC ENFORCEMENT CHIEF’S DEPARTURE
Both sides had disclosed on March 17 they were in talks to settle, one day after SEC enforcement chief Margaret Ryan abruptly left her job after just over six months.
Ryan’s departure followed clashes with other leaders at the agency over enforcement, people familiar with the matter have said.
A lawyer for Ryan did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Monday.
Musk’s civil penalty is the largest in SEC history for the type of violation he was accused of, a person familiar with the settlement said.
The case is separate from a civil lawsuit where a San Francisco jury held Musk liable on March 20 for having defrauded Twitter shareholders after announcing the buyout.
Shareholders in that class action alleged that Musk questioned whether Twitter was overrun by fake and spam accounts, known as bots, in an effort to force Twitter to renegotiate the takeover price or let him back out.
The shareholders said Musk’s comments caused Twitter’s stock price to fall, and that they suffered losses by selling shares at depressed prices. They have estimated that damages could total $2.5 billion.
Musk’s lawyers including Spiro want that case dismissed or a new trial, calling the verdict “the result of bias and prejudice toward a polarizing defendant.”
Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York and Douglas Gillison in Washington, D.C.; Editing by David Gaffen, Deepa Babington and Sonali Paul
Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.
发表回复