2026-04-24T08:00:51.224Z / 美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)
作者:安妮·格雷尔
4小时前发布
发布于2026年4月24日美国东部时间凌晨4:00
塞缪尔·科鲁姆/盖蒂图片社/资料图
2026年3月27日拍摄的美国国会大厦。
两党议员都在竭力应对当前局势:一连串辞职和行为不端丑闻冲击国会山,引发了人们对问责的呼吁。
但即便心怀善意的人也意识到,改革国会自我监管方式的道路,远比许多人预期的更长、更复杂,这让那些希望快速变革的人感到沮丧。议员们面临的风险很高,因为许多人担心,如果没有明显的改进,公众对国会的负面看法只会进一步恶化。
大多数议员都希望从改革众议院道德委员会的工作方式入手,但这个负责调查议员的委员会,因其工作性质往往被视为一个“黑箱”。
此前,媒体曝光了前众议员埃里克·斯沃韦尔和托尼·冈萨雷斯的性行为不端指控,两名议员在该委员会完成调查前就辞职了。因此,许多不在该委员会任职的议员认为,它现在需要拿出大量证据证明自己的价值。
此前,道德委员会耗时数年调查佛罗里达州民主党众议员希拉·谢菲尔-麦科马克,就在委员会准备召开会议建议对其处以多项道德违规处罚的前一周,这位议员本周辞职了。一些议员感到沮丧,认为她的辞职让自己躲过了众议院全院的驱逐投票,并认为即便议员提出辞职,众议院仍应追究其责任。
“在公众对国会的信任度处于历史低点之际,道德委员会以迅速、彻底和公正的方式调查对公众信任的滥用行为,至关重要。”加利福尼亚州无党派众议员凯文·凯利对CNN表示。
佛罗里达州共和党众议员安娜·保利娜·卢纳认为,道德委员会行动过于缓慢,效率低下。“归根结底,如此拖延问责的程序,非但不能遏制不当行为,反而会助长其发生。认真的改革早就该推进了。”这位女议员本周在《旁观者》杂志的一篇专栏文章中写道。
众议院道德委员会主席迈克尔·格斯特在接受CNN采访时为该委员会的工作辩护,称其委员会正在追究议员的责任,但他提出了三项具体改革建议,希望众议院议长迈克·约翰逊能够采纳,以加快并简化流程。所有拟议的改革都需要两党共同支持,以修改众议院规则。
内森·霍华德/路透社
2026年3月26日,众议院道德委员会听证会期间,迈克尔·格斯特(中)出席会议。
首先,格斯特希望为委员会增加更多调查人员,以便该委员会能够加快工作节奏,承接更多案件。他还希望将国会行为监督办公室纳入其管辖范围,他认为这将消除重复劳动。
目前,工作人员的投诉首先会提交给独立的无党派实体国会行为监督办公室,如果投诉涉及议员,才会转交给道德委员会,随后委员会将重新启动调查程序。格斯特还希望考虑扩大委员会的管辖范围,使其能够在议员辞职或离开国会后继续开展调查。
“我认为我们可以简化流程,通过精简流程,有望加快案件处理速度。我认为这是所有人的愿望。”格斯特在接受CNN采访时表示,他希望在不牺牲必要正当程序的前提下加快委员会的工作。
作为道德委员会成员的民主党新任众议员苏哈斯·苏布拉马尼亚姆表示,他不赞成扩大委员会的管辖范围,将议员离任后的情况纳入其中,但他希望委员会更愿意强制执行传票,对不立即配合的证人施加刑事制裁。
“我有很多想法可以让委员会加快行动、进行改革。我也希望在国会中做出改变,修改一些规则和法律,加强对我们自身的监管,确保我们成为美国人民的榜样,而不是笑柄。”他对CNN说道。
本周早些时候,约翰逊表示,只要有相关想法,他将牵头推动改革现行制度。
“我们正在研究所有可能的途径,以收紧规则,确保女性有举报渠道。”约翰逊在周二的新闻发布会上表示,“我们已经有了很多机制,但我们始终愿意让这个渠道更安全、更可靠。我将亲自牵头这项工作。”
一位知情人士告诉CNN,众议院少数党领袖哈基姆·杰弗里斯周四会见了众议院道德委员会的民主党成员,讨论其他可能的改革措施。
“国会几乎不受任何不受自身控制的监督。”自由主义监督组织“华盛顿公民责任与道德”主席兼首席执行官唐纳德·谢尔曼说道,“作为一个机构,他们需要更加努力,找到一种方式,确保他们能更积极地为为他们和选民服务的数千名工作人员打造一个安全、合乎道德且公平的工作场所。”
在CNN和其他媒体报道针对斯沃韦尔的性行为不端指控后,道德委员会宣布对其展开调查——斯沃韦尔否认了这些指控。一位了解众议院道德委员会工作的前国会工作人员告诉CNN,在他在国会山任职期间,从未有人对斯沃韦尔提出过投诉。
“这让我觉得,众议院里的人不知道他们可以对议员提出投诉。显然,人们对如何追究议员或工作人员责任的了解程度还不够。这方面的工作做得非常糟糕。”这位前工作人员说道。
“这个机构里发生的一些事情,如果换作其他任何工作场所都是绝对不能容忍的,这太离谱了”
但在试图实施解决方案之前,许多议员发现,他们甚至不知道该从何处着手。
华盛顿州民主党众议员普拉米拉·贾亚帕尔开始研究国会山的指控举报流程,和许多同事一样,她震惊地发现,现行流程竟如此复杂和混乱。
她甚至不知道有这么一个办公室存在,但很快就发现,她的大多数工作人员都将其视为举报任何诉求的主要渠道。她无法相信,现行规则竟然允许议员与工作人员建立关系,只要对方不是自己的直属员工。即便众议院道德委员会的成员,也无法一致向她说明关键细节,比如委员会在流程的哪个阶段会得知举报人的身份。
贾亚帕尔目前正致力于绘制一张图表,列明每个与道德相关的办公室的职责和管辖范围——她此前并未意识到这项任务会变得如此复杂——随后将向众议院民主党领导层汇报可以做出哪些切实可行的改革。
“我仍在努力理清这个错综复杂的体系。”贾亚帕尔对CNN说道,“我认为工作人员也不清楚在这些情况下他们享有哪些权利。”
其他议员已经提出了各自的法案,但这些法案的前路并不明朗。卢纳和苏布拉马尼亚姆本周提出了一项两党法案,旨在禁止国会议员在犯下严重罪行后领取养老金。
希瑟·迪尔/盖蒂图片社/资料图
2025年12月17日,安娜·保利娜·卢纳接受媒体采访。
凯拉·巴特科夫斯基/盖蒂图片社/资料图
2025年3月,弗吉尼亚州沃伦顿镇厅会议期间,苏哈斯·苏布拉马尼亚姆。
“我们觉得这是常识。”苏布拉马尼亚姆对CNN说道,“我之前甚至不知道,如果你因这类罪行辞职或被驱逐,离开国会后仍能继续领取养老金。”
民主党众议员玛丽·盖伊·斯坎伦的前任因被曝光使用纳税人资金和解一起性骚扰案而辞职,她随后进入国会。她提出了一项法案,旨在改革并填补2018年#MeToo运动期间通过的、旨在解决国会山职场骚扰和歧视问题的立法漏洞。
“这个机构里发生的一些事情,如果换作美国其他任何工作场所都是绝对不能容忍的,这太离谱了。”斯坎伦对CNN说道。
为了回击日益高涨的批评,道德委员会本周发布了一份罕见的声明,呼吁国会山社区举报任何性行为不端事件,并列出了该委员会自20世纪70年代以来开展的28起性行为不端调查。众议院历史上仅有6次驱逐议员的记录,道德委员会的议员们表示,驱逐这种罕见情况仍应设定高标准,强调在被证明有罪之前,个人应被视为无辜。
议员们以两起案例为例:委员会对前众议员乔治·桑托斯的调查,以及该委员会发布严厉报告后不久众议院将其驱逐;还有对前众议员马特·盖兹的调查,该调查被用于反对他的司法部长提名,最终他撤回了提名。他们认为,这两起案例表明委员会的工作带来了更广泛的问责。
在谢菲尔-麦科马克辞职后不久,格斯特与道德委员会资深民主党议员、众议员马克·德索尼尔站在一起,后者阐述了该委员会所处的两难境地。
“我们俩都对委员会受到的所有批评感到有点不悦。规则是由众议院制定的。”这位加利福尼亚州民主党人本周对记者说道,“如果有机会让它变得更好,我想我们都同意对此持开放态度。显然,至少从公众的角度来看,人们对这个机构缺乏信任,我们一直在努力追究两党议员的责任。”
道德委员会的另一位成员、民主党众议员格伦·艾维表示,尽管人们都希望委员会加快行动,但像性行为不端这样的指控不能仓促处理。
“目前没有万能解药。”他对CNN说道,“这些事情都需要时间。”
Ethics reforms won’t come easy on Capitol Hill after misconduct scandals
2026-04-24T08:00:51.224Z / CNN
By Annie Grayer
4 hr ago
PUBLISHED Apr 24, 2026, 4:00 AM ET
The US Capitol building is seen on March 27.
Samuel Corum/Getty Images/File
Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle are scrambling to meet the moment as a wave of resignations and misconduct scandals rock Capitol Hill, sparking calls for accountability.
But even those with the best intentions are realizing that the road to reforming how Congress polices itself will be much longer and more complicated than many had hoped, frustrating those who want to see swift change. The stakes for members are high, as many fear the public’s dismal view of Congress will only worsen if there aren’t clear improvements.
Making changes to how the House Ethics Committee does its work is where most members want to start, but the panel, which leads investigations into lawmakers, is often viewed as something of a black box by nature of its work.
After sexual misconduct allegations against former Reps. Eric Swalwell and Tony Gonzales came to light through media reports and both members resigned before the panel could finish its own investigations, a number of lawmakers who do not serve on the panel believe it now has a lot to prove.
After the ethics committee spent years investigating Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick, the Florida Democrat resigned this week just before the panel was set to meet to recommend punishment after finding her guilty of multiple ethics violations. Some members felt frustrated her resignation allowed her to evade an expected expulsion vote on the House floor, and feel that members should still be able to be held accountable by the chamber even if they move to resign.
“At a time when public confidence in Congress is at an all-time low, it is vitally important that the ethics committee investigates abuses of the public trust in a prompt, thorough and fair manner,” independent Rep. Kevin Kiley of California told CNN.
GOP Rep. Anna Paulina Luna of Florida has argued that the ethics committee moves too slowly and is not effective. “The bottom line is that a process that delays accountability to that extent does not deter misconduct, it enables it. Serious reform is long overdue,” the congresswoman wrote this week in a piece for The Spectator.
House Ethics Chairman Michael Guest defended the panel’s work in an interview with CNN, arguing that his committee is holding lawmakers accountable, but laid out three concrete changes he wants House Speaker Mike Johnson to make to speed up and simplify the process. All of the proposed changes would require bipartisan buy in to reform the House rules.
Rep. Michael Guest, center, attends a hearing of the House Ethics Committee on March 26.
Nathan Howard/Reuters
First up, Guest wants to add additional investigators to his committee so the panel can move faster and take on more work. He also wants to bring the Office of Congressional Conduct under his jurisdiction, which he argued would eliminate duplicative efforts.
Currently, a staffer complaint first goes to the Office of Congressional Conduct, an independent, non-partisan entity, and if that complaint involves a member, it will then be referred to the ethics panel, which then starts the investigative process over again. And Guest wants to consider expanding the committee’s jurisdiction so it can continue investigations after a member resigns or leaves Congress.
“I think we could simplify it. We could streamline the process and by streamlining the process, hopefully see that cases are moved through quicker. I think that’s the desire of everyone,” Guest, who wants to expedite the panel’s work without sacrificing necessary due process, told CNN.
Freshman Democratic Rep. Suhas Subramanyam, who serves on the ethics committee, said he does not see the point in expanding the panel’s jurisdiction to include when a lawmaker leaves Congress but wants the committee to be more willing to enforce its subpoenas by imposing criminal sanctions on witnesses who don’t immediately comply.
“There’s a lot I’d like to do to make the committee move faster and reformed. There’s a lot I want to do in Congress to change some of the rules and some of the laws to police us to make sure that we are an example for the American people, not an embarrassment,” he told CNN.
Earlier this week, Johnson said he would lead any effort to reform the current system as ideas come up.
“We are looking at every potential avenue to tighten up the rules and make sure that women have an avenue to report,” Johnson said at a press conference Tuesday. “We have a lot of mechanisms in place but we’re always open to making that safer and more secure. And I will lead that myself.”
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries met with Democrats on the House Ethics panel on Thursday amid the discussion of other possible changes, a source familiar with the meeting told CNN.
“Congress is not subject to really any kind of oversight that it does not control,” said Donald Sherman, president and CEO of the liberal-leaning watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington. “They need to work harder as an institution to figure out a way to ensure that they are more responsive to building a safe, ethical and equitable workplace for the thousands of staffers that serve them and their constituents.”
The ethics committee announced an investigation into Swalwell after CNN and other outlets reported on allegations of sexual misconduct against him – allegations Swalwell has denied. And a former congressional staffer with knowledge of the House Ethics committee’s work told CNN that during their tenure on Capitol Hill no complaint was ever filed against Swalwell.
“It makes me think that people in the House don’t know they have the option to make a complaint about a member. Clearly the culture of people understanding what recourse they have with members or staff isn’t good enough. It failed incredibly,” the former staffer said.
‘It’s crazy some of the things that happen in this institution that would not be tolerated in any other workplace’
But before attempting to implement solutions, many members are finding that it’s hard to even know where to start.
Democratic Rep. Pramila Jayapal of Washington started researching how allegations get reported on Capitol Hill and was shocked, like many of her colleagues, to learn how complicated and convoluted the current process was.
There was an entire office that she didn’t even know existed that she quickly learned most of her staff considered their primary reporting outlet for any claim. She couldn’t believe the current rules allowed lawmakers to have relationships with staffers as long as they weren’t their own. Even members on the House Ethics Committee couldn’t unanimously tell her crucial specifics like at what point in the process the panel learns the identity of an accuser.
Jayapal is currently on a mission to build a chart of what each ethics-related office does and has jurisdiction over — a task she didn’t realize would take on a life of its own — to then present to House Democratic leadership about what tangible changes could be made.
“I’m still trying to untangle the web we’ve woven,” Jayapal told CNN. “I don’t think staff is clear either about what their rights are in each of these situations.”
Other lawmakers have already introduced their own bills, but their paths forward are unclear. Luna and Subramanyam introduced a bipartisan bill this week to prevent members of Congress from receiving pensions if they commit serious offenses.
Rep. Anna Paulina Luna speak with members of the media in December 17, 2025.
Heather Diehl/Getty Images/File
Rep. Suhas Subramanyam during a March 2025 town hall in Warrenton, Virginia.
Kayla Bartkowski/Getty Images/File
“We felt like it was common sense,” Subramanyam told CNN. “I didn’t even realize that you could continue to collect a pension after leaving this place if you had to resign or got expelled for those types of crimes.”
Democratic Rep. Mary Gay Scanlon, who came to Congress following the resignation of her predecessor after it was revealed he used taxpayer dollars to settle a sexual harassment case, introduced a bill to reform and tighten up loopholes in legislation passed in 2018 during the #MeToo movement to address workplace harassment and discrimination on Capitol Hill..
“It’s crazy some of the things that happen in this institution that would not be tolerated in any other workplace in America,” Scanlon told CNN.
In an attempt to beat back the mounting criticism, the ethics committee released a rare statement this week imploring the Capitol Hill community to report any instance of sexual misconduct and outlined 28 sexual misconduct investigations the panel has conducted dating back to the 1970s. There have only been six expulsions in the history of the House of Representatives and lawmakers on the ethics committee say there should continue to be a high bar for the rare occurrence, emphasizing that individuals must be seen as innocent until proven guilty.
Members point to the panel’s investigation into former Rep. George Santos and his expulsion from the House not long after the panel released a scathing report, and its probe of former Rep. Matt Gaetz, which was cited in pushback to his nomination to be attorney general that he eventually withdrew, as two examples where the committee’s work translated into broader accountability.
Standing with Guest moments after Cherfilus-McCormick resigned, the top Democrat on the House ethics panel, Rep. Mark DeSaulnier, outlined the hard place the panel finds itself in.
“We both take a little umbrage to all the criticism the committee gets. The rules are designed by the House,” the California Democratic told reporters earlier this week. “If there are opportunities to make it better, I think we both agree that we are open to that. And clearly at least perspective from the public, there is a lack of trust in this institution and we’ve been working very hard to hold people accountable in both parties.”
Democratic Rep. Glenn Ivey, another member of the ethics panel, argued that as much as people want the committee to move faster, allegations like sexual misconduct cannot be rushed.
“There’s no panacea out there,” he told CNN. “Those things take time.”
发表回复