重新浮出水面的民主党高层与特朗普就出生权公民权持相同立场的视频引发网络哗然:“太离谱了”


2026-04-12T05:00:59-04:00 / 福克斯新闻

哈里·里德与黛安·范斯坦1993年的言论如今被特朗普政府沿用

作者:安德鲁·马克·米勒 福克斯新闻
发布于2026年4月12日美国东部时间早上5:00

观看:里德与范斯坦参议员呼应特朗普政府关于出生权公民权的立场

重新浮出水面的已故前参议员关于出生权公民权的言论在社交媒体上流传。(图片来源:C-SPAN – 1993年9月20日)

NEW 你现在可以收听福克斯新闻的文章了!

收听本文
4分钟

随着最高法院就出生权公民权展开辩论,重新浮出水面的民主党高层呼应特朗普政府论点的视频在社交媒体上引发了保守派的强烈不满。

“如果让非法入境变得不够容易,那不如为非法移民提供奖励?”参议员哈里·里德1993年在参议院议场说道。
“没有哪个理智的国家会这么做,对吧?那你就错了。如果你未经许可进入我国违反法律,还生下孩子,我们就会给这个孩子美国公民身份,并保证他能享受社会提供的所有公共和社会服务——而这些服务可不少。”

曾以民主党身份在参议院任职30年、并担任过8年参议院多数党领袖的里德,当时正在谈论他提出的1993年《移民稳定法案》。这项广泛的移民改革法案包含一项条款,即拒绝给予那些父母既非美国公民也非合法永久居民的在美国出生的孩子公民身份。

中国精英正以“产业规模”利用美国出生权公民权,专家警告

唐纳德·特朗普总统2026年3月31日在白宫椭圆形办公室签署行政命令后回答记者提问。(布兰登·斯米亚洛夫斯基/法新社通过盖蒂图片社拍摄)

里德于2021年去世,享年82岁,他最终改变了对该法案的立场,并在2018年表示这项法案是一个“错误”。

社交媒体上许多人迅速指出里德在民主党内部的崇高地位,并公开质疑为何反对出生权公民权的共和党人常被贴上“种族主义者”的标签,而里德却没有。
“我的天,”保守派影响力账号Libs of TikTok在X平台上写道。“参议员哈里·里德是民主党人,他在1993年提出法案,要终止为非法移民提供出生权公民权。但如果特朗普这么做,民主党人就会称之为‘rAcIsT’(种族主义)。”

关于最高法院重磅出生权公民权案件你需要知道的事

https://www.foxnews.com/video/6392626175112

“很多民主党人都支持他,”演员凯文·索博在X平台上写道。“他们会为了符合当前叙事而改变立场。这就是为什么他们不值得信任。”

“民主党人曾说‘没有哪个理智的国家’会给非法移民提供出生权公民权,”得克萨斯州共和党众议员兰斯·古登在X平台上写道。“如今,违反我们的法律反而能获得完整的美国公民身份,以及享受所有政府福利的权利。最高法院应该一劳永逸地终结这种滥用行为!”
“哈里·里德当时是对的,”犹他州共和议员迈克·李在X平台上写道。

点击此处下载福克斯新闻APP

持对立观点的示威者在唐纳德·特朗普总统抵达美国最高法院前对峙,2026年4月1日,华盛顿。(汤姆·布伦/美联社摄)

另一位民主党人、已故的加利福尼亚州参议员黛安·范斯坦近日也因类似的移民言论在社交媒体上引发热议,这些言论被X平台上的保守派影响力账号MAZE转发后,观看量超过800万次。
“你难道想要这样一种制度:人们可以来到这个国家,哪怕他们很富有?”范斯坦1993年说道。“拿到医疗补助,生下孩子,然后回国?答案是不!我们知道,在加利福尼亚州,医疗补助法正被滥用于此类行为。我希望这种情况能停止。”

这些重新浮出水面的帖子发布之际,特朗普政府正在最高法院为一项行政命令辩护。该命令是总统重返白宫首日签署的,旨在终止几乎所有在美国出生的、父母为无证移民或持有临时非移民签证的人自动获得公民身份的做法。

这起高风险案件将一个多世纪以来的行政部门行动、最高法院先例以及宪法本身的文本——更具体地说,是第十四修正案的公民权条款——推到了聚光灯下。特朗普政府认为,该条款自通过100多年来一直被误读。

福克斯新闻数字频道的布里安娜·德皮施对本文亦有贡献。

安德鲁·马克·米勒是福克斯新闻记者。可在推特@andymarkmiller找到他,或发送爆料邮件至AndrewMark.Miller@Fox.com。

Resurfaced clips from top Democrats echoing Trump on birthright citizenship spark online uproar: ‘Wow’

2026-04-12T05:00:59-04:00 / Fox News

Harry Reid and Dianne Feinstein both made arguments in 1993 now echoed by the Trump administration

By Andrew Mark Miller Fox News

Published April 12, 2026 5:00am EDT

WATCH: Sens. Reid and Feinstein echo Trump administration’s stance on birthright citizenship

Resurfaced clips of the late former senators speaking about birthright citizenship are making the rounds on social media. (Credit: C-SPAN – Sept. 20, 1993)

NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

Listen to this article

4 min

As birthright citizenship is debated in the Supreme Court, resurfaced videos of top Democrats echoing the argument of the Trump administration sparked a conservative uproar on social media.

“If making it easy to be an illegal alien isn’t enough, how about offering a reward for being an illegal immigrant?” Sen. Harry Reid said on the Senate floor in 1993.

“No sane country would do that. Right? Guess again. If you break our laws by entering this country without permission and give birth to a child, we reward that child with U.S. citizenship and a guarantee of full access to all public and social services this society provides — and that’s a lot of services.”

Reid, who served in the Senate as a Democrat for 30 years and was Senate majority leader for eight years, was speaking about the Immigration Stabilization Act of 1993, which he introduced. The legislation was a broad immigration reform package that included a provision to deny birthright citizenship to children born in the U.S. to mothers who were neither U.S. citizens nor lawful permanent residents.

CHINESE ELITES EXPLOITING US BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP AT ‘INDUSTRIAL SCALE,’ EXPERT WARNS

President Donald Trump takes a question from a reporter after signing an executive order in the Oval Office of the White House on March 31, 2026.(Brendan Smialowski/AFP via Getty Images)

Reid, who died in 2021 at the age of 82, ultimately changed his tune on the legislation and said in 2018 that the bill was a “mistake.”

Many on social media quickly pointed to Reid’s lofty stature within the Democratic Party and wondered aloud why he is not labeled “racist” the same way Republicans who oppose birthright citizenship often are.

“WOW,” conservative influencer Libs of TikTok posted on X. “Senator Harry Reid, a DEMOCRAT, introduced a bill in 1993 to END birthright citizenship for illegal aliens .But if Trump wants to do it, Democrats call it ‘rAcIsT.’”

WHAT TO KNOW ABOUT THE SUPREME COURT’S BLOCKBUSTER BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP CASE

https://www.foxnews.com/video/6392626175112

“Lots of Democrats supported him,” actor Kevin Sorbo posted on X. “They change their minds to fit whatever narrative suits them. That’s why they can’t be trusted.”

“Democrats once said ‘no sane country’ would give birthright citizenship to illegal aliens,” Rep. Lance Gooden, R-Texas, posted on X. “Now, breaking our laws is rewarded with full US citizenship and access to every government benefit. SCOTUS should END this exploitation once and for all!”

“Harry Reid was right,” Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, posted on X.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Demonstrators holding opposing views engage ahead of President Donald Trump’s arrival at the U.S. Supreme Court, Wednesday, April 1, 2026, in Washington.(Tom Brenner/AP)

Another Democrat, the late Sen. Dianne Feinstein from California, also became fodder on social media in recent days over similar comments on immigration that were viewed over 8 million times after being posted by MAZE, a conservative influencer account on X.

“Should you have a system where people can come to this country, even if they’re well-to-do?” Feinstein said in 1993.”Get on Medicaid and give birth to a baby, then go back? The answer is no! And we know that Medicaid laws are being used and abused to do just this in the state of California. I’d like to see that stop.”

The resurfaced posts come as the Trump administration argues at the Supreme Court in favor of an executive order signed on the president’s first day back in office that seeks to end automatic citizenship for nearly all persons born in the U.S. to undocumented parents, or to parents with temporary non-immigrant visas in the U.S.

The high-stakes case brought into focus more than a century of executive branch action, Supreme Court precedent, and the text of the Constitution itself — or, more specifically, the citizenship clause of the 14th Amendment — which the administration argues has been misinterpreted in the more than 100 years since its passage.

Fox News Digital’s Breanne Deppisch contributed to this report.

Andrew Mark Miller is a reporter at Fox News. Find him on Twitter @andymarkmiller and email tips to AndrewMark.Miller@Fox.com.

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注