2026-04-06T21:38:37.325Z / 路透社
作者:朱莉·斯廷胡森与内特·雷蒙德
2026年4月6日 世界标准时间21:38 更新于2小时前
节点运行失败
美国卫生与公众服务部(HHS)部长小罗伯特·F·肯尼迪于2026年4月2日在华盛顿特区美国环境保护署总部出席微塑料相关公告时旁观。路透社/肯·塞德诺/档案照片
- 摘要
- 法官裁定肯尼迪的ACIP委员会违反联邦法律,成员缺乏疫苗专业知识
- 新章程扩大了委员会成员资格标准,允许更多专业领域并提高灵活性
- HHS表示,章程更新与发布属于“常规法定要求”
- 特朗普政府尚未就法官的裁决提起上诉
芝加哥4月6日(路透社)——美国卫生部长小罗伯特·F·肯尼迪周一由其部门发布的一份文件显示,他正在重新制定关键疫苗咨询委员会的成员规则。此前一名法官上月裁定该委员会此前的多数任命不合格,并暂停了其所有决定。
美国疾病控制与预防中心疫苗使用咨询委员会(ACIP)此前是肯尼迪重塑美国疫苗政策的主要工具。
通过《每日案卷》新闻简报获取最新法律资讯,开启您的晨间阅读。点击此处订阅。
广告 · 继续滚动阅读
在3月16日的裁决中,波士顿联邦地区法院法官布莱恩·墨菲认定,ACIP的重组违法。此前,身为长期反疫苗活动人士的肯尼迪去年撤换并替换了该委员会此前的全部17名独立专家,新增了数名持有其有争议疫苗观点的成员。
法官在裁决中指出,肯尼迪领导的ACIP委员会违反了《联邦咨询委员会法》,并多次提及该委员会的章程要求——章程规定委员会成员必须具备疫苗使用与研究以及免疫实践方面的专业知识。
周一,由肯尼迪领导的卫生与公众服务部发布了ACIP章程的更新版本,扩大了该委员会成员的专业资质范围。该委员会负责提出包括美国儿童免疫接种计划在内的疫苗使用相关建议。
肯尼迪去年12月签署的旧版章程规定,委员会成员应熟悉免疫实践与公共卫生,具备临床疫苗使用或预防医学方面的专业知识,或拥有疫苗研究、疫苗效力与安全性方面的专业背景。
两名由往届政府任命的前ACIP成员表示,新章程似乎放宽了成员资格要求,新增了生物统计学和毒理学领域专家作为示例。
法官在裁决中称,肯尼迪任命的成员“显然不合格”,15名成员中仅有6人拥有有意义的疫苗相关经验。
HHS发言人安德鲁·尼克松淡化了此次修改的重要性,称ACIP章程的更新与发布“属于常规法定要求,并不意味着任何更广泛的政策转向”。
此次修订章程此前,代表反对疫苗安全与强制令的知情同意行动网络(ICAN)的律师亚伦·西里于3月25日致信肯尼迪,建议修改ACIP章程。
根据ICAN网站上宣传该信件的新闻稿,该组织呼吁肯尼迪“明确委员会成员资格标准”,并辩称墨菲裁决中受到资质质疑的13名ACIP成员“确实具备必要的相关经验”。
截至目前,特朗普政府尚未就墨菲的裁决提起上诉,但仍有60天的上诉窗口期。
朱莉·斯廷胡森在芝加哥、内特·雷蒙德在波士顿报道;比尔·伯克罗特编辑
我们的准则:汤森路透信托原则。
Kennedy rewrites rules for membership on US vaccine advisory panel
2026-04-06T21:38:37.325Z / Reuters
By Julie Steenhuysen and Nate Raymond
April 6, 2026 9:38 PM UTC Updated 2 hours ago
节点运行失败
U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) Robert F. Kennedy Jr., looks on during an announcement on microplastics at the EPA headquarters in Washington, D.C., U.S., April 2, 2026. REUTERS/Ken Cedeno/File Photo
- Summary
- Judge ruled Kennedy’s ACIP panel violated federal law, members lacked vaccine expertise
- New charter broadens panel membership criteria, allowing more specialties and flexibility
- HHS says charter renewal and publication are ‘routine statutory requirements’
- Trump administration has yet to appeal judge’s ruling
CHICAGO, April 6 (Reuters) – U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is rewriting the rules of membership for a key vaccine advisory panel, according to a document published by his department on Monday, after a judge last month declared most of his prior selections unqualified and put their decisions on hold.
The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, which advises the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on the use of vaccines, had been a major tool in Kennedy’s efforts to reshape U.S. vaccine policy.
Jumpstart your morning with the latest legal news delivered straight to your inbox from The Daily Docket newsletter. Sign up here.
Advertisement · Scroll to continue
In a March 16 decision, Boston-based U.S. District Judge Brian Murphy concluded that ACIP had been unlawfully reconstituted after Kennedy, a longtime anti-vaccine activist, last year removed and replaced all 17 independent experts who previously served on the panel, adding several members who share his controversial vaccine views.
In his decision, Murphy concluded that Kennedy’s ACIP panel violated the Federal Advisory Committee Act and repeatedly pointed to the panel’s charter, which required that its members have expertise in the use and research of vaccines and immunization practices.
On Monday, the Department of Health and Human Services led by Kennedy published a renewal of the charter that broadens the list of expertise for individuals who could serve on that panel, which makes recommendations impacting the use of vaccines, including the U.S. childhood immunization schedule.
Advertisement · Scroll to continue
A previous version of the charter signed by Kennedy in December stipulated that panel members should be knowledgeable about immunization practices and public health, and have expertise using vaccines in clinical practice or preventive medicine or have expertise in vaccine research, or in vaccine efficacy and safety.
Two former ACIP members appointed by previous administrations said the new charter appears to broaden the requirements for membership, listing examples of specialists in biostatistics and toxicology.
In his decision, Murphy said the members Kennedy appointed were “distinctly unqualified,” with only six of the 15 members having any meaningful experience in vaccines.
HHS spokesman Andrew Nixon downplayed the significance of the changes, saying the ACIP charter renewal and publication “are routine statutory requirements and do not signal any broader policy shift.”
The revamped charter followed a letter sent to Kennedy on March 25 by attorney Aaron Siri representing Informed Consent Action Network, a group critical of vaccine safety and mandates, recommending changes to the ACIP charter.
According to a press release on the ICAN website promoting the letter, the group called on Kennedy to “clarify committee member criteria” and argued that all 13 of the ACIP members whose qualifications were challenged in Murphy’s decision “do have the requisite experience.”
So far, the Trump administration has not appealed Murphy’s ruling, but still has time to do so under a 60-day window.
Reporting by Julie Steenhuysen in Chicago and Nate Raymond in Boston; Editing by Bill Berkrot
Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.
发表回复