2026年4月1日 13:31 UTC / 路透社
作者:布莱克·布里坦
2026年4月1日 13:31 UTC 更新于26分钟前
节点运行失败
[1/6] 2026年4月1日,美国华盛顿,示威者在美国最高法院大楼外举着标语牌。当天,最高法院将就特朗普政府限制移民子女出生地公民权的举措合法性进行口头辩论。路透社/凯莉·库珀
[1/6] 2026年4月1日,美国华盛顿,示威者在美国最高法院大楼外举着标语牌。当天,最高法院将就特朗普政府限制移民子女出生地公民权的举措合法性进行口头辩论。路透社/凯莉·库珀 购买授权,将在新标签页打开
- 内容摘要
- 围绕特朗普出生地公民权行政令的辩论
- 特朗普在关税案裁决后痛斥最高法院
- 特朗普试图限制出生地公民权
- 下级法院裁定其政策违宪并予以阻止
华盛顿4月1日电(路透社)——美国总统唐纳德·特朗普周三历史性地到访美国最高法院,出席一场关乎其强硬移民政策核心的合法性辩论——这项在他再次就职首日签署的行政令,将限制出生地公民权。
这位共和党总统坐在装饰华丽的法庭旁听席第一排,但在代表其政府的律师完成陈述、反对方律师开始发言后不久便离开了。特朗普在特勤局人员陪同下悄然离场。
立即订阅《每日案卷》新闻简报,将最新法律新闻直接发送至您的收件箱,开启您的晨间资讯。点击此处注册。
广告 · 滚动继续浏览
举报广告!
特朗普乘总统车队从白宫出发,在辩论开始前抵达现场,身着深色西装搭配红色领带。当法院法警以惯例宣布“Oyez! Oyez! Oyez!”——意为“肃静!肃静!肃静!”——以开启庭审时,特朗普与其他在场人员起立。特朗普与商务部长霍华德·卢特尼克一同在法院停留了一个半小时多一点。
首席大法官约翰·罗伯茨在宣布审理“特朗普诉芭芭拉”案的辩论前,并未提及特朗普的在场。
国会山这座新古典主义风格的法院外,示威者在辩论开始前聚集于此,部分人举着反特朗普标语,其中一块写着“特朗普现在必须下台”。
广告 · 滚动继续浏览
法庭内,特朗普头顶上方的饰带刻有象征和代表法律与秩序的人物形象,从手持十诫的圣经人物摩西,到中国哲学家孔子,再到前首席大法官约翰·马歇尔——他在一项标志性判决中确立了最高法院的司法审查权。
当最高法院律师协会的申请人被点名、举起右手宣誓“作为本法院的律师和顾问,我将正直行事,恪守法律,并维护美利坚合众国宪法”时,特朗普面朝九名大法官就座的审判席。
法庭内安保人员似乎比平时更多。
自特朗普去年再次就任总统以来,最高法院已在一系列紧急裁决中支持他,涉及移民、联邦大规模裁员、削减外国援助、解散教育部、禁止跨性别者参军等诸多领域。
但最高法院在2月20日的一起重大案件中作出不利于特朗普的裁决,该案涉及他去年依据应对国家紧急状态的法律征收的全面全球关税。自关税案裁决以来,特朗普多次猛烈抨击最高法院以及在该案中投票反对他的六名大法官。
据最高法院历史学会常驻历史学家克莱尔·卡什曼称,特朗普是首位在任期间出席最高法院口头辩论的在任总统。19世纪曾有多位总统在最高法院出庭辩护——但并非在其总统任期内,包括约翰·昆西·亚当斯、格罗弗·克利夫兰和本杰明·哈里森。1909年至1913年担任总统的威廉·霍华德·塔夫脱之后成为了最高法院首席大法官。
特朗普的车队从白宫出发,沿宪法大道随后转至独立大道,途经华盛顿纪念碑和国家广场,沿途有民众在人行道上围观。
最高法院6票对3票的保守派多数席位中,有三名大法官是特朗普首届任期内任命的:2017年的尼尔·戈萨奇、2018年的布雷特·卡瓦诺和2020年的艾米·科尼·巴雷特。
巴雷特的任命使最高法院形成当前的保守派绝对多数,并开启了一个时代:最高法院将美国法律大幅推向右翼,包括推翻堕胎权、拒绝平权入学政策、限制美国监管机构权力等一系列裁决。
特朗普及其政府高级官员经常谴责作出不利于其政策裁决的法官,有时使用极具人身攻击意味的言辞。
“他们令我作呕”
最高法院六名保守派大法官中的三名——首席大法官约翰·罗伯茨、戈萨奇和巴雷特——与三名自由派大法官一同裁决特朗普征收关税的行为越权。
特朗普尤其对戈萨奇和巴雷特感到愤怒,在裁决当天称他们“令家族蒙羞”。上周,特朗普继续谴责他任命的这两名大法官,称“他们令我作呕,因为他们对我们的国家有害”。
关税案裁决后,特朗普称自己为三名投票反对他的保守派大法官感到“羞耻”,称他们是“共和党伪君子和激进左翼民主党人的走狗和傻瓜”。RINO即“名义上的共和党人”,是保守派共和党人用来羞辱被视为对党不忠的 fellow 共和党人的术语。
裁决后特朗普还声称最高法院“被外国利益左右”,但未提供任何证据。
下级法院阻止了特朗普的行政令,该行政令要求美国机构不承认父母均非美国公民或合法永久居民(即“绿卡”持有者)的在美国出生儿童的公民身份。
特朗普政府称,给予几乎所有在美国本土出生的人公民身份,为非法移民创造了动机,并导致了“生育旅游”——即外国人为给孩子获取公民身份而前往美国分娩。
特朗普去年在社交媒体上写道:“出生地公民权本就不是为那些来美国度假、永久定居并带着家人,还一直嘲笑我们这些‘傻瓜’的人准备的!”
他补充道:“但贩毒集团喜欢这项政策!为了政治正确,我们是一个愚蠢的国家,但实际上,这与政治正确完全相反,这又是导致美国功能失调的又一个原因。”
安德鲁·钟、约翰·克鲁泽尔、扬·沃尔夫、苏珊·希维、特雷弗·赫尼西和布莱克·布里坦报道;威尔·邓纳姆编辑
我们的准则:路透社信托原则,将在新标签页打开
In historic first, Trump attends Supreme Court arguments
2026-04-01 1:31 PM UTC / Reuters
By Blake Brittain
April 1, 2026 1:31 PM UTC Updated 26 mins ago
节点运行失败
Item 1 of 6 Demonstrators hold signs outside the U.S. Supreme Court building on the day the court is expected to hear oral arguments on the legality of the Trump administration’s effort to limit birthright citizenship for the children of immigrants, in Washington, D.C., U.S., April 1, 2026. REUTERS/Kylie Cooper
[1/6]Demonstrators hold signs outside the U.S. Supreme Court building on the day the court is expected to hear oral arguments on the legality of the Trump administration’s effort to limit birthright citizenship for the children of immigrants, in Washington, D.C., U.S., April 1, 2026. REUTERS/Kylie Cooper Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab
- Summary
- Arguments over Trump’s birthright citizenship order
- Trump has denounced the court since its tariffs ruling
- Trump has sought to limit birthright citizenship
- Lower court blocked his policy as unconstitutional
WASHINGTON, April 1 (Reuters) – President Donald Trump made a historic visit to the U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday to attend arguments over the legality of a policy he considers crucial to his hardline approach toward immigration – a directive he signed on his first day back in office that would limit birthright citizenship.
The Republican president sat in the first row of the public section of seating in the ornate courtroom but departed not long after the lawyer arguing for his administration completed his presentation and the attorney for the challengers began hers. Trump quietly left, accompanied by Secret Service personnel.
Jumpstart your morning with the latest legal news delivered straight to your inbox from The Daily Docket newsletter. Sign up here.
Advertisement · Scroll to continue
Report Ad!
Trump was driven by motorcade from the White House and arrived before the arguments, wearing a red tie and dark suit. Trump and other attendees rose to their feet as the court marshal made the customary announcement beginning with “Oyez! Oyez! Oyez!” – meaning “Hear ye!” – to mark the beginning of the court session. Trump, joined by Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, was at the courthouse for a bit more than an hour and a half.
Chief Justice John Roberts did not acknowledge Trump’s presence before announcing the beginning of arguments in the case known as Trump v. Barbara.
Outside the neoclassical courthouse on Capitol Hill, demonstrators gathered ahead of the arguments, some holding anti-Trump signs including ones reading “Trump must go now.”
Advertisement · Scroll to continue
Above Trump in the courtroom were friezes featuring symbols and personages of law and order, from the biblical figure Moses bearing the Ten Commandments to the Chinese philosopher Confucius through former Chief Justice John Marshall whose opinion in a landmark decision established the Supreme Court’s power of judicial review.
Trump faced forward toward the bench where the nine justices were seated as applicants to the Supreme Court bar were identified by name, raised their right hand and swore an oath stating that “as an attorney and as a counselor of this Court, I will conduct myself uprightly and according to law, and that I will support the Constitution of the United States.”
There appeared to be more security personnel than usual in the courtroom.
The Supreme Court has backed Trump in a series of rulings issued on an emergency basis since he returned to the presidency last year. Those decisions came on matters including immigration, mass federal layoffs, cutting foreign aid, dismantling the Education Department, banning transgender people from the military and other areas.
But the court on February 20 ruled against Trump in a major case testing the legality of the sweeping global tariffs he imposed last year under a law meant for use in national emergencies. Since the tariffs ruling, Trump has lashed out repeatedly at the Supreme Court and the six justices who ruled against him in that case.
Trump is the first sitting president to attend an oral argument at the Supreme Court, according to Clare Cushman, the resident historian at the Supreme Court Historical Society. There are examples of 19th century presidents arguing cases before the court – though not while in office – including John Quincy Adams, Grover Cleveland and Benjamin Harrison. William Howard Taft, who served as president from 1909 to 1913, later became the chief justice on the Supreme Court.
Trump’s motorcade drove from the White House along Constitution Avenue and then Independence Avenue, passing the Washington Monument and the National Mall, with crowds watching from the sidewalk.
The Supreme Court’s 6-3 conservative majority includes three justices appointed by Trump during his first term in office – Neil Gorsuch in 2017, Brett Kavanaugh in 2018 and Amy Coney Barrett in 2020.
Barrett’s appointment gave the court its current conservative super-majority and ushered in an epoch in which the court has moved American law dramatically to the right including rulings rolling back abortion rights, rejecting race-conscious collegiate admissions policies, limiting the power of U.S. regulatory agencies and more.
Trump and senior officials in his administration often have denounced judges who have issued rulings against his policies, sometimes in highly personal terms.
‘THEY SICKEN ME’
Three of the court’s six conservative justices – Chief Justice John Roberts as well as Gorsuch and Barrett – joined with the court’s three liberal members in ruling that Trump had overstepped his authority in imposing tariffs.
Trump was incensed at Gorsuch and Barrett in particular, calling them on the day of that ruling “an embarrassment to their families.” And last week, Trump kept up his condemnation of his two appointees, saying that “they sicken me because they’re bad for our country.”
Trump after the tariffs ruling said he was “ashamed” of the three conservative justices who ruled against him, calling them “fools and lapdogs for the RINOs and the radical-left Democrats.” RINO, meaning “Republican in name only,” is a term sometimes used by conservative Republicans to insult fellow Republicans viewed as disloyal to the party.
Trump after the ruling also claimed that the court “has been swayed by foreign interests,” but declined to provide any evidence.
A lower court blocked Trump’s executive order directing U.S. agencies not to recognize the citizenship of children born in the United States if neither parent is an American citizen or legal permanent resident, also called a “green card” holder.
Trump’s administration has said that granting citizenship to virtually anyone born on U.S. soil has created incentives for illegal immigration and led to “birth tourism,” by which foreigners travel to the United States to give birth and secure citizenship for their children.
Trump wrote on social media last year: “Birthright Citizenship was not meant for people taking vacations to become permanent Citizens of the United States of America, and bringing their families with them, all the time laughing at the ‘SUCKERS’ that we are!”
Trump added: “But the drug cartels love it! We are, for the sake of being politically correct, a STUPID Country but, in actuality, this is the exact opposite of being politically correct, and it is yet another point that leads to the dysfunction of America.”
Reporting by Andrew Chung, John Kruzel, Jan Wolfe, Susan Heavey, Trevor Hunnicutt and Blake Brittain; Editing by Will Dunham
Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab
发表回复