2026年4月1日 美国东部时间上午11:03 / 福克斯新闻频道
特朗普出席了周三的口头辩论，彰显出他对本案的重视程度
作者：布雷安娜·德皮施、比尔·米尔斯、香农·布里姆，福克斯新闻
美国最高法院周三就所谓美国“出生地公民权”保护条款对特朗普政府的律师展开质询，这起具有里程碑意义的诉讼可能推翻延续一个多世纪的法律先例与行政分支政策。
此次质询正值大法官们就特朗普就职首日签署的行政令的合法性进行权衡。该行政令旨在终结几乎所有在美国出生的无证移民父母或持有临时非移民签证的父母所生子女的自动公民权——即“出生地公民权”。
口头辩论开始后，大法官们对特朗普政府的论点似乎有些持怀疑态度，包括其对第十四修正案的解读，并就政府对公民权条款的解读向特朗普政府的律师、美国副检察长D.约翰·索尔施压。
首席大法官约翰·罗伯茨告诉索尔，他认为特朗普政府在本案中提出的核心论点之一“颇为古怪”。
联邦法官叫停特朗普针对所有婴儿的出生地公民权禁令，考验下级法院权限
“你显然非常重视‘受其管辖’这一问题，”罗伯茨对索尔说。他指出，政府援引了“大使子女、敌对入侵期间的敌军子女、军舰上的子女”作为例证，“随后你将其扩大到国内的一整类非法移民群体”，罗伯茨说道，“我不太清楚你如何能从如此微小且略显特殊的例子延伸到这么庞大的群体。”
大法官艾米·科尼·巴雷特和尼尔·戈萨奇在早期质询中也表达了怀疑态度，并就先例、执法和公民权条款文本等关键问题向索尔施压。
“我们如今身处一个全新的世界，”索尔说道，他指出“大约80亿人只需搭乘一次飞机，就能生下一名美国公民子女。”
“世界变了，但宪法没变，”罗伯茨回应道。
特朗普的行政令去年一经推出就引发了一连串联邦诉讼，迄今为止，没有任何一家美国法院在该问题上支持政府立场。
特朗普本人出席了最高法院的口头辩论，成为首位旁听此类辩论的在任美国总统。包括司法部长帕姆·邦迪在内的其他政府官员也到场旁听。
司法部：特朗普最早将于本月开始执行出生地公民权行政令
最高法院暗示可能限制《选举权法案》关键条款
如果特朗普政府胜诉，将对美国移民政策带来颠覆性转变，并推翻长期以来的公民权理念——特朗普及其盟友认为这些理念是错误的。
这也将对在美国出生的婴儿产生直接的实际影响，促使国会和特朗普政府立即采取行动明确其身份。
点击此处下载福克斯新闻应用程序
最高法院的裁决预计将于6月底公布。
布雷安娜·德皮施是福克斯新闻数字频道的全国政治记者，负责报道特朗普政府，重点关注司法部、联邦调查局及其他全国性新闻。她此前曾在《华盛顿观察家报》和《华盛顿邮报》报道全国政治，作品还发表在《政客杂志》《科罗拉多公报》等媒体。可通过Breanne.Deppisch@fox.com向布雷安娜发送爆料线索，或在X平台关注她：@breanne_dep。
Trump, Bondi watch historic SCOTUS arguments as justices duel over birthright citizenship
April 1, 2026 11:03am EDT / Fox News
Trump attended oral arguments Wednesday, signaling just how important he views the case at hand
By Breanne Deppisch, Bill Mears, Shannon Bream, Fox News
The Supreme Court on Wednesday pressed the lawyer for the Trump administration on so-called “birthright citizenship” protections in the U.S., part of a landmark court challenge that could upend more than a century of legal precedent and executive branch policy.
The questions come as justices weighed the legality of the executive order Trump signed on his first day back in office. The order in question seeks to end automatic citizenship — or “birthright citizenship” — for nearly all persons born in the U.S. to undocumented parents, or to parents with temporary non-immigrant visas in the U.S.
As oral arguments kicked off, justices appeared somewhat skeptical of the Trump administration’s arguments, including its view of the 14th Amendment, and pressed the Trump administration’s lawyer, U.S. Solicitor General D. John Sauer, on the administration’s reading of the citizenship clause.
Chief Justice John Roberts told Sauer that he viewed one of the key arguments made by the Trump administration in its case as “quirky.”
FEDERAL JUDGE BLOCKS TRUMP’S BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP BAN FOR ALL INFANTS, TESTING LOWER COURT POWERS
A demonstrator is seen outside the U.S. Supreme Court ahead of U.S. President Donald Trump’s expected arrival on April 1, 2026, in Washington, D.C.(Al Drago/Getty Images)
“You obviously put a lot of weight on [the] ‘subject to the jurisdiction thereof’ issue,” Roberts told Sauer. He noted the administration cited “children of ambassadors, children of enemies during a hostile invasion, children on warships. And then you expand it to a whole class of illegal aliens here in the country,” Roberts said. “I’m not quite sure how you can get to that big group from such tiny and sort of idiosyncratic examples.”
Justices Amy Coney Barrett and Neil Gorsuch also expressed skepticism during early questions, and pressed Sauer on key issues of precedent, enforcement, and the text of the citizenship clause itself.
“We’re in a new world now,” Sauer said, noting that “some 8 billion people are one plane ride away from having a child who’s a U.S. citizen.”
“It’s a new world, but it’s the same constitution,” Roberts said in response.
Trump’s executive order was immediately met with a flurry of federal lawsuits last year, and to date, no U.S. court has sided with the administration on the issue.
Trump himself attended Supreme Court oral arguments, making him the first sitting U.S. president to do so. Other administration officials, including Attorney General Pam Bondi, were also in the audience.
TRUMP TO BEGIN ENFORCING BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP ORDER AS EARLY AS THIS MONTH, DOJ SAYS
Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts and other justices on the high court are seen during President Donald Trump’s 2026 State of the Union address.(Win McNamee/Getty Images)
SUPREME COURT SIGNALS IT MAY LIMIT KEY VOTING RIGHTS ACT RULE
A ruling in Trump’s favor would represent a seismic shift for immigration policy in the U.S., and would upend long-held notions of citizenship that Trump and his allies argue are misguided.
It would also yield immediate, operational consequences for infants born in the U.S., putting the impetus on Congress and the Trump administration to immediately act to clarify their status.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
A decision from the high court is expected by late June.
Breanne Deppisch is a national politics reporter for Fox News Digital covering the Trump administration, with a focus on the Justice Department, FBI and other national news. She previously covered national politics at the Washington Examiner and The Washington Post, with additional bylines in Politico Magazine, the Colorado Gazette and others. You can send tips to Breanne at Breanne.Deppisch@fox.com, or follow her on X at @breanne_dep.
发表回复