消息人士:美伊战争压力升级,赫格斯塞斯计划出席众议院听证会


2026年3月31日 / 美国东部时间下午1:01 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻

华盛顿——据两名知情人士透露,美国国防部长皮特·赫格斯塞斯暂定预计于4月29日在众议院军事委员会公开作证,这将是自美国与伊朗爆发冲突以来,他首次在国会山宣誓作证。

消息人士称,听证会的具体时间尚未最终确定,可能会有所变动。此次听证会将属于委员会对国防部及其年度预算申请的常规监督范畴。

《MS NOW》率先报道了此次听证会的相关计划。

如果听证会按计划举行,这将是议员们首次在公开宣誓场合就特朗普政府2月28日首次发动空袭以来,本届政府对战争的处理方式向赫格斯塞斯发问。随着战争持续,市场出现动荡、汽油价格持续上涨,国会山方面一直呼吁提供更详细的信息。

上周三众议院军事委员会举行了一场闭门简报会,此后这种要求获取信息的压力进一步升级。两党议员均表示,他们未能清楚了解本届政府的战略。委员会主席迈克·罗杰斯在简报会后对记者表示,官员们“受到诸多限制”且“守口如瓶”,并补充称议员们“理应获得比目前更多的答案”。

罗杰斯表示,议员们希望了解作战计划和可能的部队调动情况,但“没有得到任何答复”。他称此次简报只是信息共享受限这一 broader 模式的一部分,并警告如果这种情况持续下去,可能会对国会的支持产生“后果”。

委员会的最高民主党议员亚当·史密斯也表达了类似担忧,称议员们仍不清楚本届政府打算如何实现其在伊朗的目标。他表示,目前没有“从当前到未来”的详细计划,并指出有关潜在部队部署的讨论未能给出“具体答案”。

其他议员也呼应了这些关于战略和部队安全的担忧。科罗拉多州民主党众议员杰森·克劳表示,他的首要任务是保护美军人员,他将此描述为“极其不稳定的局势”,并警告称,关于政府计划如何保护该地区约5万名美军的“问题多于答案”。

推动获取信息的行动也已正式化。由史密斯牵头的众议院军事委员会全体民主党议员在周五发出的一封信中,呼吁立即举行五角大楼官员出席的公开听证会,理由是“缺乏透明度”,并对不断变化的作战目标、未得到解答的成本问题、可能涉及的2000亿美元追加拨款,以及可能动用美国地面部队表示担忧。

共和党众议员德里克·范·奥尔登重申了他反对派遣地面部队的立场,称他在这一问题上的态度“100%明确”,同时他也表示支持确保军队拥有在该地区行动所需的资源。

但众议院议长迈克·约翰逊周四淡化了有关信息流通的担忧,他对记者表示,他在行动开展前和行动期间“不断获得简报”,并仍与包括总统在内的高层政府官员保持定期联系。他补充称,他将努力确保罗杰斯获得所需的任何额外信息。

此次预期的作证之际,这场冲突已进入第二个月,仍无明确解决方案。赫格斯塞斯周二表示,“未来几天将具有决定性意义”,而美国官员继续对战役的进展表示信心。

这场战争也产生了更广泛的经济连锁反应。由于与冲突相关的不稳定局势以及霍尔木兹海峡附近持续的交通中断对全球能源市场造成压力,美国汽油价格已升至近四年来首次超过每加仑4美元。

Hegseth slated for House testimony as pressure builds over Iran war, sources say

March 31, 2026 / 1:01 PM EDT / CBS News

Washington — Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth is tentatively expected to testify publicly before the House Armed Services Committee on April 29, according to two sources familiar with the plans, in what would mark his first appearance under oath on Capitol Hill since the U.S. conflict with Iran began.

The timing of the hearing has not been finalized and could shift, the sources said. The session will fall under the committee’s routine oversight of the Defense Department and its annual budget request.

MS NOW first reported on the plans for the hearing.

If it proceeds as planned, the hearing would give lawmakers their first opportunity to question Hegseth in a public, sworn setting about the administration’s handling of the war since the Trump administration first ordered strikes on Feb. 28. There have been calls on Capitol Hill for more detailed answers as the war has stretched on, leading to market turmoil and rising gas prices.

That pressure has intensified following a classified House Armed Services Committee briefing last Wednesday, after which members from both parties said they were left without a clear understanding of the administration’s strategy. Rep. Mike Rogers, the committee chair, told reporters after the briefing that officials were being “very constrained” and “tight-lipped,” and added that lawmakers “deserve more answers than we’re given.”

Rogers said members sought clarity on planning and potential troop movements but “didn’t get any answers,” describing the briefing as part of a broader pattern of limited information sharing and warning it could have “consequences” for support in Congress if it continues.

The committee’s top Democrat, Rep. Adam Smith, raised similar concerns, saying lawmakers still lack a clear path for how the administration intends to achieve its objectives in Iran. He said there is no detailed plan “from here to there,” and noted discussions about potential troop deployments did not yield “specific answers.”

Other lawmakers have echoed these concerns about both strategy and troop safety. Democratic Rep. Jason Crow of Colorado said his top priority is protecting U.S. forces in what he described as a “very volatile situation,” warning there are “more questions than answers” about how the administration plans to safeguard roughly 50,000 troops in the region.

The push for answers has also been formalized. In a letter sent Friday, all Democrats on the House Armed Services Committee, led by Smith, called for an immediate public hearing with Pentagon officials, citing a “lack of transparency” and raising concerns about shifting objectives, unanswered questions about costs and a potential $200 billion supplemental, and the possible use of U.S. ground forces.

Republican Rep. Derrick Van Orden reiterated his opposition to sending ground troops, saying he has been “100% crystal clear” on that position, even as he voiced support for ensuring the military has the resources needed to operate in the region.

But House Speaker Mike Johnson on Thursday downplayed concerns about the flow of information, telling reporters he has been “constantly briefed” before and during the operation and remains in regular contact with top administration officials, including the president. He added he would work to ensure Rogers receives any additional information he needs.

The expected testimony comes as the conflict enters its second month with no clear resolution. Hegseth said Tuesday that the “upcoming days will be decisive,” as U.S. officials continue to express confidence in the trajectory of the campaign.

The war is also having broader economic ripple effects. U.S. gas prices have climbed above $4 a gallon for the first time in nearly four years, as instability tied to the conflict and continued disruptions near the Strait of Hormuz weigh on global energy markets.

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注