2026-03-29T18:30:42-04:00 / 福克斯新闻网
一项异议就能让国土安全部拨款在复活节休会前陷入停滞
作者：查德·珀格拉姆 福克斯新闻网
发布于2026年3月29日 美国东部时间下午6:30
福克斯新闻首席国会通讯员查德·珀格拉姆在《福克斯新闻@晚间》节目中表示，众议院共和党人已经自行起草了国土安全部拨款法案。
新功能：现在您可以收听福克斯新闻文章！
收听本文
3分钟
众议院周五深夜通过了针对国土安全部所有职能的为期两个月的临时拨款方案后，有关国土安全部拨款的闹剧将于周一上午重回参议院议程。
参议院原定于美国东部时间周一上午10:30召开一场简短的“形式性”会议，届时参议院仅由少量工作人员主持开幕和闭幕仪式。
但周一的情况可能并非如此。参议院完成祈祷和效忠宣誓后，很可能会有一名共和党议员请求议长认可其发言。
如果出现这种情况，我们预计这位共和党议员会请求一致同意（即所有100名参议员都同意）审议众议院周五通过的国土安全部拨款法案，对其进行“三读”并直接通过。
记者手记：《指南》带你理清结束国土安全部停摆的下一步走向
国土安全部拨款危机将于周一上午重回参议院议程。（希瑟·迪尔/盖蒂图片社 摄）
随后议长将询问是否有人提出异议。
若任何一名参议员——无论民主党还是共和党议员——提出异议，众议院的法案就会胎死腹中。这意味着参众两院在国土安全部拨款问题上仍存在分歧。例如，众议院甚至都没有审议参议院全体100名议员通过、并于周五凌晨2:19通过的那份法案。众议院直接自行起草了为期两个月的临时拨款法案，周五晚间通过后便休会离场。
如果无人提出异议，参众两院将达成一致，通过同一份法案，这意味着双方立场统一。
参议院通过众议院法案将结束当前的国土安全部停摆。（WVUE）
参议院通过众议院法案将终结国土安全部停摆。
但如果有人提出异议，一切都将陷入停滞。
这就是参议院“一致同意”程序的神奇之处——也是其阴暗面。即便有99名参议员支持某项提案，只要有一人提出异议，就能根据“一致同意”（参议院通常简称“UC”）规则挫败该法案。
事实上，民主党届时有可能提出自己的国土安全部拨款法案，并请求参议院以一致同意方式通过。而值勤的共和党议员很可能会提出异议，从而否决民主党的这项请求。
如果参议院否决了众议院的法案，那么在参众两院都在4月中旬复活节/逾越节休会结束后恢复议事之前，几乎不可能有任何办法结束国土安全部停摆。
国土安全部停摆迎来突破，但共和党人也要付出代价，拨款之争接近尾声
共和党人确实希望为国土安全部提供资金，但民主党人的异议为他们提供了政治指责的机会。（安德鲁·哈勒尔/彭博社 via 盖蒂图片社）
共和党人确实希望为国土安全部拨款。但民主党人的异议为共和党提供了政治造势的机会。他们可以将此次异议归咎为国土安全部仍处于停摆状态的原因，声称民主党阻挠了众议院通过的法案。
共和党人认为这对他们的中期选举有利。他们在2024年大选中以边境安全为竞选纲领并赢得选举。共和党希望将民主党人的异议作为证据，证明民主党人不想为移民海关执法局提供资金。
点击此处下载福克斯新闻APP
但同样，民主党也可以反驳称，如果共和党反对民主党提出的一致同意请求，那么共和党也应为停摆以及TSA（运输安全管理局）的长排队时间承担部分责任。
事情就是这样。
查德·珀格拉姆目前担任福克斯新闻频道（FNC）首席国会通讯员。他于2007年9月加入该电视台，总部位于华盛顿特区。
The Hitchhiker’s Guide to what to expect on DHS funding when the Senate meets Monday
2026-03-29T18:30:42-04:00 / Fox News
A single objection to a unanimous consent request could freeze DHS funding through the Easter recess
By Chad Pergram Fox News
Published March 29, 2026 6:30pm EDT
Fox News chief congressional correspondent Chad Pergram says House Republicans have prepped their own DHS spending bill on ‘Fox News @ Night.’
NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!
Listen to this article
3 min
The DHS funding drama heads back to the Senate on Monday morning after the House approved a two-month stopgap spending plan for all of DHS late Friday night.
The Senate meets on Monday at 10:30 am et in what was supposed to be a brief “pro forma” session where the body simply gavels in and gavels out with a skeleton crew on hand.
But that might not be what happens Monday. As soon as the Senate gets through the prayer and pledge, it’s likely a Republican senator seeks recognition from the chair.
If that happens, we anticipate the GOP senator to ask for unanimous consent (meaning all 100 senators would agree) to take up the DHS bill passed by the House on Friday, that it be “read a third time” and passed.
REPORTER’S NOTEBOOK: THE HITCHHIKER’S GUIDE TO WHAT’S NEXT TO END THE DHS SHUTDOWN
The Department of Homeland Security funding debacle heads back to the Senate on Monday morning.(Photo by Heather Diehl/Getty Images)
The chair will then ask if there is an objection.
If any senator – be they a Democrat or Republican – objects, the House bill is dead. That means that the House and Senate continue to be out of alignment on the DHS funding question. For instance, the House didn’t even consider the bill cleared by all 100 senators and passed by the Senate at 2:19 am Friday. The House simply wrote their own two-month interim bill, passed it Friday night and skipped town.
If there is no objection, the House and Senate are aligned and will have passed the same bill. That means they are on the same page.
Approval of the House bill by the Senate would end the ongoing DHS shutdown.(WVUE)
Approval of the House bill by the Senate would end the DHS shutdown.
But if there’s an objection, everything remains frozen.
This is both the parliamentary magic – and dark underbelly of “unanimous consent” in the Senate. You could have 99 senators in favor of something. But all it takes is a solitary objection to foil a bill under “unanimous consent” or “UC” as it’s often called in the Senate.
In fact, it’s possible Democrats could then offer their own DHS funding bill and ask the Senate to approve that by unanimous consent. It’s likely that whatever Republican senator is on duty tomorrow would object, thus blocking the Democratic request.
If the Senate blocks the House bill, it’s doubtful there’s any way to end the DHS shutdown until after both bodies return in mid-April after the Easter/Passover recess.
DHS SHUTDOWN BREAKTHROUGH COMES AT COST FOR REPUBLICANS AS FUNDING FIGHTS NEARS END
Republicans genuinely want to fund the DHS – but a Democratic objection presents them with an opportunity for political finger-pointing.(Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg via Getty Images)
Republicans truly want to fund DHS. But a Democratic objection presents the GOP with a political opportunity. They can then point to that objection as the reason DHS remains shuttered, arguing that Democrats blocked the House-approved bill.
Republicans believe this helps them in the midterms. They ran on border security and won in 2024. Republicans want to point to a Democratic objection as evidence that they don’t want to fund ICE.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
But by the same token, Democrats could argue that Republicans are partly responsible for the shutdown and the long TSA lines if they object to the Democratic unanimous consent request.
And so it goes.
Chad Pergram currently serves as Chief Congressional Correspondent for FOX News Channel (FNC). He joined the network in September 2007 and is based out of Washington, D.C.
发表回复