新闻


访谈文字实录:众议员吉姆·希梅斯做客《与玛格丽特·布伦南面对面》节目 2026年3月29日

>

2026-03-29T12:08:00-0400 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻

>

以下是康涅狄格州民主党众议员吉姆·希梅斯的访谈实录,该访谈于2026年3月29日在《与玛格丽特·布伦南面对面》节目中播出。

>

*

玛格丽特·布伦南: 接下来我们连线众议院情报委员会最高民主党议员、国会议员吉姆·希梅斯,他将从康涅狄格州格林威治加入我们的节目。早上好。

>

众议员吉姆·希梅斯: 早上好,玛格丽特。

>

你刚刚听到了边境事务沙皇、白宫代表在此阐述了他的观点。但从政治角度来说——我的意思是,政府停摆本是民主党人试图限制移民海关执法局(ICE)的行事方式。但实际上,ICE早就获得了资金。事实上,它是国土安全部少数几个部门之一,因为总统上一法案提供了大量拨款,工作人员已经拿到了薪水,而如今他们的职责范围还在扩大,因为他们已经部署到美国各地的机场。那么民主党人从这场对峙中得到了什么?

>

众议员希梅斯: 是的,玛格丽特,这场对峙还远未结束,对吧?显然,总统正非法为运输安全管理局(TSA)人员支付薪酬。正如你所指出的,参议院以霍南先生——霍曼——为首的议员全票通过了一项两党法案,内容是,好吧,我们给其他所有部门拨款,然后我们再来处理ICE这个棘手的问题。但众议院的共和党人却说,绝不,我们不会这么做。顺便说一句,他们还嘲笑了参议院自己的共和党领袖。所以你看——这件事目前仍悬而未决,原因很简单。我们可以谈论参众两院修改法律,但真正的原因是,绝大多数美国人看到了ICE的所作所为:两名美国公民被杀害,他们不断无搜查令就闯入美国公民的住宅,工作人员的着装就像——你知道的,像空降费卢杰那样——去执行追捕国内非法移民的合法任务,他们会说这不行,这就是我们的立场。我们的立场非常明确,我们希望ICE像他们本应扮演的警察那样行事,而这场斗争还没有胜利。很遗憾这件事被牵扯进来了。我很遗憾国会山一侧的共和党人曾认为这是个好主意,而在另一侧的共和党人却称其为笑话,但我们已经准备好就一项并非激进的要求进行谈判。我们只是希望ICE能像合格的警察那样行事。

>

玛格丽特·布伦南: 那么与此同时,总统正在重新调整现有资金来支付TSA人员的薪水。你说他是非法支付薪酬。你认为按照白宫的说法,他这样做违反了法律吗?

>

众议员希梅斯: 这不是我认为的问题,而是我明确知道这一点,对吧?我的意思是,如果说国会拥有一项权力,那就是钱包权。当然,这位总统一贯且普遍声称他实际上拥有这项权力——

>

玛格丽特·布伦南: ——所以他们不应该拿到薪水?

>

众议员希梅斯: ——但任何上过四年级公民课的美国人都知道——不,他们应该拿到薪水。他们本不该被当作人质。我们曾在参议院全票通过一项协议,如果当时该协议获得通过,他们现在就能拿到薪水,我们也不会在这里争论钱包权的宪法问题。但众议院议长迈克·约翰逊却对参议院共和党人已经同意的方案说“绝不”。

>

玛格丽特·布伦南: 不过有三名民主党议员加入了议长约翰逊的众议院版本法案阵营,即便该法案中没有任何新的问责措施。众议员格卢森坎普·佩雷斯表示,她之所以支持该法案,是因为她认为不为工作人员支付薪水是错误的,而民主党人设定了无法实现的目标。她说,既然白宫已经同意了诸如配备随身摄像头之类的要求——她所说的“意识形态纯洁性”难道不是阻碍了工薪阶层的诉求吗?她不就是这个意思吗?

>

众议员希梅斯: 这与意识形态纯洁性无关。我在一点上同意玛丽的看法,那就是工作人员不该被当作人质。我们稍后再谈这个。但无论如何,这都算不上极端要求。再说一遍,我们只是要求那些人在进入明尼阿波利斯时不要穿得像海豹突击队队员。我们要求他们像其他警察一样佩戴警徽,要求他们破门而入时必须持有搜查令。

>

玛格丽特·布伦南: 而且其中一些要求已经达成了共识——

>

众议员希梅斯: 这不是意识形态纯洁性。这是基本的守法行为——是的,好吧,既然一切都已达成共识,那就通过法律将其制度化吧。因为你知道吗,我们不信任总统说的话,就像我们不信任他说“不再佩戴口罩”一样,也不信任他说“哦,我现在正在和伊朗谈判”而实际上并没有谈判,对吧?所以如果这真的这么容易,那好,就把它写入法律。但他们不会这么做的,你知道的——他们不愿意这么做。现在,玛丽亚说得对,这一点很重要,我们已经太习惯于利用政府停摆作为立法上达成目的的手段了。而这意味着,当某一党派耍脾气时,像TSA工作人员或农业部联邦政府雇员这样的人就拿不到薪水,对吧?在这件事上,我碰巧认为美国民众——你知道的,他们站在民主党这边,认为你不能像ICE在明尼阿波利斯那样行事,但我们确实需要摆脱通过政府停摆来立法的做法,这与我们伟大的国家格格不入。

>

玛格丽特·布伦南: 嗯,他们只是希望机场和基本政府职能能够正常运转。但关于你提到的那一点,你说总统并没有真正在和伊朗谈判,这是因为你作为国会议员没有收到相关外交简报吗?还是你认为他纯粹是在撒谎?

>

众议员希梅斯: 我认为他上周日纯粹是在撒谎,当时有人告诉他——顺便说一句,我们今天的处境完全一样,你知道的,油价现在涨到了每桶112美元。股市期货下跌了2%。上周日,他意识到,我的天哪,周一将迎来金融灾难。所以他只是编造了他们正在与伊朗谈判的说法。看看这番话背后的真相,伊朗现在已经意识到他们掌握了主动权。他们控制着霍尔木兹海峡。汽油价格每加仑上涨了超过1美元,所以伊朗人意识到,我的天,我们在这里掌握了很大的筹码。

>

玛格丽特·布伦南: 今天在伊斯兰堡,有多名调解人与美国保持联系,表示他们正在就伊朗问题进行谈判。但目前美国和伊朗都没有参与谈判。不过继续说伊朗问题,我知道你很关心乌克兰的局势。值得注意的是,乌克兰总统泽连斯基在过去几天一直在海湾地区,他昨天表示俄罗斯正在向伊朗提供卫星图像,这些图像涉及美国军事基地。他还表示,俄罗斯正在向伊朗提供信号情报和电子情报。你知道有证据表明俄罗斯正在积极协助伊朗对美国发动战争吗?

>

众议员希梅斯: 嗯,玛格丽特,我得谨慎一点,因为我会审查情报,显然我不能谈论机密信息,但我绝对不会质疑泽连斯基总统的这一说法。我想请美国民众想一想,你认为普京现在在做什么?四年来,我们一直——在我看来是正确的——帮助乌克兰给俄罗斯造成沉重打击。那么你认为会发生什么?与此同时,如你所知,我们正任由伊朗——现在伊朗通过向中国出售石油获得数十亿美元,以便他们从俄罗斯购买无人机。我们正任由俄罗斯出售石油,这样他们就能获得美元来攻击乌克兰,并用这些美元来攻击——用来帮助袭击我们的军队。我的意思是,这种事就连好莱坞编剧都编不出来。

>

玛格丽特·布伦南: 嗯,鲁比奥国务卿被问及俄罗斯向伊朗提供援助的程度时,他淡化了这一情况。他说这在战场上不会产生任何影响。我知道法国、英国都曾表示俄罗斯和伊朗正在无人机领域相互协助。当你听到鲁比奥国务卿的说法时,你认为他是什么意思?

>

众议员希梅斯: 我认为作为这场战争的主要支持者之一,马克·鲁比奥有充分的理由这么说,因为美国民众现在开始意识到这场战争是一场灾难,又一个泥潭,所以鲁比奥才会说“它们不会产生任何影响”之类的话。好吧,我不同意马克·鲁比奥的这一观点。你知道,俄罗斯拥有相关能力,比如使用基本的卫星技术,顺便说一句,这可以通过商业途径实现,用来定位我们的航空母舰。目前,我们在该地区的军事基地据称已经无法居住。你认为这是为什么?

>

玛格丽特·布伦南: 在你结束采访之前,民主党一直将腐败作为攻击总统、争取夺回众议院控制权的竞选主题。你的民主党同僚、佛罗里达州的希拉·谢尔菲勒斯-麦科米克因在新冠救济资金中窃取数百万美元而被裁定25项道德指控成立。她应该辞职吗?应该被驱逐出议会吗?

>

众议员希梅斯: 你知道,如果她不辞职,众议院就会举行投票,你知道的,人们会找到支持这位女议员的理由,就像共和党人在战争时期、汽油价格过高的时候为乔治·桑托斯辩护一样——

>

玛格丽特·布伦南: 她应该辞职吗?

>

众议员希梅斯: ——这种事不应该发生。所以我希望我的同僚能够选择辞职,从而避免这种局面。但同样重要的是,两党都应该一致惩罚本党内部的道德失范行为。

>

玛格丽特·布伦南: 好的,你希望她辞职。感谢议员今天带来的所有深刻见解。我们今天的节目就到这里。稍后马上回来。

Transcript: Rep. Jim Himes on “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan,” March 29, 2026

2026-03-29T12:08:00-0400 / CBS News

The following is the transcript of the interview with Rep. Jim Himes, Democrat of Connecticut, that aired on “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan” on March 29, 2026.

*

MARGARET BRENNAN: We go now to the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, Congressman Jim Himes, who joins us from Greenwich, Connecticut. Good morning to you.

REP. JIM HIMES: Good morning, Margaret.

So you just heard the border czar, the White House representative here, make his argument. Politically speaking, though. I mean, the shutdown was intended by Democrats to try to constrain ICE and how it had been acting. But practically speaking, ICE is already funded. In fact, it’s one of the few DHS entities where people are getting paid because they had so much funding from the President’s last bill, and now their portfolio is expanding because they’re in American airports across the country. So what did Democrats get out of this standoff?

REP. HIMES: Yeah, well, Margaret, the standoff is not done yet, right? The President is illegally paying, apparently, TSA agents. You had the Senate, as you pointed out, with Mr. Honan- Homan, pass a bipartisan bill unanimously in the United States Senate to say, look, let’s fund everybody else, and let’s deal with this thorny issue about ICE. And then you had the Republican House say, hell no, we’re not doing that. And by the way, mock their own Republican leaders in the Senate. So look what- this thing is still very much live for one very simple reason. We can talk about House, Senate, changing law, for one very simple reason, which is that the vast majority of Americans look at the way ICE behaved with the murder of two American citizens, with the constant knocking down of doors of American citizens without warrants, people dressed like they are, you know, airlifting into Fallujah to do the legitimate work of going after illegal aliens in this country, and they say that is not okay, and that’s our position. Our position is very simply, we want ICE to act like the police force that they are, and that fight is not won yet. And look, I’m sorry it got tied up. I’m sorry that the Republicans on one side of the Capitol said this was a good idea, and on the other side of the Capitol. They called it a joke, but we’re ready to negotiate around something that is not a radical demand. We just want ICE to act like proper police officers.

MARGARET BRENNAN: So in the meantime, the president’s redirecting existing funding to pay TSA agents. You said he was illegally paying them. You believe that he is violating the law in this interpretation that the White House says they have?

REP. HIMES: Well, it’s not that I believe it, it’s that I know it, right? I mean, if there’s one power that Congress has, it is the power of the purse. Now this president has, of course, consistently and universally said that he in fact has that power–

MARGARET BRENNAN: –So they shouldn’t be paid?

REP. HIMES: –but any American that went through fourth grade civics- no, they should be paid. This- they should have never been held hostage. And we had a deal come out unanimously from the Senate, that if it had passed right now, they would be getting paid, and we wouldn’t be talking about the constitutional power of the purse. But Mike Johnson, leader of the House of Representatives, said hell no to what his Republicans in the Senate said yes to.

MARGARET BRENNAN: So there were three Democrats, though, who got on board with Speaker Johnson the House version of this bill, even without any new accountability measures in it, Congresswoman Glusenkamp Perez says she did so because she thinks it’s wrong not to pay people for their work, and Democrats had set unattainable goals. She says since the White House was agreeing to things like body cameras- doesn’t she have a point here that there is, as she put it, ‘ideological purity’ that’s getting in the way of working people?

REP. HIMES: So this is not a question of ideological purity. And I agree with Marie on one point, which is the people shouldn’t be held hostage. And we can come back to that. But this is not extreme demands by any stretch of the imagination. Again, we’re asking that guys not dress like Navy SEALs when they go into Minneapolis. We’re asking that they wear badges the way every other police officer does, that they have warrants when they break down doors.

MARGARET BRENNAN: And some of those things have been agreed to–

REP. HIMES: This is not ideological purity. This is basic adherence to the law- yeah, well, okay, so it’s all agreed to, let’s pass the law which codifies it. Because you know what, we don’t trust the president when he says, okay, no masks any more than we trust him when he says, oh, well, now I’m negotiating with the Iranians when he’s not, right? So if this is so easy, fine, let’s codify it into law. But they’re not, you know- they’re not willing to do that. Now, where Maria’s right, and this is important, we have gotten too used to using shutdowns as a mechanism of getting what we want legislatively. And what that implies is that people like TSA agents or folks that work in the federal government for the Department of Agriculture or- don’t get paid when one party throws a tantrum, right? Now, in this case, I happen to believe that the American people- you know are with the Democratic Party and saying you don’t get to act like ICE acted in Minneapolis, but we do need to get away from legislating through shutdown that is not consonant with the great country that we are.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Well, and they just want their airports and basic government to work. But on the point you raised, you said that the President’s not really negotiating with Iran is that because you haven’t been briefed as a member of Congress on the diplomacy. Or you think he’s flat out lying?

REP. HIMES: I think he’s flat out lying last Sunday, when he was told- and by the way, we’re in exactly the same position today, you know, oil prices now $112 a barrel. And you know futures in the stock market down 2%. Last Sunday, he realized, oh my God, I’ve got a financial cataclysm on Monday. So he just made it up that they’re in negotiations with the Iranians. Look underneath that statement, the Iranians have now realized that they have the reins. They are controlling the Strait of Hormuz. Gasoline prices are up more than $1 a gallon, and so the Iranians realize, holy smokes, we’ve got a lot of leverage here.

MARGARET BRENNAN: In Islamabad today, there are a number of mediators who are in contact with the United States saying they’re talking about Iran. But neither the United States nor Iran are at that table at this moment in time. But further on, the Iran point, I know you care about what’s happening in Ukraine. Notably, President Zelensky of Ukraine has been in the Gulf in these past few days, and he said yesterday that Russia is providing satellite imagery to Iran, and that imagery consists of U.S. military bases. He also said Russia is giving signals intelligence and electronic intelligence to Iran. Do you know of evidence that Russia is actively helping Iran in its war against the United States?

REP. HIMES: Well, I have to be a little careful about this Margaret, because I do review the intelligence, and I obviously can’t speak about things that are classified, but boy, I would sure not argue with President Zelensky on that point. And I would ask the American people to think about what do you think Putin is doing right now? Over four years, we have been, rightly, in my estimation, helping the Ukrainians exact a terrible toll on the Russians. So what do you think is happening? Meanwhile, as you know, we are letting the Iranians, so now the Iranians are getting billions of dollars sell their oil to the Chinese so that they can buy drones from the Russians. We’re letting the Russians sell oil so that they can get dollars to attack the Ukrainians and use those dollars to attack- to help attack our troops. I mean, you just couldn’t make this stuff up in a Hollywood script.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Well, Secretary Rubio was asked about the degree of aid Russia is giving to Iran, and he minimized it. He says it’s not making a difference on the battlefield. I know the French, I know the British have said that Russia and Iran are helping each other on drones here. When you heard Secretary Rubio’s statement, what did you think he meant?

REP. HIMES: I think it is very much in Marco Rubio’s interest as one of the chief cheerleaders of this war that the American people are now coming to realize is a catastrophe, another quagmire for Marco Rubio to say things like, oh, they’re not making a difference. Well, I don’t agree with Marco Rubio on that point. You know, the Russians have capabilities, things like using basic satellite technology, which you can do commercially, by the way, to find our aircraft carriers. Our military bases in the region, Margaret, right now are supposedly uninhabitable. Why do you think that is?

MARGARET BRENNAN: Before I let you go, Democrats have been making corruption a theme in their campaign against the President and to win back control of the house. Your fellow Democrat, Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick of Florida has been found guilty on 25 ethics charges related to stealing millions of dollars in COVID relief money. Should she resign? Should she be expelled?

REP. HIMES: You know, if she doesn’t resign, there will be a vote in the House, and you know, people will find reasons to support the congresswoman, just as Republicans found reasons to support George Santos–

MARGARET BRENNAN: Should she resign?

REP. HIMES: –at a time when we’re at war, when gas prices are too high, that shouldn’t happen. So I would hope that my colleague might avoid that outcome by choosing to resign. But it is also very important that both parties be consistent in punishing ethical lapses inside their own teams.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Okay, you hope she resigns. Thank you, congressman for all your insights today. We have to leave it there. We’ll be right back.

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注