2026-04-10T10:00:56.181Z / 美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)
作者:史蒂夫·孔托诺
2小时前
发布于 2026年4月10日美国东部时间早上6:00
4月6日,在白宫南草坪举行的年度复活节滚彩蛋活动中,唐纳德·特朗普总统站在蓝色房间,随后走上阳台向人群发表讲话。
长期以来一直是唐纳德·特朗普总统得力宣传工具的右翼媒体生态系统本周陷入混乱,公众对特朗普处理伊朗战争——以及脆弱的停火协议——的担忧加剧,蔓延到了他部分最知名盟友之间的公开内讧中。
从伊朗战争爆发之初, prominent MAGA人士就产生了分歧:许多人支持总统的军事行动,另一些人则认为这违背了他宣称的“美国优先”外交政策。近期这一分歧愈发尖锐,因为特朗普反复无常的态度转变——从本周初大肆威胁要实施全面摧毁,到几天后突然寻求“下台台阶”——招致了长期保守派声音的强烈反对。
塔克·卡尔森呼吁美国官员如果能阻止核战争就违抗特朗普的命令;梅根·凯利直指特朗普为一场不受欢迎的战争“保全面子”而对美国民众进行煤气灯操纵;坎迪斯·欧文斯则呼吁通过第25修正案将特朗普免职。
特朗普周四在一篇482字的社交媒体长篇抨击中回应了这些批评,称卡尔森、凯利和欧文斯是“愚蠢的人”和“麻烦制造者”,他们“为了获得一些‘免费’且廉价的宣传,会说任何必要的话”。
“他们不是‘MAGA’成员,”特朗普写道,“他们是失败者,只是想依附MAGA。”
CNN已联系卡尔森、凯利和欧文斯置评。欧文斯在X平台上回应道:“或许是时候把爷爷送进养老院了。”
异议还延伸到了特朗普过去用于吸引年轻和男性受众的核心人物。乔·罗根和蒂姆·狄龙等播客主持人对本届政府及其与以色列的紧密同盟愈发恼火。喜剧演员西奥·冯本周因将以色列领导人比作“恐怖分子”而引发广泛关注。
与此同时,特朗普的网络铁杆支持者加紧反击批评,引发了一系列不断升级的网络内讧。反对这场战争的极右翼阴谋论广播员亚历克斯·琼斯,如今与支持战争的阴谋论特朗普忠诚者劳拉·卢默产生分歧——后者还与特朗普的阴谋论政治顾问罗杰·斯通公开争吵。
特朗普的一批网络铁杆支持者指责那些支持战争、反对和平协议的保守派同行网红充当外国代理人,并呼吁对他们的财务状况展开联邦调查。
3月27日,急救人员检查德黑兰一栋在美以早前空袭中受损的住宅楼。
民调始终显示,特朗普对伊朗发动的战争得到了绝大多数共和党选民的支持,在自称支持MAGA的选民中支持率更高。尽管如此,政府和盟友仍在争相控制后续影响。副总统J·D·万斯本周在匈牙利发表讲话时,劝阻民众不要因为不同意政府政策就脱离政治。
“如果我们做了某件你不喜欢的事,正确的回应应该是更多地参与进来,让你的声音被听到,”万斯说,“并努力推动事情朝着你期望的方向发展。”
这些裂痕出现在特朗普和共和党面临艰难中期选举环境的微妙时刻。总统决定将美国拖入一场界限不明、高风险的冲突,加剧了这些担忧,尤其是在美国选民对他与以色列的紧密同盟愈发不安的情况下。
直到最近,共和党还指望着一个显著优势来保住他们今年11月的国会多数席位:一个庞大且高效的保守派媒体名人和数字网红网络。这个生态系统包括坚定的MAGA盟友、老牌保守派人士以及越来越多偏向右翼、以男性为主的播客,涵盖传统媒体和新兴平台,在特朗普第二任期内基本保持团结。
但此后裂痕开始显现,主要与特朗普在海外的军事行动以及尽管他承诺快速解决但仍持续存在的经济负担危机有关。分歧不仅出现在亿万富翁埃隆·马斯克旗下的社交媒体平台X上,也出现在保守派公开集会上。上个月,在德克萨斯州格雷普韦恩举行的2026年保守派政治行动会议(CPAC)上,与会者和演讲者在舞台内外就特朗普对伊朗的战争爆发了争执。
3月28日,人们在德克萨斯州格雷普韦恩举行的2026年CPAC大会上挥舞伊朗前伊斯兰革命旗帜。
这些紧张局势升级,源于特朗普在复活节周日发出的带脏话的威胁:如果伊朗领导人不在周二晚前“打开该死的霍尔木兹海峡”,他就袭击伊朗的基础设施。他在周一又发出威胁称,如果伊朗不配合,将彻底摧毁一个“永远无法复兴”的文明。
卡尔森称特朗普威胁袭击伊朗民用基础设施是“战争罪”,并表示他周日的言论“在任何层面都令人作呕”。凯利在其SiriusXM电台节目中表示,她“受够了这破事”。
“他就不能表现得像个正常人吗?”她周二说道。
《纽约时报》的一篇报道称,以色列总理本雅明·内塔尼亚胡2月在白宫 Situation Room 与特朗普的会面中,敦促他对伊朗采取军事行动——根据该报道,美国情报机构和内阁高级官员对这些论点持怀疑态度。右翼战争批评者借此证据称特朗普是被内塔尼亚胡拖入这场冲突,而非出于美国利益。甚至一些MAGA铁杆支持者,如保守派网红本尼·约翰逊,也对报道中描述的事态发展表示担忧。
特朗普在周二最后期限前宣布的停火协议,几乎没有平息这些反对声音——还引发了最初为特朗普的战争辩护的人士的新愤怒。右翼长期以来的伊朗强硬派人士,包括福克斯新闻主持人马克·莱文,都在哀叹特朗普似乎愿意放弃可能进一步重创伊朗的军事行动。
“所有人都说不要政权更迭,”莱文说,“那么这个政权就会以这样或那样的形式存续。原教旨主义者会存活下来……但如果因为政治风向我们不能这么做,如果因为其他原因我们不能这么做,那我们怎么能把他们关在笼子里?”
特朗普前战略师、这场战争的怀疑论者史蒂夫·班农,在周三播出的热门电视节目和播客“作战室”中嘲讽了莱文的反对意见。但他也承认,停火协议看起来很脆弱,而且对伊朗过于迁就,这正是莱文的主要担忧。
随后,他哀叹本周发生的这些事件分散了人们对他所称的特朗普支持者期望他解决的问题的注意力。
“最终,这一切只会让这个国家更加民粹主义、更加民族主义,”班农说。
The week that supercharged MAGA media feuds over the Iran war
2026-04-10T10:00:56.181Z / CNN
By Steve Contorno
2 hr ago
PUBLISHED Apr 10, 2026, 6:00 AM ET
President Donald Trump stands in the Blue Room before walking out onto the balcony to address the crowd during the annual Easter Egg Roll, on the South Lawn of the White House on April 6.
Brendam Smialowski/Pool/AFP/Getty Images
The right-wing media ecosystem that has long served as a useful bullhorn for President Donald Trump unraveled into disarray this week, as deepening fears over his management of the war — and fragile ceasefire — with Iran spilled into public infighting among some of his most prominent allies.
From its start, the Iran war has divided prominent MAGA figures, with many supporting the president’s military push and others arguing it betrayed his avowed “America First” foreign policy. That split has grown sharper in recent days, as Trump’s erratic swings — from bellicose threats of sweeping destruction early in the week to an abrupt search for an off-ramp days later — have drawn sharp backlash from longtime conservative voices.
Tucker Carlson encouraged US officials to resist Trump’s orders if it stopped nuclear war, Megyn Kelly effectively accused Trump of gaslighting Americans to “save face” for an unpopular conflict and Candace Owens has called for Trump to be removed from office via the 25th Amendment.
Trump responded to the criticism Thursday in a 482-word social media screed calling Carlson, Kelly and Owens “stupid people,” and “troublemakers” who “will say anything necessary for some ‘free’ and cheap publicity.”
“They’re not ‘MAGA,’” Trump wrote. “They’re losers, just trying to latch on to MAGA.”
CNN has reached out to Carlson, Kelly and Owens for comment. Responding on X, Owens wrote: “It may be time to put Grandpa up in a home.”
The dissent has extended to figures central to Trump’s past outreach to younger and male audiences. Podcasters like Joe Rogan and Tim Dillon have grown increasingly exasperated with the administration and its close alliance with Israel. Comedian Theo Von drew widespread attention this week for likening Israeli leaders to “terrorists.”
At the same time, Trump stalwarts online have stepped up to counter the criticism, fueling an escalating series of online feuds. Alex Jones, the far-right conspiratorial broadcaster who opposed the war, is now at odds with Laura Loomer, the conspiratorial Trump loyalist who supports it — and who is also openly sparring with Roger Stone, the conspiratorial Trump political operative.
One faction of Trump’s online stalwarts has accused rival conservative influencers who support the war and object to a peace deal of acting as foreign proxies and have called for federal investigations into their finances.
First responders inspect a residential building hit in an earlier US-Israeli strike in Tehran, on March 27.
Vahid Salemi/AP
Public polling has consistently shown Trump’s war with Iran is backed by a large majority of Republican voters and has even more support from those who consider themselves MAGA-aligned. Nevertheless, the administration and allies have scrambled to contain the fallout. Speaking this week from Hungary, Vice President JD Vance discouraged people from disengaging from politics because they don’t agree with the administration.
“If we do something you don’t like, the response should be to get more involved, to make your voice heard,” Vance said, “and to try to push things in the direction that you want them to be pushed.”
The fissures are emerging at a precarious time for Trump and Republicans as they confront a challenging midterm environment. The president’s decision to thrust the US into an undefined, high-risk conflict has compounded those concerns, particularly as American voters grow increasingly uneasy with his close alliance with Israel.
Until recently, Republicans had counted on a distinct advantage in their fight to hold onto their congressional majorities this November: a vast and highly effective network of conservative media personalities and digital influencers. That ecosystem — encompassing staunch MAGA allies, established conservative figures and a growing universe of right-leaning, male-dominated podcasts — spanned traditional outlets and newer platforms and had entered Trump’s second term largely aligned behind him.
Fractures, though, have since emerged, largely tied to Trump’s military movements abroad and an affordability crisis that has persisted despite his campaign pledge for a quick resolution. The divisions have pronounced themselves on X, the social media site owned by billionaire Elon Musk, but also at public conservative gatherings. Last month, at the annual conservative gathering known as CPAC, attendees and speakers clashed on and off the stage over Trump’s war with Iran.
People wave a pre-Islamic Revolution flag of Iran, at CPAC 2026 in Grapevine, Texas on March 28.
Laura Brett/Sipa USA/AP
Those tensions erupted in response to Trump’s profanity laden Easter Sunday threat to strike Iranian infrastructure sites if the country’s leaders didn’t “Open the Fuckin’ Strait” of Hormuz by Tuesday night. He followed it up Monday with a threat to wipe out an entire civilization “never to be brought back again” if Iran didn’t comply.
Carlson called Trump threatening Iran’s civilian infrastructure “a war crime” and said his message on Sunday was “vile on every level.” Kelly on her SiriusXM show said she was “sick of this shit.”
“Can’t he just behave like a normal human?” she said Tuesday.
The opposition further intensified in the wake of a New York Times report that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu pressed his case for military action against Iran to Trump in a February meeting in the White House Situation Room — using arguments that, according to the report, were met with skepticism from US intelligence agencies and senior Cabinet members. Critics of the war on the right have seized on it as evidence that Trump was drawn into the conflict by Netanyahu and not American interests. Even some MAGA stalwarts, like the conservative influencer Benny Johnson, have expressed alarm over the dynamics described in the report.
A ceasefire deal Trump announced ahead of Tuesday’s deadline has done little to appease these objections — and has sparked new fury from those who initially defended Trump’s war. Longtime Iran hardliners on the right, including Fox News’ Mark Levin, are lamenting that Trump appears willing to back away from military action that could further cripple the country.
“Everybody says no regime change,” Levin said. “Then the regime survives in one form or another. The fundamentalists survive. … But if we can’t do (regime change) because of the political winds, if we cannot do it for other reasons, then how are we going to keep them in a box?”
Steve Bannon, Trump’s former strategist and skeptic of the war, mocked Levin’s objections during Wednesday’s broadcast of his popular television show and podcast, “War Room.” But he also acknowledged that the ceasefire agreement appeared flimsy and exceedingly deferential to Iran, a prime concern of Levin.
Later, he lamented that the events playing out this week served as a distraction from the issues that he said Trump’s supporters expected him to solve.
“All this is going to do at the end of this,” Bannon said, “is make this nation more populist and more nationalistic.”
发表回复