2026年4月7日 下午2:54 美东时间 / CNN
亚伦·布莱克 撰稿
6分钟前发布
发布于 2026年4月7日 下午2:54 美东时间
唐纳德·特朗普 中东 国会新闻 1月6日事件
查看所有话题
Facebook 推特 电子邮件 链接 Threads
链接已复制！
特朗普总统周一在白宫复活节滚彩蛋活动期间于南草坪与记者交谈。
汤姆·威廉姆斯/CQ-Roll Call, Inc./盖蒂图片社
第25修正案的讨论又回来了。
近年来，议员们多次提出通过宪法规定的这一程序罢免总统。而在2021年1月6日国会山骚乱事件后，唐纳德·特朗普的内阁显然比许多人最初意识到的更认真地讨论过这一选项。
要成功罢免特朗普，其内阁多数成员和副总统必须表示支持。目前没有迹象表明任何内阁官员正在考虑这一举措，也没有迹象显示副总统J·D·万斯会同意。但特朗普周二上午发表的“除非伊朗达成协议，否则整个文明今晚都将覆灭”的言论，却在一群略显怪异的声音中引发了越来越多呼吁启动该修正案的呼声。
随着美国东部时间晚8点伊朗达成协议的最后期限临近，民主党议员和右翼声音都对特朗普在伊朗战争中可能采取的行动尺度表示担忧。总统威胁要袭击发电厂和其他民用基础设施的言论被谴责为战争罪行，一些人甚至担心他的最新言论暗示可能使用核武器（白宫已否认考虑过这一点）。
呼吁启动第25修正案的大多是民主党议员——事实上已有二十多位。其中包括潜在总统候选人、伊利诺伊州州长J·B·普里茨克。（当然，他们目前几乎没有权力启动罢免程序。）
但值得注意的是，一些保守派人士和近期的特朗普盟友也加入了呼吁行列。
“我们怎么才能启动第25修正案搞掉他？”阴谋论者亚历克斯·琼斯在周一的节目中问嘉宾。
到周二上午，支持这一举措的右翼人士涵盖了极端影响力博主、前特朗普政府官员安东尼·斯卡拉穆奇，以及持温和立场的反特朗普人士。
“第25修正案！！！”佐治亚州共和党前众议员玛乔丽·泰勒·格林在特朗普发表“文明覆灭”相关言论约一小时后在X平台上发帖。她称此举“邪恶且疯狂”。
一些国会民主党人转发了格林的言论。
“需要启动第25修正案，”右翼播客主持人坎迪斯·欧文斯当天晚些时候补充道。
曾在特朗普第一任期短暂担任通讯主管的斯卡拉穆奇主张罢免特朗普，并声称特朗普正威胁使用核武器。
“醒醒：他在呼吁实施核打击，”斯卡拉穆奇说，“立即寻求罢免他。”
当其他人在网上指出万斯周二上午似乎暗示特朗普可能下令进行核打击时，白宫否认他曾有过此类表述。副总统当时谈到要使用“我们迄今尚未决定动用的工具箱中的工具”。
一些反特朗普的保守派人士，如《纽约时报》专栏作家戴维·弗伦奇，也呼吁启动第25修正案。
“这显然属于第25修正案适用的情况，但人们太过麻木，无法看清这一点，”弗伦奇说。
其他人则没有走这么远，但也开始对特朗普的意图提出新的严重担忧。
其中包括前特朗普盟友塔克·卡尔森，他周一在自己的节目中前所未有地批评了特朗普。卡尔森表示，特朗普威胁要袭击基础设施导致大规模死亡，这是“战争罪、道德罪”，他甚至似乎暗示特朗普可能是反基督者。
同样在周二，一直是国会中忠实特朗普盟友的威斯康星州共和党参议员罗恩·约翰逊告诉《华尔街日报》，如果特朗普袭击发电厂等民用目标，“那我就不再支持他了”。约翰逊暗示他认为此类袭击确实违法。
这一切并不意味着第25修正案即将被启动。这一选项很难启动，需要特朗普最亲近的人认定他不适合担任公职，并违背其意愿将其罢免。万斯周二当时正在匈牙利，他曾打电话给特朗普，让总统能够在一场政治集会上发表讲话。
但即便只是一些昔日特朗普盟友和民主党人的反对姿态，也具有重要意义。他们似乎在说，特朗普最好仔细考虑一下自己的下一步行动。
同样值得反思一下当前的局势。
在特朗普第一任期提出这一想法时，几乎只有民主党人参与。而在1月6日事件后，内阁中有些人显然考虑过这一选项，但他们是秘密进行的。公众直到很久以后才得知他们当时有多认真地权衡过这一举措。
如今，甚至一些近期的前特朗普盟友显然也非常担心他接下来可能采取的行动，以至于公开呼吁罢免他。
Trump’s Iran threat spurs calls to invoke 25th Amendment — from an eclectic group
2026-04-07 2:54 PM ET / CNN
Analysis by
Aaron Blake
6 min ago
PUBLISHED Apr 7, 2026, 2:54 PM ET
Donald Trump The Middle East Congressional news January 6th
See all topics
Facebook Tweet Email Link Threads
Link Copied!
President Donald Trump speaks with reporters on the South Lawn during the White House Easter Egg Roll, on Monday.
Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc./Getty Images
The 25th Amendment talk is back.
Lawmakers have repeatedly floated the method for removing a president, as laid out in the Constitution, in recent years. And Donald Trump’s Cabinet apparently discussed the option more earnestly than many initially realized after the January 6, 2021, Capitol attack.
To successfully remove Trump, a majority of his Cabinet and his vice president would have to be supportive. And there are no indications any Cabinet officials are considering it right now, or that Vice President JD Vance would be on board. But Trump’s comment Tuesday morning that a “whole civilization will die tonight” unless Iran makes a deal has spurred increasing calls — among a somewhat odd amalgamation of voices — to invoke the amendment.
Democratic lawmakers and right-wing voices are expressing concerns about just how far Trump is about to take things in the Iran war, as an 8 p.m. EST deadline for Tehran to cut a deal approaches. The president’s threats to strike power plants and other civilian infrastructure have been decried as war crimes, and some even say they fear his latest comments are alluding to the use of nuclear weapons (which the White House has denied considering).
It’s mostly Democrats who are calling to invoke the amendment — more than two dozen of them, in fact. That includes potential presidential hopefuls like Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker. (Of course, they have little to no power at the moment to initiate removal proceedings.)
But notably, some conservatives and other recent Trump allies have taken up the call, as well.
“ How do we 25th Amendment his ass?” conspiracy theorist Alex Jones asked his guest on Monday’s show.
By Tuesday morning, right-leaning advocates for the step spanned from more-extreme influencers to former Trump White House official Anthony Scaramucci to more-moderate Never Trumpers.
“25TH AMENDMENT!!!” former congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, a Georgia Republican, posted on X about an hour after Trump’s post about Iran’s civilization dying. She called it “evil and madness.”
Some congressional Democrats re-posted Greene’s words.
“The 25th amendment needs to be invoked,” right-wing podcaster Candace Owens added later in the morning.
Scaramucci, who served briefly as Trump’s communications director during his first term, advocated for Trump’s removal and claimed Trump was threatening to use nukes.
“Wake up: he is calling for A NUCLEAR STRIKE,” Scaramucci said. “Seek his removal immediately.”
When others suggested online that Vance had implied Tuesday morning that Trump could order a nuclear strike, the White House denied he was saying anything of the sort. The vice president had talked about using “tools in our toolkit that we so far haven’t decided to use.”
Some Never Trump conservatives like New York Times columnist David French were also calling for the 25th Amendment.
“This is obvious 25th Amendment territory, but people are so desensitized that they can’t see it,” French said.
Others didn’t go quite so far, but have begun raising new levels of concern about Trump’s intentions.
One of them is former Trump ally Tucker Carlson, who on his show Monday criticized Trump like never before. Carlson said Trump was threatening to commit “a war crime, a moral crime” in Iran by attacking infrastructure in ways that would lead to mass death, and he even seemed to suggest Trump might be the antichrist.
Also on Tuesday, GOP Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, who has been a loyal Trump ally in Congress, told the Wall Street Journal that Trump “loses me if he attacks civilian targets” like infrastructure. Johnson signaled he saw such attacks as indeed illegal.
None of it means the 25th Amendment is around the corner. The option is difficult to invoke, requiring those closest to Trump to determine he is unfit for office and opt to remove him against his will. Vance happened to be in Hungary on Tuesday, and he called Trump on the phone so the president could address a political rally.
But it’s significant even as a brushback pitch from some erstwhile Trump allies and from Democrats. They seem to be saying that Trump had better think carefully about his next actions.
It’s also worth reflecting on where things stand now.
When this was floated in Trump’s first term, it was almost universally the domain of Democrats. When some in his Cabinet apparently considered it after January 6, they did so quietly. The public didn’t find out until much later how seriously they’d been weighing it.
Today, even some recent-former Trump allies are apparently so fearful of what he might do next that they’re publicly calling to oust him.
发表回复