弗吉尼亚州重划选区斗争升级,反对者援引巴拉克·奥巴马过往言论


2026-04-02T09:00:54.860Z / 美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)

弗吉尼亚州重划选区斗争升级,反对者援引巴拉克·奥巴马过往言论

作者:大卫·赖特、弗雷德里卡·舒滕
发布于 2026年4月2日,美国东部时间早上5:00


2025年11月1日,前总统巴拉克·奥巴马在弗吉尼亚州诺福克市查特韦尔竞技场,为弗吉尼亚州民主党州长候选人阿比盖尔·斯潘伯格的竞选活动站台。
斯特凡尼·雷诺兹/彭博社/盖蒂图片社

弗吉尼亚州全国有色人种协进会(NAACP)成员于周三上午集会,谴责他们所称的误导选民的邮件传单,这些传单对该州即将举行的重划选区公投进行了不实宣传。

“今天,我们直面一个回响着吉姆·克罗时代的遗留问题——旨在制造混乱、压制黑人选民声音的虚假信息。我们在此郑重表明,我们不会被吓倒,我们将反击到底,”弗吉尼亚州州协进会主席科齐·贝利牧师说道。“我敦促大家保持警惕,自行了解此次公投的目的,并为弗吉尼亚州黑人选民的权利大力发声。”

这些邮件传单印有前总统巴拉克·奥巴马的照片,并引用了他批评党派操纵选区划分的言论,其中包括六年前他在X平台上发表的一篇声明:“长期以来,党派操纵选区划分导致进展停滞,扭曲了我们的代议制政府。”传单上用醒目的大写字母敦促弗吉尼亚州选民“投反对票”。

但这掩盖了一个事实:奥巴马是支持民主党人推动弗吉尼亚州重新划分国会选区的人士之一,这是一场由得克萨斯州共和党人去年夏天在唐纳德·特朗普总统授意下发起的、关于党派重划选区的连锁斗争的一部分。

围绕奥巴马言论的争议,反映了4月21日公投前令一些民主党盟友担忧的困境。奥巴马、弗吉尼亚州州长阿比盖尔·斯潘伯格以及其他顶级民主党人过去曾推动无党派重划选区,如今却不得不动员选民参与一场特别选举,以通过一项可能导致共和党仅获得该州11个国会席位中1个的选区划分方案。


2025年11月1日,美国前总统巴拉克·奥巴马在弗吉尼亚州诺福克市查特韦尔竞技场的竞选集会上发表讲话,弗吉尼亚州民主党州长候选人、前众议员阿比盖尔·斯潘伯格(左)在一旁欢笑。
温·麦克纳米/盖蒂图片社

弗吉尼亚州的任何民主党席位增量都可能对中期选举至关重要,因为共和党人正在红色州推行新的重划选区计划,而最高法院今年夏天可能就《选举权法案》作出一项关键裁决,这将进一步打乱2026年的选举格局。

得克萨斯州和加利福尼亚州的两党已经各自通过了重划选区方案,旨在为各自党派新增五个席位——双方的增量基本相互抵消。

上周,奥巴马相关的邮件传单开始流传,全国民主党重划选区委员会发表声明,谴责这份“不诚实的传单盗用了巴拉克·奥巴马总统的照片,并就他对弗吉尼亚州公投的立场撒谎”。

当被置评时,民主与正义政治行动委员会主席、前州众议员A.C.科尔多扎为这些邮件传单进行了辩护。“没人能否认我们引用的言论的准确性。巴拉克·奥巴马、阿比盖尔·斯潘伯格等人都曾公开反对这类党派操纵选区划分的行为——我只是在提醒选民他们之前的立场,”科尔多扎说道。

民主党仍拥有资金和政治优势

得克萨斯州由共和党控制的州议会在特朗普的敦促下通过了一项重划选区法案。加利福尼亚州的相关方案已于去年11月提交给该州以自由派为主的选民表决。

弗吉尼亚州在过去三届总统选举中都没有支持特朗普,但该州政治立场更为温和。

“弗吉尼亚州不是加利福尼亚州,”弗吉尼亚州民主党众议员詹妮弗·麦克莱伦在接受《Punchbowl News》采访时表示,“两者完全不同。”

民主党人正在为推动公投通过投入大量资源,并且仍抱有多重希望。

从目前的提前投票情况来看,民主党与共和党初选参与者的比例大致与去年选举同期持平,而去年的选举中民主党人横扫了全州三大最高职位,并扩大了在弗吉尼亚州众议院的多数席位优势。虽然弗吉尼亚州的选民不会登记党派身份,但选民的初选参与历史可以表明他们大致倾向于哪个党派。


3月31日,在弗吉尼亚州阿灵顿县埃伦·M·博兹曼政府中心,指示提前投票选民就弗吉尼亚州重划选区公投投赞成票或反对票的标牌。
比尔·克拉克/CQ滚石公司/盖蒂图片社

全国民主党人通过其非营利组织“众议院多数派推进基金”,为支持该公投的最大团体“弗吉尼亚州公平选举者”提供了近4000万美元资金中的约一半。另一家领先的自由派倡导组织“公平计划”额外捐赠了1000万美元。

根据广告追踪公司AdImpact的数据,这帮助民主党在该公投的广告支出上以约3250万美元对比250万美元的优势远超共和党。

奥巴马像他在加利福尼亚州公投中所做的那样,出现在支持重划选区阵营的电视广告中,该广告的播出时长已获得超过200万美元的广告时段投入。“共和党人想在国会窃取足够多的席位,以操纵下一次选举,为他们再争取两年不受制约的权力,但你可以通过投赞成票阻止他们,”奥巴马在广告中说道。

距离投票还有三周时间,共和党阵营正涌入资金以缩小信息宣传方面的差距。众议院议长迈克·约翰逊本月将前往弗吉尼亚州为反对该公投的活动筹款。而反对重划选区的领先团体“弗吉尼亚州公平地图”在3月的最后一天收到了一家关联的匿名非营利组织捐赠的500万美元,这使其筹款总额翻倍至约800万美元。

前弗吉尼亚州总检察长、“弗吉尼亚州公平地图”领导人之一贾森·米亚雷斯将这种支出失衡描述为“有点像大卫对阵歌利亚”,并辩称重划选区的支持者“被来自伊利诺伊州、加利福尼亚州和纽约州的外部资金淹没了”。

“但正如我提醒大家的那样,大卫赢了,”米亚雷斯补充道。

新任民主党州长阿比盖尔·斯潘伯格并未像加利福尼亚州州长加文·纽瑟姆那样将本州的重划选区斗争个人化,尽管她最近出现在了支持该公投的广告中。

“我真的希望我们连考虑都不用考虑这件事,对吧?”她在接受《华盛顿邮报》采访时说道。“但在我们目前所处的世界里……我确实认为,弗吉尼亚州因为有能力做出响应,我认为为选民提供这种选择很重要。”

支持新选区地图的团体还表示,他们指望随着各郡县增设线下投票点,未来几天民主党选民的投票热情会高涨。例如,从周六开始,弗吉尼亚州北部人口众多、以民主党选民为主的费尔法克斯县,提前投票点将从3个增加到16个。

“弗吉尼亚州不是加利福尼亚州,对吧?但它仍然是一个蓝色州。而且我也认为民主党人总体上可能……拥有热情优势,”弗吉尼亚大学选举分析师凯尔·孔迪克说道。

CNN的爱德华·吴为本报告贡献了内容。

Virginia’s redistricting fight ramps up as opponents wield Barack Obama’s past comments

2026-04-02T09:00:54.860Z / CNN

Virginia’s redistricting fight ramps up as opponents wield Barack Obama’s past comments

By David Wright, Fredreka Schouten

Published Apr 2, 2026, 5:00 AM ET

Former President Barack Obama during a campaign event for Abigail Spanberger, Democratic gubernatorial candidate for Virginia, at the Chartway Arena in Norfolk, Virginia, on November 1, 2025.

Stefani Reynolds/Bloomberg/Getty Images

Members of the Virginia NAACP gathered Wednesday morning to denounce mailers they said were misleading voters about the upcoming redistricting referendum in their state.

“Today, we confront a legacy that echoes the Jim Crow era – disinformation designed to sow confusion and suppress the voices of Black voters. We are here to affirm that we will not be deterred, we will fight back,” said Rev. Cozy Bailey, president of the NAACP Virginia State Conference. “I urge you all to remain vigilant, to educate yourselves about the purpose of this referendum, and to advocate fiercely for the rights of Black voters in Virginia.”

The mailers feature images of former President Barack Obama and quotes in which he criticizes gerrymandering, including one statement from six years ago, when he wrote on X: “For too long, gerrymandering has contributed to stalled progress and warped our representative government.” Large block letters on the mailers urge Virginians to “Vote No.”

But that obscures that Obama is among those supporting Democrats’ push to redraw congressional lines in Virginia, part of a cascading fight over partisan redistricting begun by Texas Republicans last summer at President Donald Trump’s behest.

The argument over Obama reflects the conundrum that is worrying some Democratic allies ahead of an April 21 referendum. Having promoted nonpartisan redistricting in the past, Obama, Virginia Gov. Abigail Spanberger and other top Democrats now have to motivate voters to turn out for a special election to impose a gerrymander that could leave Republicans with just one out of 11 US House seats in the state.

Virginia Democratic gubernatorial candidate, former Rep. Abigail Spanberger (left) laughs as former US President Barack Obama speaks during a campaign rally in the Chartway Arena on November 1, 2025 in Norfolk, Virginia.

Win McNamee/Getty Images

Any Democratic gains in Virginia could be crucial for the midterms, with Republicans pursuing new redistricting plans in red states and a pivotal Supreme Court decision on the Voting Rights Act that could come this summer and further upend the 2026 landscape.

Already, Republicans in Texas and Democrats in California have enacted redistricting plans aimed at adding five seats to their respective columns – virtually offsetting each other.

Last week as the Obama mailers began to circulate, the National Democratic Redistricting Committee issued a statement condemning the “dishonest mailer that features an unauthorized photo of President Barack Obama and lies about his position on the Virginia referendum.”

Reached for comment, former state delegate A.C. Cordoza, the chairman of Democracy and Justice PAC, defended the mailers. “No one can refute the accuracy of the quotes we’re presenting. Barack Obama, Abigail Spanberger, and others have already spoken against this kind of gerrymandering – I’m simply reminding voters where they stood,” Cordoza said.

Democrats still have financial and political advantages

Texas’ GOP-controlled state legislature passed a measure at Trump’s urging. California’s response was put to the state’s predominantly liberal electorate last November.

Virginia went against Trump in each of the last three presidential elections but has a more moderate bent.

“Virginia’s not California,” Rep. Jennifer McClellan, a Virginia Democrat, told Punchbowl News. “It’s apples to oranges.”

Democrats are pouring resources into the effort to pass the referendum and are still hopeful for several reasons.

In the early vote so far, the ratio of Democratic to Republican primary participants is running roughly on par with the ratio at this point in last year’s election, which saw Democrats sweep the top three statewide offices and expand their majority in the Virginia House of Delegates. While voters in Virginia do not register with a political party, the primary participation history of voters can indicate which party they generally align with.

Signs urge early voters to vote yes or no on the Virginia redistricting referendum at the Ellen M. Bozman Government Center in Arlington, Virginia, on March 31.

Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call, Inc./Getty Images

National Democrats, through their nonprofit House Majority Forward, have contributed roughly half of the nearly $40 million in funding for the largest group on the “Yes” side, Virginians for Fair Elections. Another leading liberal advocacy organization, The Fairness Project, contributed an additional $10 million.

That’s helped Democrats outspend Republicans on advertising for the vote by about $32.5 million to $2.5 million, according to data from the ad tracking firm AdImpact.

Obama, as he did for California’s referendum, appears in a TV ad for redistricting proponents that has received more than $2 million in airtime. “Republicans want to steal enough seats in Congress to rig the next election and wield unchecked power for two more years, but you can stop them by voting yes,” Obama says in the spot.

With three weeks to go, funds are rushing in on the Republican side to help close the messaging gap. House Speaker Mike Johnson is set to attend a fundraiser in Virginia this month for the opposition effort. And the leading group opposing redistricting, Virginians For Fair Maps, received $5 million on the last day of March from an affiliated, anonymous nonprofit, which more than doubled its fundraising total to about $8 million.

Jason Miyares, former Virginia attorney general and one of the leaders of Virginians For Fair Maps, described the spending mismatch as “a little bit of David versus Goliath,” and argued redistricting proponents were “flooded with outside money from Illinois and California and New York.”

“But, as I remind people, David won,” Miyares added.

The new Democratic Gov. Abigail Spanberger has not personalized her state’s redistricting fight as Gov. Gavin Newsom did in California, though she appeared in a recent ad for the referendum.

“Do I wish that we didn’t have to even consider this? Sure,” she told the Washington Post. “But in the world that we are living in … I do think that Virginia, because we have the ability to be responsive, I think that it’s important that we give that option to voters.”

Groups supporting the new map also say they are counting on a surge of Democratic voters in the days ahead as counties open additional in-person voting locations. Starting Saturday in northern Virginia’s populous and heavily Democratic Fairfax County, for instance, early voting sites will grow from three sites to 16.

“Virginia is not California, right? But it’s still a Democratic state, though. And I also think Democrats probably just generically have kind of … an enthusiasm advantage,” said Kyle Kondik, an elections analyst at the University of Virginia.

CNN’s Edward Wu contributed to this report.

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注