2026年4月1日 美国东部时间凌晨2:54 / 福克斯新闻
法官艾莉森·伯勒斯下令特朗普政府撤销针对约90万名使用CBP One应用程序的移民的驱逐决定
撰稿：兰登·米恩 福克斯新闻
随着机场运输安全管理局人手短缺，特朗普政府周一下令移民和海关执法局（ICE）进驻全美各地机场。（图片来源：尼古拉斯·巴拉西 福克斯数字新闻）
一名联邦法官周二裁定，特朗普政府非法终止了数千名移民的合法身份，这些移民在使用拜登政府扩大开发的、用于预约移民官员面谈的应用程序后，获得了在美国临时居留的许可。
美国波士顿联邦地区法院法官艾莉森·伯勒斯下令特朗普政府撤销去年实施的一项政策，即撤销使用CBP One应用程序的移民的合法身份。
该应用程序在前总统乔·拜登任期内于2023年推出，旨在缓解边境危机，允许部分移民预约寻求庇护，其中许多人获得了最长两年的假释入境资格，但唐纳德·特朗普总统去年重返白宫后下令关停该应用程序。
伯勒斯发现，美国国土安全部去年4月的行为非法，当时该机构向约90万名通过该应用程序入境的移民发送了群发邮件，告知他们“是时候离开美国了”。
委内瑞拉移民及进步团体在诺姆取消拜登时期“受保护身份”后起诉特朗普
美国波士顿联邦地区法院法官艾莉森·伯勒斯下令特朗普政府撤销去年实施的、撤销使用CBP One应用程序的移民合法身份的政策。（美联社照片/马克·席费尔贝恩）
“相关法规并未赋予该机构不受限制地终止假释的自由裁量权，”伯勒斯写道。
“当被告方未遵守法规和自身条例规定的程序就终止相关非公民的假释身份时，他们的行为‘不符合法律规定’，”法官补充道。
本案原告之一马萨诸塞州委内瑞拉协会对这一裁决表示欢迎，称其“在数月的恐惧和不确定性之后，带来了期盼已久的救济”。
协助提起这场法律诉讼的另一团体“民主前进”也对法官的裁决表示赞赏。
联邦法官维持海地移民的临时受保护身份
该应用程序在前总统乔·拜登任期内推出，旨在缓解边境危机，允许部分移民预约寻求庇护，其中许多人获得了最长两年的假释入境资格。（桑迪·哈法克/彭博社 via 盖蒂图片社）
“今天的裁决明确否决了试图一键抹去数十万人合法身份的政府，”该组织主席斯凯·佩里曼在一份声明中说道。
“我们的客户遵守了法律：他们等待、登记、接受检查，并依法获得了假释身份。特朗普-万斯政府试图在一夜之间剥夺他们的身份，这不仅非法，而且残忍——今天，法院驳回了这项有害且破坏稳定的政策，”声明补充道。
国土安全部发言人表示，这一裁决是“公然的司法激进主义”的例子，干涉了特朗普决定谁可以留在美国的权力。
“取消这些假释资格是向美国人民兑现的承诺，旨在保障我们的边境安全并保护我们的国家安全，”该发言人在一份声明中说道。
法官发现，国土安全部去年4月向约90万名通过该应用程序入境的移民发送群发邮件，告知他们“是时候离开美国了”，这一行为违反了相关规定。（美联社照片/埃里克·盖伊 资料图）
点击此处下载福克斯新闻应用程序
这一裁决源于去年8月由三名分别来自委内瑞拉、古巴和海地的个人提起的集体诉讼，他们辩称特朗普政府将他们驱逐出境的行为是突然且非法的，旨在剥夺移民的假释身份和工作许可。
特朗普政府曾辩称，拜登政府通过广泛授予假释资格而非逐案审批的方式，超越了假释权限。
伯勒斯表示，国土安全部向移民发送终止通知时，未能遵守相关要求，即提供一份记录，证明有官员已确定假释的目的已经实现。
“因此，终止假释的行为超出了该机构的法定权限，也与其自身条例中规定的程序相矛盾，”法官写道。
路透社对本文亦有贡献。
Trump admin unlawfully terminated legal status of migrants who used Biden-era app, judge rules
April 1, 2026 2:54am EDT / Fox News
Judge Allison Burroughs ordered the Trump administration to reverse terminations affecting many of the roughly 900,000 migrants who used the CBP One app
By Landon Mion Fox News
As TSA manpower dwindles at airports, Trump deployed Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to airports across the country on Monday. (Credit: Nicholas Ballasy for Fox News Digital)
A federal judge ruled on Tuesday that the Trump administration unlawfully terminated the legal status of thousands of migrants who had been allowed to temporarily live in the U.S. after using an app expanded by the Biden administration to schedule appointments with immigration officials.
U.S. District Judge Allison Burroughs in Boston ordered the administration to reverse its move last year to revoke the legal status of migrants who used the CBP One app.
The app was used under former President Joe Biden starting in 2023 to address the crisis at the border by allowing some migrants to make appointments to seek asylum, with many paroled into the country for up to two years, but President Donald Trump moved to shut down the app when he returned to the White House last year.
Burroughs found that the U.S. Department of Homeland Security acted unlawfully in April of last year when it sent mass emails to many of the roughly 900,000 people who entered the country using the app, informing them that it was “time for you to leave the United States.”
VENEZUELAN MIGRANTS, PROGRESSIVE GROUP SUE TRUMP AFTER NOEM NIXES BIDEN-ERA ‘PROTECTED STATUS’
U.S. District Judge Allison Burroughs ordered the Trump administration to reverse its move last year to revoke the legal status of migrants who used the CBP One app.(AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein)
“The regulations do not give the agency unfettered discretion to terminate parole,” Burroughs wrote.
“When Defendants terminated the impacted noncitizens’ parole without observing the process mandated by statute and by their own regulations, they took action that was ‘not in accordance with law,’” the judge added.
The Venezuelan Association of Massachusetts, one of the plaintiffs in the case, celebrated the ruling, saying it “brings long-awaited relief after months of fear and uncertainty.”
Democracy Forward, another group that helped bring the legal challenge, also praised the judge’s decision.
FEDERAL JUDGE UPHOLDS TEMPORARY PROTECTED STATUS FOR HAITIAN IMMIGRANTS
The app was used under former President Joe Biden to address the crisis at the border by allowing some migrants to make an appointment to seek asylum, with many paroled into the country for up to two years.(Sandy Huffaker/Bloomberg via Getty Images)
“Today’s ruling is a clear rejection of an administration that has tried to erase lawful status for hundreds of thousands of people with the click of a button,” the group’s president, Skye Perryman,said in a statement.
“Our clients followed the law: they waited, registered, were inspected, and were granted parole under the law. The Trump-Vance administration’s effort to tear that status away overnight was unlawful and cruel — and today, the court rejected that harmful and destabilizing policy,” the statement added.
A DHS spokesperson said the ruling was an example of “blatant judicial activism” that interfered with Trump’s authority to determine who remains in the country.
“Canceling these paroles is a promise kept to the American people to secure our borders and protect our national security,” the spokesperson said in a statement.
The judge found that DHS acted unlawfully in April of last year when it sent mass emails alerting many of the roughly 900,000 people who entered the country using the app that it was “time for you to leave the United States.”(AP Photo/Eric Gay, File)
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
The ruling came after a class-action lawsuit filed in August by three individuals from Venezuela, Cuba and Haiti who argued the Trump administration’s effort to remove them from the country represented an abrupt, unlawful move to pull parole status and work authorization from migrants.
The Trump administration had argued that Biden overstepped parole authority by broadly awarding the status instead of granting it on a case-by-case basis.
Burroughs said when DHS sent out termination notices to migrants, it failed to comply with requirements to provide a record showing an official had determined that the purposes of parole had been served.
“Accordingly, the parole terminations exceeded the agency’s statutory authority and contradicted the procedures set forth in its own regulations,” the judge wrote.
Reuters contributed to this report.
发表回复