2026年3月31日 / 美国东部时间晚上9:11 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻
作者：卡米洛·蒙托亚-加尔韦斯
卡米洛·蒙托亚-加尔韦斯 移民记者
卡米洛·蒙托亚·加尔韦斯是哥伦比亚广播公司新闻的移民记者，他的报道在多个节目和平台播出，包括全国广播节目、CBS新闻24小时频道、CBSNews.com以及该机构的社交媒体账号。
阅读完整简历
卡米洛·蒙托亚-加尔韦斯
波士顿一名联邦法官周二指示特朗普政府恢复根据现已废止的拜登政府时期一项针对抵达南部边境寻求庇护者的计划入境美国的移民的合法身份。
美国地区法院法官艾莉森·伯勒斯宣布特朗普政府终止根据拜登时期的CBP Home计划入境美国的移民的移民假释身份的决定无效，认定该举动违反了美国法律规定的程序。该计划曾依赖一款手机应用程序，而第二届特朗普政府此后对其进行了改造并重新命名为CBP Home，以协助在美国境内非法居留的人员自行遣返。
在CBP One系统下，全球各地的超过90万移民通过南部边境的官方入境口岸被允许进入美国。目前尚不清楚有多少人将从这一裁决中获益，因为其中一些人可能已被驱逐，或已获得其他合法身份。
美国司法部很可能会对该裁决提起上诉。
当时，拜登政府辩称，CBP One计划为潜在越境者提供获得政府许可进入美国的机会，从而减少了非法移民。
但特朗普政府官员辩称，拜登政府无权设立此类计划，且该计划允许数十万移民绕过传统合法移民体系入境美国，违反了美国移民法。
2025年4月，美国国土安全部宣布终止根据CBP One计划办理入境手续的人员的假释身份，敦促他们自行遣返，否则将面临被抓获、逮捕并强制遣返的后果。
国土安全部在周二的一份声明中表示，其有权撤销拜登政府时期允许入境的人员的假释身份。
“我们反对这一公然的司法激进主义，它破坏了总统根据第二条宪法修正案决定谁可以留在美国的权力，”国土安全部称。“拜登政府滥用了灾难性的CBP One计划下的假释权限，允许数百万非法外国人进入美国，进一步加剧了美国历史上最严重的边境危机。”
挑战终止假释政策的联邦法院诉讼参与方“民主前进”组织主席兼首席执行官斯凯·佩里曼表示，周二的命令否决了“一项有害且破坏稳定的政策”。
“今天的裁决明确拒绝了一个试图通过点击按钮就抹去数十万人合法身份的政府，”佩里曼说。“我们的客户遵守了法律：他们等待、登记、接受检查，并依法获得了假释身份。”
Judge orders Trump administration to restore legal status of migrants allowed into U.S. through Biden-era phone app
March 31, 2026 / 9:11 PM EDT / CBS News
By Camilo Montoya-Galvez
Camilo Montoya-Galvez Immigration Correspondent
Camilo Montoya-Galvez is the Immigration Correspondent at CBS News, where his reporting is featured across multiple programs and platforms, including national broadcast shows, CBS News 24/7, CBSNews.com and the organization’s social media accounts.
Read Full Bio
Camilo Montoya-Galvez
A federal judge in Boston on Tuesday directed the Trump administration to restore the legal status of migrants allowed into the U.S. under a now-defunct Biden administration program for asylum-seekers who arrived at the southern border.
U.S. District Court Judge Allison Burroughs voided the Trump administration’s decision to end the immigration parole status of migrants who entered the country under the Biden-era CBP Home policy, finding that the move violated procedures outlined in U.S. law. That program relied on a phone app that the second Trump administration has since repurposed and renamed as CBP Home to facilitate self-deportations of those in the U.S. illegally.
More than 900,000 migrants from countries across the globe were allowed into the U.S. at official ports of entry along the southern border under the CBP One system. It’s unclear how many will benefit from the ruling since some may have been deported already or gained another lawful status.
The Justice Department is likely to appeal the ruling.
At the time, the Biden administration argued the CBP One program reduced illegal immigration by giving would-be border crossers the chance to enter the U.S. with the government’s permission.
But Trump administration officials have argued that the Biden administration did not have authority to create such a program and that it violated U.S. immigration law by allowing hundreds of thousands of migrants to enter the country outside of the traditional legal immigration system.
In April 2025, the Department of Homeland Security announced it was terminating the parole status of those processed under the CBP One program, urging them to self-deport or face the prospect of being found, arrested and forcibly deported.
In a statement Tuesday, DHS said it had the power to revoke the parole status of those allowed in by the Biden administration.
“We disagree with this blatant judicial activism undermining the President’s Article II authority to determine who remains in this country,” DHS said. “The Biden Administration abused the parole authority under the disastrous CBP One program to allow millions of illegal aliens into the U.S. which further fueled the worst border crisis in U.S. history.”
Skye Perryman, President and CEO of Democracy Forward, a group that challenged the parole terminations in federal court, said Tuesday’s order rejected “a harmful and destabilizing policy.”
“Today’s ruling is a clear rejection of an administration that has tried to erase lawful status for hundreds of thousands of people with the click of a button,” Perryman said. “Our clients followed the law: they waited, registered, were inspected, and were granted parole under the law.”
发表回复