发布时间：2026年3月27日，美国东部时间中午12:40
作者：莎拉·费里斯、安妮·格雷尔、劳伦·福克斯
众议院议长迈克·约翰逊目前尚未获得足够票数来批准参议院在清晨通过的一项为国土安全部（DHS）大部分部门提供资金的法案。
然而，这位众议院共和党领袖及其团队对该法案极为愤怒，甚至不愿将其提交至众议院进行投票。多位共和党消息人士透露，争议焦点在于参议院共和党人在此次用于重新启动国土安全部剩余部门的资金法案中，未纳入联邦移民执法或边境巡逻的资金。
“我能告诉你的是，我们的领导层和成员对参议院的所作所为普遍感到厌恶，这确实不合适。”众议院多数党督导汤姆·埃默周五上午表示。
与此同时，愤怒的众议院保守派对该法案进行了公开抨击，称参议院多数党领袖约翰·图恩在深夜强行通过了这项法案，既未进行唱名投票，也未给予辩论机会。消息人士透露，部分众议院共和党领导层正在认真考虑是否完全拒绝该法案，并提出他们自己的提案——尽管目前尚未做出决定。
约翰逊及其团队正急于弄清楚共和党会议是否能够接受该法案，或者是否应该将带有自身优先事项的法案“反弹”回参议院，消息人士表示。
共和党领袖们整个上午都在紧急磋商下一步行动，而工作人员则在疯狂研究该法案。
在一次愤怒的表态中，极端保守的众议院自由党团领袖宣布他们不会支持参议院法案，要求任何法案都必须包含边境巡逻资金，以及总统唐纳德·特朗普的一项主要国内优先事项：新的选民身份限制。
“我们唯一会支持的是在法案中加入这些资金，加入选民身份限制，然后将其送回参议院，让他们回来完成工作。”马里兰州众议员、自由党团领袖安迪·哈里斯表示。
他还淡化了部分共和党同僚对机场届时将陷入困境的担忧：“总统已经表示他会从现有资金中为运输安全管理局（TSA）提供资金。”
周五凌晨，图恩在接受记者采访时表示，他认为“众议院清楚我们的计划”，但多位资深共和党众议院领袖告诉CNN，他们并未收到图恩推动这项仅部分资助国土安全部法案的任何预警。
“我甚至还不知道这是什么内容。”众议院拨款委员会主席汤姆·科尔周五在被问及是否可能支持该计划时告诉CNN。
众议院共和党领袖对能否按照常规程序通过该法案持怀疑态度，常规程序要求在众议院进行需要共和党人几乎完全一致支持的程序性投票。（一些民主党人暗示他们可能会帮助投下这一票，这一不同寻常的举动反映出众议院席位差距悬殊以及各方越来越希望找到资金解决方案。）
另一种选择是民主党人帮助通过一项快速程序法案，该程序需要众议院三分之二多数票支持，即所谓的“暂停规则”（suspension）。
但共和党强硬派厌恶这种暂停规则——实际上，他们在众议院规则中加入了一项条款，禁止在周五、周六和周日进行此类投票。领导层或许可以绕过这项规则，但这将在党内引发强烈不满。
无论走哪条路都将异常棘手，且很可能需要特朗普的支持才能争取到足够的共和党选票。
但一些共和党人坚持认为，他们的党别无选择，尤其是在春季旅游旺季（春假）期间，运输安全管理局（TSA）的问题每小时都在恶化，同时联邦紧急事务管理局（FEMA）、海岸警卫队等部门的运作也存在担忧。
“我的意思是，看在上帝的份上，我们必须要让这部分政府机构正常运转。”新泽西州众议员杰夫·范德鲁告诉CNN。
“我们会用最艰难、最痛苦、最尴尬、最漫长且最糟糕的方式来完成，但最终我们会做到的。”俄克拉荷马州众议员弗兰克·卢卡斯告诉CNN，“这就是一个典型的例子。”
众议院民主党人尚未就该法案发表正式声明，但多位接近民主党领导层的人士认为，多数党团最终会支持该计划。民主党会议周五上午正在召开会议，讨论下一步行动——以及他们愿意在众议院投票中给予约翰逊多少支持。
尽管该法案未包含民主党推动的改革，但也没有为移民和海关执法局（ICE）提供任何新资金——这是一个重大让步，因为民主党人认为这为未来进一步谈判创造了机会。
对民主党人来说更重要的是，该法案没有包含边境巡逻资金，而这在之前的谈判中是一个主要障碍。（参议院法案确实包含了美国海关运营的资金。）
美国有线电视新闻网的泰德·巴雷特和摩根·里默对此报道有贡献。
House GOP erupts over Senate’s overnight move to fund pieces of DHS | CNN Politics
PUBLISHED Mar 27, 2026, 12:40 PM ET / By Sarah Ferris, Annie Grayer, Lauren Fox
Speaker Mike Johnson does not currently have the House votes to approve the Senate’s early morning funding measure to fund large swaths of the Department of Homeland Security.
But the House Republican leader and his team are so furious about the bill that they do not want to put it to a vote on the floor. At issue, multiple GOP sources say, is that Senate Republicans did not include money for federal immigration enforcement or border patrol in the funding bill that would reopen the remainder of the department.
“The one thing I can tell you is that there is a common disgust from our leadership team and from our members about what they did over in the Senate, and it really was not appropriate,” House Majority Whip Tom Emmer said Friday morning.
Enraged House conservatives, meanwhile, publicly blasted the bill they said Senate Majority Leader John Thune jammed through his chamber in the middle of the night, with no roll call vote or the chance to debate it. And some in the House GOP leadership team are seriously contemplating whether to reject the measure altogether and put forward their own proposal, the sources said – though no decisions have yet been made.
Johnson and his team are now scrambling to figure out if the GOP conference can accept the bill or whether they should attempt to boomerang legislation with their own priorities back to the Senate, the sources said.
GOP leaders have spent the morning huddling about next steps, while staff has frantically pored through the bill.
In one display of anger, leaders of the ultraconservative House Freedom Caucus announced they would not support the Senate measure, demanding that any bill include money for border patrol, as well as one of President Donald Trump’s top domestic priorities: new voter ID restrictions.
“The only thing we’re going to support is adding that funding into the bill, adding voter ID, sending it back to the Senate, make them come back in and do their work,” said Rep. Andy Harris of Maryland, who leads the Freedom Caucus.
And he downplayed the urgency felt by some of his GOP colleagues that airports will suffer in the meantime: “The president has already said he’s going to fund TSA out of funds he has.”
While Thune told reporters in the early morning hours of Friday that he believed the “House is aware of what we’re contemplating,” multiple senior GOP House leaders told CNN they received no warning about Thune’s plans to push through a measure that would only partially fund the department.
“I don’t even know what it is yet,” House Appropriations Chairman Tom Cole told CNN when asked Friday about whether he could support the plan.
House GOP leaders are skeptical they can pass the bill under regular order, which requires a procedural vote on the floor that requires near-total unanimity among Republicans. (Some Democrats have suggested they would help with that vote, an unusual move that reflects the tight House margins and growing desire to find a funding solution.)
Another option would be Democrats helping to pass the bill under a fast-tracked process that requires two-thirds approval of the House, known as “suspension.”
But GOP hardliners detest this suspension route – and have actually tucked a provision in House rules that prevents those kinds of votes from happening on Fridays, Saturdays and Sundays. Leadership can get around the rule, but it would cause intense consternation in their ranks.
Either route would be messy and likely require Trump’s blessing to help round up GOP votes.
But some Republicans insist they party has no choice, with TSA woes increasing by the hour during a popular spring break travel season, as well as concerns about FEMA, Coast Guard operations and others.
“I mean, we’ve got to, for God’s sake, we’ve got to open this piece of government up,” Rep. Jeff Van Drew of New Jersey told CNN.
“We do it the hardest, most painful, most awkward, most drawn out miserable way, but eventually we get it done,” Rep. Frank Lucas told CNN. “This is a classic example of that.”
House Democrats have not made formal statements about the measure but multiple people close to leadership believe the majority of the caucus will ultimately support the plan. The conference is huddling Friday morning to discuss next steps — and how much help they’re willing to lend Johnson on the floor.
While the bill does not include reforms that the party had pushed for, it does not include any new money for ICE — a significant concession, since Democrats see this as a chance for further negotiation in the future.
Importantly for Democrats, the bill does not include money for Border Patrol, which was a major sticking point in previous talks. (The Senate measure does include money for US customs operations.)
CNN’s Ted Barrett and Morgan Rimmer contributed to this report.
发表回复