发布时间:2026年3月26日,美国东部时间凌晨5:00 | 美国有线电视新闻网政治版
来自全国各地的保守派人士正齐聚2026年保守政治行动大会(CPAC)——这是右翼人物和影响力人士最大规模的集会之一。
通常在华盛顿特区地区举行的该会议,今年定于德克萨斯州达拉斯-沃思堡地区的格雷普韦恩(Grapevine)举办。
以下是今年大会面临的一些重大问题。
当前右翼的心态如何?
2025年CPAC大会主要是唐纳德·特朗普总统的胜利时刻。
在1月6日国会山骚乱后,他的政治生涯看似终结四年后,特朗普在其第二个总统任期开始仅一个月时便意气风发,推行了或许是白宫历史上最厚颜无耻的政治议程。
埃隆·马斯克曾手持玩具链锯登台,誓言“砍掉”联邦政府雇员(隐喻性表述)。在经历几年共和党至少在“远离MAGA路线”边缘试探后,如今该党似乎不可逆转地回归“红药丸”(注:此处指更激进的MAGA理念)。
然而,事实证明,一年之内情况可能发生巨大变化。
特朗普的民调支持率大幅跳水,危及共和党在2026年中期选举中保住参众两院的希望——以及特朗普的议程。尽管他的核心支持者仍坚定站在他这边,但特朗普推动的一些事业,如对伊朗开战,显然正在考验这种团结。我们偶尔会看到议员们以过去难以想象的方式公开反对他。
一个重大问题是,CPAC的参会者会在多大程度上正视这些问题——讨论如何“纠正航向”以及如何为党指明前进方向——还是会试图回避棘手议题。
伊朗战争分歧会显现吗?
我们仍在试图弄清楚保守派运动对这场战争的态度。CPAC应该能让我们了解右翼内部分歧的真实程度。
尽管普遍认为MAGA群体支持这场战争,但特朗普核心支持者的态度比这更复杂。
自称为MAGA支持者的人绝大多数表示支持这场战争,但多达五分之一的共和党人和四分之一的2024年特朗普选民表示反对。其余人中许多人对战争也只是态度冷淡。(特朗普自己的副总统和国家情报局局长明显避免明确支持,另有一名特朗普政府官员最近因反对战争而辞职。)大量知名保守派影响力人士明确反对这场战争。
一名与会者举着描绘礼萨·巴列维(Reza Pahlavi)的标牌,出现在2026年保守政治行动大会上。
Callaghan O’Hare/路透社
演讲嘉宾名单包括流亡伊朗反对领袖、王储礼萨·巴列维。也包括支持战争的知名人士,如德克萨斯州参议员特德·克鲁兹和前美国常驻联合国代表马克·华莱士(他领导着“联合对抗伊朗核威胁”组织)。但也有持战争怀疑态度的人士,如佛罗里达州前众议员马特·盖茨和前特朗普顾问史蒂夫·班农。
至少目前,演讲名单中没有包括一些最知名的反伊朗战争影响力人士,如塔克·卡尔森和梅根·凯利——这些人可能真的会试图组织反对特朗普战争的力量。
但如果大会刻意回避对战争的强烈支持表态,也同样值得关注。
2028年初选前,卢比奥和万斯将如何定位?
与上述问题相关的是,共和党如何在2028年大选前开始确定方向。
自特朗普第二任期开始以来,副总统JD·万斯被视为特朗普的潜在继承人,且其2028年民调支持率也支持这一说法。
但伊朗战争和特朗普日益增强的干预主义倾向,使万斯的地位有所边缘化。与此同时,特朗普更鹰派的国务卿马尔科·卢比奥的势头似乎在上升。
副总统JD·万斯和国务卿马尔科·卢比奥于1月离开艾森豪威尔行政办公楼。
Brendan Smialowski/法新社/盖蒂图片社/档案照片
我们不应期望保守派运动在2028年首次初选前就开始站队。但此类集会——以及CPAC的 straw poll(稻草投票)——可以传递关于基础选民最关注部分的信号。
如果CPAC对向来不那么亲MAGA的卢比奥表示热烈欢迎,这可能预示着该运动的未来之争比我们预期的更为激烈。
(两人目前均未确定出席。)
右翼会就德克萨斯州参议院席位表态吗?
自特朗普宣布将介入德克萨斯州共和党参议院竞选 runoff(决选)以来,已过去三个多星期。当时他支持的是参议员约翰·科宁,希望结束这场残酷的角逐。支持科宁的共和党领袖认为,在与民主党候选人州议员詹姆斯·塔拉利科的关键竞选中,科宁更具竞争力。
但由于MAGA更支持帕克斯顿,特朗普的介入政治从未轻松。而且特朗普仍未兑现承诺。
本周末在达拉斯-沃思堡地区的集会,应该会将共和党基础选民面临的这一重要选择重新推到前沿。
帕克斯顿将发表演讲。事实上,他在CPAC周五晚间的里根晚宴上有重要演讲时段。
CPAC也邀请了科宁演讲,但科宁以CPAC支持帕克斯顿为由婉拒。
德克萨斯州参议员候选人兼州总检察长肯·帕克斯顿在3月3日达拉斯的初选夜集会中向支持者演讲。
Sergio Flores/盖蒂图片社
如果CPAC成为帕克斯顿的 rally(集会)时刻,这将使参议院共和党领袖更难获得特朗普对科宁的支持。而帕克斯顿赢得5月26日的决选,显然是民主党所期望的,因为他有个人和官方丑闻的历史。
近年来,右翼表现出提名问题候选人的能力,这些候选人往往会危及本可稳赢的选战。但该党正再次面临重大风险。
爱泼斯坦文件会成为焦点吗?
伊朗战争目前是更大焦点,但不要忽视爱泼斯坦文件。
大部分共和党基础选民似乎已听从特朗普的呼吁,认为应“向前看”,但这类集会中,该问题曾一度占据重要位置。
也有一些与该问题相关的关键演讲者。包括班农,他在爱泼斯坦晚年与其关系密切,但到目前为止在右翼并未引发重大反弹。
还有司法部副部长托德·布兰奇,他是司法部公布文件的公开发言人,但这并未让许多美国人满意。还有众议院监督委员会主席詹姆斯·科默,其委员会已对爱泼斯坦文件相关问题发出传票。
CPAC是否不再重要?
有理由相信该活动的影响力可能正在减弱。
演讲嘉宾名单并不完全是保守派右翼的名人录。议程中也没有特朗普、万斯或许多其他特朗普政府高官如卢比奥。
(确定出席的人士包括教育部长琳达·麦凯恩、农业部长布鲁克·罗林斯、联邦通信委员会主席布伦丹·卡尔、边境负责人汤姆·霍曼和医疗保险与医疗补助服务中心管理员梅赫梅特·奥兹。)
如果特朗普没有在最后时刻出席,这将是自2016年他以“希望专注竞选活动”为由退出以来,首次缺席该活动。
但当时CPAC的“特朗普色彩”远不如现在浓厚。自那时起,该活动已成为特朗普集结基础选民、展示支持者力量的平台。
Analysis: 6 big questions at CPAC 2026 | CNN Politics
PUBLISHED Mar 26, 2026, 5:00 AM ET | CNN Politics
Conservatives from across the country are gathering for the 2026 edition of the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC), one of the biggest gatherings of right-wing figures and influencers.
Normally held in the Washington, DC, area, the conference is this year set for Grapevine, Texas, in the Dallas-Fort Worth area.
Below are some of the biggest questions looming over this year’s edition.
What is the right’s mood right now?
CPAC 2025 mostly served as a moment of triumph for President Donald Trump.
Four years after his political career seemed finished following the January 6 Capitol riot, there was Trump riding high just a month into his second presidential term, pursuing perhaps the most brazen political agenda in recent White House history.
Elon Musk was on stage with a toy chainsaw, vowing to hack away at the federal workforce (metaphorically). And after a few years of the GOP at least flirting with a less MAGA course, it looked like the party was inexorably red-pilled now.
But a lot can happen in a year, it turns out.
Trump’s poll numbers have taken a nosedive, imperiling the GOP’s hopes of holding both the House and Senate in the 2026 midterms — and Trump’s agenda along with them. And while his base is still very much in his corner, Trump has pursued a number of causes, such as the Iran war, that are clearly testing that unity. We’ll occasionally see lawmakers stand up to him in ways that were previously unthinkable.
One of the big questions is how much the attendees at CPAC choose to reckon with all that — to discuss how to right the ship and how to orient the party moving forward — versus trying to avoid difficult issues.
Does the Iran war divide show up?
We’re still trying to figure out how the conservative movement feels about the war. CPAC should give us some indication of how real the divides might be on the right wing.
While the conventional wisdom is that MAGA is united behind the war, the picture of Trump’s base is more nuanced than that.
Self-proclaimed MAGA supporters overwhelmingly say they support the war, but as many as 1 in 5 Republicans and 1 in 4 Trump 2024 voters don’t. Many of the rest are only lukewarm on the war. (Trump’s own vice president and director of national intelligence have conspicuously avoided full endorsements, and another Trump administration official recently resigned over it.) Plenty of prominent conservative influencers are explicitly against it.
A person holds a sign depicting Reza Pahlavi, during the Conservative Political Action Conference on Wednesday.
Callaghan O’Hare/Reuters
The list of speakers includes exiled Iranian opposition leader and Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi. It includes prominent supporters of the war like Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas and former United Nations Ambassador Mark Wallace, who heads a group called United Against Nuclear Iran. But it also features skeptics of the war such as former Rep. Matt Gaetz of Florida and former Trump adviser Steve Bannon.
At least so far, the speakers list doesn’t include some of the most prominent anti-Iran war influencers such as Tucker Carlson and Megyn Kelly – the types who might really try to marshal opposition to Trump’s war.
But it would also be telling if the gathering just avoids huge shows of support for the war.
How do Rubio and Vance stack up two years before the 2028 primaries?
Related to the above issue is how the party starts to orient itself ahead of 2028.
Since the start of Trump’s second term, Vice President JD Vance has been seen as Trump’s heir apparent, and he’s got the 2028 poll numbers to back that up.
But the Iran war and Trump’s increasing interventionist streak have pushed Vance somewhat to the back seat. And all the while, the fortunes of Trump’s more hawkish Secretary of State Marco Rubio have appeared to be on the rise.
Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio depart the Eisenhower Executive Office Building in January.
Brendan Smialowski/AFP/Getty Images/File
We shouldn’t expect the conservative movement to start picking sides two years before the first 2028 primaries. But gatherings like this — along with the CPAC straw poll — can send signals about the most passionate portions of the base.
If CPAC warms to Rubio, who hasn’t generally been terribly MAGA-friendly, that could signal more of a fight for the future of the movement than we might have otherwise anticipated.
(Neither man is thus far slated to attend.)
Does the right make a statement about the Texas Senate race?
It’s been more than three weeks since Trump said he would intervene in the Texas GOP Senate runoff between Sen. John Cornyn and state Attorney General Ken Paxton, in hopes of ending the brutal contest. GOP leaders backing Cornyn see him as more electable in a key race against Democratic nominee state Rep. James Talarico.
But the politics of that were never easy, given that MAGA is much more on board with Paxton, and Trump still hasn’t followed through on his promise.
The venue this weekend in the Dallas-Fort Worth area should push this very important choice for the GOP base back to the forefront.
Paxton is due to speak. In fact, he’s got a prominent slot as the featured speaker at CPAC’s Ronald Reagan Dinner on Friday night.
CPAC also invited Cornyn to speak, but Cornyn has declined, citing the fact that CPAC has endorsed Paxton.
Senate candidate and Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton speaks to supporters at a primary election night watch party in Dallas, on March 3.
Sergio Flores/Getty Images
If CPAC turns into a rallying moment for Paxton, that could make it even more difficult for Senate GOP leaders to get a Trump endorsement of Cornyn. And Paxton winning the May 26 runoff is clearly what Democrats would prefer, given his history of personal and official scandals.
In recent years, the right has demonstrated a knack for nominating problematic Senate candidates who imperil — and often lose — very winnable races. But the party is flirting with yet another major risk.
Are the Epstein files a focus?
The Iran war is a much bigger focus right now, but don’t sleep on the Epstein files.
Much of the GOP base appears to have heeded Trump’s call for everyone to move on, but this is the kind of crowd where this issue once loomed very large.
There are also some key speakers with proximity to the issue. Those include Bannon, who had a cozy relationship with Epstein in his later years but has avoided a significant backlash on the right thus far.
They also include Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, who has been the public face of the DOJ’s release of the files, which hasn’t satisfied many Americans. And they include House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer of Kentucky, whose committee has pursued subpoenas related to the Epstein files.
Is CPAC a big deal anymore?
There are reasons to believe this event’s influence might be on the wane.
The list of speakers doesn’t exactly read like a who’s who of the conservative right. And the agenda doesn’t include Trump, Vance or many other high-profile Trump administration officials like Rubio.
(Those who are slated to appear include Education Secretary Linda McMahon, Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins, Federal Communications Commission Chairman Brendan Carr, border czar Tom Homan and Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services Administrator Mehmet Oz.)
Assuming Trump doesn’t add a last-minute appearance, it would be the first time he has skipped the event since he pulled out of it in 2016, citing a desire to stay on the campaign trail.
But that was at a time when CPAC was considerably less Trumpy. Since then, the event has served as an opportunity for him to rally the base and show much of it was in his corner.
发表回复