五角大楼在法官推翻记者准入限制规则后将撤销媒体办公室


2026年3月23日 / 美国东部时间晚上10:44 / CBS/美联社

美国国防部周一表示,在联邦法官在一场质疑记者进入五角大楼限制的诉讼中支持《纽约时报》后,该部门将撤销媒体机构在五角大楼内的办公空间。

国防部发言人肖恩·帕内尔表示,被称为”记者走廊”的五角大楼区域(记者数十年来一直在此报道美国军方活动)将立即关闭。记者最终将能够在大楼外的一个”附属楼”工作,他表示该附属楼”准备就绪后即可使用”,但他没有透露需要多长时间。

《纽约时报》迅速回应称,这一决定违反了法官的命令且违宪。该报发言人查理·斯塔特兰德在一份声明中表示:”我们将重返法庭。”

五角大楼记者协会称这一政策”明显违反了上周裁决的字面和精神”。

该组织在一份声明中写道:”在这个关键时刻,我们要问为什么五角大楼选择限制有助于向所有美国人通报情况的重要新闻自由。”该组织提及了与伊朗的战争以及美国最近在委内瑞拉的行动。

这一新政策是特朗普政府任内新闻自由争议的最新事件,该政府限制传统媒体而扶持保守派媒体。

去年秋天,在军方要求记者签署一系列新限制条件以维持日常进入大楼的权限后,包括哥伦比亚广播公司新闻、美国广播公司新闻、全国广播公司新闻、美国有线电视新闻网和福克斯新闻在内的数十名记者放弃了他们的五角大楼记者证。该政策暗示,向军方人员”征求”机密或敏感信息的记者可能被视为安全风险并被禁止进入大楼。

《纽约时报》于去年12月起诉五角大楼和国防部长皮特·赫格塞斯,声称该机构的新记者证政策侵犯了记者的宪法言论自由和正当程序权利。

华盛顿特区美国地区法官保罗·弗里德曼上周支持了该报纸的诉求,命令五角大楼恢复七名《纽约时报》记者的记者证,并推翻了该机构对新闻报道的部分限制,包括关于征求信息的政策。

弗里德曼表示,”无可争议的证据”表明,该政策旨在淘汰”不受欢迎的记者”,并代之以”支持并愿意为政府服务”的记者,他认为这是违反《第一修正案》的非法观点歧视。他还表示,该政策在宪法上过于模糊,记者不清楚哪些行为违反规则。

帕内尔表示,国防部不同意这一裁决并正在提起上诉。他称安全考虑促使限制媒体进入,而记者们对此提出了反驳。

根据周一宣布的最新五角大楼规则,记者仍可通过国防部公共事务团队安排的新闻发布会和采访进入五角大楼,但必须由专人陪同,帕内尔在社交媒体上写道。

去年颁布的政策中还对记者可进入大楼的区域有新限制,弗里德曼未推翻这部分内容。

目前五角大楼记者团主要由同意去年政策的保守派媒体组成,拒绝同意新规则的媒体记者仍在继续报道军事新闻。

Pentagon to remove media offices from building after judge strikes down rules for reporters

March 23, 2026 / 10:44 PM EDT / CBS/AP

The Defense Department said Monday it will remove media outlets’ office spaces from the Pentagon after a federal judge sided with The New York Times in a lawsuit challenging limits on reporters’ access to the building.

An area of the Pentagon known as “Correspondents’ Corridor” that reporters have used for decades to cover the U.S. military will close immediately, department spokesperson Sean Parnell said. Journalists will eventually be able to work from an “annex” outside the building, which he said “will be available when ready.” He offered no details about how long that will take.

The New York Times quickly responded by arguing the decision violated the judge’s order and was unconstitutional. Times spokesperson Charlie Stadtlander said in a statement: “We will be going back to court.”

The Pentagon Press Association called the policy a “clear violation of the letter and spirit of last week’s ruling.”

“At such a critical time, we ask why the Pentagon is choosing to restrict vital press freedoms that help inform all Americans,” the group wrote in a statement, referring to the war with Iran and the recent U.S. operation in Venezuela.

The new policy is the latest dispute over press access during President Trump’s administration, which has limited legacy media while boosting conservative outlets.

Dozens of reporters — including from CBS News, ABC News, NBC News, CNN and Fox News — gave up their Pentagon credentials last fall, after the military required journalists to sign onto a host of new restrictions in order to maintain daily access to the building. The policy suggested that reporters who “solicit” classified or sensitive information from military personnel could be deemed a security risk and barred from the building.

The Times sued the Pentagon and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth in December, claiming the agency’s new credentialing policy violated journalists’ constitutional rights to free speech and due process.

U.S. District Judge Paul Friedman in Washington, D.C., last week sided with the newspaper. He ordered the Pentagon to reinstate the press credentials of seven Times journalists and struck down some of the agency’s restrictions on news reporting, including the policy on soliciting information.

Friedman said the “undisputed evidence” shows that the policy was designed to weed out “disfavored journalists” and replace them with those who are “on board and willing to serve” the government, in what he viewed as an instance of illegal viewpoint discrimination in violation of the First Amendment. He also said the policy was unconstitutionally vague, and it wasn’t clear to reporters what kinds of conduct do and don’t violate the rules.

Parnell said the Defense Department disagrees with the ruling and is pursuing an appeal. He said security concerns prompted restrictions on press access, a claim that journalists have pushed back on.

Under the latest Pentagon rules announced Monday, journalists will still have access to the Pentagon for press conferences and interviews arranged through the department’s public affairs team, but they will have to be escorted, Parnell wrote on social media.

The policy that was enacted last year also had new restrictions on which parts of the building journalists could access. Friedman did not strike down those portions.

The current Pentagon press corps comprises mostly conservative outlets that agreed to last year’s policy. Reporters from outlets that refused to consent to the new rules have continued reporting on the military.

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注