特朗普政府可能正在损害以色列本已受损的声誉


分析:艾伦·布雷克
3小时前
发布于 2026年3月19日,美国东部时间下午4:00

中东 唐纳德·特朗普 石油与天然气 打击虚假信息

[查看所有主题]

Facebook
推特
电子邮件
链接
Threads
链接已复制!

唐纳德·特朗普总统周四在椭圆形办公室与日本首相高市早苗举行会面。

Aaron Schwartz/CNP/Bloomberg/Getty Images

唐纳德·特朗普总统与以色列联手发动对伊朗的战争,正值美以关系处于不吉利的时期。

就在首轮打击的前一天,盖洛普民调显示美国人对以色列的看法降至21世纪低点;最引人注目的是,美国人首次不再比巴勒斯坦人更同情以色列人。

更棘手的是,近几个月来,右翼内部就如何应对其支持者和有影响力人士阶层中日益令人不安的反犹主义抬头产生了分歧。一些保守派思想界的知名人士越来越多地——而且常常是以阴谋论的方式——将以色列与美国的各种弊病联系起来。

广告反馈

鉴于美国人从一开始就对这场战争持相当怀疑态度,不难想象有人会指责以色列,甚至编造关于以色列的阴谋论。

而这确实发生了。但出人意料的是,这在很大程度上要归功于特朗普政府关于这场战争的一些言论。

总统及其身边人士的一些言论并没有帮助以色列,反而对其不利。

在两次重大场合中,政府都暗示以色列对战争的重大转折点负有主要责任——尽管这两点的证据并不完全清晰。

卢比奥关于“伊朗迫在眉睫威胁”的言论

首先,国务卿马尔科·卢比奥以一种间接的方式为伊朗对美国构成迫在眉睫的威胁辩护。卢比奥声称以色列无论如何都会打击伊朗,而伊朗会报复性打击美国目标;因此,论点是伊朗对美国构成迫在眉睫的威胁。

国务卿马尔科·卢比奥出席特朗普总统与日本首相高市早苗的会面。

Evelyn Hockstein/路透社

然而,这种表述的政治问题在于,它听起来很像是美国政府被迫受以色列的影响。

因此,特朗普政府迅速放弃了这一论点,并转向其战争理由清单中的另一个论点。

乔·肯特的辞职

但本周表明,以色列的公关问题毫无进展。

周二,我们得知特朗普政府首位高调官员因伊朗战争问题辞职。但即将离任的国家反恐中心主任乔·肯特不仅批评这场战争;他还强烈指责“以色列及其强大游说团体的压力”迫使美国卷入战争。

肯特在辞职信中继续多次提及以色列,并将其他战争归咎于以色列。周三,他在接受塔克·卡尔森采访时,还传播了关于以色列与已故保守派活动家查理·柯克遇刺阴谋论的言论。

主流右翼对肯特的反应大多是将其斥为反犹主义者。但这是特朗普任命到有权势职位的人——尽管他已知过去与包括白人至上主义者和纳粹同情者在内的极端分子有联系。而肯特现在正利用政府赋予他的公信力来攻击以色列。

特朗普的最新言论

最后是特朗普周三深夜的奇怪声明。

美国东部时间晚上10点左右,他在社交媒体上发文否认美国对以色列袭击伊朗南帕尔斯天然气田相关设施负有任何责任。

“美国对这次特定袭击一无所知,”特朗普坚持说。

这次袭击是一个大事件,因为伊朗回应称打击了卡塔尔的天然气田部分,加剧了该地区邻国间的紧张局势。(特朗普还威胁说,如果伊朗继续攻击卡塔尔,将“大规模炸毁”伊朗的天然气田部分。)而南帕尔斯气田是世界上最大的气田,其破坏可能对本已挣扎的全球能源市场和供应产生巨大影响。

伊朗布什尔省南帕尔斯气田在周三遭袭后,浓烟和火焰升起,此图取自社交媒体视频。

路透社

首先需要注意的是,特朗普的说法遭到了反驳。一名美国消息人士告诉CNN,美国“知晓”这次打击,而以色列消息人士表示双方就此次打击进行了协调。(其他专家,包括前美国驻以色列大使丹·夏皮罗,也指出,如果以色列没有将此次规模和重要性的袭击通报美国,那将是令人震惊的。)

但暂且不论这一点,特朗普的言论——与卢比奥的类似——暗示以色列对此次升级负有单一责任,并将美国描述为对以色列强加的升级做出回应的角色。

否认参与可能符合特朗普的国内政治目的,但无助于以色列在美国的声誉。事实上,特朗普声称美国一无所知的立场,助长了像肯特这样的人所持有的阴谋论。

以色列总理本雅明·内塔尼亚胡周四表示,以色列在打击南帕尔斯天然气田相关设施时“独自行动”,但没有直接回应美国是否事先知晓此次行动。

内塔尼亚胡还驳斥了以色列胁迫美国参战的说法,质疑是否有人能对特朗普施加这样的影响。

“说我们把美国拖入战争的谣言——这不仅是谣言;这是荒谬的。简直荒谬,”内塔尼亚胡在新闻发布会上说。

令人不安的问题

特朗普周四似乎加倍坚持他的说法,告诉记者美国和以色列“是独立的,但相处得很好”。

他谈到内塔尼亚胡时说:“这是协调的。但有时他会做一些事,如果我不喜欢,我们就不再做了。”

但这种情况再次给政府带来了令人不安的问题。

周四五角大楼新闻发布会上,右翼网站《网关 pundit》的记者问国防部长彼得·赫格塞斯关于特朗普周三“真相社交”帖子的问题。

“如果以色列要追求自己的目标,我们为什么要帮助以色列进行这场战争?”记者问道。

赫格塞斯没有回应特朗普帖子的实质内容,而是含糊地保证美国的目标正在实现。

“我们掌握主动权。我们有目标。这些目标很明确,”他回应道。“我们的盟友也在追求目标,事实不言而喻。”

当天上午晚些时候,国家情报总监图尔西·加巴德在众议院情报委员会听证会上被问及为什么以色列会(据称)违背特朗普意愿打击伊朗能源基础设施。

“我无法回答这个问题,”她回应道。

国家情报总监图尔西·加巴德在众议院情报委员会听证会上作证。

Kylie Cooper/路透社

加巴德随后被问及以色列的目标是否与美国一致,她再次显得不知所措。经过长时间停顿后,她说她正在“仔细考虑”可以公开说些什么。

(她最终承认,以色列更专注于消灭伊朗领导层,而美国则更专注于解除伊朗的武装——无论是在核领域还是常规武器方面。)

听证会上,中央情报局局长约翰·拉特克利夫证实,卢比奥的说法有美国情报的真正依据。

拉特克利夫表示,有“一系列证据”表明,“如果伊朗和以色列之间发生冲突,无论美国是否置身冲突之外,美国都将立即遭到攻击。”

这场战争原本就很难向美国人民解释,也是对美以关系的真正考验。

但由于无法制定一致的信息,以及特朗普倾向于在任何时候说对自己有利的话,政府使这一局面的后半部分变得比必要的更加复杂。

美国社会和以色列的声誉可能会长期感受到这种影响。

中东 唐纳德·特朗普 石油与天然气 打击虚假信息

[查看所有主题]

Facebook
推特
电子邮件
链接
Threads
链接已复制!

广告反馈

订阅
登录
我的账户

  • [设置]
  • [新闻通讯]
  • [关注的主题]
  • [登出]

您的CNN账户
登录您的CNN账户

[](https://www.cnn.com/account/log-in)

*

[收听][观看]

*

  • [美国]
  • [犯罪与司法]
  • [移民]
  • [教育]
  • [交通]
  • [种族与身份]
  • [世界]
  • [非洲]
  • [美洲]
  • [亚洲]
  • [澳大利亚]
  • [中国]
  • [欧洲]
  • [印度]
  • [中东]
  • [英国]
  • [政治]
  • [特朗普]
  • [事实核查]
  • [CNN民调]
  • [2026年选举]
  • [重新划分选区跟踪]
  • [爱泼斯坦文件]
  • [商业]
  • [科技]
  • [媒体]
  • [计算器]
  • [视频]
  • [市场]
  • [盘前]
  • [盘后]
  • [恐惧与贪婪]
  • [投资]
  • [现在市场]
  • [夜话]
  • [健康]
  • [生活,更好]
  • [健身]
  • [饮食]
  • [睡眠]
  • [正念]
  • [人际关系]
  • [CNN精选]
  • [电子产品]
  • [时尚]
  • [美容]
  • [健康与健身]
  • [家居]
  • [评论]
  • [优惠]
  • [礼品]
  • [旅行]
  • [户外]
  • [宠物]
  • [娱乐]
  • [电影]
  • [电视]
  • [名人]
  • [科技]
  • [创新]
  • [风格]
  • [艺术]
  • [设计]
  • [时尚]
  • [建筑]
  • [奢侈品]
  • [美容]
  • [视频]
  • [旅行]
  • [目的地]
  • [美食与饮品]
  • [住宿]
  • [新闻]
  • [视频]
  • [体育]
  • [职业足球]
  • [大学足球]
  • [篮球]
  • [棒球]
  • [足球]
  • [奥运会]
  • [科学]
  • [太空]
  • [生活]
  • [新发现]
  • [气候]
  • [解决方案]
  • [天气]
  • [天气]
  • [视频]
  • [气候]
  • [乌克兰-俄罗斯战争]
  • [以色列-哈马斯战争]
  • [观看]
  • [精选]
  • [节目与电影]
  • [电视网]
  • [片段]
  • [CNN头条]
  • [CNN短片]
  • [节目列表]
  • [CNN 10]
  • [CNN电视节目表]
  • [收听]
  • [CNN五件事]
  • [跟着桑贾伊·古普塔博士生活]
  • [与奥迪·科尼什的任务]
  • [一件事]
  • [拔河]
  • [CNN政治简报]
  • [斧头档案]
  • [与安德森·库珀一起]
  • [所有CNN音频播客]
  • [游戏]
  • [每日填字游戏]
  • [填字游戏]
  • [照片洗牌]
  • [Sudoblock]
  • [数独]
  • [五件事测验]
  • [亚马逊Prime日]
  • [关于CNN]
  • [订阅]
  • [照片]
  • [调查]
  • [CNN人物]
  • [CNN领导层]
  • [CNN新闻通讯]
  • [在CNN工作]

*

[](https://www.cnn.com/

How the Trump administration could be hurting Israel’s already damaged brand

Analysis by Aaron Blake
3 hr ago
PUBLISHED Mar 19, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

The Middle East Donald Trump Oil & gas Fighting disinformation

[See all topics]

Facebook TweetEmailLink Threads
Link Copied!

President Donald Trump sits in the Oval Office on Thursday, during a meeting with Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi.

Aaron Schwartz/CNP/Bloomberg/Getty Images

President Donald Trump joined with Israel to launch the Iran war at an inauspicious time for the US-Israeli relationship.

Just a day before the first strikes, Gallup polling had shown Americans’ views of Israel hitting a 21st century low; most strikingly, Americans for the first time didn’t sympathize more with Israelis than Palestinians.

Making matters even more fraught, the right has in recent months become riven over how to deal with what many regard as a troubling rise in antisemitism in its base and influencer class. Some of the biggest names in conservative thought have increasingly — and often conspiratorially — linked Israel to all manner of American maladies.

Ad Feedback

Given Americans seemed quite skeptical of this war from the jump, it didn’t take an active imagination to surmise that some people would blame Israel and even craft conspiracy theories about that.

And that’s certainly happened. But, in a twist, that’s thanks in large part to some of the Trump administration’s rhetoric about the war.

The president and those around him have done Israel no favors with some of their claims.

On two major occasions now, the administration has gestured at Israel being mostly responsible for major inflection points in the war — even though the evidence on both counts isn’t totally clear.

Rubio’s claim about an ‘imminent’ Iranian threat

First, it was Secretary of State Marco Rubio making a kind of bank-shot case for why Iran posed an imminent threat to the United States. Rubio said Israel was going to strike Iran no matter what, and Iran was going to retaliate by striking at US targets; ipso facto, the argument went, Iran was an imminent threat to the United States.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio attends a meeting between President Donald Trump and Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi.

Evelyn Hockstein/Reuters

The political problem with this formulation, though, was that it sounded a lot like the United States government was having its hand forced by Israel.

So the Trump administration quickly abandoned that argument and moved on to another in its long line of justifications for the war.

Joe Kent’s resignation

But this week has showed how Israel’s PR problem is going nowhere.

On Tuesday, we learned that the first high-profile Trump administration official had resigned while citing the Iran war. But outgoing National Counterterrorism Center Director Joe Kent didn’t just criticize the war; he heavily blamed “pressure from Israel and its powerful lobby” for coercing the United States into it.

Kent in his resignation letter went on to repeatedly cite Israel and blame it for other wars, too. And in an interview with Tucker Carlson on Wednesday, he played into conspiracy theories about Israel and the assassination of late conservative activist Charlie Kirk.

The reaction on much of the establishment right has largely been to dismiss Kent as an antisemitic crank. But this is someone Trump put in a powerful position — and did so despite his known past associations with extremists, including White nationalists and a Nazi sympathizer. And Kent is now using the credibility the administration vested in him to target Israel.

Trump’s latest claim

And finally came Trump’s bizarre missive late Wednesday night.

In a social media post at about 10 p.m. ET, he disclaimed any US role in the major Israeli attacks on facilities linked to the South Pars gas field in Iran.

“The United States knew nothing about this particular attack,” Trump maintained.

The attack was a big deal because Iran responded by striking Qatar’s portion of the gas field, raising tensions between neighbors in the region. (Trump also threatened to “massively blow up” Iran’s portion of the gas field if it keeps attacking Qatar.) And the gas field is the world’s largest, meaning its destruction could have an outsized impact on the already struggling global energy markets and supplies.

Smoke and fire rise near the South Pars gas field following an attack in Bushehr Province, Iran, on Wednesday, in this screengrab obtained from a social media video.

Reuters

The first thing to note is that Trump’s account has been contradicted. A US source has told CNN that the US was “aware” of the strike, and an Israeli source has said the two sides coordinated on the strike. (Other experts, including former US ambassador to Israel Dan Shapiro, have noted it would be shocking if Israel didn’t loop the United States in on an attack of this scale and significance.)

But setting that aside, Trump’s comments — much like Rubio’s — imply that Israel is singularly responsible for this escalation, and they cast the United States in a role of responding to that Israeli-imposed escalation.

Disclaiming involvement might serve Trump’s domestic political purposes, but it doesn’t help Israel’s reputation in the United States. If anything, Trump’s position that the US knew nothing feeds those harboring theories like Kent’s.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Thursday said Israel had “acted alone” in a strike on a processing facility linked to the South Pars gas field, without directly addressing whether the United States was aware of the operation beforehand.

Netanyahu also rejected the idea that Israel coerced the United States into the war, casting doubt that anyone could do that to Trump.

“This canard that we dragged the United States into it – it’s not just a canard; it’s ridiculous. It’s just ridiculous,” Netanyahu said at his news conference.

Uncomfortable questions

Trump seemed to double down on his claim on Thursday, telling reporters that the US and Israel were “independent” but “get along great.”

He said of Netanyahu: “It’s coordinated. But on occasion he’ll do something, and if I don’t like it, and so we’re not doing that anymore.”

But the situation is again posing uncomfortable questions for the administration.

At Thursday’s Pentagon briefing, a reporter for the right-wing website Gateway Pundit asked Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth about Trump’s Wednesday Truth Social post.

“Why are we helping Israel prosecute this war, if they’re going to pursue their own objectives?” the reporter asked.

Hegseth didn’t address the substance of Trump’s post, instead offering vague assurances that US objectives were being met.

“We hold the cards. We have objectives. Those objectives are clear,” he responded. “We have allies pursuing objectives as well, and the truth speaks for itself.”

Later that morning, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard was asked at a House intelligence committee hearing why Israel would strike Iranian energy infrastructure (purportedly) against Trump’s wishes.

“I don’t have an answer for that,” she responded.

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard testifies before a US House Intelligence Committee hearing on Thursday.

Kylie Cooper/Reuters

Gabbard was then asked if Israel’s objectives aligned with the United States’, and she again appeared stumped. After a long pause, she said she was “thinking carefully” about what she could say publicly.

(She eventually acknowledged that Israel was more focused on taking out Iran’s leadership, while the United States was more focused on disarming Iran — both on the nuclear front and with its conventional weapons.)

Also at the hearing, CIA Director John Ratcliffe confirmed that what Rubio said had a real basis in US intelligence.

Ratcliffe said there was a “body of evidence” available that said, “in the likely event of a conflict between Iran and Israel, that the US would be immediately attacked — regardless of whether the United States stayed out of that conflict.”

This war was always going to be a tough sell with the American people and a real test of the US-Israeli relationship.

But through its inability to craft a consistent message and Trump’s tendency to say whatever might be expedient at the moment, the administration has made the latter portion of that equation even more complicated than it had to be.

American society — and Israel’s reputation — could be feeling the effects of that for a long time.

The Middle East Donald Trump Oil & gas Fighting disinformation

[See all topics]

Facebook TweetEmailLink Threads
Link Copied!

Ad Feedback

Subscribe
Sign in
My Account

  • [Settings]
  • [Newsletters]
  • [Topics you follow]
  • [Sign out]

Your CNN account Sign in to your CNN account

[](https://www.cnn.com/account/log-in)

*

[Listen][Watch]

*

  • [US]
  • [Crime & Justice]
  • [Immigration]
  • [Education]
  • [Transportation]
  • [Race & Identity]
  • [World]
  • [Africa]
  • [Americas]
  • [Asia]
  • [Australia]
  • [China]
  • [Europe]
  • [India]
  • [Middle East]
  • [United Kingdom]
  • [Politics]
  • [Trump]
  • [Facts First]
  • [CNN Polls]
  • [2026 Elections]
  • [Redistricting Tracker]
  • [Epstein Files]
  • [Business]
  • [Tech]
  • [Media]
  • [Calculators]
  • [Videos]
  • [Markets]
  • [Pre-markets]
  • [After-Hours]
  • [Fear & Greed]
  • [Investing]
  • [Markets Now]
  • [Nightcap]
  • [Health]
  • [Life, But Better]
  • [Fitness]
  • [Food]
  • [Sleep]
  • [Mindfulness]
  • [Relationships]
  • [CNN Underscored]
  • [Electronics]
  • [Fashion]
  • [Beauty]
  • [Health & Fitness]
  • [Home]
  • [Reviews]
  • [Deals]
  • [Gifts]
  • [Travel]
  • [Outdoors]
  • [Pets]
  • [Entertainment]
  • [Movies]
  • [Television]
  • [Celebrity]
  • [Tech]
  • [Innovate]
  • [Style]
  • [Arts]
  • [Design]
  • [Fashion]
  • [Architecture]
  • [Luxury]
  • [Beauty]
  • [Video]
  • [Travel]
  • [Destinations]
  • [Food & Drink]
  • [Stay]
  • [News]
  • [Videos]
  • [Sports]
  • [Pro Football]
  • [College Football]
  • [Basketball]
  • [Baseball]
  • [Soccer]
  • [Olympics]
  • [Science]
  • [Space]
  • [Life]
  • [Unearthed]
  • [Climate]
  • [Solutions]
  • [Weather]
  • [Weather]
  • [Video]
  • [Climate]
  • [Ukraine-Russia War]
  • [Israel-Hamas War]
  • [Watch]
  • [Featured]
  • [Shows & Films]
  • [Network TV]
  • [Clips]
  • [CNN Headlines]
  • [CNN Shorts]
  • [Shows A-Z]
  • [CNN 10]
  • [CNN TV Schedules]
  • [Listen]
  • [CNN 5 Things]
  • [Chasing Life with Dr. Sanjay Gupta]
  • [The Assignment with Audie Cornish]
  • [One Thing]
  • [Tug of War]
  • [CNN Political Briefing]
  • [The Axe Files]
  • [All There Is with Anderson Cooper]
  • [All CNN Audio podcasts]
  • [Games]
  • [Daily Crossword]
  • [Jumble Crossword]
  • [Photo Shuffle]
  • [Sudoblock]
  • [Sudoku]
  • [5 Things Quiz]
  • [Amazon Prime Day]
  • [About CNN]
  • [Subscribe]
  • [Photos]
  • [Investigations]
  • [CNN Profiles]
  • [CNN Leadership]
  • [CNN Newsletters]
  • [Work for CNN]

*

[](https://www.cnn.com/

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注