鲍威尔的律师讨论了他继续留在美联储董事会的可能性


2026年3月13日 美国东部时间晚上10:54 / 路透社

作者:霍华德·施奈德

美联储主席杰罗姆·鲍威尔于2026年1月13日抵达美国华盛顿的美国联邦储备委员会。路透社/内森·霍华德/资料照片

  • 摘要
  • 案件中涉及刑事传票相关文件
  • 鲍威尔的律师于1月29日与皮罗会面
  • 若他继续留任,可能成为关键投票者

华盛顿,3月13日(路透社)- 周五公布的文件显示,美联储主席杰罗姆·鲍威尔的律师在今年1月与司法部的一次会面中,提出了他可能在5月主席任期结束后继续留任美联储理事会成员的可能性——这是打破先例的决定。

这些文件是美联储试图阻止司法部对鲍威尔处理美联储华盛顿总部翻新工程的刑事调查发出传票的案件的一部分。一名联邦地区法院法官周五作出有利于美联储的裁决,驳回了传票。

想每日获取最新法律新闻并直接发送到您的收件箱?请订阅《每日简报》通讯。立即注册。

广告 · 滚动继续阅读

在为反对美联储在此案中的动议进行辩论时,司法部律师称,鲍威尔的律师在1月29日与美国检察官让娜·皮罗的会面中表示:”主席(鲍威尔)认为,如果他仍在接受调查,他不会在主席任期结束时离开董事会;虽然他不能肯定相反情况,但如果他不面临刑事调查,对主席而言情况就会不同,他将能够专注于家庭事务并做出决策。”

文件还称,鲍威尔的律师表示,一直施压鲍威尔降低利率的总统唐纳德·特朗普”在参议院没有足够的票数确认新的董事会主席”。

广告 · 滚动继续阅读

特朗普提名接替鲍威尔的前美联储理事凯文·沃什面临确认障碍。

73岁的鲍威尔尚未公开表示其任期结束后的计划,但他可能继续担任理事的可能性将变得更加重要——其席位可能成为美联储七人理事会中的关键摇摆票。

按照惯例,美联储主席在新主席上任时会离开董事会席位,但对美联储独立性的担忧以及特朗普若填补另一空缺可能带来的额外影响,引发了鲍威尔可能留任的猜测。

对于一位前主席仍就货币政策发表评论和投票的情况下如何履职,以及他将如何与沃什相处,目前尚无先例可循。

鲍威尔的理事任期延至2028年1月,跨越11月即将到来的中期选举以及特朗普政府的最后一年。

美联储未就公开文件中的内容置评。

文件中司法部律师称,他们认为鲍威尔律师的言论是”胁迫”美国检察官,暗示如果调查被撤回,他将离开董事会。

该文件称:”通过提出这种奇特的建议,美联储董事会将传票变成了他们所抱怨的那种东西”,试图将政治因素注入讨论。

报道:霍华德·施奈德;编辑:辛西娅·奥斯特曼

我们的标准:路透社信托原则。

Powell’s attorneys discussed the possibility of his remaining on Fed board

March 13, 2026 10:54 PM UTC / Reuters

By Howard Schneider

节点运行失败

Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell arrives at the U.S. Federal Reserve in Washington, U.S., January 13, 2026. REUTERS/Nathan Howard/File Photo

  • Summary
  • Documents part of case on criminal subpoenas
  • Powell’s attorneys met with Pirro on January 29
  • If he stayed on board, Powell could be swing vote

WASHINGTON, March 13 (Reuters) – Attorneys for Fed Chair Jerome Powell raised the possibility he ​might remain as a member of the central bank’s board of governors after his term as ‌chair ends in May, a precedent-breaking decision, at a meeting with the Department of Justice in January, documents unsealed on Friday said.

The documents were part of a case in which the Fed sought to block Justice Department subpoenas in a criminal investigation into ​Powell’s handling of renovations of the central bank’s Washington headquarters. A District Court judge ruled in favor ​of the Fed and blocked the subpoenas on Friday.

Jumpstart your morning with the latest legal news delivered straight to your inbox from The Daily Docket newsletter. Sign up here.

Advertisement · Scroll to continue

In an argument opposing the Fed’s motion in ⁠the case, a Department of Justice lawyer said Powell’s attorneys told U.S. District Attorney Jeannine Pirro at a ​January 29 meeting: “The Chair (Powell) feels like he would not leave the Board when his term as Chair expires, if ​he was still under investigation; and while he could not say the converse is true, it would be a different look to the Chair if he was not facing criminal investigation and the Chair would be free to make a decision that would focus ​on his family.”

Powell’s attorneys also said, according to the document, that as it stood President Donald Trump, who ​has pressured Powell to lower interest rates, “does not have enough votes in the Senate to confirm a new Board Chair.”

Advertisement · Scroll to continue

Trump’s nominee to ‌succeed ⁠Powell, former Fed Governor Kevin Warsh, faces obstacles to confirmation.

Powell, 73, has not stated publicly his plans for the end of his term, but the possibility he could remain as a governor would take on added significance, with his seat a potential swing vote on the Fed’s seven-member governing board.

By tradition Fed chairs leave their board seats when ​a new chair takes over, ​but concerns about Fed ⁠independence and Trump’s added impact if he fills another spot have stoked speculation Powell might remain.

There is no template for how he might function in the job as a ​former chair still commenting and voting on monetary policy, or how he would relate ​to Warsh.

Powell’s term ⁠as governor extends to January 2028, past upcoming midterm elections in November and during the final year of Trump’s administration.

The Fed had no comment about the material in the unsealed documents.

Justice Department attorneys in the document said they regarded the ⁠comments from ​Powell’s lawyers as “strongarming” the U.S. attorney with the suggestion he would ​leave the board if the investigation was withdrawn.

“By making this peculiar suggestion, the Board morphed the Subpoenas into the exact thing about which they ​complain,” by trying to inject politics into the discussion, the document argued.

Reporting by Howard Schneider; Editing by Cynthia Osterman

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注