廉价的伊朗无人机袭击正迫使五角大楼在中东迅速扩大分层防空系统,因为驻扎在该地区的数千名美军正面临日益升级的空中威胁,这一威胁正在考验传统导弹防御系统的极限。
阿联酋周二表示,其防空系统探测到伊朗发射的9枚弹道导弹和35架无人机。8枚导弹被拦截,一枚坠入海中。
该国称,在35架无人机中,26架被击落,9架在阿联酋境内坠毁。
[伊朗战争,第11天:美军掌控天空,油价飙升,地区为下一步做准备]
这场交火凸显了战场正在发生怎样的转变。
弹道导弹飞行高度高且速度快,这使得爱国者防空系统和末段高空区域防御系统(THAAD)等远程拦截器能够可预测地对其进行拦截。而伊朗在近期交火中越来越依赖的无人机群,给美军带来了不同的挑战。
它们飞行高度更低、速度更慢,且常常成群出现,这使得它们更难被探测到,也更可能耗尽为高速威胁而构建的防御系统。
美军部队已经直接受到了地区单向攻击无人机的影响。3月1日,在科威特阿瑞法扬军营附近,一架伊朗无人机击中战术行动中心,造成6名美国军人死亡,数十人受伤。
每次拦截也都有成本。
高端导弹拦截器每发射一次可能耗资数百万美元。
而它们旨在摧毁的许多无人机成本低廉且产量巨大——这使得国防官员将其描述为现代战争中日益严重的“数学问题”。美军最终可能要向相对便宜的无人机发射昂贵的导弹,而如果攻击呈波浪式袭来,这种消耗战将更难持续。
这种失衡正在加速五角大楼内部推动扩大分层反无人机策略——结合短程拦截器、电子战工具和高能激光等新兴技术。
对于该地区的美军而言,更大规模的无人机群增加了防御系统不堪重负的可能性,哪怕只有一架无人机也可能抵达基地或舰船。
这标志着美军首次面临大规模、国家支持的无人机群作为战场核心特征的持续对抗——这迫使指挥官实时调整策略,并借鉴乌克兰的经验教训,因为在乌克兰,大量生产的“见证者”(Shahed)无人机重塑了防空战略。
激光与持久防御能力
受到重新关注的美军新系统包括高能激光。
定向能武器正在为反无人机任务开发和测试,并已在有限的国内环境中投入使用。
美国国防官员表示,激光具有潜在的显著优势:一旦供电,它们可以重复开火,而无需消耗传统弹药。
与每次发射后都需更换的导弹拦截器不同,激光系统只要有足够电力,就能持续拦截目标。理论上,这能在大规模无人机群攻击期间提供持续的防御能力。
“现在这取决于我们的采购系统,要尽可能快地将这些技术部署到部队手中,”美国海军中央司令部前司令、退役海军中将凯文·多尼根告诉福克斯新闻数字频道。
多尼根承认,这项技术确实存在,但尚未在所有战区全面部署。
扩展高能系统需要发电、整合和基础设施——这些都需要时间。
一位美国官员向福克斯新闻数字频道证实,定向能系统已在实战场景中测试并用于对抗无人机,五角大楼“继续努力尽快扩大这种能力”。
负责监督中东地区的美军中央司令部拒绝置评激光是否是其当前针对伊朗的反无人机防御系统的一部分。
构建防御纵深
虽然激光代表着长期发展方向,但指挥官目前依赖多层防御体系。
近期部署到美军中央司令部的“蜂群终结者”(Merops)无人机反制系统就体现了这种方法。
由美国支持的国防公司Perennial Autonomy开发的Merops是一种移动反无人机系统,通过卡车安装的平台发射小型拦截无人机,以摧毁来袭威胁。该系统曾在乌克兰针对“见证者”无人机进行过实战测试,并在波兰等北约国家部署,随着无人机活动加剧,该系统被加速部署到中东。
一位熟悉反无人机行动的前国防官员表示,有效的反无人机能力取决于围绕高价值目标整合的重叠系统,而非依赖单一拦截器。
“有效的反无人机能力是重叠的,”该官员表示,“没有任何单一系统能独立解决无人机问题。”
[最高领袖的武器库VS美军火力:伊朗的四大威胁及我们的应对策略]
该地区的美国舰船依赖“滚动弹体导弹”(RAM)和“海麻雀”等短程导弹系统,以及“密集阵”近程武器系统——一种雷达制导的速射炮,可在近距离拦截威胁。
陆基防御系统结合雷达探测与专门的拦截器,如雷神公司的“郊狼”(Coyote)系列,专门用于摧毁小型无人飞行器。Anduril公司的“走鹃”(Roadrunner)等工业系统则增加了可自主拦截空中威胁、部分配置可重复使用的拦截无人机。
成功始于早期探测。雷达系统追踪低空飞行的无人机,为操作员争取时间,选择是干扰、拦截还是摧毁来袭威胁。
“我们已在所有作战平台的武器系统中内置了反无人机能力,”多尼根说。
乌克兰经验教训
伊朗的“见证者”无人机是在俄罗斯对乌克兰的战争中改进的,在这场战争中,城市每晚都面临低成本一次性攻击机的蜂群。在乌克兰,结合短程拦截器、电子战和不断发展的技术的分层防御体系,在吸收持续攻击方面被证明至关重要。
乌克兰官员表示,一些城市在一晚之内面临超过100架无人机的袭击,迫使防空人员长时间保持戒备。
[乌克兰随后]表示,随着伊朗无人机在中东的活动扩大,愿意与美国和海湾合作伙伴分享其战场经验。
官员们表示,这些经验正在影响美军的规划。
“联合特遣部队-401正在加速在多个作战司令部采购多种反无人机能力,包括传感雷达、动能拦截器和其他可用系统,不仅限于‘蜂群终结者’,以扩大美军中央司令部行动区域的分层防御,”一位美国官员表示。
“一些被紧急部署的能力反映了我们从乌克兰战场学到的教训和正在转移的技术。”
[点击此处下载福克斯新闻应用]
其结果是防御纵深不断扩大——旨在吸收并击败这种廉价、持续的威胁,而这种威胁正塑造着现代战争的未来。
随着无人机生产规模扩大和战术不断演变,低成本攻击无人机与分层防空系统之间的较量,正在伊朗引发关于未来战争本身的争论。
Cheap Iranian drone attacks are forcing the Pentagon to rapidly expand layered air defenses in the Middle East, as thousands of U.S. troops stationed across the region face an escalating aerial threat that is testing the limits of traditional missile defenses.
The United Arab Emirates (UAE) said Tuesday its air defenses detected nine ballistic missiles and 35 drones launched by Iran. Eight missiles were intercepted while one fell into the sea.
Of the 35 drones, 26 were shot down and nine crashed on UAE soil, the country said.
[IRAN WAR, 11 DAYS IN: US CONTROLS SKIES, OIL SURGES AND THE REGION BRACES FOR WHAT’S NEXT]
The engagement highlights how the battlefield is shifting.
Ballistic missiles travel high and fast, allowing long-range interceptors such as the Patriot air defense system and the Terminal High Altitude Area Defense system (THAAD) to engage them predictably. Drone swarms, which Iran increasingly has relied on in recent exchanges, present a different challenge to U.S. forces.
They fly lower, move slower and often arrive in clusters, making them harder to detect and more likely to strain defenses built for high-speed threats.
U.S. troops already have been directly affected by one-way attack drones in the region. In a March 1 strike near Camp Arifjan in Kuwait, six American service members were killed and dozens wounded when an Iranian drone hit a tactical operations center.
Each interception also carries a cost.
High-end missile interceptors can run into the millions of dollars per shot.
Many of the drones they are designed to defeat are far cheaper and produced in large numbers — creating what defense officials have described as a growing “math problem” in modern warfare. The U.S. can end up firing expensive missiles at relatively inexpensive drones, a dynamic that becomes harder to sustain if attacks come in waves.
That imbalance is accelerating a push inside the Pentagon to expand a layered counter-drone strategy — combining short-range interceptors, electronic warfare tools and emerging technologies such as high-energy lasers.
For U.S. forces in the region, larger drone waves increase the odds that defenses are stretched, and that even one drone could reach a base or ship.
This marks the first sustained confrontation in which U.S. forces are facing large-scale, state-backed drone waves as a central feature of the battlefield — forcing commanders to adapt in real time and draw on lessons learned from Ukraine, where mass-produced Shahed drones reshaped air defense strategy.
Lasers and staying power
Among the new U.S. systems drawing renewed attention are high-energy lasers.
Directed energy is being developed and tested for counter-drone missions and has been used in limited domestic contexts.
U.S.defense officials say lasers offer a potentially significant advantage: Once powered, they can fire repeatedly without expending traditional ammunition.
Unlike missile interceptors, which must be replaced after each launch, a laser system can continue engaging targets as long as sufficient power is available. In theory, that provides sustained defensive capacity during large drone waves.
“It’s a function now of our procurement system, moving those things to the troops as fast as we can,” retired Vice Adm. Kevin Donegan, former commander of U.S. Naval Forces Central Command and the U.S. 5th Fleet,told Fox News Digital.
Donegan acknowledged the technology is real but not yet fully fielded across combat zones.
Scaling high-energy systems requires power generation, integration and infrastructure — all of which take time.
A U.S. official confirmed to Fox News Digital that directed energy systems have been tested and employed to counter drones in combat scenarios, and the Pentagon “continues to work to scale this capability as quickly as possible.”
Central Command, the U.S. military command tasked with overseeing the Middle East, declined to comment on whether lasers are part of its current drone defense system against Iran.
Building defensive depth
While lasers represent a longer-term evolution, commanders are relying on multiple defensive layers today.
The recent deployment of the Merops drone-on-drone interceptor into U.S. Central Command reflects that approach.
Developed by U.S.-backed defense firm Perennial Autonomy, Merops is a mobile counter-drone system that launches small interceptor drones from a truck-mounted platform to disable incoming threats. The system was battle-tested against Shahed drones in Ukraine and fielded in NATO countries such as Poland before being accelerated into the Middle East as drone activity intensified.
A former defense official familiar with counter-drone operations said effective counter-UAS capability depends on overlapping systems integrated around high-value targets rather than reliance on a single interceptor.
“Effective counter-UAS capability is overlapping,” the official said. “No one system solves the drone problem by itself.”
[AYATOLLAH’S ARSENAL VS. AMERICAN FIREPOWER: IRAN’S TOP 4 THREATS AND HOW WE FIGHT BACK]
U.S. ships in the region rely on short-range missile systems such as the Rolling Airframe Missile and Sea Sparrow, along with the Close-In Weapon System, a radar-guided rapid-fire gun that can engage threats at close range.
Ground-based defenses incorporate radar detection with specialized interceptors such as Raytheon’s Coyote family, designed to defeat small unmanned aircraft. Industry systems like Anduril’s Roadrunner add autonomous interceptor drones capable of engaging airborne threats and, in some configurations, returning for reuse.
Success begins with early detection. Radar systems track low-flying drones and give operators time to choose whether to jam, intercept or destroy incoming threats.
“We’ve built into the weapon systems of all our military platforms that are combatants counter-drone capability,” Donegan said.
Lessons from Ukraine
Iran’s Shahed drones were refined during [Russia’s war in Ukraine], where cities faced nightly waves of low-cost one-way attack aircraft. There, layered defenses combining short-range interceptors, electronic warfare and evolving technologies proved essential in absorbing sustained attacks.
Ukrainian officials have said some cities faced more than a hundred drones in a single night, forcing air defense crews to remain on alert for hours at a time.
[Ukraine has since offered] to share its battlefield experience with the United States and Gulf partners as Iranian drone activity expands in the Middle East.
Officials say those lessons are influencing U.S. planning.
“JIATF-401 is accelerating procurement of multiple counter-UAS capabilities across several combatant commands, including sensing radars, kinetic interceptors and other available systems, not just Merops, to expand layered defenses in the U.S. Central Command area of operations,” a U.S. official said.
“Some of the capabilities being surged to support our warfighters reflect lessons we are learning and technology we are transferring from the battlefield in Ukraine.”
[CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP]
The result is expanding defensive depth — designed to absorb and defeat a threat that is [inexpensive, persistent] and increasingly central to modern warfare.
For the troops stationed at those bases and aboard those ships, that layered defense is what stands between a drone intercepted in the sky and one that reaches its target.
As drone production scales and tactics evolve, the contest between low-cost attack drones and layered air defenses playing out in Iran the future of warfare itself.
发表回复