特朗普要求最高法院允许针对海地人的保护措施到期终止


By John Fritze, Tami Luhby | 31分钟前 | 发布于2026年3月11日,美国东部时间下午3:16

2026年2月20日拍摄的美国最高法院。
Samuel Corum/Sipa USA/AP

美国总统唐纳德·特朗普周三敦促最高法院允许其政府终止约35万年来合法居住在美国的海地人的临时移民保护措施,将又一场快速推进的移民争端升级至美国最高法院。

这一上诉是在华盛顿特区联邦地区法院2月份做出一项严厉裁决之后提出的,该裁决阻止了政府终止海地公民的临时保护身份(TPS)。

大法官们目前已在考虑政府终止对6000多名叙利亚人类似保护措施的决定。

最高法院大法官布雷特·卡瓦诺和凯坦吉·布朗·杰克逊
Getty Images
当紧急案件日程出现时,卡瓦诺和杰克逊的听证会变得尖锐起来 | 3分钟阅读

在上诉中,政府要求最高法院审理其终止针对各类群体TPS的权力这一更广泛的问题。如果大法官们同意受理此案,将使特朗普激进的移民政策在最高法院成为焦点——最高法院已在考虑特朗普推动终止出生公民权的诉求。

美国副检察长D.约翰·绍尔(D. John Sauer)写道:“除非法院解决这些争议的是非曲直——这些问题现在已在全国范围内的法院中得到过审理——否则这种不可持续的循环将一次又一次重复,滋生更多相互矛盾的裁决和对本法院临时命令的不同解读。”“本法院应当打破这种循环。”

过去一年中,最高法院在快速处理的移民上诉案中多次支持特朗普政府,包括涉及委内瑞拉的TPS问题和政府所谓的“流动巡逻”政策。在其他案件中,最高法院则采取了更为细致的态度:去年春季,最高法院冻结了基于《敌国公民法》进行的某些驱逐令;并要求政府“协助”一名去年被错误驱逐到萨尔瓦多的马里兰州男子返回美国。

海地TPS持有者是最新一批生活将被特朗普政府颠覆的外国出生居民,特朗普政府正致力于削减进入美国并居住的移民数量。美国国土安全部也在寻求终止其他国家的TPS身份,包括洪都拉斯、尼泊尔和南苏丹。

TPS允许政府在特定国家发生动荡时期,允许来自这些国家的人们临时合法在美国生活和工作。2010年海地发生地震后,海地公民获得了TPS资格,此后由于该国面临一系列危机——包括武装团伙大规模暴力和2021年总统遇刺——该身份多次被延长。

资格获得者需经过审查,如在美国犯有重罪或多项轻罪则无资格。国土安全部部长有权指定某个国家适用TPS。

包括国土安全部官员在内的批评者表示,这些身份认定从未被设计为永久性的。最高法院过去曾给予政府广泛的自由裁量权以取消这些身份,包括2024年5月裁定的涉及委内瑞拉TPS持有者的案件。

这一案件以及其他在联邦下级法院发酵的案件,都涉及特朗普政府试图在TPS身份自然到期前取消资格的努力。然而,海地人的TPS身份是拜登政府在2024年延长的,为期18个月,原定于今年早些时候到期。

正如在许多其他案件中一样,政府辩称,联邦法院无权审查延长TPS的自由裁量决定。

但五名受益于TPS的海地公民声称,政府未能进行充分审查,违反了联邦法律,并认为政府违反了平等保护条款,理由是该决定似乎是出于对海地人的种族敌意。

一名护士在患者家中进行家访。
LPETTET/E+/Getty Images
许多海地人可能很快无法在美国工作。这将使老年人护理变得更加困难 | 6分钟阅读

美国联邦地区法院法官安娜·雷耶斯(Ana Reyes)在一份83页的判决书中支持了原告。

雷耶斯指出了特朗普在选举期间关于俄亥俄州海地移民吃邻居宠物的虚假言论,写道国土安全部部长克里斯蒂·诺姆(Kristi Noem)终止保护措施的决定可能并非基于对当地实际情况的全面审查。(诺姆本月早些时候被特朗普解雇。)

“综合来看,现有记录强烈表明,诺姆部长终止海地TPS身份的决定至少部分是出于种族敌意,”雷耶斯写道。“部长在终止决定中所言与证据显示的情况之间存在脱节,这证实终止海地TPS身份并非理性决策的结果,而是以借口理由合理化的预先决定。”

雷耶斯写道,诺姆“有权根据宪法第一修正案称移民为杀手、寄生虫、福利瘾君子或任何她想使用的不当名称。”

但她表示,政府受到宪法和联邦法律的约束,必须将事实与法律应用于实施TPS项目。

“到目前为止的记录显示,她尚未做到这一点。”

Trump asks Supreme Court to let protections for Haitians expire

By John Fritze, Tami Luhby | 31 min ago | PUBLISHED Mar 11, 2026, 3:16 PM ET

The UU Supreme Court is seen on February 20, 2026.
Samuel Corum/Sipa USA/AP

President Donald Trump urged the Supreme Court on Wednesday to let his administration end temporary immigration protections for some 350,000 Haitians who have lived in the US legally for years, escalating another fast-moving fight over immigration to the nation’s highest court.

The appeal followed a scathing ruling from a federal district court in Washington, DC, in February that blocked the administration from letting Temporary Protected Status expire for Haitian nationals.

The justices are already considering the administration’s decision to end similar protections for more than 6,000 Syrians.

Supreme Court Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Ketanji Brown Jackson Getty Images Kavanaugh and Jackson appearance gets testy when emergency docket comes up 3 min read

In its appeal, the administration asked the Supreme Court to take up the broader of question of its power to end TPS for various groups. If the justices agree to do so, it would put Trump’s aggressive immigration policies front and center at a court that is already considering Trump’s push to end birthright citizenship.

“Unless the court resolves the merits of these challenges — issues that have now been ventilated in courts nationwide — this unsustainable cycle will repeat again and again, spawning more competing rulings and competing views of what to make of this court’s interim orders,” US Solicitor General D. John Sauer wrote. “This court should break that cycle.”

The Supreme Court has repeatedly sided with the Trump administration on fast-track immigration appeals over the past year, including on a TPS issue involving Venezuela and the administration’s so-called roving patrols. In other cases, it has taken a more nuanced approach. The court froze certain deportations under the Alien Enemies Act last spring and it required the administration to “facilitate” the return of a Maryland man mistakenly deported to El Salvador last year.

Haitian TPS holders are among the latest foreign-born residents whose lives are being upended by the Trump administration, which is focused on slashing the number of immigrants entering and living in the US. The Department of Homeland Security has sought to terminate TPS for other countries as well, including Honduras, Nepal and South Sudan.

TPS allows an administration to permit people who arrived from certain countries at times of upheaval to temporarily live and work in the US legally. Haitian nationals became eligible after an earthquake rocked the country in 2010 and the designation has been repeatedly renewed since then as the country faced a host of crises, including widespread violence by armed gangs and the assassination of its president in 2021.

Recipients are vetted and are ineligible if they’ve been convicted of any felony or more than one misdemeanor in the US. The Homeland Security secretary has discretion to designate a country for TPS.

Critics, including DHS officials, say the designations were never intended to be permanent. And the Supreme Court has afforded the administration wide deference to cancel the designations in the past, including in a case involving Venezuelans with TPS status that the court decided in May.

That case, and others percolating in lower federal courts, have involved the Trump administration’s effort to cancel designations before they naturally expired. The status for Haitians, however, was last extended by the Biden administration in 2024 for an 18-month period that was set to expire earlier this year.

As it has in many other cases, the administration argued that federal courts are not permitted to review a discretionary decision to extend TPS.

But five Haitian nationals who benefit from TPS claimed that the administration violated federal law by failing to conduct an adequate review and argued the administration violated the equal protection clause because, they said, the decision appeared to be motivated by racial animus towards Haitians.

A nurse visiting a senior patient at home. LPETTET/E+/Getty Images Many Haitians may soon not be able to work in the US. That will make caring for the elderly much harder 6 min read

In an 83-page opinion, US District Judge Ana Reyes agreed with the plaintiffs.

Calling attention to Trump’s false claims during the election that Haitian migrants in Ohio were eating their neighbors’ pets, Reyes wrote that DHS Secretary Kristi Noem’s decision to end the protections was likely not based on a thorough review of conditions on the ground. (Noem was fired by Trump earlier this month.)

“Taken together, the record strongly suggests that Secretary Noem’s decision to terminate Haiti’s TPS designation was motivated, at least in part, by racial animus,” wrote Reyes, who was nominated to the federal bench by President Joe Biden. “The mismatch between what the secretary said in the termination and what the evidence shows confirms that the termination of Haiti’s TPS designation was not the product of reasoned decision-making, but of a preordained outcome justified by pretextual reasons.”

Noem, Reyes wrote, “has a First Amendment right to call immigrants killers, leeches, entitlement junkies, and any other inapt name she wants.”

But, she said, the administration is constrained by both the Constitution and federal law to apply the facts to the law in implementing the TPS program.

“The record to-date,” Reyes wrote, “shows she has yet to do that.”

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注